Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Liz Smith | 09/15/2008 4:15 pm

Liz Smith: Thoughts Over Last Weekend While Drowning in Palin Politics

Liz Smith
I went to a book party* given for the TV hero Bob Schieffer last Friday and every single person I knew who entered, all media sophisticates, came up to me and asked plaintively, "Well, what do you think about Sarah Palin?"

Then, I can’t tell you how many suffering Dems contacted me in the last 48 hours and said, "Is there any possibility that Joe Biden would step aside and let Barack Obama now make Hillary Clinton his vice president?" 

Well, the answer has to be no. How would THAT make Obama look? (Like the jerk he is for not embracing Hillary in the first place.) But I guess it aroused wishful hoping after Joe Biden himself — a really good guy — asserted that Hillary would probably have been a better choice than he was.

Vice President Palin — for I fear that is what she will become — has a built-in "second" in comedian Tina Fey. Tina looked more like Palin than Palin does on "Saturday Night Live" and even has the Alaska governor’s flat vocal pattern down pat.

And you have to stand amazed that an actor could get an unknown person down so correctly that at this point, you honestly probably couldn’t tell them apart.

Just a few years late, I finally went to see the musical "Wicked" over last weekend and its presentation onstage of the Wizard of Oz made me think. When you see John McCain and Sarah Palin together, they look for all the world like the bluffing faking wizard and Judy Garland, intrepid and brave as Dorothy. Or they resemble a doting grandpa looking on as his little darling takes center stage. Voters have to remember if they choose the McCain-Palin ticket, they’ll most likely be voting Sarah Palin into the office of president of the U.S. in this election. 

Speaking of "Wicked," where the bad and good witch are just sisters under the skin, reminded me of the teacher who asked her young class to write an essay about Red Riding Hood. The class protested that the tale was too well-known; what could they say? The teacher then told them, "Yes, but I want you to write it now from the point of view of the wolf!"

I have to compliment the excellent Tom Friedman’s op-ed column in The New York Times last weekend. Everything in the Times is pointedly and intelligently leveled against the election of John McCain and Sarah Palin, so, of course, detractors deem it biased and too liberal. But Friedman taking on McCain’s "drill, drill, drill" mania for offshore oil "now" cited this as total dinosaur thinking.

Urging invention and new techniques to find other energy than oil and saying that McCain’s ideas simply feed America’s oil mania – he noted that this policy is like urging people to make more typewriters in a time when the Internet and computer technology has already rendered typewriters obsolete. It’s a great piece of thinking and writing.

*By the way, Bob’s book is titled Bob Schieffer’s America and brings together 171 of his best essays done on CBS. And, if you thought Schieffer and Katie Couric were bitter enemies, as they say in network gossip, there she was, enthusiastic and chowing down on barbecue, celebrating Bob at Manhattan’s Hill Country honky-tonk café on West 26th Street.

85 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Elizabeth Bennett
Eleanor I believe you have mixed up your Sunday morning political shows. It was George Will who said yesterday that “that’s why God made Georgetown interns.” See http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek
By Elizabeth Bennett on 09/15/2008 10:03 pm
eleanor roche
Yes, Elizabeth, you are right, I actually attributed that George Will quote to Shieffer. Mea Culpa. Schieffer actually alluded to the same problem on Hannity and Colmes, admitting that he is less than adept at computer skills, so the same analysis hold. SCHIEFFER: You know, I’m an old-fashioned guy. I actually clip newspapers. I clip articles. COLMES: You don’t click and paste on the Internet? SCHIEFFER: My young assistant, she just goes wild on that word processor and stuff, but I’m still a paper guy. Hey, don’t get me wrong, I like Bob Schieffer, they never should have replaced him with Couric, in MHO. BTW elizabeth, do you go around checking my posts for accuracy? I have to say, I doubt you would ever admit to a mistake—being the “Queen of Spin” that you are. I was going to ask you, since you know so much more about being a woman in science than I do, would you like to teach my class on “Evolutionary Biology” when I go out on maternity leave?
By eleanor roche on 09/15/2008 10:57 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
Really, Eleanor, I thought I was being helpful. I never thought you were opposed to accuracy. I saw This Week only yesterday and remembered Will made the comment.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 09/16/2008 1:01 am
eleanor roche
No Elizabeth, I am not opposed to accuracy and appreciate that you noticed my mistake—I actually watched both of their appearances (Schieffer and Will) within a few days of each other and apparently got them confused. I took notice since they both alluded to the same problem—being of the older crowd—mentioned the same thing about computers. My point whether it’s Schieffer, Will, McCain or anyone else who doesn’t regularly use a computer does not make them “out of touch” or stupid or any of the other insults directed at McCain. There was actually an article written during the 2000 campaign that attributed McCain’s inability to use a keyboard to his injuries from his prisoner of war days. I was just ribbing you a bit—sorry if you took it the wrong way.
By eleanor roche on 09/16/2008 1:10 pm
Buh- Bye
An enjoyable post to read Liz Smith, thank you. And wasn’t Tina Fey just so fabulous on SNL. She nailed it. But so did Poehler. That was her best Hillary yet. The content was perfect as well. Please Lorne Michaels, book Tina for a cameo appearance every week until the election.
By Buh- Bye on 09/15/2008 10:00 pm
josepha leyba
Josepha asks. I f Sarah was Sarah Kennedy Palin one of the cousins) and she migrated to Alaska, married a hunky local,became the Mayor, had (all) five children and then became the Governor- and did all this without using the Kennedy NAME or money. Would you all hate her as much? or would you think she was the best thing since popcorn? P.S. If God forbid, anything happened to ‘W’ or Chenny- Nancy Pelosi would be President. P.P S Nancy is a women and she has five children. Would love an answer from all
By josepha leyba on 09/15/2008 11:23 pm
kathy hurt
Josepha: Personally,I would not want Pelosi to be my president ,hasn’t quite won me over either.Have a great day. K Hurt
By kathy hurt on 09/16/2008 9:47 am
Tee Zee
Alright Josepha, one example, Matt & Jo Kennedy. In 1979, Kennedy established Citizens Energy Corporation, a non-profit organization, to provide discounted heating oil to low-income families. Citizens Energy also began pursuing commercial ventures aimed at generating revenues that in turn would be used to generate funds that could assist those in need in the United States and abroad. Citizens Energy grew to encompass seven separate companies, including one of the largest energy conservation firms in the U.S. Citizens became one of the nation’s first energy firms to move large volumes of natural gas to more than 30 states. As a precursor to market changes under electricity deregulation in the late 1990s, Citizens was a pioneer in moving and marketing electrical power over the grid. Not all of the Kennedy’s are rich, many have made it through school and are paying student loans like the rest of us. What has McCain or Palin given back to their communities?
By Tee Zee on 09/16/2008 10:08 am
Elizabeth Bennett
It has nothing to do with her name. It has nothing to do with her children. It has everything to do with her dismal record as mayor and governor and her lack of knowledge or preparation to be vice president. As for Nancy Pelosi, not only are her children grown, but Pelosi has met foreign leaders, does know that Saddam was not behind 9/11, knows a great deal about how the federal government works, she has read the Constitution, and she would be an excellent President.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 09/16/2008 11:01 am
Linda Mason
Hi Josepha — Frankly, your question is insulting. My opinions about Palin are not personal — they are political. And they have nothing to do with her name, lineage, or her children. They have everything to do with her Neanderthal views which are wrong for America. Obviously, you have issues about Ms. Pelosi, but I will not ask you why you “hate” her. Go Cubs!
By Linda Mason on 09/19/2008 8:07 pm
josepha leyba
Joaepha asks , Why is it that the Kennedys are the only ones who are allowed to be RICHE?
By josepha leyba on 09/15/2008 11:28 pm
Tee Zee
Joaepha, what I believe many people are responding to is many of us were brought up with the principle “For everyone to whom much is given, of him shall much be required.” — Luke 12:48. What I admire about the Kennedy’s is they were given much and have given back. What I have a hard time with is the ostentatious display of wealth in Cindy McCain’s wardrobe and the discussion of the McCain many homes when so many across this country are suffering. For the cost of her earrings alone, how many young children who are going to bed hungry tonight have a hotdog?
By Tee Zee on 09/16/2008 10:32 am
Linda B
It wasn’t until I saw the requisite end-of-convention tableaux of Barack and Michelle and Biden and his wife (see, I can’t even remember her name) that I understood why picking Hillary as his VP was so potentially problematic. Think of that picture. Barack and Michelle…Bill and Hillary arm-in-arm, waving. It’s easy to second-guess now but I can easily imagine the dozens of news cycles, the cable chatter about how diminished Obama looks when sharing the stage with his running mate and her spouse. The Republicans would have used every awkward portrait of the foursome in ads from now until election day.
By Linda B on 09/16/2008 12:07 am
bambi59 mac
Here we go again. I was just watching The View and Elisabeth threw out a comment about Senator Biden saying Governor Palin would be a step back for women. When Whoopi and Barbara questioned her on the source, she couldn’t come up with it. I decided to fact check the info: September 9, 2008 Biden: Palin Would Be ‘Backward Step for Women’ @ 1:08 pm by Andy Barr Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) says that if Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) becomes the first female vice president it will be a “backward step for women.” Asked by a local television reporter in Milwaukee, Wisconsin if electing Palin would be a step forward for women, Biden said, “well look, I think the issue is what does Sarah Palin think? What does she believe?” “I assume she thinks and agrees with the same policies that George Bush and John McCain think,” Biden added. “And that’s obviously a backward step for women. So obviously Senator Biden was talking about the policies of Bush/McCain/Palin. I’m an admirer of The View, but instead of women voicing their own opinions, Elisabeth has crossed a line and entered new territory. I’m sure she would be much better suited for Fox news. I think she should either offer Senator Biden a formal apologize, presenting the info she spouted in full disclosure or be fired. She is now hurting the credibility of the show.
By bambi59 mac on 09/16/2008 10:37 am
Frank Peterson
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16herbert.html?hp The McCain health insurance boondoggle that will cost Americna families more money for less coverage—this is a gem I sure thought up by Phil Gramm and his Enron cronies that already aren’t in jail. This plan will you the american family a lot of money.
By Frank Peterson on 09/16/2008 10:54 am