Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 11/19/2008 7:30 am

Margo Howard to Republicans: Don't You People EVER Learn?

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Click here to read her column on Yahoo!

Ah yes, he was going to “bring dignity back to the White House.” Instead, he brought Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and half of K Street. Aren’t there any Republicans who are gonna say they’re sorry?

Perhaps not. My take on Republican hopes is not unlike La Rochefoucauld’s view of remarriage: the triumph of hope over experience. According to The New York Times, “a whopping 91 percent of Republicans have a favorable view” of Palin, who is “the runaway favorite when they are asked to rank possible contenders for the party’s 2012 presidential nominee.” Clearly, these people have put their fingers in their ears and gone lalalalala to the 60-plus percent of people who were kindly disposed toward McCain but said they could not vote for him because they felt the lady was in no way ready to assume the presidency, if the need arose.

Meaning no offense to my Republican brethren and sistren, I cannot help but wonder: Don’t you people ever learn? Do you think these polls are made up? Are you not a little bit pleased to look forward to at least four years of hearing a president for whom English is his first language? Do you not take some pride in the fact that we have been mostly (and relatively instantaneously) reinstated in the international community? Can you imagine Barack Obama ever giving a neck massage to Angela Merkel at an economic conference? On whose watch, exactly, do you think we saw the mess of the last eight years unfold?

I, for one, am thrilled that George Bush and co. are soon to head back whence they came. I suspect they might be a little bit thrilled themselves.

Something really telling is that, as of now, there is no interest in a presidential memoir. This is a first in modern times. I mean, all any recent president has needed is “former” after his name and Bob Barnett, and voila! A big deal book contract. This is too bad, in a way, because with no Bush memoir the book he will most be associated with is My Pet Goat.

And just talking about books makes me think of language, and playing with words. I am sorely temped to riff on an old chestnut and say, "Good Riddance to bad RuBush," but that would be rude. Oh, hell, given what we’ve been through, what’s a little rudeness?

163 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Sherrie Crews
Don’t you people ever learn?” Apparently not. I wonder if it’s because they’re not capable or just don’t want to. I’ve seriously considered the possibility that republicanism is a genetic defect and therefore incurable. What else could explain anybody not realizing what a complete disaster the policies of the last eight years have brought on? What else could explain anybody still having any modicum of respect for the moron in the White House?
By Sherrie Crews on 11/19/2008 7:45 am
Kryssi K
You should have titled this, “IS Our Republicans Learning?”…
By Kryssi K on 11/19/2008 8:07 am
f p
lmao nice one Krissi.
By f p on 11/19/2008 8:15 am
f p
Frank Rich said it best: “The trouble is far more fundamental than that. The G.O.P. ran out of steam and ideas well before George W. Bush took office and Tom DeLay ran amok, and it is now more representative of 20th-century South Africa during apartheid than 21st-century America. The proof is in the vanilla pudding. When David Letterman said that the 10 G.O.P. presidential candidates at an early debate looked like “guys waiting to tee off at a restricted country club,” he was the first to correctly call the election.” The GOP’s “southern strategy” is as dated as the 50’s and it’s promoting of Palin and Jindal is a inane as it is simplistic. It’s a party not in disarray but a party in the throes of it’s own self-immolation thanks to it’s inability to come to terms with the 21st century, let alone the last half of the 20th. Rich’s comparison with South African Apartheid is very apt and telling. It’s appeal in the form of the McCain/Palin debacle to the lowest common denominator in this country is the single major indication of is loser status and I see no indication of true conservatism being resurrected any time in the future. If fact I do not see any indication of a true understanding of the word conservative at all in the current GOP. Party of Lincoln? He’d be appalled by this current incarnation.
By f p on 11/19/2008 8:14 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
So nice to have you back, Frank. I’ve really missed you.//// Watched a discussion by a panel of conservative/Republican women some weeks ago on CSpan and was taken aback by their stance on almost everything. It gave me the willies. It was like listening to someone who had been through a hurricane and was blaming the destruction on some god whose anger had been awakened. I always like to get different takes on issues, different ways of thinking, but I found myself utterly flummoxed by their––to me––sorry lack of reasoning.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 11/19/2008 8:37 am
f p
Thanks Phyllis—scary people at times aren’t they—the repubs are blaming everything and everyone but the right ones: themselves for their jingoistic pandering to the religious right and their inability to see reality and the will of the people. Their pandering to the lowest common denominator is a sad spectacle to say the least—Ike would be pissed off mightily methinks.
By f p on 11/19/2008 9:06 am
Diana T
Frank, Susanne, DeB, Agyness, or anyone else, listen to Chuck Hagel speaking yesterday before the JohnsHopkins School of Advanced International Studies: (I hope this works; you will have to turn it on) http://www.sais-jhu.edu/news-and-events/index.htm What an articulate man! I hope Obama finds a job for him as he is stepping down from the Senate; did not re-run…
By Diana T on 11/19/2008 5:48 pm
beverly linens
Phyllis, It has been 28 years since a Republican woman was considered anything more than arm candy. They patted her on the head and said Yes Dear as the looked the other way and heard nothing she had to say. I guess they had to resort to prayer to get heard. Since I consider myself one of those women who were jumping up and down making a fuss I didn’t notice when prayer got added into the mix. It was just there and I’ve been asking ever since what did that have to do with anything. Lack of reasoning is an understatement. It’s been insane for 28 years. I’m done, I’m moving on.
By beverly linens on 11/19/2008 12:59 pm
Diana T
You wrote it very well, Frank. This GOP is not the GOP I grew up with; it started its decline when the people that commandeered it decided to take it to the lowest denominator. These are the folks that decided that education is not as important to our future as being Born Again and Christian Only. They became so exclusive that they became the “elite” and then turned that word into something undesirable and 4 letterish—-just like Liberal. And, when one looks at the numbers in this election, they will see that most of us want well educated intellectually curious people in our administration. And, now? All the GOP can do is still discredit and defame as much as possible. Time will tell….
By Diana T on 11/19/2008 4:18 pm
Chrome Toe
No kidding. I’ve been thinking the same thing (do they ever learn)…. As a side note… if you want to get a rather shocking looking at how white male centric our political leaders have been… google wikepedia “presidential cabinet” then click on the various links to the various positions and it brings up a long list with pictures of every person whose ever held that cabinet position. FASCINATING. It was like a still picture documentary about power and intolerance.
By Chrome Toe on 11/19/2008 8:39 am
Mommy Dearest
If memory serves, dears, with respect to our current economic situation, wasn’t it Bill Clinton that signed legislation that permitted credit default swaps and rescinded Glass-Steagall?
By Mommy Dearest on 11/19/2008 9:22 am
Ms. Dee
Good call, Mommy. I think our new President-elect will have a lot to teach us all.
By Ms. Dee on 11/19/2008 10:56 am
Delete This
Momm Dearest—That’s true but it had a context. When the $72M fueled, Ken Starr whipped up hysteria was going on I was wonderfing what does this mask. In fact, I can remember standing in a downtown building lobby speaking to a Harvard Law grad from one of San Francisco’s most prominent families asking him the same thing. The Republicans led a 25-year effort to get rid of Glass Stegall fought back by Democrats. Sandy Weill, then CEO of Citigroup put together a deal that would combine investment and commercial banking and insurance…things the speculators harnessed to manipulate markets that brought about the 1929 Crash and ensuing great depression. Weill puts $125 million into lobbying with trillions at stake to get rid of Glass Stegall…to make it a fait acompli he put together the world’s biggest banking deal…Smith Barney, Teveller’s Insurance and Citibank. By the way, Saudi’s Prince Talal was his #1 investor. And the Senate Banking Committee led by Alfonse D’Amotto was in Weill’s pocket. The Republicans effectively stopped government and also stopped funding it, created a massive smoke screen and forced the passing of Glass Stegall with literally a loaded cock pointed at Clinton’s head. That does not excuse Clinton who also unleashed NAFTA and the WTO. Then Bush/Cheney came in and wholesale deregulated everything allowing derivatives to explode from $9 trillion in value then to over $700 trillion in global ‘value’ today destablizing and dwarfing the global economy like an unseen, monterous and lethal Sci-Fi-ish force. Add that to the prolific spending and waste of Bush Inc and the criminal construct that we refer to as Wall Street and crooks have been at the helm of the government and economy for 8 monumentally disasterous years.
By Delete This on 11/19/2008 12:56 pm
f p
Lily—excellent !
By f p on 11/19/2008 12:35 pm
Maurine H
Brilliant, Lily! I’ve sent this article off to those in my circle who also speak in complete sentences. (That would be everyone).
By Maurine H on 11/19/2008 1:09 pm