Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 09/20/2008 8:03 pm

Margo Howard: Thanks, Sandra Bernhard, for the Palin Jokes. Like We Needed This

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Click here to read her column on Yahoo!

The never demure and always foul-mouthed Sandra Bernhard is back with her desperate-to-shock apercus.  This go-round was aimed at Sarah Palin – and wound up on You Tube, no less.  One of her shout-outs to Ms. Palin (that I am willing to commit to print) was: "You whore in cheap glasses." Nice, huh? She could not have given a better gift to Republicans and Palin supporters than this vulgar, ridiculous, attention-grabbing pronouncement.  (And I don’t know if Bernhard has her own oil well, but those glasses cost $400.)

I believe the lady with the literally and figuratively big mouth to be for Obama, so how, I am wondering, does she think a rant like hers helps him?  The other side is properly outraged; just look at the comment boards. (And if one were to seriously follow the whore metaphor in this political circumstance, it would be McCain, not Palin, who is the whore.) Meant to shock, crude insults about almost anything or anyone may be fine for nightclubs, but they are landmines in campaigns. Mort Sahl she isn’t.

I do not think Sarah Palin can be faulted for accepting what was offered. The real problem is what she offers, which ain’t much.  Perhaps more disturbing than her near-amateur status is the excitement with which the Republican faithful, not to mention the whack-job churchies, greeted her. When and how did Know-Nothingism make such a comeback? It is unsettling that great numbers of people have become used to so little, and hard to believe that what was a great line on Saturday Night Live (“I can see Russia from my house!”) was Sarah Palin’s actual response when the subject of Russia came up.

McCain’s No. 2 (even though she’s been slipping and calling the ticket "Palin-McCain") strongly suggests that quite a chunk of the country has undergone an intellectual cleansing. That is a bigger problem than Ms. Palin … that and the fact that the lady should have blinked.

276 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Maurine H
A N - and I would say to you that Palin was brought on board the Republican ticket to deflect the attention from John McCain’s inability to lead or to understand even the basics of the economy. Her experience is limited to one mayorship of a tiny town and a recent governship of a sparsely populate state and is flawed, contradictory, and filled with cronyism and possible corruption, (although she is trying hard to stall that investigation). On the other hand, Senator Obama (State Senator, U.S. Senator, Harvard Law School graduate, economic expert) gets it. When last weeks financial crisis peaked and panic started to set in on Wall Street, Senator Obama didn’t fly off the handle calling for the firing of anyone, he didn’t say “the economy is fundamentally strong”, he didn’t wrongly name the agencies. Barack Obama acted Presidential and surrounded himself with the right people for an open discussion about the crisis and the appropriate next steps. McCain and Palin went blah, blah, blah and made no sense. As usual. McCain is losing it. What are his qualifications? Oh, yes, he was one of the biggest backers of de-regulation!!! And, in his own words, McCain “doesn’t know much about the economy.” Palin is ambitious to the point of making Freudian slips (Palin/McCain ticket????), and as a writer in one of the Anchorage, Alaska newspapers discribed her as “all bluff and fluff.” Who needs that in the Vice Presidency? OBAMA/BIDEN -08!
By Maurine H on 09/21/2008 11:23 am
A N
And Maurine, who were the top 2 recipients of Fanny Mae? #1,Dodd, and #2, Obama. McCain has proved to be bipartisan and called for a correction of Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac 2 years ago! Yes, I concede, Obama did not take a stand on the economy this week…but isn’t that a little scary to you? No action taken, just like his voting record… voting “present” to sidestep the issues. BTW, Gov. Palin must be doing something right with an 80% approval rating! Congress’ rating is even lower than POTUS! Bipartisanship is extremely important, not only in the crisis we face today, but always.
By A N on 09/21/2008 11:46 am
Amy Van Cleave
Oprah and j. Wright’s teachings
By Amy Van Cleave on 09/21/2008 12:59 pm
HoBo Economy Thanks Bush-McSame
Isn’t Rush missing a fan…thought you were going over there to drink more of the toxic kool aide.
By HoBo Economy Thanks Bush-McSame on 09/21/2008 2:28 pm
Marjorie C.
Whassa matter, HoBo, does the thought of Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s sermons send a tingle up your leg?
By Marjorie C. on 09/22/2008 6:54 am
sibelle daubigne
Marjorie That one is too good to be missed! Whassup?
By sibelle daubigne on 09/22/2008 5:37 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Here’s a segment from Maurine Dowd’s column today: OBAMA The problem is we can’t appear angry. Bush called us the angry left. Did you see anyone in Denver who was angry? BARTLET Well … let me think. …We went to war against the wrong country, Osama bin Laden just celebrated his seventh anniversary of not being caught either dead or alive, my family’s less safe than it was eight years ago, we’ve lost trillions of dollars, millions of jobs, thousands of lives and we lost an entire city due to bad weather. So, you know … I’m a little angry. OBAMA What would you do? BARTLET GET ANGRIER! Call them liars, because that’s what they are. Sarah Palin didn’t say “thanks but no thanks” to the Bridge to Nowhere. She just said “Thanks.” You were raised by a single mother on food stamps — where does a guy with eight houses who was legacied into Annapolis get off calling you an elitist? And by the way, if you do nothing else, take that word back. Elite is a good word, it means well above average. I’d ask them what their problem is with excellence. While you’re at it, I want the word “patriot” back. McCain can say that the transcendent issue of our time is the spread of Islamic fanaticism or he can choose a running mate who doesn’t know the Bush doctrine from the Monroe Doctrine, but he can’t do both at the same time and call it patriotic. They have to lie — the truth isn’t their friend right now. Get angry. Mock them mercilessly; they’ve earned it. McCain decried agents of intolerance, then chose a running mate who had to ask if she was allowed to ban books from a public library. It’s not bad enough she thinks the planet Earth was created in six days 6,000 years ago complete with a man, a woman and a talking snake, she wants schools to teach the rest of our kids to deny geology, anthropology, archaeology and common sense too? It’s not bad enough she’s forcing her own daughter into a loveless marriage to a teenage hood, she wants the rest of us to guide our daughters in that direction too? It’s not enough that a woman shouldn’t have the right to choose, it should be the law of the land that she has to carry and deliver her rapist’s baby too? I don’t know whether or not Governor Palin has the tenacity of a pit bull, but I know for sure she’s got the qualifications of one. And you’re worried about seeming angry? You could eat their lunch, make them cry and tell their mamas about it and God himself would call it restrained. There are times when you are simply required to be impolite. There are times when condescension is called for!
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 09/21/2008 8:50 am
Ms. Dee
Yeah, well. I’m thinking Palin is already aware of McCain’s own gender-bias and notorious sexism. It’ll be interesting to see how long she can take it before she cries “foul”.
By Ms. Dee on 09/22/2008 6:05 pm
Jill J
whack-job churchies…what is that supposed to mean? Is your intent to label all Christians as extremists?
By Jill J on 09/20/2008 10:52 pm
HoBo Economy Thanks Bush-McSame
Jill- “Is your intent to label all Christians as extremists” obviously she’s referring to the extremist wing-nuts….but am rather sick of hearing about religion & politics. We have a Constitutional, secular society….separation of church and state….and Palin is a whack-jon churchie. Good term. Real nut job stuff. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QG1vPYbRB7k
By HoBo Economy Thanks Bush-McSame on 09/21/2008 12:57 am
Kryssi K
If there is truly a separation of church and state, why am I forced to do my voting IN A CHURCH every election? (Something tells me this is unheard of in other parts of the country…)
By Kryssi K on 09/21/2008 3:51 am
Rita T
I live in Alabama and I vote in a church, too. The City uses lots of churches, probably because they allow them the use for free. I used to vote in the elementary school around the corner and it was difficult with all the people and all the kids and all the cars! The church is better, traffic-wise.
By Rita T on 09/21/2008 9:04 pm
Steve R
I vote in a church too. It used to be in an elementary school. I do not know why it was changed. My guess would be that it had something to do with class disruption, child safety, or school security. In truth, the only people in the church during an election are the voters and the election officials. If there is even a janitor, I have not seen him/her. There are no hoards of signs or pamphlets or children’s artwork. While I am uncomfortable with holding secular elections at a religious venue, there is, in practice, no effort to commingle religion and politics. That is the most important thing.
By Steve R on 09/23/2008 1:01 am
Steve R
At least my precinct passes the no-religion litmus test.
By Steve R on 09/23/2008 1:09 am
Mugsy Peabody
No, just the whack-job churchies.
By Mugsy Peabody on 09/21/2008 3:51 am