Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Liz Smith | 09/04/2008 9:45 am

Liz Smith: Governor Palin and Her Merry Men!

“There is something about a national convention that makes it as fascinating as a revival or a hanging. It is vulgar, it is ugly, it is stupid, it is tedious, it is hard upon both the higher cerebral centers and the gluteus maximus, and yet it is somehow charming.”

This was said by the critic H. L. Mencken who died several decades ago. But he was right then and right now.

I enjoyed the hell out of the Democrats’ get-together and once it got started, I liked a lot about the Republican Convention on Wednesday night, even though I could take or leave Mitt Romney who seemed to just be auditioning once again for himself to be president. (I don’t think we can get rid of this guy.)

You might be surprised, but I was absolutely blown away by the speeches of both Mike Huckabee and Rudy Giuliani – yes, and when the governor of Alaska finally presented herself to the American people, I couldn’t rip my eyes off of her either. (She is easily one of the most fascinating public characters in all of American politics, past and present.)

Huckabee scored as his always-irresistible self with good humor and a manner that makes you like him no matter what he is saying. His ending anecdote about the school teacher who refused to give her new students desks, making them sit on the floor and guess what they had to do to “earn” them, was just priceless. (The desks were then brought in by veterans still in uniform and the children were told that the desks had been “earned” for them by the actions and valor of these men.) It was heartwarming and super patriotic.

And though I never cared much for Guiliani in his mayor of New York days, socially he is a knockout – brilliant at public speaking without a note, great on his feet, charming, funny, witty, intelligent. He is a great dinner companion, although I could have done without his inevitable evocation of 9/11. Most of his speech extolling John McCain’s considerable virtues and citing Barack Obamas’s weaknesses seemed very effective to me.

I found Gov. Palin a little unnerving in her self-possession, her poise, her certainty and her indelible toughness. This shows through her attractive demeanor and rightly so. It is obviously the way she is – hot, young, dynamic wife and mother, a self-satisfied probably deserving governor who has accomplished a lot, huge attractive family (they are off-limits for the press to criticize but nevertheless the GOP is using them for PR like crazy), a newly adopted anti-Washington, blame-the-media stance. She almost makes the fact that she is a woman and possibly going to be a “first” a non-issue. In her case, being female hardly matters.

Barring some future-revealed “negative,” she certainly seems to be the galvanizer John McCain needed. Perhaps she will help redefine the Republican Party. She certainly helped the GOP bring itself together Wednesday night in rare form. I always believed that eventually even the deep-dyed right would rally behind McCain. I am not surprised that now the radical conservatives and the wild maverick contingents have all come together. They have no choice.

Nevertheless, having enjoyed the GOP in action using the democratic process and admiring John McCain in spite of everything, I have to personally say I could never vote for people who would:

1. Make the Supreme Court go ultra-right and conservative for two decades.
2. Have no plan for universal health care.
3. Have no stated realistic ideas that I can discern for economic recovery beyond tax breaks for the rich.
4. Want to deny women the right to choose.
5. Seem to be actually advocating, encouraging and applauding teen pregnancy.
6. Don’t believe in science and evolution.
7. Insist on bringing God into our misadventure in Iraq. And want to insist on that chimera, “victory.” 
8. Deny global warming.
9. Have a significantly flawed and reluctant energy program.    

And, yes, I can bear to be taxed for the good of the nation. Yes, I can. And while I agree with the Republicans that HOPE isn’t a program, I’m still going to have to vote for hope, given the list above. So, sue me. 

P.S. Once and for all, couldn’t we retire “God bless you and God bless America”? There must be some other benediction, or original way to sign off.  

Click here to read my column in the New York Post.

236 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Rush L
Well, we in teh GOP couldn’t get a race war going, so we did the next best thing: We brought back the Culture War. Just what America needs, something to take our “minds” off of our real problems. Now, unless you want to be forced to marry a gay person, vote McCain/Palin. Take the “L” (for Liberal) out of Palin, and you are left with a pain.
By Rush L on 09/04/2008 12:20 pm
Listenin Lady  NY
Thank you ,LIz, for your listing of what I was feeling about this nomination. I NEVER had any intention of voting for Palin. What I find disturbing about her attacks is how they are couched in her snippy, sarcastic, snarly manner and then delivered with her feminist guile. Daring anyone to question her…would everyone find her so special if she was not, to quote some, “a hot babe???”
By Listenin Lady NY on 09/04/2008 1:15 pm
Star Lawrence
I would. I am not really into the hotness of babes thing.
By Star Lawrence on 09/04/2008 1:29 pm
Willow K
Star—I’m curious, I’ve been reading your comments, and you’re obviously in Palin’s corner. What do you see in her, like about her that so many of us are not seeing?
By Willow K on 09/04/2008 1:58 pm
Star Lawrence
I have said for months now that I am a life-long Dem, cannot abide Sen Obama (not going back over all that) and am looking at voting Republican for the first time, which will probably give me an out-of-body experience. But hey, something new… Maybe I am projecting some qualities onto her that I actually like about me—boldness, courage (I like to think), sloughing off insults and lame stuff, articulateness, poise (I am also a public speaker and could NEVER have done what she did last night—I hear the teleprompter was broken part of the time, too). She is a fixer. If she sees things in her surroundings, she rolls up her sleeves and fixes them or tries to. She seems practical, organized, like she could govern if she had to. Govern, not just frame problems and talk about them. She seems like a fast learner. I actually like her sarcasm—again regulars on the list know this is my preferred method of expression. I don’t like the down-the-line pro-life deal or whatever the term is these days. I don’t like people telling me what to do. But I think if whoever wants to overturn R v W cared to get into this mess, they would have already. Censoring books, if this is true—I would be against that. We have some dads out here in Chandler trying to keep books out of the library—and their kids are infants. I don’t think she will be in charge of the Library of Congress, though, should they get elected. As for the trooper thing—I tried to get authorities to act once and went nuts doing it—I wished I had been the governor. Guess that will come out in the $100K investigation, which some say is instigated by men she ticked off. I don’t know the facts. So, in short, I think we need someone with common sense, energy, and the ability to soak up knowledge while holding her own. I see that in her. I also will let her decide how to take care of her family—she’s the mother and seems to have that in hand (kids will get pregnant out of sight of their mothers). Everyone gets one vote. If it had been Romney, I would have written in The Big Lebowski. This may seem wacky to people, but I can be a littlw wacky. I have lost almost all my friends over this. Some friends. I am learning as I go along too.
By Star Lawrence on 09/04/2008 2:14 pm
Frannie Em
Star That was a great post. Thanks for that. I understand fully Liz’s concerns, but you have made a great case. The book censoring is what concerns me. Right now there is such hash slinging going on with everyone trying to outscoop each other, that I am waiting for the air to clear I read a linked post by someone from the Washington post. I read all the negatives about her that he said, and then waited and went back an hour later and reread the link, and it was actually very deceptive writing, because it sounded like trying to turn a positive into a negative. I want the truth, that is what is important to me, I feel I have been too tested by life to waste time on press manipulations. So at some point, I have to look up more. Thanks for the great post, it says tons.
By Frannie Em on 09/04/2008 2:23 pm
Willow K
Thanks Star—I like your picture of her, not that it jives with what I saw last night, but I appreciate your take. My only solace if she and McCain are elected is that we are likely to have a democratic congress, who will likely moderate who they can get approved for the Supreme Court and any bills will have to be both signed by McCain and approved by congress. My parents were great believers in divided government, we may soon have that again.
By Willow K on 09/04/2008 3:18 pm
Star Lawrence
You maybe amazed to learn that I would welcome a split. I think both branches in one party is dangerous. There has to be real reaching across the aisle, horse-trading, dialogue. I think this would be good!
By Star Lawrence on 09/04/2008 4:07 pm
Frannie Em
Star I would welcome a split as well. Agree that both branches in the hands of one party is not a great idea, and can be very dangerous. I hope there is some reaching across the aisle this time, or we are in big trouble. I think this time they have to because the electorate is pretty pissed off in both parties.
By Frannie Em on 09/04/2008 4:13 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Star - You are witty, wily and yes a little wacky. But you are also a wonderful writer. I know how much you like the letter “w”….so I thought I would add a few. Okay, okay….that is a little joke. But, seriously, your post is so honest and from the heart. Yet, it is the last couple of lines that made me pause. To almost have lost a few friends over politics is not a worthwhile endeavor. In some of your brief comments you have attempted to bring about some normalcy about the campaign. I just do not think that some folks are capable of seeing it that way and that is very sad. “Every campaign is the most important in history” is a mantra I have heard through too many election cycles; and, for the most part, that is just hype. I hope your friends will come to understand that and not lose you as a friend; it would be their loss.
By Bonnie Oliver on 09/04/2008 3:22 pm
Star Lawrence
Thanks, Bonnie. Yes—I saw my w typos—too late. I am down to one eye, but I still have “vision.” Heh. Yes, I notice my friends shying away…but I have my opinions…kind of a creepy acid test, tho. I don’t like it.
By Star Lawrence on 09/04/2008 3:53 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Oh Star, I was not making my “w” comment because of any typos - which I did not notice anyway. It was just a joke about George W. whom you have satirized quite eloquently and of whom I know you have little interest. Poor joke. Sorry.
By Bonnie Oliver on 09/04/2008 4:08 pm
Marjorie C.
Star, I know I’m repeating myself, but you’re one helluva writer.
By Marjorie C. on 09/04/2008 3:34 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
Star, sometimes it seems like you have a Ph.D. in sarcasm and I say that as a compliment! I worry about several of the things you said, but I also worry that she simply is not seasoned enough to step in if McCain is incapacitated in some way. I also see her as someone whose style is to attack rather than to create, and really government is mostly about creating. She would have to hire people, and her preferred mode is firing. She would have to come up with solutions, and her preferred mode is to attack the solutions others propose. I got an email this morning from someone in Alaska with some chilling details about Palin. Some excerpts: “As an Alaskan, I am writing to give all of you some information on Sarah Palin, Senator McCain’s choice for VP. As an Alaska voter, I know more than most of you about her and, frankly, I am horrified that he picked her. She is a life time member of the NRA and has worked tirelessly to allow indiscriminate hunting of wildlife in Alaska , particularly wolves and bears. She has spent millions of Alaska state dollars on aerial hunting of these predators from helicopters and airplanes, dollars that should have been spent, for example, on Alaska ‘s failing school system. We have the lowest rate of high school graduation in the country. Not all of you may think aerial predator hunting is so bad, but how anyone (other than Alaska wolf-haters, of which there are many, most without teeth), could think this use of funds is appropriate is beyond me. She has been a strong supporter of increased use of fossil fuels, yet the McCain campaign has the nerve to say she has “green” policies. The only thing green about Sarah Palin is her lack of experience. She has consistently supported drilling in ANWR, use of coal-burning power plants (as I write this, a new coal plant is being built in her home town of Wasilla ), strip mining, and almost anything else that will unnecessarily exploit the diminishing resources of Alaska and destroy its environment. Prior to her one year as governor of Alaska , she was mayor of Wasilla. The average maximum education level of parents of junior high school kids in Wasilla is 10th grade. Unfortunately, I have to go to Wasilla every week to get groceries and other supplies, so I have continual contact with the people who put Palin in office in the first place. I know what I’m talking about. These people don’t have a concept of the world around them or of the serious issues facing the US. Furthermore, they don’t care. So long as they can go out and hunt their moose every fall, kill wolves and bears and drive their snow mobiles and ATVs through every corner of the wilderness, they’re happy. I wish I were exaggerating. Sarah Palin is currently involved in a political corruption scandal. She fired an individual in law enforcement here because she didn’t like how he treated one of her relatives during a divorce. The man’s performance and ability weren’t considered; it was a totally personal firing and is currently under investigation. While the issue isn’t close to the scandal of Ted Steven’s corruption, it shows that Palin isn’t “squeaky clean” and causes me to think there may be more issues that could come to light. Clearly McCain doesn’t care. When you line Palin up with Biden, the comparison would be laughable if it weren’t so serious. Sarah Palin knows nothing of economics (admittedly a weak area for McCain), or of international affairs, knows nothing of national government, Social Security, unemployment, health care systems - you name it. The idea of her meeting with heads of foreign governments around the world truly frightens me. In an increasingly dangerous world, with the economy in shambles in the US , Sarah Palin is uniquely UNqualified to be vice president. John McCain is not a young man. Should something happen to him such that the vice president had to step in, it would destroy our country and possibly the world to have someone as inexperienced and inappropriate as Sarah Palin. The choice of Palin is a cheap shot by McCain to try to get Hillary supporters to vote for him. when McCain introduced her today, Palin had the nerve to compare herself with Hillary and Geraldine Ferraro. Sarah Palin, you are no Hillary Clinton. To those of you who, like me, supported Hillary and were upset that she did not get the nomination, please don’t think that Sarah Palin is a worthy substitute. If you supported Hillary, regardless of what you think the media and the democratic party may have done to undermine her campaign, the person to support now is Obama, not Sarah Palin. To those of you who are independent or undecided, don’t let the choice of Palin sway you in favor of McCain. Choosing her shows how unqualified McCain is to be president. To those of you who are conservative, I guess you have no choice for president. But please try to see how the poor choice of Palin tells us a great deal about McCain’s judgment. While the political posturing inherent in the choice of Palin is obvious, the more serious issue is the fact that the VP is, literally, a heartbeat away from the presidency. Sarah Palin is totally and unequivocally unqualified to be vice president, let alone president.” I have also heard speculation that Palin is a “stub.” That is, she is in the race as vice presidential candidate because of the cynical assessment that she will help win some independent votes, but she will not be expected to serve as full fledged vice president and may even be asked to resign, as Agnew did, to be replaced with someone less electable. I don’t know if that is true. I really think McCain did not want to raid the Senate because he is still hoping to keep a filibuster minority of 41 to keep Congress from interfering with the presidency. So he was stuck with looking to elected state officials and not too many fit the profile of pro-life/anti-choice, theocrat, female.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 09/04/2008 5:27 pm
Star Lawrence
If you think all this, you would not vote for her. That fine. I never heard the term “stub” before. Agnew resigned because he took $23K from a guy for a favor. I heard Biden was dropping out tomorrow. We hear lots of things. I don’t think either is valid of those two.
By Star Lawrence on 09/04/2008 5:43 pm