Post | 05/16/2008 9:15 am

Lunching with Lance Armstrong

Liz Smith

This week of May, we had another get-together in the famed Michael’s restaurant, put together by media king Joe Armstrong. We were the envy of everyone because the other people in the restaurant saw us at the big middle table in the window. They didn’t realize we could hardly hear a thing anybody was saying. (After Joe helped make Michael’s famous, the restaurant added another 20 tables!) We had Joe’s famous cowboy boot signed by Willie Nelson sitting on the table filled with the ubiquitous yellow roses. (Yes, yes, a few of us present had been born or raised in Texas.)

The guest of honor was none other than bike champ Lance Armstrong, sandwiched between two of ABC’s hottest babes — Diane Sawyer and Cynthia McFadden. The rest of us were just supernumeraries. There was: the kingpin, Joe himself; your Liz; Newsweek’s perspicacious editor Jon Meacham; “60 Minutes” ace Steve Kroft; Lance’s president in charge of Livestrong, Doug Ulman; and Sports Illustrated editor Terry McDonnell.

Photo by Jimi Celeste

Jon Meacham, Liz Smith, Joe Armstrong, Lance Armstrong, Diane Sawyer, Cynthia McFadden, Terry McDonnell, Doug Ulman and Steve Kroft in Michael’s window

Lance and Doug, who are both cancer survivors, have been traveling like crazy all over the U.S., advancing their big cause, which is to cure cancer on a wholesale scale. They told us that they have sold 72 million of the Livestrong yellow bracelets and editor Meacham notes that he had put the rubber memento on the cover of his magazine as a symbol in the cancer fight.

I will tell you more about this great cause another time because, while I heard most of the gossip exchanged at the table, I couldn’t quite get down all the nuts and bolts of the Livestrong effort. All I know so far is that Lance is a champion guy and Doug seems to be another one and they are smart, dedicated and determined to wipe out cancer in the world, affording equal treatment, time and research to one and all of us. (Believe me — the FDA, which oversees medical outcomes in America, did not come in for good PR at this get-together.)

American politicians who merely give lip service to this enormous needy cause better be careful because I think they “mess” with Lance and Doug at their peril!

P.S. The last time Joe Armstrong arranged a photo in this restaurant, Joe, Diane and I had Bill Clinton, Ann Richards, Billy Crystal and Robin Williams with us. A photographer for the New York Post whizzed in and snapped us without permission and that picture went around the world. This time, we hired our own photographer.

Note: Click here on this text to read my nationally syndicated daily column.



  

Life in the Little Lane: Edith Ann on RiddlesFace to Face with the Weak Dollar

27 Reader Comments (so far…)

James Gemmell

A good cause, for sure. My mother died of lung cancer. Thanks for the article.

By James Gemmell on 05/16/2008 10:02 am
Alessan O

American politicans who give lip service to this cause, which ones? Lance was just in DC with Elizabeth Edwards and others talking to a committee headed by Ted Kennedy, I watched, it was on C-Span, are you saying Ted Kennedy is giving lip service to the cancer cause?

By Alessan O on 05/16/2008 11:56 am
Bella Mia

The research will teach us, but people will still be choosing poor behavior - some figuring- ‘well now that there is a cure for lung cancer - I’m not as worried about smoking,’ etc. It’s called risk homeostasis: increasing risky behavior when someone believes there is a lesser chance of suffering the full consequences - like death.

Have you all been following the alcohol-cancer connection stories?
“Alcohol boosts cancer risk by 75%.”
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/05/08/2238459.htm

“Assistant Health Minister Verity Firth says the risks of excessive drinking are well known, but the report shows even moderate drinking can be dangerous.

“What this report shows us is that it really only has to be two standard drinks a day before you increase your chances of developing breast cancer by up to 22 per cent,” she said.

“So it really is seen as linking what was previously seen as quite moderate levels of alcohol intake to severely increasing risks of cancer.”

Ms Firth says people need to reconsider their alcohol intake.”

My brother-in-law died a very horrible and painful death of bowel cancer at age 64. He drank moderately.

By Bella Mia on 05/16/2008 12:33 pm
CAROLINE MuLVEY

With out getting into the ugly story, as soon as I found out that I had to have 90% of my colon removed ( it turned into a rubber band) I have not had a single drink not even a wine cooler. My doctor warned me of alcohol hurting the bowel that I had left. At the same time my Husband has given up any kind of drinking even a beer after doing the yard work.

By CAROLINE MuLVEY on 05/16/2008 1:12 pm
Elizabeth Bennett

A member of my family died of complications from testicular cancer. Basically he would not have died if he had not been disqualified for affordable health insurance because he was a cancer survivor. I do not think we will truly conquer cancer until we have universal health care. Earl Warren [a Republican] ran on a campaign for universal health care in 1948.

I am glad Lance Armstrong is working for a cure for cancer. But even cancer that is curable is not being cured in this country. This is a disgrace.

By Elizabeth Bennett on 05/16/2008 4:23 pm
Bella Mia

After my father had a brain tumor removed, he was placed on subsidized health insurance through a partnership of the state of California, and I think it was BLue Cross. His premium was only $140/mo. - which he felt was entirely reasonable for pretty good coverage.

By Bella Mia on 05/18/2008 10:00 pm
mary lou s

the planets AND stars aligned for me when i got uterine cancer. medicare meant i had health insurance, and if you are going to have cancer, you may well come to ann arbor, my home, to get it treated.

unlike gilda radner, i had symptoms (postmenopausal bleeding) and therefore caught the cancer at an early stage. my friends and family all rallied around me, and the surgery was a success. (at the hospital they kept asking for my surgery history, and i kept telling them my only previous surgery was a cervical cauterization 30 years ago.)

one big reason for the success of my recovery was a robin’s nest at floor level (3rd floor) in a maple tree. i kept watching the robins tend the nest and then the young. they were my example and inspiration.

the moral of the story is: CATCH YOUR CANCER EARLY!!! then, get treatment!

By mary lou s on 05/16/2008 4:50 pm
C A Rose

Mary Lou, Early Dx + Early Trtmnt = Better Survival Chances. I’ve had cancer(s) since 1989. That’s 7 Primary Sites with no mets. I’m still alive because I get my check-ups, and I have excellent Specialists who help me decide to make the right choices. I had a friend who was facing Stage IV breast cancer and couldn’t get enough assistance in her state to keep her on her permanent need for chemo as maintenance. I get the Lance Armstrong Newsletter and they do more than just raise money for research. They have a whole team that helps poor people fight the system and helps them find the public services available to stay alive. Literally overnight after she contacted them they were there for her with names and places…so she didn’t have to live in her car while trying to stay on her chemo regimen. I was amazed at how talented the group working on these issues were, and how far reaching their resources were. A lot of times people forget that just getting the dx and then treatment involves coordination with so many agencies, and follow-up or a lifetime of maintenance treatment requires a lot of $$ and people to make it happen. That is the arm of the Lance Armstrong Foundation that blew me away. It was literally one call and when they called back they had a plan. That is paramount for someone who doesn’t have medical insurance, and needs help to break through the BS. If you have never been poor, without insurance, and get dx’d with a life threatening disease, you really don’t know how hard every day can be. Lance and his team are making a difference in many ways to help battle cancer. I keep a supply of Yellow Livestrong Bracelets on hand because rarely does a day go by that I don’t meet someone who is fighting the battle and is grateful for that symbol of hope.

By C A Rose on 05/18/2008 3:34 am
mary lou s

elizabeth, you are SO RIGHT about our nation needing universal healthcare. and if we create a single payer system, $350 billion of expensive insurance infighting and profit taking stops becoming an expense (i know i can say it better than that: single payer eliminates $350 billion in administrative costs). per year.

By mary lou s on 05/16/2008 4:59 pm
Elizabeth Bennett

Wow, if you divide that by the US population, about 300 million, that is over $1100 per year in reduced cost— or improved benefits. That is a stunning figure. I knew it was high, but wow oh wow!

By Elizabeth Bennett on 05/17/2008 1:39 am
Elizabeth Bennett

I meant over $1100 per person, per year. I should not post late at night; I always leave something out.

By Elizabeth Bennett on 05/17/2008 11:38 am
Alessan O

Single payer is too expensive and only helps the Insurance companies get richer. Universal Healthcare that covers everyone is the way to go, and saves the country money. Stop the
occupation of Iraq, and save billions of dollars to be put into Universal healthcare for Americans, especially people who cannot afford to pay their insurance, after losing their jobs.

By Alessan O on 05/17/2008 7:47 pm
mary lou s

alessan, single payer and universal healthcare are not mutually exclusive. to me, they are the same future thing. but in the present, medicare applies only to 65+ year olds and formally acknowledged disabled. the government messed up medicare a couple of years ago with part d, thus increasing everybody’s premium. i don’t know if citizens of canada, england or france pay a health premium tax, but we on medicare do. at least some congressfolk want to create the proviso that government can negotiate drug costs, which the medicare d plan expressly prohibited. the veteran’s administration can and does negotiate drug costs.

By mary lou s on 05/17/2008 9:45 pm
Elizabeth Bennett

Single payer pretty much eliminates the insurance companies. That is why the insurance company lobbyists in D.C. won’t let it happen. That is why it saves $350 billion a year. Here is a web site about it. http://www.pnhp.org/news/press_releases.php Most doctors want this type of health care plan.

By Elizabeth Bennett on 05/17/2008 10:08 pm
mary lou s

elizabeth, thanks for the follow-up and link. from your link i got this link, which may explain my point with more authority: http://www.pnhp.org/news/2005/november/1_in_5_health_care_d.php

those poor people whose health costs exceed their resources! my heart goes out to them. it could have been me.

By mary lou s on 05/18/2008 9:14 pm