Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Liz Smith | 10/21/2008 2:20 pm

Liz Smith Passes on the 'Paradox of Palinism'

© AP

Dear wOw friends,

I have written in a brittle manner in the past about some of my famous bosses. I actually have four of them. There is Joni Evans who runs this website. There is Col Allen who is boss at The New York Post tabloid where my column appears. I do news commentary for “Fox & Friends” on weekends and my boss there is the famous Roger Ailes. And, I write two columns a week for Daily Variety, the Bible of Show Business. My boss there is the admirable Peter Bart, a man who once ran Hollywood studios and produced movies. He knows all there is to know about the cinema world.

This week in one of his rare Variety columns, Mr. Bart discussed a political cultural topic: “Pop Culture Must Face Big Divide,” ran his headline. I just want to repeat his commentary:

"I’ve finally come to realize Sarah Palin has been a big help. Whether your focus is politics or pop culture, Palin’s emergence has dramatized the Big Divide in this country. Palin’s America is split between (to use Palin’s lexicon) the ‘Joe Six-packs’ and the so-called ‘elites.’ And apparently, we all have to choose sides.

"The Big Divide, as it continues to expand, will impact not only the presidency and the party system but also film, TV and other sectors of our culture.

"So make up your mind, folks. Are you one of those ridiculous, pointy-headed, over-secularized and overeducated elitists? Or are you one of Palin’s down-home value-based ‘real’ folks?

"Some might ask, does this Big Divide make any sense? David Brooks, the conservative columnist for The New York Times, observed last week that Republican strategy seems based on a doctrine of disunity.

"’The Republican party has driven away people who live in highly educated regions and on the coasts,’ he wrote. ‘Polls have also shown that the party has systematically alienated whole professions – lawyers, doctors, tech executives, even the banking community.’

"At the same time, the party also is blowing off the working class, thus squeezing the party at both ends. Who’s left? Moose-hunters in Alaska?

It’s intriguing that Palin’s America has begun to assert itself at the very time the economy is tanking. Joe Six-pack (and Joe the Plumber, who emerged in the final debate) may resent the excesses of Wall Street, but Joe’s also the guy who’s been buying homes he can’t afford and running up credit card debt.

"General Motors for generations has been styling its gas guzzlers for Joe Six-pack, abjuring the tastes of those elitists who’ve been favoring the Prius or Lexus.

"Television has found its own way of dealing with the Great Divide. Broadcast networks are treading water with ‘My Name Is Earl,’ even as elitist snobs fork out the big bucks for pay cable.

"Similarly, it’s increasingly clear that the movie business is split into two dream factories – one hammering out tent-pole pictures for the teen Six-packs and the other focusing on specialty films for those damn elites. The studios only ran into trouble when the tent-polers tried to mess around in the art-house business.

"The paradox of Palinism is that it represents a basic misunderstanding of the conservative movement. Going back to Edmund Burke or even to William F. Buckley, Brooks reminds us that the thoughtful ‘right’ was sophisticated and urbane. Reagan conservatism came across as a pragmatic, if eccentric, blend of smalltown values with coastal reach.

"Take a look at Oliver Stone’s ‘W.’ and you’re also reminded that it was George Bush who made the cynical decision to reinvent the Republican Party. An abject failure at everything he tried, this prep school Yalie decided he could only succeed as, guess who, Joe Six-pack. Under Karl Rove’s guidance, Brooks says, ‘Republican political tacticians decided to mobilize the new Bush coalition into a form of social class warfare.’

"And now John McCain has reinforced it by making what may turn out to be the most erratic casting choice in modern political history as his vice president. No one’s ultimately going to gain from his choice except ‘Saturday Night Live.’"

Click here on this text to read Liz’s New York Post column.

73 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Belinda Joy
The paradox of Palinism is that it represents a basic misunderstanding of the conservative movement.” On the money….a spot on observation! For years I labeled myself a Democrat and had a clear idea of that that definition meant. After Clinton’s administration the Democratic party changed into something I didn’t recognize, it drifted too far to the left…..and so I left. I (for a second) considered becoming a Republican, but I noticed they didn’t cater to any of my ideas and beliefs about what I believe being an American is. I didn’t feel welcomed. I had a stereotype of what I felt a Republican was and Sarah Palin now epitomizes exactly what I believe them to be…and I am sure I’m not alone. I know a lot of people who consider themselves to be conservatives and they are insulted at the mere implication that they are a Republican. They proudly and quickly correct you if you label them as such. There are a number of staunch Republican that post on this site and others that still defend the actions of their party, but those voices are dwindling. If you read the posts from a month an a half ago you will see that countless women warned of the very situation McCain finds himself in because of his choice in choosing her to run with. But then again, we have 14 days, and a lot could happen. We may be saying “Vice President Palin” come November 4th….oooh…I think I just threw up a little in my mouth!
By Belinda Joy on 10/21/2008 3:48 pm
DeBúrca obj
That’s funny, most people would say Clinton was too far to the right… in fact, didn’t Alan Greenspan call him the best Republican president he’d ever worked with, or something close to that? As far as Palin’s fascist view of this country and who is considered pro- or anti- American… I am a good, patriotic American with Liberal values who believes in strong unions, and happens to live in a huge city. According to Palin I am probably not one of her nice “pro-American” Americans.
By DeBúrca obj on 10/21/2008 3:58 pm
James the Game
Speaking of the Big City, how was the weather in Chicago today, DeB’? Fourteen days until the chads start hanging.
By James the Game on 10/21/2008 6:14 pm
DeBúrca obj
Lovely to look at but pretty cold. I think it’s time for me to give in and wear the winter coat.
By DeBúrca obj on 10/21/2008 8:09 pm
James the Game
Same here. Getting chilly in Grand Rapids. Frost will be on the pumpkin.
By James the Game on 10/21/2008 8:16 pm
Dona Howlett
DeBurca orj, Have you seen this link…………. It’s Right on……. http://www.palinaspresident.us/
By Dona Howlett on 10/21/2008 8:47 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Here’s a little tidbit about the expenditure of Palin’s clothes and makeup: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/22/palin-clothes-spending-ha_n_136…
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 10/22/2008 9:29 am
DeBúrca obj
Thanks for the link, Frank gave me that too. It’s funny, just this morning when I was having my coffee an acquaintance who happens to be a past Republican and is now a strong Obama supporter told me about this. As far as Palin’s “elite” wardrobe, I guess that’s how you put lipstick on a pitbull.
By DeBúrca obj on 10/22/2008 9:53 am
C Hardy
How much money is Obama spending on his suits and Michelle’s clothes? Maybe we should compare, oh wait thats right they neve release that info but I am sure ya’ll will find a way to say its ok…
By C Hardy on 10/22/2008 10:25 am
Victoria J
C O…but that’s not the issue at hand, although that $148.00 black and white dress Michelle Obama wore for her appearance on The View got lots of positive press. The issue before you is the really really really dumb idea of someone in the McCain camp with the help of Sarah Palin spending $150k on a vice presidential candidate who is serving up ProAmerican statements to joe sixpacks in small town America, where the hot shopping spot is likely Target or Walmart….KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE! and any good executive will tell you that? And for anybody who believes the line that a Republican surrogate bought those clothes…HA! Women on this board know that if you were send out a surrogate to buy for a VP candidate…the first pieces you would buy her would be a pair of red patent leather pumps, knee high black suede boots, a Vuitton handbag and a red leather jacket. Exactly! each of those pieces are specific and very personal fashion choices for a woman. No surrogate walking through Neiman’s or Saks says “and gosh, would those candy apple red patent leather pumps be just the right thing for Dayton, Ohio. Sarah Palin either went through the catalogs for Neiman and Saks or she went to the stores and selected those items. They try to tell us someone brought those items to her hotel room and she picked them having not a clue what they cost. Please ladies, Sarah Palin appeared last year or earlier this year in Vogue in its piece on women in public office. We all know designer clothes when we see them, we drool over them all the time exactly because we can’t afford them. The TV interview by Access this summer on the Obama family where Michelle was wearing a Gap sundress and Senator Obama has a rather tattered belt and scuffed shoes. At that point the pants he was wearing were ten years old according to his wife. He has since, according to the media, purchased several suits at $1500 per suit. John McCain wears Ferragamo loafers at $500 a pair..again he can afford them, so he should wear them, but does the base he represents understand that his shoes cost as much as their mortgage payment? The Obama’s normal lifestyle and spending habits better represent the general public than that of the McCains.
By Victoria J on 10/25/2008 3:54 pm
Lady Gator
Well Liz, if you put it that way ——I’m a down home -value based real folk! Don’t live on either coast — just out here in the middle!
By Lady Gator on 10/21/2008 3:49 pm
beth willis
Lady Gator, I am going to see Tina Turner Sunday in Dallas. These are tough times, economically and politically, but the fire in the belly must be stoked. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 10/21/2008 4:23 pm
Lady Gator
Beth….I am so envious!!!!!!!!!!!!! I had already planned to attend in Orlando. However, hubby informed me we were going to a meeting — I can tell you it won’t be the likes of the AIG weekend!!!!!LOL He did try to make it better — he got us tickets to go to Neil Diamond. Yeah, these may be tough times, but ya just gotta have little fun in your life. Life is too short. Keep me posted on the concert — what she wore and the songs. Gee, I’m turning green with envy as I type!!
By Lady Gator on 10/21/2008 5:05 pm
Sandbee (FB) 54
Saw Neil Diamond last week, he did a wonderful show!! And to top it off, he gave all money that was taken in at merchandise stands to Hurricane Ike fund and added $200,000. to that personally.
By Sandbee (FB) 54 on 10/21/2008 5:57 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Lady G. did you get my response to your questioning me on the thread re: Obama? I hope so cuz I wanted you to understand what I meant. Enjoy old Neil this weekend.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 10/22/2008 8:20 am