Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Marlo Thomas | 08/29/2008 3:54 pm

Marlo Thomas: They Don't Understand Women

Marlo Thomas
I am aghast at the cynicism of this choice. As if Hillary’s voters will go for any woman. Hillary’s constituency (myself being one of them who has now moved to Obama) is not going to vote for a woman who is against choice, against stem cell research and thinks creationism should be taught in schools. They may have chosen a woman but they don’t understand women.
Read more about: John McCain, News, Politics, Sarah Palin

167 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Zera Lee
Following my argument, Obama picked Biden to address conservative concerns about foreign policy, and national defense and security. Palin’s selection further entrenches the far right. McCain actually wanted to nominate Lieberman (who is technically an independent), but the RNC wouldn’t tolerate it. They told him it would cost him too much core support. You are right about McCain’s “maverick” status being irrelevant. He has abandoned it for the support of the far right, without which he could not get elected. Selecting Palin attempts to resurrect the maverick issue, but time will tell if that is successful. Reaching across the aisle in a highly republican environment is not as hard as doing it in DC. I never suggested that either candidate select a member of the opposing party for VP. McCain had a chance to appeal to moderates and independents with a moderate republican choice, but he went for the partisan option. I have no doubts that conservatives are happy. Liberals, Progressives, Moderates, and Centrists, on the other hand, have been dissed. Obama has not moved farther to the left, he has moved toward the center. A move that has made the far left nervous. A move that reaches out to the center, the independent, the undecided, and moderate republicans. Obama is making an effort to represent all America. McCain represents the far right and the republican party, which seem to define the borders of “his” country.
By Zera Lee on 09/03/2008 6:45 pm
James the Game
Well, McCain’s the one who portrayed himself as a moderate. It’s shocking to me that he would select someone who is so far to the right, at a time when the race is dead-even and there are so many undecided and independent voters who could’ve tilted the race heavily in McCain’s favor, had he thrown them a bone.
By James the Game on 08/29/2008 6:07 pm
eleanor roche
James—If McCain had picked a pro-choice candidate, like Ridge, he would have lost a lot of the base. Forget Lieberman, the base would have abandoned him with that pick. Without the base, he can’t win. Many in his camp wanted to direct the campaign toward the Independents and the moderate Dems, but to do so with a pro-choice candidate would have be a big mistake. I think he still gets plenty of Independents and moderate Dems, but have to agree with you, not as many as he would have with a moderate or someone like Leiberman on the ticket. But going after those votes was a risk and may not have paid off. The Republican party was lukewarm to McCain and he really needed to reassure them—a solid conservative VP choice was the only way for him to do that. That just my GOP humble opinion.
By eleanor roche on 08/29/2008 6:32 pm
James the Game
Right, Eleanor. But if McCain had chosen a so-called anti-abortion female candidate, he may’ve garnered many of the undecided or independent voters who don’t cast their votes based on the abortion issue. Right now, pocketbook issues are what Americans are primarily concerned about, as every poll has indicated. From a strategic standpoint, McCain made a smart move selecting a woman, but a dumb one selecting an inexperienced, unknown woman who can’t help him win the large percentage of undecideds. The selection of a right-wing radical pushes the ticket all the way to the right.
By James the Game on 08/29/2008 6:44 pm
eleanor roche
See James, here is where you are wrong. She is not “a right-wing radical”—we do not view her as such—she represents the typical, average GOP member. This is your view—based on your left leaning beliefs. Just as I am sure you don’t think Obama is a far left radical—many in the GOP —like me—view him as such. It is all perspective and in this case your persepective and those on the left are not the dominant concern, just as Obama was not concerned about putting someone on his ticket to appease moderate Republicans. McCain, like Obama only has to take some of the undecideds, but they both need all of their base. Obama’s abrupt move to the middle after winning the primary should be a concern to Dems—he is not making points in this department. McCain’s pandering to the middle was not getting him anywhere. If you noticed, after “Saddleback” he started to make gains. Now instead of voting against Obama, many in the GOP are voting for McCain. As to the Hillary supporters, Obama was the one who blew that and McCain will obviously benefit.
By eleanor roche on 08/29/2008 7:38 pm
HA BIBI
Eleanor, Great posts and so very true. Someone eairlier stated they were not interested in pro-choice as they were in menopause. I thought what a poignant statement, as most everyone on this site is in the same physical catagory (Menopause) that is.it cracks me up that this seems to always prevail as a dominate concern, these women would have more luck in winning the lottery than they do of becoming pregnant….Unless of course, they want their daughters to have the right to kill their grandchildren. And you are so right, it’s not the responsibility of the Rep’s to choose running mates based on what the Dem’s think. They need to focus on their race and leave the Rep’s to run theirs. And again I say, if they are so certain that Obama is the winner….Then for goodness sake, why all the fretting? :)
By HA BIBI on 08/30/2008 8:41 am
HA BIBI
Oh, and one other thing. Why is it that the fact she is against the murdering of innocent children (That’s exactly what abortion is) or any other woman or man against it always get labeled as far right-wingers? Come to think of it…I kinda like it, anything that has the word right in it can’t be wrong!
By HA BIBI on 08/30/2008 8:46 am
eleanor roche
Elaine, Some of the comments I have read on this site in the past two days have nauseated me. One person actually said that (paraphrasing of course) she didn’t think it was doing a down’s syndrome child any favors by not aborting it. Playing God is what happens when you see no power higher than yourself.
By eleanor roche on 08/30/2008 9:19 am
Frannie Em
Eleanor Interesting summation.
By Frannie Em on 08/31/2008 4:21 pm
candace obrien
I was a Hillary supporter and a life-long democrat. I was shocked at the naivete and actually arrogance and finally stupidity fo the demo leadership and I then decided to cast my vote for McCain. I am THRILLED at today’s decision. I hope many more PUMAS out there are with me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
By candace obrien on 08/29/2008 6:24 pm
Diana T
So, why would you have voted for Hillary in the first place? Only because she was a female? What possible resemblance, other than physical, does this woman have to Hillary Clinton? Obviously, you do not support equal pay for women or a woman’s right to choose. And, certainly, you care not for Sen. Clinton’s foreign policy opinions. So, I know you will be very happy when McCain puts up pro-life Supreme Court Judges and federal judges for nomination.
By Diana T on 08/29/2008 8:59 pm
Diana T
Thank you, James. Palin is playing with the big leagues now; I hope she is treated as such.
By Diana T on 08/31/2008 11:23 am
James the Game
The differences in foreign-policy experience will sure be played to the hilt in the debates, Diana.
By James the Game on 08/31/2008 11:29 am
Diana T
It damned well better be, James, what with nuclear India and nuclear Pakistan sitting next to each other foaming at the mouth, and all of the other hotspots going on. It makes my blood chill. This is not some game, and we must not allow ourselves to be hooked into one.
By Diana T on 08/31/2008 11:34 am