The Love Goddess | 12/15/2008 12:30 pm
The NYT on Hooking Up: OK for Older Women, Drudgery for Younger Ones

Editor’s Note: Who
is the wisest of them all? Who is more dedicated to your pleasure than
anyone on earth? Who can help you when you’re going online for the
first time to find love; or when your lover’s children hate you; or
when you want to strangle your husband? Why, the Love Goddess, of
course. She promises nothing less than celestial wisdom, heavenly sex, divine dating. Read on …
A New York Times essay by Charles Blow this last weekend laments the fact that dating, as we know it, has ended. Anyone who reads or speaks with The Love Goddess knows that dating as courtship, that orderly ritual by which a man and women get to know each other in order to proceed to intimacy and, it has always been hoped, marriage, ended ages ago. The writer’s point is that hooking up – that is, having sex (usually with a friend) before getting to know him or her, with no plans to continue afterward toward emotional intimacy – is a sad way to conduct the getting-to-know-you process, even as he admits that "hooking up emphasizes group friendships over the one-pair model of dating," and also takes away the stigma of being in a group but without a date.
For you grown-up women with rich pasts and rich futures who are dating anew, hooking up isn’t so bad. It allows a busy, high-achieving woman with little time on her hands to have sex, with the same casual feelings about it as a man always has had. Hooking up, unromantic as it is, reflects the fact that a strong woman now makes her own choices about how she wants to live and with whom she feels like sleeping at the moment; and she needn’t proceed to Relationship or to Emotional Intimacy as if she were a young girl of long ago, warding off her sexual urges until that relationship takes hold.
What I worry about isn’t grown women dating again after a long time, but your daughters and granddaughters. Here’s why.
Of all the things this new paradigm has going against it, it’s still men who decide whom to see AFTER the hooking up and hanging out (yes, still). It’s still women who get the bad reputation for hooking up too often (yes, still). And for college women, one holdover reflects the very worst part of the old paradigm: In coed dorms, where the whole notion of hooking up and hanging out began and continues to flourish, it’s women who can’t stand the mess men leave and do the cleaning up. Yes, still. It’s women doing the laundry and making the breakfast. Women washing men’s sweatsocks and sweatshirts. Women vacuuming the rooms, changing the sheets, putting flowers around. Women trying to bring some elegance and charm to their newfound lives of sexual equality. Why? Because that’s the way it works. Yes, still.
Hooking up was supposed to free everyone from the tangle and the work of relationships by allowing them sex with no strings. But this goddess has spoken to many people hooking up and hanging out, and the women are stuck in a time warp. So beware: The equality part is great. The age-old drudgery part, not so.
Do you agree?
-TLG
Like all savvy goddesses, the Love Goddess has her own blog, which you can visit by clicking here.























23 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Chrome Toe,
I agree completely with you and with love goddess. I’ve seen the same with children in late teens and twenties who have been disgusted by this culture. They’d hoped for something different (and it was different at their high school)—not so in college. None of them I’ve seen. Some are worse than others, sure. The mix of hooking up and alcohol (usually the two go in combination) aren’t doing anyone any favors. Seems most rarely even remember the sex they have. It’s something to "get over with and quickly" and somehow this is seen by many females as "feminism." No. Not so. It’s as if "we are liberated enough now to objectify ourselves." They missed the whole meaning. Very sad. Play right into the boys’ games—not grounding for these females in femaleness—only "maleness" which yes, still dominates. But as long as young females don’t get this they will fall into the trap. Yes, still using their bodies (calling it liberation) but hoping to be "loved." More consciousness raising is needed. Spread the word. It’s not about prudishness but about caring for oneself.
Belinda,
Yes, it’s true. Very very little (if any) dating or romance. It’s drunken screwing as if intimacy is the most frightening thing on earth. NOT casual sex as we might remember it—at least we did remember it. In too many cases now, the girls have no idea if they gave consent or were raped. Often when they are aware of "whom" they did it with (if the boy is not "cool") they are mortified and will call "rape." Which is awful for women who are truly raped—clearly raped. To think feminism is whatever the worst of the boys do is to miss the point altogether. Pass on to all young girls you know.
Also, the boys don’t have to do a thing (as in asking a girl out)—the girls tend to get desperate and throw themselves on the boys anyway, servicing them (often in bars) and getting nothing (the girls) for themselves even. Yes, we’ve failed them somehow in terms of any understanding of healthy feminism which does include strong self-esteem and critical thinking.
Not all students are into this scene, but it dominates. Those who aren’t into it either fall into the "college marriage" (past going steady too but not literally getting married but not dating anyone else—ever)…there IS no dating. Hardly any dances even.
And the dancing—most often, grinding…not dancing. It’s sad, really. Educate the girls. And no, not to be prudes, not the point (or not my point.)
One girl I know at one major university just starting asking guys out (on dates) and didn’t get drunk and screw them either…typical dates. She never got turned down for a date. A girl like that is bold. Yes, it would be nice if the boys would ask girls out too, but if not, this girl took the present situation and turned it into a major smart move for herself.