Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 10/05/2008 10:05 am

Loud-Mouth-and-Loose-Lipped Palin Owes Obama an Apology for This One, by Margo Howard

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Click here to read her column on Yahoo!

I really thought I was done talking about Sarah Palin, but life is what happens when you’re making other plans. I wish there were a word that was a cross between "appalled" and "nauseated," because that’s what the lady’s latest outburst has me feeling. Saturday evening Drudge picked up a Breitbart story where the headline was: "Palin says Obama ‘palling around’ with terrorists." As if this weren’t bad enough, she went on to tell whatever group she was addressing: "This is not a man who sees America as you see America and as I see America." Well, I’ll tell you what I see: a loud-mouth, loose-lipped nobody who is drunk on media attention and a quart low in the judgment department. I think both she and her aged "maverick" buddy owe Mr. Obama an apology for this one.

To live on the same street and to have served on a board with Billy Ayers, part of the Weather Underground when Obama was in grade school and now a professor, is not my idea of "palling around with." I think this hockey mom/moose skinner fits perfectly into the class war she is helping perpetuate, even though she has none.

It would have far more factual validity for Obama, or a surrogate, to publicize the fact that Track, the kid who joined the Army, did so because a judge told him it was that or jail due to his dealing drugs. I have a strong hunch, however, the Obama people would never get into that. Up until now the lady has annoyed me because of her ignorance and arrogance, but now I am furious, especially when her headline-making remark from yesterday was that Obama was not "fit" to be commander-in chief. I think the McCain people better lock the lady up again and tell her to zip it, because she is not fit to even ad-lib.

328 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Freyja Valkurie
Tack själv så mycket, M. Pepe. Most helpful.
By Freyja Valkurie on 10/06/2008 2:21 pm
Linda P
Oh, puh-leeze! I can think of things to get exercised about, but “maverick” ain’t one of ‘em.
By Linda P on 10/06/2008 8:53 pm
Belinda Joy
Track, the kid who joined the Army, did so because a judge told him it was that or jail due to his dealing drugs” Margo you have just hit on the number one point I have been making among my friends and family. There is so much about Sarah Palin and her family that most of her supporters would recoil by. This is a woman that says she wants to have a hand in running our country, yet she can not run her own household. From a son who was selling drugs, to a teenage daughter who lacks any level of sexual control or education and is now pregnant, to a husband that has “questionable” drive as it pertains to providing financially for the home…..She clearly is not someone that should be lauded as the best candidate McCain could have chosen as a running mate. It sickens me every time I hear her speak. The “Aw shucks, ya know, I’m gonna and I’m just a typical Joe six pack” drives me crazy! Americans, do we really want this woman serving as a spokesperson for the U.S. around the world? Her behavior at the debate is an excellent illustration of how McCain made a huge mistake in picking her. That was not a debate. She didn’t debate Biden, she simply regurgitated talking points the McCain campaign taught her. She is a former sports reporter….an actress of sorts. She didn’t answer any questions directed at her; she simply spoke on the subjects that she wanted to speak on. It was theater, no more and no less. Sarah Palin needs to go back into hiding. Because if she and the McCain campaign think for one second they will win this race by playing from the bottom of the deck by character attacks on Sen. Obama, they are (using Sarah Palin’s vernacular) “gonna be, gosh darn it, really surprised!”
By Belinda Joy on 10/05/2008 11:25 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Talking at the debate about how she would “positively affect the impacts” of the climate change for which she’s loath to acknowledge human culpability, she did a dizzying verbal loop-de-loop: “With the impacts of climate change, what we can do about that, as governor, I was the first governor to form a climate change subcabinet to start dealing with the impacts.” That was, miraculously, richer with content than an answer she gave Katie Couric: “You know, there are man’s activities that can be contributed to the issues that we’re dealing with now, with these impacts.” At another point, she channeled Alicia Silverstone debating in “Clueless,” asserting, “Nuclear weaponry, of course, would be the be-all, end-all of just too many people in too many parts of our planet.” (Mostly the end-all.) A political jukebox, she drowned out Biden’s specifics, offering lifestyle as substance. “In the middle class of America, which is where Todd and I have been, you know, all our lives,” she said, making the middle class sound like it has its own ZIP code, superior to 90210 because “real” rules. Sometimes, her sentences have a Yoda-like — “When 900 years old you reach, look as good you will not” — splendor. When she was asked by Couric if she’d ever negotiated with the Russians, the governor replied that when Putin “rears his head” he is headed for Alaska. Then she uttered yet another sentence that defies diagramming: “It is from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there.” Reared heads reared themselves again at the debate, when she said that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “were starting to really kind of rear the head of abuse.” She dangles gerunds, mangles prepositions, randomly exiles nouns and verbs and also — “also” is her favorite vamping word — uses verbs better left as nouns, as in, “If Americans so bless us and privilege us with the opportunity of serving them,” or how she tried to “progress the agenda.” Poppy Bush dropped personal pronouns and launched straight into verbs because he was minding his mother’s admonition against “the big I.” Palin, by contrast, uses a heck of a lot of language to praise herself as a fresh face with new ideas who has “joined this team that is a team of mavericks.” True mavericks don’t brand themselves From Maureen Dowd
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 10/05/2008 1:49 pm
Dana Jae
Standing ovation, Belinda! Excellent!
By Dana Jae on 10/05/2008 8:52 pm
Patty E
OMG—you are right—Palin was not the one who made the decision that she should be the VP candidate—McCain made that choice..so Palin need not apologize for being ‘picked’ by someone other than herself. BUT! Palin, now that she has agreed to do the job as VP candidate, running for office WITH McCain, hoping the ticket will win —-at the LEAST, should understand that not all Americans are as ‘folksy’ a she is. Republicans in my town in MICHIGAN, do NOT like her—-ask yourself why McCain pulled out of Michigan? Could it be his base did not want to continue working for him, with Palin on the ticket?? I have had this thought running rampant thru my mind the last several days: McCain knew he wasn’t going to win, so decided that he was going to be the ‘pesky interference’ , with the hope that Obama would become soooo frustrated, that he would ‘lose his cool’, and go negative. McCain, ALSO, knowing he was not going to win, picked Palin, because she was adept at playing down and dirty—it’s a game with her, and if she can voice absurdities, McCain won;t have to…..protecting himself by using her…and Palin? She doesn;t even know what she does not know…like she may not even know that she has been picked as the one to do the firty work—-she might believe that she really IS qualified! Her ego, McCains anger with the world not going his way——a great combination!
By Patty E on 10/05/2008 11:26 am
Buh- Bye
Patty I think Rove picked her and McCain capitulated to shore up the base.
By Buh- Bye on 10/05/2008 11:34 am
John G
that is a good call… you are most likely correct.
By John G on 10/05/2008 12:55 pm
mary lou s
patty, i heard that when macomb county (think reagan democrats) went for obama, mccain pulled out of michigan. as for palin, pfffttt!
By mary lou s on 10/06/2008 12:55 am
Patty E
The Macomb County situation was more than that. Several weeks ago, the GOP chair of Macomb County, announced that they would be using foreclosure lists to ‘challenge’; whether or not a resident would be able to vote. Because the Republicans were not going to bother with allowing the person to prove they were still living in the house, even though it had been foreclosed on. The Chair was doing this under the radar, they thought, and a reporter at the courthouse discovered and reported, what she learned, immediately. When a home is foreclosed on, the person usually gets a certain number of months to get out…My 79 yr old Aunt was given 6 months, after they foreclosed oh her for an equity loan taken out on her fully paid-for house, to pay for medical bills for her daughter. Her daughter passed away, BTW 3 weeks ago, 3 weeks after my Aunt was forced to move out of her home. The Chair of the Republican Party had hoped to be able to deny voters on he day of election, without due process, which is allowed in Michigan thru a loop-hole, but becasue they were not using a document that was deemed a legal ‘final say’, and the wording specifically stated ‘those that were foreclosed on’, as opposed to ‘those that cannot prove they are still living in the house’, or something similar—-AND because a Challenge at the polls, would effectively deny someone who COULD have been able to vote, the opportunity to vote ON THE DAY OF the election, the GOP would have been able to prevent those they assumed would vote for the Dem. ticket, the right to vote. Because it was ASSUMED that these foreclosures were “being done to minorities, who had no business buying a home they could not afford”, I decided to look up the demographics. I live in Michigan, and my brother lives in theDetroit Area, and the last I knew, Macomb County had mostly white people living in it—-and my curiosity was peaked. Macomb County, when one looks up the demographics, was around 92%, Causcasion and 2% African-American. The median income was above $100K, well above the median for all of America. So I had to ask myself, why were they using Macomb County as the litmus test, forchallenging voters the right to vote with a foreclosure LIST—-as opposed to a list of foreclosures that had been finalized with the tenant moved out, and the house on the market. About the same time, I learned that Rove was advising McCain….. Ohio has more foreclosures than just about anywhere in the country. It is so bad there, that City’s are suing the lenders of the ARM loans! So MY thinking was that I should think like Rove! And IF, Macomb County had been able to get away with the ‘challenge’, then it would open the door for the GOP to deny voters in Ohio, the right to vote, if they too, were in foreclosure, using Macomb County as the ‘precedent’ . Fortunately, the Governor of MI., and many others, fought back, and would not allow the Chair of the GOP in Macomb County to challenge votes using a foreclosure list….. In the town I live in, historically solid Republican, there is more support and money, and volunteers for Obama than there EVER has been for a Democrat candiddate. Back in 2004, I interviewed people who were waiting to hear and see John Edwards. There were many who told me then, that for the 2004 election, it would be the first time in their lives that they would vote the Democrat ticket. They had hoped to get rid of Bush, as our economy was in the toilet, and Bush was so mad at Granholm for beating DeVos, that he put his blinders on to the plight of Michigan, and essentially ignored us. So now the Obama fever is stonger than the Kerry fever was in 2004! I drive down the streets and do not even SEE a McCain sign on the front lawns. Of course, the demographics here, include Colleges and Universities—which has been shown where the Obama support is very strong.
By Patty E on 10/06/2008 2:02 pm
C Hardy
Ok Patty…I am not curious about your post…If someone’s house was foreclosed on & they are still living there b/c YES they do have some time before they actually have to be out…as long as that is still their primary residence according to DMV records, which is where your voter registration card shows your address, they should be able to vote in the same place…RIGHT? I mean I just moved and had to mail in my updated address for my voter registration even though my location won’t change, I wanted to make sure I got it in before the deadline…If you move you have to give your new address…If your house is going through Foreclosure and you have a new place to live, then you need to notify DMV, at least that is the law here in VA, within 30 or 60 days, not sure exact time, and when you do that with DMV they ask you do you want to update your Voter Registration address also…So if the homeowner’s who have already moved, should just file a change of address…Maybe I am not getting the full of your story…
By C Hardy on 10/06/2008 2:43 pm
Patty E
There were many people on that list who had not yet moved—-they had no other address to move to yet….they were still living in the house that found it’s way to the foreclosure list…..the ‘Challenge of the vote’ included those who had not yet moved—-so they were being discriminated against—in that they could not vote if they had been foreclosed on……
By Patty E on 10/06/2008 3:07 pm
C Hardy
Patty…Really! Oh MY GOD now that is nuts…Im sorry but that is wrong…I was really hoping that as a Country we could get through this election without something awful happening at the polls. Like I said in another post…My Fiance’ is a State Trooper here in VA and all Troopers had to go through more riot training and crowd control just to be posted all over the state at all the election polls…Because they are already getting threats of possible riots at voting polls…man what is the world coming to?
By C Hardy on 10/06/2008 3:13 pm
Lotus Kann
Patty, why hasn’t this been reported in the national media? Why hasn’t the Obama campaign run with this yet? They need to get this out there. Nothing like kicking people when they are down. The RNC will do just about anything and they can’t stand the middle class and lower. They are so disgusting.
By Lotus Kann on 10/07/2008 5:45 pm
Patty E
It was——about 2 weeks ago…maybe 3 now, as time goes by quickly in my world.
By Patty E on 10/07/2008 6:51 pm