Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the username or e-mail address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Liz Smith | 09/04/2008 10:45 am

Liz Smith: Governor Palin and Her Merry Men!

“There is something about a national convention that makes it as fascinating as a revival or a hanging. It is vulgar, it is ugly, it is stupid, it is tedious, it is hard upon both the higher cerebral centers and the gluteus maximus, and yet it is somehow charming.”

This was said by the critic H. L. Mencken who died several decades ago. But he was right then and right now.

I enjoyed the hell out of the Democrats’ get-together and once it got started, I liked a lot about the Republican Convention on Wednesday night, even though I could take or leave Mitt Romney who seemed to just be auditioning once again for himself to be president. (I don’t think we can get rid of this guy.)

You might be surprised, but I was absolutely blown away by the speeches of both Mike Huckabee and Rudy Giuliani – yes, and when the governor of Alaska finally presented herself to the American people, I couldn’t rip my eyes off of her either. (She is easily one of the most fascinating public characters in all of American politics, past and present.)

Huckabee scored as his always-irresistible self with good humor and a manner that makes you like him no matter what he is saying. His ending anecdote about the school teacher who refused to give her new students desks, making them sit on the floor and guess what they had to do to “earn” them, was just priceless. (The desks were then brought in by veterans still in uniform and the children were told that the desks had been “earned” for them by the actions and valor of these men.) It was heartwarming and super patriotic.

And though I never cared much for Guiliani in his mayor of New York days, socially he is a knockout – brilliant at public speaking without a note, great on his feet, charming, funny, witty, intelligent. He is a great dinner companion, although I could have done without his inevitable evocation of 9/11. Most of his speech extolling John McCain’s considerable virtues and citing Barack Obamas’s weaknesses seemed very effective to me.

I found Gov. Palin a little unnerving in her self-possession, her poise, her certainty and her indelible toughness. This shows through her attractive demeanor and rightly so. It is obviously the way she is – hot, young, dynamic wife and mother, a self-satisfied probably deserving governor who has accomplished a lot, huge attractive family (they are off-limits for the press to criticize but nevertheless the GOP is using them for PR like crazy), a newly adopted anti-Washington, blame-the-media stance. She almost makes the fact that she is a woman and possibly going to be a “first” a non-issue. In her case, being female hardly matters.

Barring some future-revealed “negative,” she certainly seems to be the galvanizer John McCain needed. Perhaps she will help redefine the Republican Party. She certainly helped the GOP bring itself together Wednesday night in rare form. I always believed that eventually even the deep-dyed right would rally behind McCain. I am not surprised that now the radical conservatives and the wild maverick contingents have all come together. They have no choice.

Nevertheless, having enjoyed the GOP in action using the democratic process and admiring John McCain in spite of everything, I have to personally say I could never vote for people who would:

1. Make the Supreme Court go ultra-right and conservative for two decades.
2. Have no plan for universal health care.
3. Have no stated realistic ideas that I can discern for economic recovery beyond tax breaks for the rich.
4. Want to deny women the right to choose.
5. Seem to be actually advocating, encouraging and applauding teen pregnancy.
6. Don’t believe in science and evolution.
7. Insist on bringing God into our misadventure in Iraq. And want to insist on that chimera, “victory.” 
8. Deny global warming.
9. Have a significantly flawed and reluctant energy program.    

And, yes, I can bear to be taxed for the good of the nation. Yes, I can. And while I agree with the Republicans that HOPE isn’t a program, I’m still going to have to vote for hope, given the list above. So, sue me. 

P.S. Once and for all, couldn’t we retire “God bless you and God bless America”? There must be some other benediction, or original way to sign off.  

Click here to read my column in the New York Post.

236 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

WendyWilson1
Whoever said “guzzling the Kool-Aid” says it all. The deception covers a dazzingly dangerous Republican ticket.
By WendyWilson1 on 09/04/2008 10:45 pm
DeniG
Great article Liz!
By DeniG on 09/05/2008 12:22 am
Lumeriam
Perfect, simply perfect.
By Lumeriam on 09/05/2008 2:38 am
georgiafatwood
Hello Liz..thank you for your wonderful observations. I’m also glad to think that white (and yummy yellow) is ok after Labor Day. Re: “fascinating…revival or a hanging”….a friend of mine called to say that the conventions were so horribly compelling that it “was like watching snakes f***….” Just can’t keep your eyes averted enough… Lord, Sarah’s on the TV talking about defeating evil and the POW thing. Re: gluteus…I found this motto of the Addams Family: “Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc”…(we gladly feast on those who would subdue us)… Today on WOW I read that Sarah would be the “solution to elitism”. Isn’t this a euphemism for dumbing us down, down, down…? Thanks again, Liz…come back soon.
By georgiafatwood on 09/05/2008 12:32 pm
MarciaL
A woman priest friend of mine posted the following on her blog site. The statement was from MJR of Michigan and was posted in the NYT comments section and is now making it’s way around the Internet. MJR said,”Mrs. Palin (and Rudy G. /my add on) needs to be reminded that Jesus was a community organizer, Pontius Pilate was a governor.”
By MarciaL on 09/05/2008 1:21 pm
garydavey
Your nine points are just a joke. First and foremost there is not ultra right. Conservative yes but ultra right is an ultra left made up state. For the legislating decision making courts have for years pulled so called rights from their posterior. All of our founding documents are very specific that this government of ours is supposed to protect life. That is all life. There are no provisions for someone to irradiate the life of an inconvenience. It is an insult to our society that some individuals that have been fortunate to be placed on the Supreme Court are allowed to circumvent the constitution and place there own opinions ahead of the document as written. The invention of supposed rights is not in the national interests.
By garydavey on 09/05/2008 2:38 pm
RushL
Great Job Gary, How many McCain points was that worth? I don’t have the conversion table.
By RushL on 09/06/2008 11:31 pm
JudyR1
Just to give you a little reality check on some of your “talking points.” 1. Make the Supreme Court go ultra-right and conservative for two decades. With the Dem congress, that seems unlikely. 2. Have no plan for universal health care. There is a plan for affordable health care. Obama’s campaign says they won’t get to healthcare until second term anyway.Hillary was the one with a good healthcare plan. 3. Have no stated realistic ideas that I can discern for economic recovery beyond tax breaks for the rich. That’s what the reform is about. 4. Want to deny women the right to choose. Palin has repeatedly referred to “personal choice.” Again, Dem congress. 5. Seem to be actually advocating, encouraging and applauding teen pregnancy. There is NO evidence to support that. 6. Don’t believe in science and evolution. Not true. Just suggest perhaps there should be discussion of both science and creationism if requested. 7. Insist on bringing God into our misadventure in Iraq. And want to insist on that chimera, “victory.” There are NO atheists in a foxhole! 8. Deny global warming. McCain believes in global warming and he is running for POTUS 9. Have a significantly flawed and reluctant energy program. It’s difficult to know who has the best energy plan at this point but Palin advocates responsible use of oil resources while concentrating on increasing renewable and clean energy sources like solar, wind, etc.
By JudyR1 on 09/06/2008 9:48 pm
MelanieWaldrop
Governor Palin is not only one of the most fascinating politicians on the scene, she is one of the most FRIGHTENING (kind of like a horrible accident—you don’t want to see it, but you just can’t turn away….). She represents so much of what is wrong with American politics: she is young and fairly pleasant lokking on the outside, but within she is a bigotted, hypocritical moron who (unless someone takes the her apart to reveal her inner “stepford” machinery) must be self loathing on the basis of her gender.If she ever sees higher office she will be in a position to do GREAT HARM to the civil rights of all Americans. Surely the fight for the equal rights of ALL Americans, regardless of race-creed-color-gender-sexual orientation, could not be forgotten so quickly that this nightmare of a political ticket will be forced upon us! I am a Christian who happens to also be a lesbian…I am also a patriot who values the pricipals of freedom of religion (as well as the right to not be religious)and the SEPARATION of church and state as being SACRED. All I can say is, “Please God, don’t let the American public be deluded by this outward fluff which is—at its core— mean spirited, bigotted, regressive, and truely against the ideals on which our country was founded!”
By MelanieWaldrop on 09/07/2008 11:16 am
HoboQuestioningAlmostEverything
wowOwow - Sounds like this blog needs a little lesson in diversity - it is what is being taught to our school children. What can we do to encourage, value, and promote diversity? Never tolerate bullying, teasing, and other put-down behavior at any time. Implement a “zero tolerance” for anything that is disrespectful, hurtful, or intolerant of diversity. Fostering Independent Thinking - Dependant thinkers uncritically accept whatever they are taught and rarely question information or asking themselves if the information really make sense. Independent thinkers feel the need to make sense of the world based on personal observations and experiences rather than just going along with the thoughts of others. Independent thinkers strengthen a team because they understand that different backgrounds and perspectives bring different ideas and solutions. They are willing to share ideas that differ from those of the rest of the team and sometimes require explanations that force the team to force the team to give careful consideration to information. Independent thinkers must be careful not to question everything or they can impede progress. However, when something seems wrong, or they don’t understand something, or they see a better way of doing something, they must have the confidence to voice their opinion.
By HoboQuestioningAlmostEverything on 09/07/2008 1:36 pm
MelanieWaldrop
Hi…sorry for the belated reply, but I do hope your comment about diversity wasn’t directed at my former post, because. if it indeed was, I have been misunderstood. As I said, I am a Christian, but I am vehemently opposed to forcing public school prayer…I am vehemenly opposed to forcing or endorsing any one religious viewpoint in public/political forums. I am gay…I can confidently say that life under a McCain/Palin administration could be very uncomfortable for those as ‘diverse’ as me. Basically all I can say is that I appreciate the strides that have been made in the areas of gay rights, womens issues, etc., and I am very afraid for the loss of ground which has been gained in the area of civil rights. While the Obama/ Biden ticket is CERTAINLY not my personal “dream ticket” (Hillary Clinton has got more intellect than that of each member of both tickets combined and squared), they seem to be the lesser evil….BECAUSE “Question Almost Everything” any platform which so blatantly courts the religious right, such as the Republicans do, SHOULD be questioned…those who support the continued presence of our troops in Iraq SHOULD be questioned…The present administration, as well as the whole party he represents, should be brought to task for the horrible economy, the attempts at curtailing civil rights (remember Georgie’s Patriot Act?), public policy disasters, and generally horrible (do I dare use the term..)leadership. We should all question the business- as-usual approach that the McCain/Palin ticket is offering up.
By MelanieWaldrop on 09/09/2008 9:43 pm
HoboQuestioningAlmostEverything
Hi Melanie - I hope you get this response (also belated). I agree with you on the Senator Clinton issue on qualification alone. But, that ship has sailed. The Columbia University interview with Senators Obama and McCain were a breath of fresh air. The time is here and we are succeeding in the movement for a new voter mentality, its been hard work but worth it. People are dropping party lines. They are accepting that every person/candidate has their own opinions, and the issues on the hill have to be voted according to what the people want and not personal opinion. Although we are required (hopefully not for much longer) to have a party affiliation, we are now campaigning for people to vote-in nominees that can cross party lines to get things done. We don’t do party lines anymore - that is the future of real change. And, I have questioned the continued troops in Iraq, and by that I mean questioned the troops in Iraq. I have taken and continue to take their message to Washington, and I do mean take the message. There are many doors to knock on to get the message sent. And, to my dismay, I have been met by a poster board outside of some of the offices with the total $$$$ amount of the war. In response, military family members have posted pictures on the board and wrote the words “the true cost of war” beneath it. We all know the issues brought to vote are bogged down with “what’s in it for me” and the true meaning gets buried. Reality is in 2006 we voted in a democrat majority senate to bring about change…….it didn’t happen. This is my last comment as I need to step away from the keyboard and get back in the trenches. All my best.
By HoboQuestioningAlmostEverything on 09/13/2008 1:43 pm
SherylS
I am not one bit impressed by Sarah Palin; all the way around. Besides, people are going to have to start thinking that IF McCain was to voted (please no) president, and something happened to him: SHE WOULD BE PRESIDENT, now c’mon she is not presidential material and neither is he. I’m sorry to sound shallow, but honestly he met her once, I feel he chose her because #1 she is a women and #2 a good looking women, and her ego bought it. If the stories are true, she already has let her positions go to her head, she pushes her weight around, wanting to fire a top state officical because he wouldn’t fire a state police officer that was involved with her sister!! Do we want a person like that; if it’s true perhaps running our country? Good grief and I can’t even believe anyone, any where would entertain the idea.
By SherylS on 09/07/2008 4:22 pm
HoboQuestioningAlmostEverything
Sheryl, really? “If the stories are true,” “Do we want a person like that; if it’s true perhaps running our country?” - geez, it’s like this whole election is based on gossip…….come on people! We need a government working together to stop the “us/them” party mentality. People voted in need to work for AMERICA and not a political party. There are still two more months to go and a lot more to be said and tested. I’m going to be blunt - let’s all shut-up and listen for a change before casting the first stone - I mean vote.
By HoboQuestioningAlmostEverything on 09/07/2008 6:17 pm
SherylS
Question Almost-Everything: Oh, I certainly intend to vote, but not blindly. We have to think of every scenerio, and my point was, if something happened to McCain, she would become president, it is my opinion she is not ready for that. It’s true we still have two months to go before the election; to analize the parties and make an educated vote. I miss Tim Russert so much and espically at this point in time. Additionally, that is why I prefaced my statement by, “if it’s true.” And IF it is, I personally would not want a person like that who lets a bit of authority/power go to their head.
By SherylS on 09/08/2008 8:11 am