Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 09/20/2008 8:03 pm

Margo Howard: Thanks, Sandra Bernhard, for the Palin Jokes. Like We Needed This

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Click here to read her column on Yahoo!

The never demure and always foul-mouthed Sandra Bernhard is back with her desperate-to-shock apercus.  This go-round was aimed at Sarah Palin – and wound up on You Tube, no less.  One of her shout-outs to Ms. Palin (that I am willing to commit to print) was: "You whore in cheap glasses." Nice, huh? She could not have given a better gift to Republicans and Palin supporters than this vulgar, ridiculous, attention-grabbing pronouncement.  (And I don’t know if Bernhard has her own oil well, but those glasses cost $400.)

I believe the lady with the literally and figuratively big mouth to be for Obama, so how, I am wondering, does she think a rant like hers helps him?  The other side is properly outraged; just look at the comment boards. (And if one were to seriously follow the whore metaphor in this political circumstance, it would be McCain, not Palin, who is the whore.) Meant to shock, crude insults about almost anything or anyone may be fine for nightclubs, but they are landmines in campaigns. Mort Sahl she isn’t.

I do not think Sarah Palin can be faulted for accepting what was offered. The real problem is what she offers, which ain’t much.  Perhaps more disturbing than her near-amateur status is the excitement with which the Republican faithful, not to mention the whack-job churchies, greeted her. When and how did Know-Nothingism make such a comeback? It is unsettling that great numbers of people have become used to so little, and hard to believe that what was a great line on Saturday Night Live (“I can see Russia from my house!”) was Sarah Palin’s actual response when the subject of Russia came up.

McCain’s No. 2 (even though she’s been slipping and calling the ticket "Palin-McCain") strongly suggests that quite a chunk of the country has undergone an intellectual cleansing. That is a bigger problem than Ms. Palin … that and the fact that the lady should have blinked.

276 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Rita T
You know Marjorie, you can repeat the lie that Senator Obama has no experience all you want … it still doesn’t make it true. Newt Gingrich, commenting on Obama’s experience: “Well, Abraham Lincoln served two years in the U.S.House, and seemed to do all right.” (Meet The Press) You know, you are right that the Democrats did nothing about the sexism Senator Clinton experienced and it is a shame that they didn’t stand up to people like Rush Limbaugh who said: “Mrs. Clinton’s testicle lockbox is big enough for the entire Democrat hierarchy.” (Limbaugh also suggested America wasn’t ready to watch a female politician age because only men looked more “authoritative, accomplished [and] distinguished” as they approached the grave.) If comments like that make you proud to be a Republican, I will pray for you. McCain chose Palin because he thought she would be grateful to be selected and willing to stand in the background and allow him to shine. He had no clue that she would make it the Palin/McCain ticket. And here is a good one for you, Marjorie, why did the McCain campaign insist that the debate between Joe Biden and Palin have a shorter question-and-answer segments than those for the presidential nominees (which means there will less opportunity for direct exchange between the candidates)? What is McCain afraid of? A loose format could leave Palin at a disadvantage and put her largely on the defensive aka she isn’t smart enough to keep up with Joe!
By Rita T on 09/21/2008 4:51 pm
Marjorie C.
Rita: …make you proud to be a Republican, I am not a Republican, I am what is known as an Indy (Independant). I have no allegiance to either party. I am not voting as much for McCain as I am voting against Obama. So bad talking McCain or Palin has no effect on my vote. I will vote for John McCain in November, and sincerely hope he wins.
By Marjorie C. on 09/21/2008 5:29 pm
HoBo Economy Thanks Bush-McSame
MC—Either you are really a racist or really dumb.
By HoBo Economy Thanks Bush-McSame on 09/21/2008 11:48 pm
Star Lawrence
Tsk tsk.
By Star Lawrence on 09/22/2008 12:20 pm
Frannie Em
Rita I think the republicans did not think it out very well when asking for shorter response time for candidates in the VP debates. I would have let Biden have as long as he wanted to put his foot in his mouth. Nobody can do it like he does it.
By Frannie Em on 09/21/2008 10:33 pm
A N
Marjorie, Sarah Palin has executive experience as mayor and governor. She is the 5th most important governor in the US who has an excellent record; to her credit, she went after corruption in her own party! How many politicians do that? Once again, she is an executive running for the executive branch of govt. And you are so right, she brings a lot more experience to that office. As Hillary stated,” I know Senator McCain has a lifetime of experience that he will bring to the White House and Senator Obama has a speech.” I agree that Hillary was deserted by her own party…Howard Dean ALLOWED the sexism to continue. What bothers me the most is that very few of us women were outraged about it. It boggles the mind.
By A N on 09/21/2008 6:24 pm
HoBo Economy Thanks Bush-McSame
ANPALIN is NOT the 5th most imp gov and she does NOT have a good record. She left a mess behind as the major of a small town with a tiny budget she left $27M in debt and barely missed being recalled….her state is the least populous and the least diverse and with the highest drop out rate and she is under investigation.
By HoBo Economy Thanks Bush-McSame on 09/21/2008 11:51 pm
A N
Hobo, please read the following: “One rap on Sarah Palin’s qualifications to be Vice President is that she governs one of our least populated states, with a budget of “only” $12 billion and 16,000 full-time state employees. On the other hand, it turns out that the Governor’s office in Alaska is one of the country’s most powerful. For more than two decades Thad Beyle, a political scientist at the University of North Carolina, has maintained an index of “institutional powers” in state offices. He rates governorships on potential length of service, budgetary and appointment authority, veto power and other factors. Mr. Beyle’s findings for 2008 rate Alaska at 4.1 on a scale of 5. The national average is 3.5. Only four other states — Maryland, New Jersey, New York and West Virginia — concentrate as much power in the Governor’s office as Alaska does, and only one state (Massachusetts) concentrates more. California may be the nation’s most populous state, but its Governor rates as below-average (3.2) in executive authority. This may account in part for Arnold Schwarzenegger’s poor legislative track record. The lowest rating goes to Vermont (2.5), where the Governor (remember Howard Dean) is a figurehead compared to Mrs. Palin. In Alaska, the Governor has line-item veto power over the budget and can only be overridden by a three-quarters majority of the Legislature. In 1992, the year Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton was elected President, his state budget was $2 billion and among the smallest in the country. Compared to that, Sarah Palin is an executive giant.” Without preconditions Paliin took on a company that has a market cap of $205 billion and annual revenues of $291 billion in worldwide operations. Its budget is larger than that those of most sovereign countries, yet she won on her terms. Then to follow up that act, she got the Alaskan Legislature to approve development of the TransCanada gas pipeline, a $40 billion deal that will go 1,715 miles from the treatment plant at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, to the Alberta hub in Canada, from which it will be transferred to the United States. This project had been sitting around for 30 years on hold because the big energy companies didn’t think it would be profitable, and their corrupt cronies in the legislature obediently kept it on the shelf. Crusading against corruption and negotiating across the aisle, Palin not only got it passed in record time, but opened up the bidding when the U.S. companies were reluctant to jump in. So she went ahead and awarded the contract to low-bidder TransCanada Alaska, a firm that has already built 36,000 miles of pipelines in North America. As a final fillip, the Governor signed the bill at the Alaska AFL-CIO biennial convention. While Barack Obama’s solution to the energy problem is to urge us to check the air in our tires, Palin’s solution is to start building a $40 billion gas pipeline, without Federal government assistance. As to her investigation, the jury is out on that one. But if my brother-in-law had tasered my nephew and threatened to kill my family, I’d have fed “his family jewels” to a moose for Thanksgiving dinner!
By A N on 09/22/2008 6:01 am
Marjorie C.
A N, Thank you for the post defending Sarah Palin. Makes one proud to be voting for her.
By Marjorie C. on 09/22/2008 6:50 am
Star Lawrence
Yup, she is doing fine. Someone sent me an email about how she shot Bullwinkle. That is the level of the argument now, when they are not calling her a bucket of slop, etc. Pathetic.
By Star Lawrence on 09/23/2008 11:28 am
sibelle daubigne
A N Thank you for taking the time to expose true facts! good post!
By sibelle daubigne on 09/22/2008 8:12 am
Marjorie C.
A N: As Hillary stated,” I know Senator McCain has a lifetime of experience that he will bring to the White House and Senator Obama has a speech.” You gotta love Hillary. She took such a sexist beating from the Dems, and in the end they picked the empty suit. That’s when I, along with a million or more others, decided to not vote Democrat this year. Now along comes Sarah Palin and makes it all that much easier. Her qualifications are as good as they get. She’ll deliver the women’s vote to the Republicans.
By Marjorie C. on 09/22/2008 6:42 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
A N : Here’s a segment from an article on Obama’s teaching methods: Times Topics: Barack Obama Enlarge This Image Mitch Blunt/Kingston University, England Obama taught at the University of Chicago Law School for a decade before he left in 2003 to run for the United States Senate. He emerged as one of the Senate’s most liberal members, and his voting record is often invoked in the current campaign, especially by his opponents. But the men and women who studied with him at Chicago echo Escuder’s observation that Obama was much more pragmatic than ideological. Even as his political career advanced, Obama’s teaching stuck to the law-school norm of dispassionately evaluating competing arguments with the tools of forensic logic. But Obama apparently was not attached to legal argumentation for its own sake. “It was drilled into us from Day 1 that you examined your biases and inclinations,” Richard Hess, now an attorney at Susman Godfrey in Houston, told me. “And then, when you made decisions, they were based on sound empirical reasons.” Escuder saw his professor as “a street smart academic”: “He wanted his students to consider the impact laws and judicial opinions had on real people.” According to Marcus Fruchter, who took constitutional law with Obama and now practices at the law firm of Schopf & Weiss in Chicago, “You never would have known he was going to be a liberal senator based on what he said in his courses.”
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 09/21/2008 11:07 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
And here is the link: It’s a fascinating piece and would give you more insight into Obama. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/magazine/21obama-t.html?ref=magazine
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 09/21/2008 11:10 am
Frannie Em
Phyllis and A N Thanks for the input. It is very helpful.
By Frannie Em on 09/22/2008 1:38 pm