Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 09/10/2008 8:40 am

McCain Camp: Obama Owes Palin Apology for Lipstick Joke

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Sarah Palin’s "lipstick" joke is being used against her — purposefully or not — and John McCain’s campaign isn’t happy about it.

"What’s the difference between a pit bull and a hockey mom?" the Alaskan governor said in her speech at the Republican convention last week. "Lipstick."

During a campaign stop in Virginia Tuesday, Sen. Barack Obama — in arguing that John McCain is more of the same of George Bush — said: "You can put lipstick on a pig … It’s still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still going to stink after eight years."

McCain’s campaign called the comments "offensive and disgraceful" and said Obama owes Palin an apology. His campaign even held a conference call with former Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift, a McCain supporter. 

Click here to listen to the conference call. 

"I think what’s most disappointing and the reason why we need to continually combat this stream of insults is that this is just the latest in the series of comments that many folks like me will find offensive, whether it is Sen. Biden’s comments about Gov. Palin being ‘good-looking,’ their strategist David Axelrod commenting that she obviously knows how to take orders or do what she’s told; the just disgraceful comment by their spokesman that compared her to a ‘Nazi sympathizer’; or the line that I, the mother of three children, find particularly offensive, questioning by one of his finance committee, trying to say that her children, one who has Down syndrome, she’s incapable of doing the job of being the vice president of the United States," Swift said.

"This is just the same old low-road, flinging accusations. And as I said, there are a number of us women across the Republican party, but I also think I’m joined by Independents and Democrats who aren’t going to let our discourse fall to this level. And I think the best way to get things back on the right track would be for Sen. Obama to issue an apology to Gov. Palin."

The Obama camp, which said Obama wasn’t referring to Palin at all, is also firing off verbal responses and e-mails in their defense.

"That expression is older than my grandfather’s grandfather, and it means that you can dress something up but it doesn’t change what it is,” Obama campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki told ABC News. "He was talking pretty clearly about the fact that you can’t just call yourself change when you’ve voted with George Bush 90 percent of the time."

Democrats point to a news article last fall that said McCain criticized Democrats for offering what he called costly universal health-care proposals that require too much government regulation. While he said he had not studied then-Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s plan, he said it was "eerily reminiscent" of the failed plan she offered as First Lady in the 1990s. "I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig," he said of her proposal.

They also point out that former Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee even said to give Obama a break on the lipstick comment.

"It’s an old expression, and I’m going to have to cut Obama some slack on that one," Huckabee told FOX News. "I do not think he was referring to Sarah Palin; he didn’t reference her. If you take the two soundbites together, it may sound like it. But I’ve been a guy at the podium many times, and you say something that’s maybe a part of an old joke and then somebody ties it in. So, I’m going to have to cut him slack."

137 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

No Kill and Drill Palin
Mo- The GOP has ‘won’ (if you don’t count voter caging, fixed machines by Diebold one of GWB’s biggest supporters etc) by having a short list of points and saying them over and over. that is because they believe the voters to be dumb and GWB is even on tape saying his job is to ‘repeat the propaganda over and over.’ Palin could say the “moon is made of cheese” over and over again…the entire news media could put out scientific fact that it is rock…but the dittoheads…and that’s how they got the sobriquet will nod yes, ‘It’s cheese!” democrats are democrats because they don’t go for that simple minded stuff….but Obama needs to scale it down and hammer it home and repeat it…as much as a former Constitutional law professor would hate to put complex issues in soundbites. Democrats since FDR have always had the strongest economy, created the most jobs, etc., have across the board had the best records…they need to get out simple GAO charts…and drive it home. The GOP has always been the party for the rich..despite their phony dog and pony show. And despite the glaring economic gulf they created in the last 8 years. The dittoheads will stock up on Top Ramen and still vote for them. They listen to the radio shows that 24/7 drum it in their ear. As the song goes ‘you’ve got to be carefully taught.’
By No Kill and Drill Palin on 09/10/2008 1:20 pm
Buh- Bye
I guess turnabout’s fair play. The Obama camp is getting a taste of its own medicine (if someone already made this observation, my apologies - no time to read the posts today with all the interesting news on the Large Hadron Collider.) The implications that Obama’s remarks are sexist are about as relevant as the attacks his camp made on Clinton and Ferraro calling them racist for innocent analysis comments. Looks like the GOP paid attention. The analysis could have been interpreted as racist through a certain lens, and the lipstick/pig and fish references could be and have been interpreted as sexist. Now Obama has a dilemma. Refuse to apologize and look like he really means it (look out!) or apologize saying that he was misunderstood and convey the slightest possibility that he didn’t mean it. Rock and a hard place. Same situation he offered to the Clintons and Ferraro. I think the whole problem with the pig statement is that Obama’s forays into folksy talk don’t work for him. First of all, these sayings don’t roll off his tongue, he has to force them out of his mouth (sounds more like Carville to me) and second of all, no one buys that he is folksy, so he looks fake. Like Kerry with that hunting rifle and in the wetsuit windsurfing. Best to just be who you are and tell everyone that’s what they need, because everyone can smell a fake and pandering remarks just get you in trouble.
By Buh- Bye on 09/10/2008 8:10 pm
No Kill and Drill Palin
My Alias….I sure agree with you there. Gore/Kerry both listened to advisors rather than just be authentic and i thought really unattractive and costs votes. If Obama does it will cost him with supporters, too. I agree, be yourself. For instance, I have more respect for Obama for admitting he smoked and inhaled ‘that was the point’. And that bend her backwards and ravish her kiss of Al Gore/Tipper on stage at the DNC nearly made me upchuck. (and I like Al Gore)….but the phony/staged stuff backfires with me bigtime. That kiss made me wince. Get a room Al.
By No Kill and Drill Palin on 09/10/2008 10:07 pm
Buh- Bye
OMG! DeCornelia you made me LOL!
By Buh- Bye on 09/10/2008 10:43 pm
Deni G
Late Tuesday, the Obama campaign shot back with a statement from senior adviser Anita Dunn, calling the attack “a pathetic attempt to play the gender card about the use of a common analogy - the same analogy that Senator McCain himself used about Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s health care plan just last year. This phony lecture on gender sensitivity is the height of cynicism and lays bare the increasingly dishonorable campaign John McCain has chosen to run.” It seems the context of Obama’s remark has been left out of this article. Enough with the stupid distractions. Here are Obama’s words: “The other side, suddenly, they’re saying ‘we’re for change too.’ Now think about it, these are the same folks that have been in charge for the last eight years,” the Illinois senator said to a crowd of 2,400 people. “You can put lipstick on a pig. It’s still a pig. You can wrap up an old fish in a piece of paper and call it change. It’s still going to stink after eight years. We’ve had enough,”

By Deni G on 09/10/2008 8:30 am
E .
Deni, looking at the entirety of Senator Obama’s quote that you’ve pasted here points out even more effectively that the negative imagery was intentional. The Obama campaign needs to quit playing by the GOP rules. It was successful in putting down Senator Clinton in the primary process but will never work in a campaign against the GOP candidate. Senator Obama has succeeded so far by building up a cult of personality - her garnered a ridiculous hero status that is now being picked away at by some in the media that helped to create this image in the first place. What he/his campaign failed to recognize (while they were basking in the all the glory and adulation) was that many media outlets were in his corner only for the time it took to eliminate Senator Clinton. Now it is Senator Obama’s turn to be taken out and he is playing right into their hands. It is so obvious that it borders on the ridiculous. He/his campaign needs to get out of the mirror, reevaluate and build on their strengths to win this election.
By E . on 09/10/2008 10:02 am
Deni G
E Flynn, Since you have referred to “the Dems and their media lapdogs” and Hillary Clinton as a b*tch, I am sure you understand, I won’t be putting much stock in your evaluation, opinion or concern.
By Deni G on 09/10/2008 10:28 am
E .
Deni, so you have gone through all my previous posts and cherry picked some of my words. Cherry-picking and out of context quotes to undermine someone’s point is underhanded and cheap to say the least. I am not about to go into my previous quotes in an attempt to defend myself against your attack but I will say that you are incorrect in your inference. You seem to think that I am against the Democratic ticket and if that is the case you are simply wrong. You owe me and yourself an apology.
By E . on 09/10/2008 10:41 am
Deni G
I looked at your past posts, because your post rang a familiar bell. Before I jumped the gun and made a rash judgment, I thought I should see if I was wrong. Obviously this has made you uncomfortable. I am not attacking you. In fact I was quite kind and considerate in not posting the whole of your remarks about Hillary. I make no inference. And I make no apology. This election is not Obama’s to win or lose. It is the American people’s win or loss.
By Deni G on 09/10/2008 11:03 am
E .
I looked at your past posts, because your post rang a familiar bell. Before I jumped the gun and made a rash judgment, I thought I should see if I was wrong. Obviously this has made you uncomfortable.” You carefully perused and considered all of my posts then, so as not to make a “rash judgment”? You’d have to juxtapose all my posts about Hillary with the one Hillary post that you are focused on in order to accurately characterize my intent. By the way you haven’t made me uncomfortable and I didn’t expect that you would apologize for the attack. “Kind and considerate” is very much not how you acted in your attack.
By E . on 09/10/2008 11:19 am
No Kill and Drill Palin
This election is not Obama’s to win or lose. It is the American people’s win or lose.” Is that EVER the case.
By No Kill and Drill Palin on 09/10/2008 12:37 pm
No Kill and Drill Palin
oops. realized say that expression and the meaning is clear, type it and maybe not. It IS the American people’s to win or lose…although the GOP operatives are already up to their dirty tricks caging the vote in Ohion etc…..but if the publc votes for 4 more years of the last 8 years—-then yes—they’ll proved once and for all just how dumb downed the US populace has become.
By No Kill and Drill Palin on 09/10/2008 12:40 pm
E .
Deni, I realize that you feel passionate about B. Obama’s campaign. That’s evident in your many posts here. Are you so blinded by your passion that you fail to see the irony and your own hypocrisy when in the very same thread you say “It seems the context of Obama’s remark has been left out of this article. Enough with the stupid distractions.” and then try to slam me by using snippets of posts that I’ve made and set them up against me out of context? Are you so blinded that you make excuses for that with such ease?
By E . on 09/10/2008 3:47 pm
amy lamb-hall
Deni, i agree this is up to Obama to play smart and fight fair. There is no reason he should have to attack Palin.He is running against McCain,I would think that Joe Biden would have some sort of debate with her.At least that is what i am hoping for.But the American women and men need to remember to be informed and vote. If we do not take a stand and stand up, we could be stuck with what we have now.I wish i could talk to Obama and tell him we would like to hear you and the party to rally together and get some good conversations going about the issues.In my eyes if we do not change the direction of this country now, we may not get another chance for a long time.And that would be very sad.
By amy lamb-hall on 09/10/2008 4:16 pm
Deni G
Hi Amy, There has been plenty of good conversation about the issues from Obama. McCain has nothing to say on the issues, because his policies and his voting record are the same as Bush’s. I am not sure what you are listening to and reading, but Obama is talking about the issues. We each must take responsibility for informing people and not sit and wait for the media to spoon feed us. The media is much happier spinning stories than talking about issues. If you do not know what Obamas’ proposals are, go to his website and then tell others. It is our job, to take the initiative in our country, not wait for anyone to do it for us. Obama is not about magically waving a wand for us. He is about empowering us at a grass roots level, to take back control of our country. His election is about developing communities at the grass roots level, not just to win an election, but to build on those organizations after he is elected. So that we do not hand our power over to the government. But instead use our power to shape government. To make that government work for us, rather than paying them to work for Big Business and Corporations. Building our Government from the ground, from the community, upward, not waiting for it to mythically trickle downward. A government of the people, by the people and for the people.
By Deni G on 09/10/2008 4:37 pm