Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Mary Wells | 06/12/2008 12:00 am

Mary Wells: Mrs. McCain Is Pretty but Michelle Obama Is Glorious

Mary Wells

I think Michelle is gloriously 2008 and shouldn’t change. Pretty Mrs. McCain stands still on the side, slightly behind, like so many of the women.
In America’s history, wives of heads of corporations as well as wives of presidents – they barely breathe, they smile demure smiles, we are not supposed to focus on them, but we all register: nice ladies. Mrs. McCain must be cute to know – he had a wide choice. But when a woman is as still as she is you get an idea that he is the general and she marches to his tune.

Hillary’s face is active and expressive and can be dramatic and she has learned a new smile that is big and lovely and somebody new is doing her makeup this year — good for her!!! But Hillary moves like a girls’ basketball coach — back and forth, from an older era. Michelle moves from head to toe, she moves her slim athletic body as if she could jam with the best of them, clicking her fingers. The two of them, Barack and Michelle, use a podium or speech area differently than other political couples.

They move around each other, like a dance routine, and they relate to each other and even touch each other, groovy, feeling free. She makes me feel good. She isn’t scared. She has opinions. He cares about them. They have a dancing marriage that has spirit. Other good marriages in the White House, no matter how glamorous, have been still and typical of the puritanical American past. Some of the male presidents have had secret or not-so-secret affairs. But there was no happy heat that we could see – no strong communication that was obvious to us between the president and his wife. The Obamas look and act like change, like 2008, like good times. I don’t want to lose any of that.

Read more about: Election, Politics, Relationships

35 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

linda trueblood lambert
Shame on all of you for making judgements on these women! Isn’t that what we are trying to get away from? We do not know how much involvement Cindy has in her family business (and has been willing to support (tolerate)her husband’s dreams. And we do not know all of the progression of Mrs. Obama’s career (in Chicago’s highly questionable Cook County system). Give them a break and let’s listen to what the candidates have to say and then their spouses. BUT, I have a long standing anger at the media for the inequality of treatment of Nancy Reagan and Hillary Clinton. Nancy was chastised and ridiculed for borrowing designer fashions while all were entranced with Hillary’s makeover on the Vogue cover. (Was it relief?) And while we are at it……china, anyone? Nancy was made to be an empress, ordering new china for the WH. It is something that happens by necessity every few administrations. So, where was the similar comment when Hillary ordered new china?….not more than 1 term after the last had been provided? AND, it was photographed and commented that the Clinton china was the most gilt, opulent and ornate china in the entire WH collection. How about that! Let’s try to bring a little objectivity in our discussions. I will not vote for “pretty Mrs. McCain” or the “vibrant Michelle”. I will vote for the candidate that will best serve our country.
By linda trueblood lambert on 06/15/2008 5:55 pm
theCHEROKEErose
do we need a presidential ‘couple’ doing the touchey/feeley in public view…i think not..have a little decorum, folks
By theCHEROKEErose on 06/17/2008 2:19 pm
Lady Gator
Cherokee — “I think not” ——-I am in total agreement with you. This site is akin to a catty sorority room on the night with the black and white marbles. Sounds like a “black ball” for Cindy and a praise fest for Michelle MaBell. But those of us who experienced all of that in that sorority room years ago were WAY younger than the women on this site. I refuse to cast my vote in the election as to the “little woman”. There are FAR too many other issues I’d rather address.
By Lady Gator on 06/17/2008 3:35 pm
Lady Gator
And I forgot to add — I wouldn’t call Michelle “Glorious”. Glorious means to elevate someone or to elevate to celestial glory. I think of an angel when I hear that description — don’t think the description fits.
By Lady Gator on 06/17/2008 3:40 pm
sibelle daubigne
Hummm, fresh conversation here! “Gloria in Excelsis” .Yes, Mary probably got carried away with “Angelophobia”. Or maybe the time of the “old Glory”. Or maybe the french Glory! Who knows?
By sibelle daubigne on 06/17/2008 10:31 pm