Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 09/10/2008 8:40 am

McCain Camp: Obama Owes Palin Apology for Lipstick Joke

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Sarah Palin’s "lipstick" joke is being used against her — purposefully or not — and John McCain’s campaign isn’t happy about it.

"What’s the difference between a pit bull and a hockey mom?" the Alaskan governor said in her speech at the Republican convention last week. "Lipstick."

During a campaign stop in Virginia Tuesday, Sen. Barack Obama — in arguing that John McCain is more of the same of George Bush — said: "You can put lipstick on a pig … It’s still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still going to stink after eight years."

McCain’s campaign called the comments "offensive and disgraceful" and said Obama owes Palin an apology. His campaign even held a conference call with former Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift, a McCain supporter. 

Click here to listen to the conference call. 

"I think what’s most disappointing and the reason why we need to continually combat this stream of insults is that this is just the latest in the series of comments that many folks like me will find offensive, whether it is Sen. Biden’s comments about Gov. Palin being ‘good-looking,’ their strategist David Axelrod commenting that she obviously knows how to take orders or do what she’s told; the just disgraceful comment by their spokesman that compared her to a ‘Nazi sympathizer’; or the line that I, the mother of three children, find particularly offensive, questioning by one of his finance committee, trying to say that her children, one who has Down syndrome, she’s incapable of doing the job of being the vice president of the United States," Swift said.

"This is just the same old low-road, flinging accusations. And as I said, there are a number of us women across the Republican party, but I also think I’m joined by Independents and Democrats who aren’t going to let our discourse fall to this level. And I think the best way to get things back on the right track would be for Sen. Obama to issue an apology to Gov. Palin."

The Obama camp, which said Obama wasn’t referring to Palin at all, is also firing off verbal responses and e-mails in their defense.

"That expression is older than my grandfather’s grandfather, and it means that you can dress something up but it doesn’t change what it is,” Obama campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki told ABC News. "He was talking pretty clearly about the fact that you can’t just call yourself change when you’ve voted with George Bush 90 percent of the time."

Democrats point to a news article last fall that said McCain criticized Democrats for offering what he called costly universal health-care proposals that require too much government regulation. While he said he had not studied then-Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s plan, he said it was "eerily reminiscent" of the failed plan she offered as First Lady in the 1990s. "I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig," he said of her proposal.

They also point out that former Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee even said to give Obama a break on the lipstick comment.

"It’s an old expression, and I’m going to have to cut Obama some slack on that one," Huckabee told FOX News. "I do not think he was referring to Sarah Palin; he didn’t reference her. If you take the two soundbites together, it may sound like it. But I’ve been a guy at the podium many times, and you say something that’s maybe a part of an old joke and then somebody ties it in. So, I’m going to have to cut him slack."

137 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Deni G
drill baby drill” seems to be the McCain and Republican battle cry. But McCain and Palin and the Republicans are not drilling that oil for you and me. from Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) September 2, 2008 The Honorable Samuel W. Bodman U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 “Dear Secretary Bodman, On June 3, 2008 and July 30, 2008 respectively, your Department issued and affirmed an order pursuant to Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act that will allow two major integrated oil companies – ConocoPhillips and Marathon Oil – to export 98.1 billion cubic feet of Alaskan natural gas to Japan and other Pacific Rim countries. This order, which will allow the export of as much natural gas as is used by 1.4 million American families in a year, comes at a time when the President had demanded that the moratoria on oil and gas drilling along our environmentally-sensitive coastal areas be lifted and Americans are being warned that their winter heating bills are going to be dramatically higher. The Administration is trying to have it both ways – arguing that we need to drill everywhere because we don’t have adequate energy supplies, while finding that we have so much energy that big oil companies can export it overseas and keep prices here at home higher than they would otherwise be. ” Drill baby drill! And sell it to the Japanese! McCain/Palin the low road to nowhere.
By Deni G on 09/10/2008 1:41 pm
JJ GB
Maybe Sen. Obama should apologize to pigs, those with and without lipstick and to smelly fish? I did not connect the comment to Gov. Palin at all, but I guess if someone’s trying to make a mountain out of a molehill, they could take just about any comment and run amuck with it and before this campaign is over, I’m sure there will be others to do just that, probably from both sides. My understanding of the comment was in reference to the Republican run of the past 8 years and that no matter how it’s dressed up, it’s just more of the same if McCain is elected. Same thing with the “fish comment”. The media keeps these ridiculous fights going by reporting the same thing over and over and over. Enough already! The nerve of Sen. Biden calling Gov. Palin “good looking”. I am shocked! What is the world coming to when someone calls an attractive woman, “good looking”! Why, someone should just wash his mouth out with soap!
By JJ GB on 09/10/2008 1:54 pm
Bonita Caracciolo
Thanks JJ! Apologize to pigs indeed, hilarious. :)
By Bonita Caracciolo on 09/10/2008 7:34 pm
K K
I think Rove is taking his cues from Obama. When Obama says casually their playing the refs, well then, yes they will. Not only play the refs, but try to run out the clock out - 58 days - without Palin fouling out. They are going to keep her so heavily protected, it won’t matter if Obama, Biden or their surrogates double team her. Unfortunately, debate-wise.. I have a fear Biden will end up being the straight guy enabling her slings of humor and charm.
By K K on 09/10/2008 2:52 pm
Donna Leach
Diana T., I too see the response to a McCain’s call for an apology as unnecessary. Since Gov. Palin is the person who brought it up the lipstick fraze in the first place. This is politics and it gets dirty. As the Republicans know, since they are so good at making dirt out of nothing. If Palin can not stand the heat, then get out of the kitchen. The Democrats have been handling this campaign just fine. Although some of you seem to want a fight of some kind. Let us take the high road and keep to the issues, The Economy, Health care, the Iraq War and Terrorism and jobs.
By Donna Leach on 09/10/2008 2:55 pm
Tee Zee
Where’s the apology to the survivors of 9/11? Where’s the apology to the survivors of Katrina? Where’s the apology to the families who lost their loved ones in the Middle East?
By Tee Zee on 09/10/2008 3:14 pm
Sunny Inflorida
McCain is a hypocrit!!!! He has used the pig phrase too!!! From the AP….”The lipstick maxim is hardly new to either Obama or McCain. The Democrat has used it in the past, and McCain repeated the folksy metaphor when he criticized Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on health care. McCain was never accused of being sexist when he uttered those words. On Tuesday, Obama criticized McCain’s policies as similar to those of President Bush, saying: “You can put lipstick on a pig. It’s still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still going to stink after eight years.” The McCain campaign immediately jumped on the comments, arguing they were directed at Palin, the GOP’s first woman on a presidential ticket. In her acceptance speech last week, she had referred to herself in a joke about lipstick being the only difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull. Accusing Obama of “smearing” Palin in “offensive and disgraceful” comments, the McCain campaign demanded an apology. The McCain campaign on Wednesday issued an Internet ad that said Obama was talking about Palin and said of Obama: “Ready to lead? No. Ready to smear? Yes.” Obama’s campaign has accused the GOP camp of engaging in a “pathetic attempt to play the gender card.” The campaign noted two other instances of McCain using the phrase “lipstick on a pig” and its use by other Republicans such as House Minority Leader John Boehner and Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl.”
By Sunny Inflorida on 09/10/2008 3:51 pm
amy lamb-hall
owe her an apology?HAH!i saw 4 times today where that same slogan was used. if she feels threatened by that comment how do you think the poor pit bulls felt when she associated herself with the word LIPSTICK. We did not losely align her with lipstick. she did .if its good for the goose its good for the gander.unless she wants to aplogize to an entire breed of dogs, they need to take it as it was said. IN CONTEXT.
By amy lamb-hall on 09/10/2008 4:04 pm
Bonita Caracciolo
There you go again, makin’ me laugh! I hope we can get over this insane frenzy in the first quarter and get into some serious discussions. I can hardly wait for the debates! That’s when we can really eyeball these suckers.
By Bonita Caracciolo on 09/10/2008 7:41 pm
No Kill and Drill Palin
Bonita, Your posts crack me up…very colorful, and right on!
By No Kill and Drill Palin on 09/10/2008 10:34 pm
Bonita Caracciolo
Thank you Suzanne de C, just the response I’ve been looking for! I believe that you illicit the response that YOU do (response = attack) because you are sharing feelings that you clearly hold strong. When a person utters truisms, backed by evidence, people squirm. The American people do NOT want to know the truth, hear the truth, see the truth, or admit the truth. It is so much easier to pretend that everything is hunky-dory and follow along, as you say, like Sheeple. Where’s the outrage? Our country is in peril. It’s the old, “Nero fiddles while Rome burns” scenario. I may wince at your comments too, from time to time, but only because, as they say, “the truth hurts”. Keep it up and don’t be cowed into backing off. I admire anyone on any side who stands their ground as long as they study the facts and ignore the white noise. You’ve managed to do that.
By Bonita Caracciolo on 09/11/2008 5:54 am
Susan Gabriel
If the McCain campaign gets to pull stuff like this, then shouldn’t the Obama campaign get to use the word “lynching” to describe their tactics? It seems the overt gender issue is being used as a club to beat down the covert race issue. All of this proving that fighting fair is a lost art, at least in today’s political climate.
By Susan Gabriel on 09/10/2008 4:37 pm
Dutch 163
I am disgusted with the McCain campaign…it is clear Obama was talking about mcCain policies, not Palin with “lipstick/pig” comment…
By Dutch 163 on 09/10/2008 5:16 pm
~ countrywoman ~
Pigs? Flag pins? What’s new here? It is all about distracting us from examining the legitimate issues, and I am heartsick to see that in many ways, it is working. The talking heads (where so many voters tune in to get their minute of “news”) are wallowing in the distractions, discussing whether or not they are wallowing in the distractions, justifying the fact that they are wallowing in the distractions……I agree with an earlier post…..this is the Twilight Zone. Thanks to all who speak out and are not willing to buy into this destructive self-defeating smoke screen. We need to keep asking the question “What is it they do not want us to see?”
By ~ countrywoman ~ on 09/10/2008 5:33 pm
John G
Each side has things they do not want us to see. As others have stated, this is just another layer on the huge heap they’ve been piling up for the last year or so. They rely upon the lazy U.S. public. They are all looking to not have to commit to anything real. They are politicians, not saints. They would sell their grandmother to get to the next power level. There is no such thing as a truthful politician… only a true politician.
By John G on 09/10/2008 6:45 pm