Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Entertainment | 10/31/2008 10:10 pm

Margo Howard and Roger Ebert Say to Erica Jong: Take a Vow of Silence, You’re no Norman Mailer

By Margo Howard and Roger Ebert

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Click here to read her column on Yahoo! Howard’s friend famed-film-critic Roger Ebert joined the opining for this column.

Dear, passé, clueless Erica Jong has shot off her mouth in Italy – apparently thinking she was talking only to Italians. She sounded absolutely nuts. Among the things she said to the Italian daily, Corriere della Sera:

1. If Obama loses, it will result in a second American Civil War. (!) 

2. Her friends, Ken Follett and Susan Cheever "are extremely worried." As if the discomfiture of these two worthies were not enough, she relates that "Naomi Wolf calls me every day." This would be the same Naomi Wolf who advised Gore to dress in earth tones … which, as we know, didn’t help a whole lot. And the afore-mentioned people are not the only fellow-sufferers. Jane Fonda e-mailed Jong that she cried all night and that the stress of it all was giving her back spasms. Her distress was so acute, Jong relates, that Fonda had no choice but to visit an acupuncturist and get an RX for Valium.

3. And getting back to the second American civil war, Jong opines, "Blood will run in the streets, believe me. And it’s not a coincidence that President Bush recalled soldiers from Iraq for Dick Cheney to lead against American citizens in the streets."

4. And I think the following is the most egocentric remark I have heard since I have been middle-aged. It has to do with her soi-disant fellow writers at the top ranks of American letters who are not doing anything to help Obama. "Tom Wolfe and John Updike are men of the right and Philip Roth is at this point a hermit who leads a monastic life in Connecticut, far from everything and everybody."

But all is not lost. She says she is still trooping the flag, and of course there is also Michael Chabon. The two of them she believes, have "taken the place of Susan Sontag and Norman Mailer respectively," because, she said, they have the same political sensibilities, "but a better sense of humor."

Forgive me, but I knew Norman Mailer … and you know the rest. As for appointing herself Susan Sontag, well, my advice to her would be to borrow some of Ms. Fonda’s Valium and take a nap, not to mention a vow of silence.

by Roger Ebert ebert_2.jpg

What is the matter with Erica Jong? Has she lost her mind? She’s raving like a right-wing nut about a "second civil war" if Obama loses. Where did she say this? In an interview with an Italian newspaper, possibly because no American newspaper gives a fart in a windstorm what she thinks about the election. So now the Italians have been warned.

A story in the New York Observer makes her sound scripted by the Onion. How will this Jong quote play with the paranoids on the right:
"Yesterday, Jane Fonda sent me an email to tell me that she cried all night and can’t cure her ailing back for all the stress that has reduced her to a bundle of nerves. My back is also suffering from spasms, so much so that I had to see an acupuncturist and get prescriptions for Valium."

Ohmigod! Spasms! Aimed like an arrow into Sarah Palin’s next speech.

But Jong will bravely fight at the barricades, despite her aching back. There are no other writers to do so. She goes on:
"Tom Wolfe and John Updike are men of the right and Philip Roth is at this point a hermit who leads a monastic life in Connecticut, far from everything and everybody."

Dire, although at least the monk is a great novelist, and keeps on writing. But wait, there is hope. The Observer reports: "Luckily, she said, there are her and Michael Chabon, who, she says, have ‘taken the place of Susan Sontag and Norman Mailer respectively’."

Nobody has taken their places. Nobody is ever gonna. Erica Jong is not even high on the "nobody’s gonna" list. If Susan Sontag had read that, she would have hurled. I loved Chabon’s New York Review convention coverage and his fiction. Erica Jong is known mostly for Fear of Flying. Now she should write Fear of Thinking.

Maybe the McCainists are correct, and the coasts are overpopulated with elitist feminist flywheels. We here in Illinois elected Senator Obama in such a landslide (70% - 27%) that the GOP saw it coming and had to hire a guy from out of state to run against him. We voted out of conviction, not as a cure for psychosomatic spasms.

555 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Frannie Em
Diana Great post, well put.
By Frannie Em on 11/02/2008 4:03 pm
Dona Howlett
Diana, Perfect……………
By Dona Howlett on 11/03/2008 4:33 am
EKA -
I am coming to this thread very late because I have always dislikes Erica Jong, but thought I should see what is worth 400 posts ! I’ve been thinking about Jackie Robinson also, and one of the things that set him apart, according to Doris Kearns Goodwin, was his amazing temperament, that he was probably, because of that temperament, the only one who could have survived what he went through as a trailblazer. I totally agree with you about Barack having the same temperament, which he has showed already, and which he will need in spades. We are about to enter unknown territory, with the perfect person to lead us through.
By EKA - on 11/03/2008 2:33 pm
Diana T
EKA, You are so correct; the even temperament and the fact that Jackie Robinson was such a Class Act. It is that type of person that we need so much now to lead us into unchartered territory. Not to mention the fact that Obama is in the right age category, the age of Now and The Future. If we can’t venture into inventiion and aspirations when we need to do it so much, I really think we are heading for a decline, which I also hear Tom Friedman sadly say to Charlie Rose when he was on a few weeks ago promoting his book. I just read on CNN that Obama’s grandmother died this afternoon. I have always said that when it comes to death, dying and parents/grandparents that one must follow their instincts and go to them when they get that gut feeling. I know he is glad he took the time out to see her one last time.
By Diana T on 11/03/2008 4:34 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Here’s a link to Erica’s piece on Huff. Post re: possible voter fraud: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/erica-jong/podunk-dogpatch-politics_b_1393…
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 11/01/2008 11:18 am
DeBúrca obj
I’m confused. The Erica Jong piece in Huffington Post doesn’t say anything about an American Civil War (unless I missed that part), it’s about protection against voter fraud. Is this a different piece than the one being discussed in this thread?
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 12:34 pm
Margo Howard
Hellloo. These are two different pieces. The one Roger and I wrote about was an interview given to an Italian newspaper.
By Margo Howard on 11/01/2008 2:10 pm
DeBúrca obj
Thank you for clearing up my confusion! Her Huffington Post piece was good though, don’t you think? At least it gave some good suggestions that might help prevent some election fraud. I don’t know if I want to read the Italian one though, it doesn’t sound like it adds anything positive or hopeful to the discussion, and at the moment I am too anxious about the outcome of this election to read any more “be afraid” scenarios, from either side of the fence!
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 2:33 pm
Liza Donnelly
She’s a humorist! I don’t doubt she’s scared, as many of us are. But is she not known to dramatize for comedic effect? That’s what I think. As always, in her humor there is truth.
By Liza Donnelly on 11/01/2008 8:27 am
Buh- Bye
agreed!
By Buh- Bye on 11/01/2008 10:58 am
C jay
You took the words right out of my slow, DST mouth! Thank you, My Alias, et al. Who the heck cares what Ebert has to say about anything. BASTA. We are grown up, self-actualizing women and we can think for ourselves. Bring on the real news, please. *pass that coffee once against, too*
By C jay on 11/02/2008 11:38 am
Dee T
Why live in fear when we can live in HOPE? Let’s seek the positive track for this country; the progressive track. Instead of a civil war, let’s have civil liberty for ALL Americans, all colors, all religions, all socio-economic backgrounds, all walks of life. We can respect and embrace diversity, working together for the country as a whole. This is the message of Barak Obama. Take a look at the film from his rallies and see the diversity in the crowds. Awesome. Then take a look at film from McCain’s rallies or Palin’s. Diversity? Minimal.
By Dee T on 11/01/2008 8:34 am
Buh- Bye
yes, then take a look at the fact that he pays his female staff 83 cents on his man dollar.
By Buh- Bye on 11/01/2008 2:22 pm
DeBúrca obj
First of all, that little piece of spin has been disproven so many times I just advise you to let it drop. Secondly… if we want to talk about the pay of women in the two campaigns, well, McCain blew the top out of the curve on that one by making the highest paid person in his campaign the woman who applies Palin’s stage make up.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 2:39 pm
Carolyn K
Excuse me, but how is this better? Do you really think that the person who applies Palin’s stage make up deserves to be the highest paid person in his campaign man or woman? If this is true, then it seems to back up the notion that he knows little about the economics of merit pay. Can you really trust someone like this to stimulate the economy so it creates good paying jobs?
By Carolyn K on 11/01/2008 3:10 pm