Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Liz Smith | 09/11/2008 10:00 am

Liz Smith Responds to Those Who Want to Tie Sarah Palin to the Stake, Setting Her Afire Before the Nov. 4 Election

© AP

Honeys … please! Give me a break. I had no intention of "lecturing" you on how to treat Sarah Palin . I just wanted us to calm down a bit about the incipient GOP vice president before our furor at this veep choice explodes in our faces. And backfires on us.

Let’s get things totally straight here. I wasn’t backtracking. I haven’t changed my mind; I could never vote for a ticket that had Sarah Palin on it. She is anti almost everything I believe in except “the zipper and the dial telephone,” as Tallulah once opined of Republican candidate Tom Dewey. 

I would ride to hell in a handbasket for the talented Julia Reed and for my other wOw partners who are conservatives, worried about having to pay more taxes. For this they are willing to shut their eyes to the antideluvian (and I believe, immoral) beliefs of the Republican Party. I violently disagree with them. If they think I’m a little to the left of Trotsky, I think they are a little to the right of Franco, Mussolini and that German guy.      

I honestly feel as if I will perish if I have to live through an administration in which she is there, stealing all the thunder from her own president.

But through the years I’ve managed to be friends with William F. Buckley Jr., Roy Cohn, Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr., Taki Theodoracopulos, Rudy Giuliani, Pat Buchanan and to have a civil dialogue with them. I suppose old-fashioned manners and differences of opinion die hard.

OK, sweetie pies, go crazy for all I care. March on the Palin headquarters with flaming torches. I don’t want her to win anymore than most of you seem to. I honestly feel as if I will perish if I have to live through an administration in which she is there, stealing all the thunder from her own president. And being written of as a glamorous maverick for four years. (No matter how the media may hate her, they will eat her up and lick their chops if she continues as a public figure.) Or if I have to live through seeing the Supreme Court add just one more conservative Justice which will be the end of Western Civilization as we know it.

I was just saying that we might back off a bit from hysteria before we go to vote. Sometimes violent diatribes backfire and if the Democrats are as crazed by Sarah Palin as they seem to be, this may embolden Republicans and those who haven’t yet decided to go for her as a rebuke to overkill.

I would say if you want to read a reasoned response, again, you should go to Newsweek for September 15th and just take a look at Anna Qindlin’s reasoning under the headline “Can You Say ‘Sexist’?: If you’re a Republican, you’d better learn. The right wing that trashed the women’s movement suddenly finds its inner feminist.”

I used to like John McCain. But he lost me when that woman in his audience asked: “How do we beat the bitch?” (referring to Hillary Clinton) and he responded of his friend and colleague in the Senate: “Excellent question.”        

So, OK, I thought Sarah Palin was an appalling choice. I was just overtaken by my Miss Manners training when I suggested we might damp it down a bit. We have 60 days to work to change things. My only wish is that Barack Obama had chosen Hillary Clinton as his vice-presidential choice. When Hillary debated Sarah, nobody could accuse either one of them of being unfair or sexist.  

But if wishes were horses we all could ride. Now I am just going to cool my jets, unbuckle my saddle and take off my spurs. Somebody spurt some cool water on my head. 

Click here on this text to read my New York Post column.

163 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

G T
Thank you for this information. Aloha.
By G T on 09/11/2008 10:34 pm
Sherrie Crews
“book learnin’ ruins the shootin’ eye mentality.” By Jackie Sanders on 09/11/2008 6:47 pm Thank you for that quote Jackie. That is the exact philosophy this country has been governed by for the last eight years and I honestly believe that’s one of the reasons they have done nothing of value for education is because they don’t want the general public to be well educated or informed. Liz, I agree with much of what you said and like Deni, I would much rather have threads comparing and discussing the parties’ and candidates’ platforms on the real issues. The problem is, there are no treads like that. I know politics was never supposed to be the primary focus of this site but that is the focus of our nation right now. I think I’d be more worried if we weren’t focusing on some aspect of it here at WOW and if there were no political threads at all many of us would probably be spending our online time elsewhere. When the only political topics are about the Palin nonsense though, that’s where we’re going to congregate. Think of it this way, were it not for the internet and sites like this allowing those of us who are so vehemently opposed to this travesty the reps are making of our presidential campaign to speak up, where would we be heard? Certainly not on the mainstream media. We’re not the ones who made Palin the focus of their campaign, they are and we have not only a right, but a duty to speak out against it. Rather than trying to stifle our voice why not let us give voice to the real issues that Palin is distracting us from by starting some issue based threads. I and many others would much rather talk about that.
By Sherrie Crews on 09/12/2008 8:24 am
Bonnie Seitz
I want him to drop her and pick Lieberman, much rather have a known evil than an unknown one.
By Bonnie Seitz on 09/12/2008 12:31 pm
Andy C
I can’t believe either of their choices for running mates; what were they thinking????
By Andy C on 09/12/2008 1:49 pm
Star Lawrence
I like Sarah. I may not agree with her on everything but she could kick every butt ragging her on this list—and I don’t have the energy or tolerance for repetition. I am voting Repubican for the first time in 45 yrs. I am not changing my party affiliation in the hopes that sanity will return to the Dem party at some distant point. If you guys want to continue, allow me to introduce most of you…preacher, choir, choir, preacher.
By Star Lawrence on 09/12/2008 3:15 pm
Linda Mason
Hi Star — “I may not agree with her on everything but she could kick every butt ragging her on this list…” Well, thanks for clarifying your criteria for V.P.! Depending on how you define, “kick butt,” I may agree with you. If you mean drop Palin and the Wowowow Bloggers into Rome’s Colesseum circa 100 A.D. and see who is the last one standing, I guess you’re right. But intellectually, well … I’m going to be exercise restraint her because she’s just too easy a mark!
By Linda Mason on 09/12/2008 8:16 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
Well, I don’t know if she would kick every butt ragging her on this list; she would probably just shoot us. Remember she is a life member of the NRA and has the arsenal to prove it. Go ahead and vote against your interests Star; it is an old American tradition. If people voted on the issues, we would likely have never had President Bush, a war in Iraq, or a ginormous deficit, and we probably would have universal health insurance, more progress on solving global warming, and functioning infrastructure. But that would be wrong, wouldn’t it? We wouldn’t have enough butt-kicking going on. Can’t have that.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 09/13/2008 12:20 am
Mugsy Peabody
Star, Star, Star. I honestly believe you’re losing it. “Kicking every butt” is not the criteria of a statesman, or stateswoman. “Kicking the butt” of Russia is a poor idea indeed, since we have no resources left for another, particularly not a full-scale nu-ku-lur war. Reread The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire, Star. What brought them down is what is bringing us down — the far-flung, expensive military supported by an ever-increasingly failing domestic economy. Sound familiar? Also, ignorant “Cesars” who knew nothing of diplomacy, always believed they were in the right, wouldn’t listen to anyone, and had no regard for the citizenry. Sound familiar? Seriously, we are not going to survive much more of this nonsense. And these aren’t even conservatives. A conservative? Oh, dear ole Bill Buckley, Jr. A prince of a man. Of course, I could have throttled him on most issues, but he served for years on the Board of Amnesty International (along with Joan Baez). Believed in sanity, that man did.
By Mugsy Peabody on 09/13/2008 4:24 pm
Star Lawrence
I only accept medical diagnoses from board-certified professionals, my dear Mugsy. Have to go now and brush up on my Latin. Omnia gallia est in tres partes divisa. All I remember. Wait something about Illegitimi nil carborundum. Not that anyone of this list is a bastard or female equivalent. I don’t even believe in that term. But I do believe in not getting ground down.
By Star Lawrence on 09/13/2008 4:49 pm
Mugsy Peabody
That was a political diagnosis, Star, not a medical one.
By Mugsy Peabody on 09/13/2008 7:06 pm
Star Lawrence
I feel like Al Pacino—just when I think I am out, you pull me back into this lame hate-a-thon. See? I name-called! Yes, I am voting “against my interests,” blah, blah, everyone is right, I am wrong, I am an idiot. What else have you got? I have explained time and time again why I am not voting for Senator Obama and why the Dem party no longer represents my interests or can operate effectively in the real-life Washington environment in which I served for so many years. I typed until I was blue in the face (since you guys love the expressions). I am losing interest in this site. I thought Whoopi came off as a boor on The View, too! I am tempted to say, Take a big suck of that! But, of course, won’t.
By Star Lawrence on 09/13/2008 10:39 am
Elizabeth Bennett
Hey Star, I for one love having you here. You have a sense of humor, and that is not a universal characteristic, at least online, where some people park their sense of humor offline. I know you have said that you don’t like Obama and you don’t trust Obama and you won’t vote for him. But there are other folks on the ballot. Ralph Nader, Bob Barr, and Cynthia McKinney are also running for President. Why McCain if you want to vote against Obama? There are all these other choices. The media likes to make every race into a boxing match, but sometimes they are more like track meets. I am sorry your face is blue. Please take a week to think this over and let your face recover before you even consider replying.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 09/13/2008 12:26 pm
Deni G
Oh gee do we hear to hear this ‘i’m leaving’, yet again ? This is a weekly occurance with you. look! see, lots of people want you to stay. I, on the other hand, couldn’t care less. Go, stay, I don’t care, just stop goin on and on about it and quit whining about how horrible and boring it all is.
By Deni G on 09/14/2008 12:31 am
Star Lawrence
Please take a week to think this over and let your face recover before you even consider replying. As you may have noticed, I don’t take direction well. I don’t need a week. I have also explained why I am able to vote for McCain—and now am looking forward to it. Cynthia McKinney? Bob Barr? I want to defeat Sen Obama! I was going to write in The Big Lebowski (great story in this month’s Rolling Stone, by the way) until I came to this site—then the quality of the remarks against Sen McCain kind of led me to stop calling him Grandpa McCain and see his “I am old and it’s finally going to be my way” appeal. When he selected a flat-out scrapper for a running mate, my heart was won. I have explained before—many times, boringly horribly many times—that I don’t think the pres or admin can do much about the economy. Maybe a new Fed chairman or Comptroller of the Currency…does the incoming admin even get new picks there? Not sure. Kitty? Health care? Neither has a clue—I don’t like McCain’s “here’s some money, buy your own” thing, since I have done that for many yrs and people who need that money just pay FICA, probably. The other guy’s rambly ideas about health care are mainly committed to getting more children on. I don’t think mems of Cong like this fellow enough to do all this reaching across the aisle. I have been all through this! I only have one vote—and so do all of you. As we used to say on the Hill, if you have the votes, you win. We will survive either way, I promise you. And I highly doubt the vice president willl shoot you or anyone else. If she does, it will make all the papers.
By Star Lawrence on 09/13/2008 12:38 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
Well, that is a relief, about the shooting that is. I have been sort of hunkered down, worried that the Saracuda would find out I was voting for Obama and track me down. I think you are not an issues voter. You have said you were against the Iraq war from the start, in favor of universal health care, pro-choice, and a number of other things that make you solidly Democratic if one were to look at issues alone. McCain voted for the bankruptcy bill you dislike so much. But you are looking at something else, whether you think the candidate will listen to you or work well on the Hill, or get us out of Iraq [even though he says he wants to stay till the last insurgent is caught], or something. I sure hope we end up with a more competent government because Bush has been such a disaster it makes me worry whenever I see a flag. I made a mistake in thinking you were looking at issues, and really—- not all voters look at issues. Some look at something else, whether it is called character or experience or gravitas or charisma. I just don’t understand why you are so enthused about Palin, not that she is a liar per se, but she certainly is making claims that reporters are rapidly debunking. The only thing Palin said in that interview with Gibson that rung true to me is what she said about Senator Clinton. Senator Obama would have been better off with Clinton as Veep, and even Biden said so.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 09/13/2008 5:16 pm