Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Entertainment | 10/31/2008 10:10 pm

Margo Howard and Roger Ebert Say to Erica Jong: Take a Vow of Silence, You’re no Norman Mailer

By Margo Howard and Roger Ebert

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Click here to read her column on Yahoo! Howard’s friend famed-film-critic Roger Ebert joined the opining for this column.

Dear, passé, clueless Erica Jong has shot off her mouth in Italy – apparently thinking she was talking only to Italians. She sounded absolutely nuts. Among the things she said to the Italian daily, Corriere della Sera:

1. If Obama loses, it will result in a second American Civil War. (!) 

2. Her friends, Ken Follett and Susan Cheever "are extremely worried." As if the discomfiture of these two worthies were not enough, she relates that "Naomi Wolf calls me every day." This would be the same Naomi Wolf who advised Gore to dress in earth tones … which, as we know, didn’t help a whole lot. And the afore-mentioned people are not the only fellow-sufferers. Jane Fonda e-mailed Jong that she cried all night and that the stress of it all was giving her back spasms. Her distress was so acute, Jong relates, that Fonda had no choice but to visit an acupuncturist and get an RX for Valium.

3. And getting back to the second American civil war, Jong opines, "Blood will run in the streets, believe me. And it’s not a coincidence that President Bush recalled soldiers from Iraq for Dick Cheney to lead against American citizens in the streets."

4. And I think the following is the most egocentric remark I have heard since I have been middle-aged. It has to do with her soi-disant fellow writers at the top ranks of American letters who are not doing anything to help Obama. "Tom Wolfe and John Updike are men of the right and Philip Roth is at this point a hermit who leads a monastic life in Connecticut, far from everything and everybody."

But all is not lost. She says she is still trooping the flag, and of course there is also Michael Chabon. The two of them she believes, have "taken the place of Susan Sontag and Norman Mailer respectively," because, she said, they have the same political sensibilities, "but a better sense of humor."

Forgive me, but I knew Norman Mailer … and you know the rest. As for appointing herself Susan Sontag, well, my advice to her would be to borrow some of Ms. Fonda’s Valium and take a nap, not to mention a vow of silence.

by Roger Ebert ebert_2.jpg

What is the matter with Erica Jong? Has she lost her mind? She’s raving like a right-wing nut about a "second civil war" if Obama loses. Where did she say this? In an interview with an Italian newspaper, possibly because no American newspaper gives a fart in a windstorm what she thinks about the election. So now the Italians have been warned.

A story in the New York Observer makes her sound scripted by the Onion. How will this Jong quote play with the paranoids on the right:
"Yesterday, Jane Fonda sent me an email to tell me that she cried all night and can’t cure her ailing back for all the stress that has reduced her to a bundle of nerves. My back is also suffering from spasms, so much so that I had to see an acupuncturist and get prescriptions for Valium."

Ohmigod! Spasms! Aimed like an arrow into Sarah Palin’s next speech.

But Jong will bravely fight at the barricades, despite her aching back. There are no other writers to do so. She goes on:
"Tom Wolfe and John Updike are men of the right and Philip Roth is at this point a hermit who leads a monastic life in Connecticut, far from everything and everybody."

Dire, although at least the monk is a great novelist, and keeps on writing. But wait, there is hope. The Observer reports: "Luckily, she said, there are her and Michael Chabon, who, she says, have ‘taken the place of Susan Sontag and Norman Mailer respectively’."

Nobody has taken their places. Nobody is ever gonna. Erica Jong is not even high on the "nobody’s gonna" list. If Susan Sontag had read that, she would have hurled. I loved Chabon’s New York Review convention coverage and his fiction. Erica Jong is known mostly for Fear of Flying. Now she should write Fear of Thinking.

Maybe the McCainists are correct, and the coasts are overpopulated with elitist feminist flywheels. We here in Illinois elected Senator Obama in such a landslide (70% - 27%) that the GOP saw it coming and had to hire a guy from out of state to run against him. We voted out of conviction, not as a cure for psychosomatic spasms.

555 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

C jay
If anyone followed your links, I’ll be sorely disappointed in this group of WowOWow Women! You are not a Conservative, your a Vaudeville opportunist.
By C jay on 11/02/2008 11:40 am
Sally K
I’m sorry, but everytime I see this picture with that honking big cigar, I don’t even read what the man says. All I can think of is what my Grandmother said about men who smoke cigars that big and what they’re compensating for, and I giggle.
By Sally K on 11/03/2008 11:11 am
Sally K
OK, I got past that cigar and watched the links; they were hysterical. As far as poor Erica Jong goes, she’s just sad. Too much time on her hands, perhaps? She needs a job or a hobby. Something, anything to get her out of that self-absorbed state.
By Sally K on 11/03/2008 1:24 pm
Mary NSB-Florida
Perhaps one of our major problems, especially for the last decade, has been the “ranting” from both sides. Not serious discussion… hysteria. Get a grip everyone and lower the decibels a few ranges to benefit all of us.
By Mary NSB-Florida on 11/01/2008 8:06 am
DeBúrca obj
Roger Ebert has been doing some great political commentary the past couple of years. As far as Jong goes… I think there is an element out there trying to stir things up and scare people and she appears to be part of that element. I wish they’d keep their negativity to themselves though. Although we can’t know if a few crazies would use the election to act out, my guess is that the day after the election will be about as eventful as January 1, 2000 was… with all its hype, with people storing water and can goods in their basements… it was pretty much the same as every New Year’s Day. However, if McCain loses I suspect a lot of his supporters who bought into the fearmongering will have a hard time supporting our new president… and I also suspect THAT is the GOP plan to undermine his administration. If Obma doesn’t win, his supporters will become very depressed and some of the young supporters will lose their enthusiasm for voting again. Although it will be hard to get behind McCain due to his behavior during the election, Obama didn’t spend the last few months trying to make his supporters hate and fear McCain, so McCain would have less to worry about as far as that goes. Personally, if Obama were to lose, I would not only be very disappointed at a wonderful opportunity missed by this country, but I would be extremely depressed and disillusioned that fear and smear triumphed yet again. THAT, I think, would be the worst of it.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 8:24 am
DeBúrca obj
typo “canned goods” lol
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 8:55 am
Diana T
DeB, You couldn’t have said it better. Thank you; it needed to be said. As for undermining administrations, that is exactly what the Gingrich republicans tried to do with Clinton, and succeeded a lot of the time. Remember when Clinton let the government shut down and his ratings went through the roof? If Obama doesn’t win, though, I agree with you that it will be a missed opportunity to turn this nation into a whole new and exciting era. I’ve been thinking a lot lately of Jackie Robinson. I am old enough to remember all of the publicity when he became the first black baseball player in the Major Leagues. Our teachers talked about it, and told us it was an historical moment. And, Jackie really had obstacles to face. He had to prove himself to his fellow players. He had to prove to the fans that he was a loyal, capable and classy guy. And, as time went on, he faced each obstacle with good natured optimism. Everybody loved Jackie Robinson, and he acknowledged in later life that he knew that someone had to be first, so he’d be the best example of “first” that he could be. I think Obama is the “Jackie Robinson” of politics. Somebody has to be the first black president, and he is determined to be the best “first” that he can be. If he gets elected, I think this country will be inspired once again to prove how great it really is.
By Diana T on 11/01/2008 10:06 am
DeBúrca obj
I like your analogy Diana!
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 12:14 pm
Diana T
Well, DeB, sooner or later, we will have a black president or a woman one. It is the first one out that will pave the way for the next ones, and then it will be considered perfectly normal. Jackie Robinson had a tough time when he first started and ended up being one of the most respected men in our country. Obama’s toughest job at first will be to prove himself and to overcome the myths of another race being the leader of the free world. It will be a huge challenge to overcome the unjustified fears that some of our citizens have (and you can see that fear in some of the posts on wow.). It takes a special personality and a even and consistent tempermant to do this, and I think he is the one to pave the way. Too bad that Sarah Palin has to be the woman to pave the way if McCain is elected. She has not the personality, the qualifications or the intellectual prowess that would be required. The most important element in this person who has to be the first one is to have the ability to convey confidence and trust in him/her.
By Diana T on 11/01/2008 12:31 pm
DeBúrca obj
Sarah Palin will be used as an excuse NOT to elect a woman if she manages to get into the Oval Office (which is what I think the plan of the Far Right, has been all along).
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 12:47 pm
DeBúrca obj
Let me explain the above post…. I don’t mean the Far Right intends Palin to be used against women getting elected… I think that would just be the result of her getting into the VP position then maybe even presidential position. The plan of the Right, I think, is to get her into that VP position knowing McCain won’t finish the term.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 12:50 pm
Ro H
Diana, It is unfortunate on one hand, that a woman still has to take second place to a man, albeit a man of color. On the other hand, it seems almost as if a “higher power” has had a hand in this election - Obama, in my opinion, is exactly what this country needs in order to take back our rights and constitutional law, and privileges, (like citizenship _ kind of intended as a form of truth in jest_). I was a Hillary supporter, I still am. However, I have been won over by Senator Obamas’ assurances, and specific directions for this nation. I can only see the good in it. Alas! Anyone who continues to write, talk, and in any wise form an opinion about death and assassination, and chaos, ought to be put on a remote island somewhere, to rethink their idiocy! There is absolutely no reason for putting those kinds of ideologies into the minds of the “crazies” around us - in or out, of this country! In my mind, it is nearly the same as the Palin tactics, which incited the crowds who were verbalizing hate speech and threats.
By Ro H on 11/01/2008 3:43 pm
Diana T
The thing is, Ro, that when you look at the teams advising Obama, they are the gold standard of their various specialties. People like Lawrence Summers, Paul Volcker and Warren Buffet. Sam Nunn, Dennis Ross and Richard Holbrooke. People who brought sensibility to government before the Bush/Cheney group of republicans took over. I think that you are absolutely spot on; he is exactly what this country needs… Let’s make sure to communicate on election night. Oh, the Economist Magazine will have a blog site and election results that night. Also, I think it is important to read their endorsement in this week’s magazine: http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displayStory.cfm?source=most…
By Diana T on 11/01/2008 3:55 pm
Ro H
Diane, I am one of the fortunate ones who lives in a state with absentee ballots, thus, I have already voted. I will repeat what I wrote on another post… if the Republicans win this election, we will know it is “fixed” yet again. In all the news, polls, info. everywhere I have heard or read, Obama is too far ahead to lose, at this point. Unless there is a huge landslide of new voters getting out to the polls - I doubt it.
By Ro H on 11/02/2008 3:11 pm
Diana T
I hope you are right, Ro; I won’t relax until it’s over. I felt the same way about Gore back in 2000, and we all know what happened there.
By Diana T on 11/02/2008 3:51 pm