Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Entertainment | 10/31/2008 10:10 pm

Margo Howard and Roger Ebert Say to Erica Jong: Take a Vow of Silence, You’re no Norman Mailer

By Margo Howard and Roger Ebert

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Click here to read her column on Yahoo! Howard’s friend famed-film-critic Roger Ebert joined the opining for this column.

Dear, passé, clueless Erica Jong has shot off her mouth in Italy – apparently thinking she was talking only to Italians. She sounded absolutely nuts. Among the things she said to the Italian daily, Corriere della Sera:

1. If Obama loses, it will result in a second American Civil War. (!) 

2. Her friends, Ken Follett and Susan Cheever "are extremely worried." As if the discomfiture of these two worthies were not enough, she relates that "Naomi Wolf calls me every day." This would be the same Naomi Wolf who advised Gore to dress in earth tones … which, as we know, didn’t help a whole lot. And the afore-mentioned people are not the only fellow-sufferers. Jane Fonda e-mailed Jong that she cried all night and that the stress of it all was giving her back spasms. Her distress was so acute, Jong relates, that Fonda had no choice but to visit an acupuncturist and get an RX for Valium.

3. And getting back to the second American civil war, Jong opines, "Blood will run in the streets, believe me. And it’s not a coincidence that President Bush recalled soldiers from Iraq for Dick Cheney to lead against American citizens in the streets."

4. And I think the following is the most egocentric remark I have heard since I have been middle-aged. It has to do with her soi-disant fellow writers at the top ranks of American letters who are not doing anything to help Obama. "Tom Wolfe and John Updike are men of the right and Philip Roth is at this point a hermit who leads a monastic life in Connecticut, far from everything and everybody."

But all is not lost. She says she is still trooping the flag, and of course there is also Michael Chabon. The two of them she believes, have "taken the place of Susan Sontag and Norman Mailer respectively," because, she said, they have the same political sensibilities, "but a better sense of humor."

Forgive me, but I knew Norman Mailer … and you know the rest. As for appointing herself Susan Sontag, well, my advice to her would be to borrow some of Ms. Fonda’s Valium and take a nap, not to mention a vow of silence.

by Roger Ebert ebert_2.jpg

What is the matter with Erica Jong? Has she lost her mind? She’s raving like a right-wing nut about a "second civil war" if Obama loses. Where did she say this? In an interview with an Italian newspaper, possibly because no American newspaper gives a fart in a windstorm what she thinks about the election. So now the Italians have been warned.

A story in the New York Observer makes her sound scripted by the Onion. How will this Jong quote play with the paranoids on the right:
"Yesterday, Jane Fonda sent me an email to tell me that she cried all night and can’t cure her ailing back for all the stress that has reduced her to a bundle of nerves. My back is also suffering from spasms, so much so that I had to see an acupuncturist and get prescriptions for Valium."

Ohmigod! Spasms! Aimed like an arrow into Sarah Palin’s next speech.

But Jong will bravely fight at the barricades, despite her aching back. There are no other writers to do so. She goes on:
"Tom Wolfe and John Updike are men of the right and Philip Roth is at this point a hermit who leads a monastic life in Connecticut, far from everything and everybody."

Dire, although at least the monk is a great novelist, and keeps on writing. But wait, there is hope. The Observer reports: "Luckily, she said, there are her and Michael Chabon, who, she says, have ‘taken the place of Susan Sontag and Norman Mailer respectively’."

Nobody has taken their places. Nobody is ever gonna. Erica Jong is not even high on the "nobody’s gonna" list. If Susan Sontag had read that, she would have hurled. I loved Chabon’s New York Review convention coverage and his fiction. Erica Jong is known mostly for Fear of Flying. Now she should write Fear of Thinking.

Maybe the McCainists are correct, and the coasts are overpopulated with elitist feminist flywheels. We here in Illinois elected Senator Obama in such a landslide (70% - 27%) that the GOP saw it coming and had to hire a guy from out of state to run against him. We voted out of conviction, not as a cure for psychosomatic spasms.

555 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

C Hardy
Mrs. DeB I mean that and much more…I was just wondering b/c I was listening to NPR the other morning and they had two ladies speak, can’t remember their names, but one was from McCain and one was from Obama camps…The McCain lady said that Obama’s plan to share the wealth would be like if you went into a restaurant and got great service from the waitress but then took her tip outside and gave it to the homeless man sitting on the street…I guess I had never heard anyone break it down that way? You being as knowledgable as you are I wanted to ask you and that is NOT meant in a smart a$$ way…I respect your opinions.
By C Hardy on 11/02/2008 9:17 pm
DeBúrca obj
I’ve heard the analogy of the restaurant worker and it is an attempt by the McCain spin-mill at trying to paint Obama’s tax plan as Socialism. I suspect that woman first heard it on one of the Right Wing talking head shows like Hannity or O’Reilly. It’s spin. I pasted an article I just read today about this below (or above, wherever it happened to land!)
By DeBúrca obj on 11/02/2008 9:23 pm
DeBúrca obj
If you are concerned about a transfer of wealth, the Wall Street Bailout is the biggest corporate welfare bailout in our history. And while we are discussing fairness, check out this article by Clarence Page: OBAMA’S TAX PLAN AND MCCAIN’S FANTASY Tax policy is worth a serious debate. It’s too bad that we’re not hearing it. Instead McCain, his running mate Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and some of their most prominent supporters are touting Joe, hoping voters are too dense to know the difference between a three-point rise in the top marginal tax rate and the threat of a Marxist takeover. Politics often is called “show business for ugly people” because both blur the lines between fact and fantasy. Enter Joe the Plumber, who presents the image of a man burdened by government, even when he isn’t. Wurzelbacher asked Obama why he should have to pay more taxes if he buys the business he hopes to buy. Obama’s plan calls for families that earn more than $250,000 a year to pay higher taxes. That’s about 5 percent of the population and way above what most plumbers make. “My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody,” Obama explained. “I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.” McCain, Palin and their allies have spread that spread-the-wealth-around phrase around as though it were excerpted from “The Communist Manifesto.” “His economic policies are clearly those that have been used by other countries that you could describe as socialist,” McCain said in a Miami radio interview last week. “I mean redistribution of wealth, take money from one group, give it to others is fundamental principle of some of these quote ‘socialist’ countries.” Oh? Viewed in that way, Obama’s not alone among Americans who want to give lower- and middle-income folks a break. Get a load of this quote: “Look, here’s what I really believe: That when you are, when you reach a certain level of comfort, there’s nothing wrong with paying somewhat more. But at the same time it shouldn’t be totally out of proportion.” Yes, McCain said that in October 2000 at Michigan State University during Chris Matthews’ MSNBC Hardball College Tour. He was responding to a student who wanted to know whether we were “getting closer and closer to socialism and stuff” when “someone like my father who goes to school for 13 years gets penalized in a huge tax bracket because he’s a doctor.” Or how about this McCain quote in 2001, according to CNN’s Fact Check: “I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle-class Americans who most need tax relief.” But now that Obama wants to remove that tax cut from the top 5 percent of earners, McCain defends the Bush cuts against Obama’s “socialism.” And when Fox’s Chris Wallace asked McCain if his vote for the recent $700 billion Wall Street bailout, which is being used partially to nationalize American banks, isn’t socialism, McCain said no. “That,” he responded, “is reacting to a crisis that is due to greed and excess in Washington.” Right. But, if relief for working people is socialist but a rescue for careless banks is not, where does one draw the line? The issue is fairness. Americans have long supported a progressive income tax. That means you try to give lower-income earners a break without getting carried away with the burdens you put on the rich. Joe the Plumber favors a flat tax, but even two-time Republican presidential candidate Steve Forbes, the publisher who made a flat tax his central issue, proposed exempting low-income earners. Forbes hardly views himself as a “redistributionist.” He’s only trying to be a realist. The public believes in tax fairness. The hard part is getting our political leaders to talk seriously about it.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/02/2008 9:19 pm
Irish Eyes NY
Hi Eleanor: Have you heard the latest report?? BO’s aunt, living in Boston is a illegal alien, or as the left would say un-documented worker. Though I doubt very much if she works. No wonder, BO wants to give SS, med ins etc to illegals, now it fits. Did you hear about this/
By Irish Eyes NY on 11/01/2008 3:21 pm
DeBúrca obj
Did Barack Obama vote to give Social Security to Illegal Aliens?” “No, not really… On May 18, 2006, Sen. John Ensign of Nevada proposed an amendment to the “Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act” (CIRA) that would have barred former illegal workers from claiming credit for payments into the Social Security system that they made before they obtained legal immigration status through CIRA. 50 senators voted on a motion to “table” the amendment (remove it from consideration before voting), including Obama, McCain, and Hillary Clinton. Some conservative partisans have misrepresented this vote by claiming those senators voted in favor of allowing illegal aliens to collect the Social Security benefits that other, legal workers worked hard to put into the system. However, the actual situation they indirectly voted in favor of (as did all the senators that later voted for CIRA) is described below: 1. Illegal workers pay into Social Security system using fake or “stolen” Social Security numbers. 2. Illegal workers are granted legal immigration status under CIRA. 3. Now-legal workers apply to retroactively receive credit for the payments that they contributed to the Social Security system before becoming legal. While there is room to disagree over the desirability and fairness of the scenario described above, those senators never voted to give Social Security benefits to illegal aliens. Source: http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/socialsecurity.asp
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 6:10 pm
DeBúrca obj
In a nutshell, the amendment referenced above wasn’t about ‘fiving illegal aliens Social Security benefits’; it was about whether FORMERLY illegal aliens (who had since become legal) should be credited for monies they themselves had paid into the Social Security fund while they were in the U.S. illegally. The senators listed above [Obama, McCain, and Hillary Clinton along with many others] did not vote in favor of this proposition; they voted to withdraw the amendment from consideration. “
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 6:18 pm
DeBúrca obj
Typo: ‘giving…’ not fiving.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 6:20 pm
Irish Eyes NY
Thanks Burca, for clearing that up for me.
By Irish Eyes NY on 11/02/2008 9:09 am
C jay
Dear Irish” please remember from whence you came!
By C jay on 11/02/2008 11:52 am
Irish Eyes NY
Carol, What do you mean??
By Irish Eyes NY on 11/02/2008 12:45 pm
gulliver fourmyle
Zogby is considered an international Joke—-good luck—-his polls? trash—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 11/01/2008 8:03 pm
Susan B
Eleanor, please stop insulting me, my ideals, the place where I live and the people who live there. Once again, you’re parroting hate and divisiveness and aiming it millions of people you don’t even know. And don’t tell me that “they’re doing it to you”, or that “they do it too” or that “they’re worse.” That doesn’t justify your own angry and unfair words and it doesn’t help a single thing. We all need to learn that there will always be people who do not see the world as we do, but that does not automatically make them bad people. Drop the pack mentality and provincialism, take a look at your own life, see where you can do better, and do better. That’s all any of us can do, and ranting at masses of faceless people is not only irrational and inaccurate, but hopeless. I’m sure I could come up with some negative, sweeping generalizations about Illinois and the Republicans who live there. And then, I would be the nasty one, wouldn’t I? Can you please stop pointing fingers back at people who you disagree with, and try to come up with something kind, smart, funny or constructive to say. My gawd, woman, you totally went off about that “right wing nut” comment. It’s not about you, but you almost have me convinced that it is.
By Susan B on 11/01/2008 8:34 pm
DeBúrca obj
As far as Obama and Ryan are concerned… Obama didn’t eliminate Ryan, Ryans behavior came out because the GOP in Illinois had earlier demanded the opening of a Democrat’s divorce decree… so tit for tat, Ryan’s was demanded, not by Obama btw. And Ryan was abandoned by the Illinois Republicans. So blame Ryan, blame the Illinois Republicans, blame the Republicans for going down the holier than thou road of “family values” till it bit them in the face…. but don’t talk about things you don’t know about and say “this is how Obama wins elections”…. no, this is how Republicans LOSE elections.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/02/2008 8:59 am
C jay
LOL, Eleanor, that’s how Palin was selected, in fact - “The GOP had to find a replacement … ” And, McCain, too. No one would run with him. Oh my. Methinks we are tired of this crapola, frankly, plum tired out. Just speak for yourself, please, and see if your own stance isn’t just a highly regarded. Believe me, who ever is elected will not “run the USA” - WE own America! Hear ye, Hear ye! And, there are more women than men, so watchout, you guys, and you Joe 6 Packs, and even ya hockey moms, here come WO-MEN! .
By C jay on 11/02/2008 11:47 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Yes, Liza, I agree. Erica has always been edgy, bawdy, funny, ironic, sly, very sexually charged, outrageous and has written extensively about women. We are all anxious about the outcome of this election; she has taken those anxieties and pumped them up with perhaps tongue in cheek. I’m sure she knows she is certainly not another Susan Sontag and Chabon isn’t anything like Mailer–––people like that cannot be replaced––as if anybody really can be.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 11/01/2008 8:55 am