Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Entertainment | 10/31/2008 10:10 pm

Margo Howard and Roger Ebert Say to Erica Jong: Take a Vow of Silence, You’re no Norman Mailer

By Margo Howard and Roger Ebert

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Click here to read her column on Yahoo! Howard’s friend famed-film-critic Roger Ebert joined the opining for this column.

Dear, passé, clueless Erica Jong has shot off her mouth in Italy – apparently thinking she was talking only to Italians. She sounded absolutely nuts. Among the things she said to the Italian daily, Corriere della Sera:

1. If Obama loses, it will result in a second American Civil War. (!) 

2. Her friends, Ken Follett and Susan Cheever "are extremely worried." As if the discomfiture of these two worthies were not enough, she relates that "Naomi Wolf calls me every day." This would be the same Naomi Wolf who advised Gore to dress in earth tones … which, as we know, didn’t help a whole lot. And the afore-mentioned people are not the only fellow-sufferers. Jane Fonda e-mailed Jong that she cried all night and that the stress of it all was giving her back spasms. Her distress was so acute, Jong relates, that Fonda had no choice but to visit an acupuncturist and get an RX for Valium.

3. And getting back to the second American civil war, Jong opines, "Blood will run in the streets, believe me. And it’s not a coincidence that President Bush recalled soldiers from Iraq for Dick Cheney to lead against American citizens in the streets."

4. And I think the following is the most egocentric remark I have heard since I have been middle-aged. It has to do with her soi-disant fellow writers at the top ranks of American letters who are not doing anything to help Obama. "Tom Wolfe and John Updike are men of the right and Philip Roth is at this point a hermit who leads a monastic life in Connecticut, far from everything and everybody."

But all is not lost. She says she is still trooping the flag, and of course there is also Michael Chabon. The two of them she believes, have "taken the place of Susan Sontag and Norman Mailer respectively," because, she said, they have the same political sensibilities, "but a better sense of humor."

Forgive me, but I knew Norman Mailer … and you know the rest. As for appointing herself Susan Sontag, well, my advice to her would be to borrow some of Ms. Fonda’s Valium and take a nap, not to mention a vow of silence.

by Roger Ebert ebert_2.jpg

What is the matter with Erica Jong? Has she lost her mind? She’s raving like a right-wing nut about a "second civil war" if Obama loses. Where did she say this? In an interview with an Italian newspaper, possibly because no American newspaper gives a fart in a windstorm what she thinks about the election. So now the Italians have been warned.

A story in the New York Observer makes her sound scripted by the Onion. How will this Jong quote play with the paranoids on the right:
"Yesterday, Jane Fonda sent me an email to tell me that she cried all night and can’t cure her ailing back for all the stress that has reduced her to a bundle of nerves. My back is also suffering from spasms, so much so that I had to see an acupuncturist and get prescriptions for Valium."

Ohmigod! Spasms! Aimed like an arrow into Sarah Palin’s next speech.

But Jong will bravely fight at the barricades, despite her aching back. There are no other writers to do so. She goes on:
"Tom Wolfe and John Updike are men of the right and Philip Roth is at this point a hermit who leads a monastic life in Connecticut, far from everything and everybody."

Dire, although at least the monk is a great novelist, and keeps on writing. But wait, there is hope. The Observer reports: "Luckily, she said, there are her and Michael Chabon, who, she says, have ‘taken the place of Susan Sontag and Norman Mailer respectively’."

Nobody has taken their places. Nobody is ever gonna. Erica Jong is not even high on the "nobody’s gonna" list. If Susan Sontag had read that, she would have hurled. I loved Chabon’s New York Review convention coverage and his fiction. Erica Jong is known mostly for Fear of Flying. Now she should write Fear of Thinking.

Maybe the McCainists are correct, and the coasts are overpopulated with elitist feminist flywheels. We here in Illinois elected Senator Obama in such a landslide (70% - 27%) that the GOP saw it coming and had to hire a guy from out of state to run against him. We voted out of conviction, not as a cure for psychosomatic spasms.

555 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Marina B.
I suspect you may be underestimating her ego, and if the piece was meant to be tongue in cheek, she certainly fell flat in her attempt to get THAT tone right.
By Marina B. on 11/01/2008 9:49 am
Margo Howard
Marina — you are right on the money. There wasn’t an ounce of humor intended in that piece.
By Margo Howard on 11/01/2008 10:45 am
Marina B.
Margo, I hope that you continue to post here on a regular basis. You add substance to the fluff. My thanks to both Margo and Roger for pointing out that hysteria is never helpful to a cause.
By Marina B. on 11/01/2008 9:46 am
Buh- Bye
if McCain wins, you expect no unrest Marina?
By Buh- Bye on 11/01/2008 2:24 pm
DeBúrca obj
And what unrest do you expect if Obama wins, My Alias?
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 2:44 pm
Marina B.
DeBurca, of course My Alias doesn’t expect any unrest if Obama wins. After all, McCain/Palin supporters are a nice, reasonable genteel bunch, unlike those highly suspect terrorist loving, liberal, brown, etc. people who support Obama.
By Marina B. on 11/01/2008 3:01 pm
Buh- Bye
I am most likely, far more liberal than you Marina, which is why I cannot support Obama who suppresses votes, oppresses women and uses soft money to feather the campaign nest.
By Buh- Bye on 11/02/2008 9:48 am
Marina B.
LOL. I don’t feel the need to measure my “liberal” chops to anyone else’s. It’s silly, in part because what I call “knee jerk” liberals in their way have minds as closed as those f “knee jerk” conservatives. I haven’t been around long enough to have read your posts during the primaries, but it strikes me that you were an ardent Hillary supporter? And you couldn’t quite come to grips with the fact that she lost, and now your nose is completely out of joint.
By Marina B. on 11/02/2008 11:28 am
Star Lawrence
Don’t worry—most of us are grownups, experienced at politics (someone loses, we have noticed), and so darn old it’s all we can do to get to our Geritol. We haven’t turned over a car in weeks! Exception: Sen McCain…that man is indefatiguable and has by boundless admiration!
By Star Lawrence on 11/01/2008 3:48 pm
DeBúrca obj
My Alias made the comment “if McCain wins, you expect no unrest Marina?” and I asked, what unrest does she expect if Obama wins. Still haven’t heard back on that. I am not worried if either wins about any unrest and certainly wouldn’t imply that one side or the other would be more likely to do anything violent, stupid… or whatever falls under the umbrella of “unrest”.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/01/2008 5:45 pm
Marina B.
Oh, I’ll be rioting in the streets! LOL!!!
By Marina B. on 11/01/2008 2:53 pm
mary lou s
pi, although you did not address this question to me, i will reply that i expected unrest four years ago if kerry lost and got none. why would this change now?
By mary lou s on 11/01/2008 8:11 pm
beth willis
Oh my, how much easier it is to be tolerant of the outrageous when they share our viewpoint. This really is a truism, not meaning to be sarcastic. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 11/01/2008 2:30 pm
Marina B.
Actually, I get more upset at ignorant liberals than I do at ignorant conservatives. The latter are always good for a laugh, while I find the former to be somewhat of an embarrassment.
By Marina B. on 11/01/2008 6:56 pm
Buh- Bye
yes indeed, to me too.
By Buh- Bye on 11/02/2008 9:50 am