Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Mary Wells | 07/14/2008 11:00 am

The Truth About 'Mad Men' Told by a Real-Life 'Mad' Woman

Advertising Great Mary Wells takes a good hard look at AMC’s Golden Globe-winning hit ‘Mad Men’ and tells us what the glory days of advertising were really like.
Courtesy of Wells Rich Greene

Question: Is the advertising business really full of collegiate WASPs who do nothing but talk about sex and drink while holding a cigarette in each hand?

Ye gods no. "Mad Men" is a smartly written and juicy sitcom about personalities and their relationships – and it is highly addictive. But you could pick up the whole pack of those boys and girls in "Mad Men" and drop them into the old "Sopranos" set or into a hedge fund or change the name to "Desperate Husbands" and drop them into that. Enjoy it, lust for Don Draper if he’s your type, but don’t imagine it’s about advertising. Even in the early ’50s, when America had things to buy again after the war and it was easy to sell almost anything, there was fierce competition among agencies – and people worked their heads off. In agency creative departments, we were smothered with research to help us find the perfect sales line or jingle for our clients. It took until the late ’50s, though, for the Jews with their great imaginations and dramatic writing skills and the powerhouse Italian artists to join up, take over and make advertising the preferred entertainment.

Even before 1960 the agency world was glued to the new-wave movies by Visconti, Fellini, Antonioni, Truffaut, Godard, Orson Welles, Stanley Kubrick, to Mike Nichols and Elaine May, to the Group Theatre and Elia Kazan and Marlon Brando. And do you remember when the movie “The Graduate” happened? And the Beatles – we had a Beatles-wave in America. I remember the shock when they first appeared on American television. By 1960, it was as if the world had handed authority for the future over to the young and talented.  

Click here to see photos from Mary Wells’s early advertising days.

Advertising is always part of the front line. We watched with appreciation when David Ogilvy smartened things up. But when Bill Bernbach joined the creative revolution with a new agency that based free and courageous thinking on extraordinary talent, it seemed as if half of New York got in line and applied for a job with him.

I miss the glamour in our work ... It is glamorous to be on the front line of change the way advertising so often is and was, especially, in 1960.  

What a breakthrough time that was! The fierce competition among advertising agencies for accounts became a fierce competition among talented people for stardom. The lust we felt those days was not about sex – although there is always a string of sex running through every business of every era. By 1960 the "big lust" you felt as a creative operator in the film, theater, music, dance, book and advertising world was for yourself – your desire was to be a star, to make a difference, to be the one that threw out the old ways and brought in thrilling new ways. You lusted to be FAMOUS for a great campaign, a great song, a great movie – to walk down the street knowing you had taken something unimportant and made it vital to millions of people. If you could have such a success, oh, what a thrill you were to yourself as well as to others. None of that dazzling period is in "Mad Men." Though it would make a great show, too.

Click here for some fun-to-remember campaigns from Jack Tinker & Partners and Wells Rich Greene.

The women’s movement was gathering speed then and there were many strong and aggressive and successful female talents in the advertising revolution – believe me, secretaries were not coffee carriers and a large percentage of agencies were comprised of women! Just one example:  Phyllis Robinson at Doyle Dane Bernbach was a wonderful copy chief and co-creative head with Bill – and the first person I know of who understood that advertising on early television was flat like a newspaper or a magazine and needed to become dimensional; it needed to become theater. I was working at Doyle Dane then and Phyllis and Bob Gage brought a new dimension to Polaroid television advertising. I remember promising myself that one day I would have an agency that made advertising as emotional as movies, advertising that would make people feel deeply about the product or service we were selling, advertising that would make people feel nervous if they hadn’t tried it.

72 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

James the Game
Advertising today fails to promote togetherness and the idealism of the 1960’s. It’s all about consumerism, the myth that having more, more, more will lead to happiness.
By James the Game on 07/14/2008 10:26 am
Emcye Edwards
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2008/07/17/VI20080717 (A photo shoot of former ad execs promoting the show.)
By Emcye Edwards on 07/21/2008 2:12 pm
Bella Mia
I’d like to teach the world to sing - was about selling Coke, raw consumerism, not togetherness. Competitiveness in the marketplace has allowed the genius of the swarm, identified in Swarm theory, to identify the most beneficial and creative products. Notice the swarm towards healthier drinks than soda. Often advertising is behind the curve of the swarm instead of leading the swarm. Read more about Swarm Theory from the national geographic original article: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2007/07/swarms/miller-text Who do I see to deprogram my mind from some of the those jingles that have taken up permanent lodging?
By Bella Mia on 07/14/2008 10:41 am
Bella Mia
PS. When I look through fashion magazines with my daughters and we check out the the thousand-dollar-plus shoes and purses and dresses, I remind them: The people selling them are using your money to buy real estate. Skip the shoes and purses, and buy the real estate yourselves. (Actually, we know 2 people who just bought real estate. It’s a good time to get a great deal on a house, especially in California that has more foreclosures that 40 other states combined.)
By Bella Mia on 07/14/2008 10:46 am
No Way-No How -No McCain
Wow, Bella Mia. YThanks for the Swarm piece…love it. I was predicting this when people were taking out heavy-weight mortgages to buy McMansions, but hadn’t read that CA leads the nation on foreclosures. That’s not good.
By No Way-No How -No McCain on 07/14/2008 11:26 am
James the Game
Maybe so, but it still portrayed a “together” theme. The Swarm theory has brought us all kinds of chemicals, additives, sugars and every other kind of harmful product McDonald’s, et al., can throw in there with an addicting effect.
By James the Game on 07/14/2008 11:27 am
Sandbee (FB) 54
That ad “I want More and I want it Now” - I don’t even know what they are selling but everytime I hear it, it reminds me of the problems that too many people are getting into nowadays. They want everything and they don’t want to wait until they can afford it.
By Sandbee (FB) 54 on 07/14/2008 11:17 am
rocky rocky
Ms. Wells: Thank you for your reminisces. I do like that show and, though my time was a bit later (mid 60s), it does evoke in me memories of what it was like to try to survive as a woman in the second half of that century. But I must say, it is shocking to hear you say “It took … the Jews … and the Italian[s] …” Not so much that you say it so baldly, but more about what you are saying. I’m trying to bring to mind what I know about that era: man in grey flannel suit, gentleman’s agreement, doris day, monroe, rose tatoo, fellini, the declaration of the independence of Israel, mccarthyism. It wasn’t a particularly enlightened time — no one had any idea that the whole society was on the cusp of embracing the concepts of diversity, inclusion, and equal opportunity. And it is true that being of Italian descent and/or Jewish put us on the outside in U.S. business and many social situations—and if included, often considered “exotic.” And of course just being a woman in business was a very difficult challenge. I suppose when Madison Ave doors began to open to all talented people, what you said is in fact what you saw. Perhaps the “Italians” and “Jews” found a foothold, but there were still so many so talented others kept in the shadows — and still our conversations about “immigrants” continue. I don’t know whether to cry or celebrate.
By rocky rocky on 07/14/2008 11:19 am
No Way-No How -No McCain
Rocky x2—“I must say, it is shocking to hear you say “It took … the Jews … and the Italian[s]” am trying to figure out why this is shocking. It’s pretty obvious that some cultures seem to have great affinity or talent in some areas than others, ie the French had the presumed ‘wine gene’ and lock on winemaking until 1976. Out of 70 winemaking nations and though they are a relatively small country with less than twice the population of CA they still have a monster lead on production. That Italians are stylish etc isn’t news, is it? I was very surprised once to be dating very successful wine importer and when we drove by the Jonathan Club (one of the leading men’s clubs in the country) in downtown LA and I mentioned than my former husband was a member, he responded that he gave wine talks there but couldn’t be a member because he is Jewish. I had no idea. This was in the 80s in LA…not the 50s-60s and was absolutely bowled-over learning that.
By No Way-No How -No McCain on 07/14/2008 11:41 am
rocky rocky
Winery L. — Your question is so huge. I don’t know how to respond. I have to work now, so may I think about it? Perhaps when I am able to get back here, someone else who had the same (or similar) reaction as I might have an answer or two. If not, I’ll be working on it. Best, RR
By rocky rocky on 07/14/2008 12:02 pm
No Way-No How -No McCain
Isn’t that true Rocky. So much is huge and little time….I’ve been not sleeping for a week getting a project done (related to Batman! So lots of fun thinking about that! Never noticed Batman before and now totally enthralled). I do think it’s interesting that so much of the Great American songbook written by Jewish men. So little time to explore all the complex origins and whys of things.
By No Way-No How -No McCain on 07/14/2008 12:29 pm
rocky rocky
Hi Winery L. Been thinking all day about our original interchange. Here’s what I’ve come up with. Tell me how I’ve done (agreement not required): I was thinking about a bunch of high-minded reasons why I was so surprised … but I think the real reason is I’m used to “political correctness.” It was a very blunt and unapologetic statement. Perhaps even impudent. It popped out (to me) because I sincerely believe that a person’s religion has nothing to do with his or her creativity or ability in advertising — beyond the usual thanking God or praying for inspiration, that is. To find out for sure, I’d ask Young & Rubicam or Ogilvy or Ries & Trout if they would prefer their work to be known by their names or by their religions. And I do worry — that our society easily could fall back into old bad habits, if we are not diligent. When someone attributes talents and abilities (or lack of them) to a whole people and is not challenged, I worry that the next step is prelude to a pogrom or lynchings or all of us looking at the world from the inside of a burqa. The thing is when people stereotype each other and think only in broad generalizations, they cannot see the individual truth—about you or me or anyone else, even themselves. We are all guilty of it. Me, too. And that’s dangerous. Ask those who lived through WW II. As someone else on this site alluded: I often don’t know what I think until I try to write it down. So I thank you for so kindly asking me to explain. Did I? R.
By rocky rocky on 07/14/2008 9:24 pm
No Way-No How -No McCain
Rocky x2, “When someone attributes talents and abilities (or lack of them) to a whole people and is not challenged.” Good point, I just assume many Jewish people are very artistic because of my reference points, just as also think people from Middle East are often excellent engineers or that Chinese are great scientist, the Swiss manage their money, Russia produces great ballet stars, and California’s full of sun-kissed blond people. We make generalizations because people have a inborn survival instinct to ID ‘tribes.’ So I see your point. I’m kind of tried of too much PC….but you’re also right…we can’t slip back. You’re right…wOw is like an open-source diary that talks back. Love this vid “Together” sweet. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouk18F7eKFs My fav “tribe” today are the Millennials. Who probably wouldn’t let me in because I’m a Boomer. Not fair! I’m not like all Boomers. I’m one of them. Really! ;) “asking me to explain. Did I?” Yes you did! Thanks.
By No Way-No How -No McCain on 07/15/2008 1:59 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
I’m puzzled by your “Not so much that you say it so badly…” What do you mean by that exactly? How is Mary saying it badly? She’s stating facts.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 07/14/2008 12:47 pm
Gianna Bracco
Hi Phyllis … I don’t think she said “badly.” I think she said “baldly,” so I’m taking that as meaning very frankly, or something on that order?
By Gianna Bracco on 07/14/2008 1:03 pm