Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 09/10/2008 8:40 am

McCain Camp: Obama Owes Palin Apology for Lipstick Joke

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Sarah Palin’s "lipstick" joke is being used against her — purposefully or not — and John McCain’s campaign isn’t happy about it.

"What’s the difference between a pit bull and a hockey mom?" the Alaskan governor said in her speech at the Republican convention last week. "Lipstick."

During a campaign stop in Virginia Tuesday, Sen. Barack Obama — in arguing that John McCain is more of the same of George Bush — said: "You can put lipstick on a pig … It’s still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still going to stink after eight years."

McCain’s campaign called the comments "offensive and disgraceful" and said Obama owes Palin an apology. His campaign even held a conference call with former Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift, a McCain supporter. 

Click here to listen to the conference call. 

"I think what’s most disappointing and the reason why we need to continually combat this stream of insults is that this is just the latest in the series of comments that many folks like me will find offensive, whether it is Sen. Biden’s comments about Gov. Palin being ‘good-looking,’ their strategist David Axelrod commenting that she obviously knows how to take orders or do what she’s told; the just disgraceful comment by their spokesman that compared her to a ‘Nazi sympathizer’; or the line that I, the mother of three children, find particularly offensive, questioning by one of his finance committee, trying to say that her children, one who has Down syndrome, she’s incapable of doing the job of being the vice president of the United States," Swift said.

"This is just the same old low-road, flinging accusations. And as I said, there are a number of us women across the Republican party, but I also think I’m joined by Independents and Democrats who aren’t going to let our discourse fall to this level. And I think the best way to get things back on the right track would be for Sen. Obama to issue an apology to Gov. Palin."

The Obama camp, which said Obama wasn’t referring to Palin at all, is also firing off verbal responses and e-mails in their defense.

"That expression is older than my grandfather’s grandfather, and it means that you can dress something up but it doesn’t change what it is,” Obama campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki told ABC News. "He was talking pretty clearly about the fact that you can’t just call yourself change when you’ve voted with George Bush 90 percent of the time."

Democrats point to a news article last fall that said McCain criticized Democrats for offering what he called costly universal health-care proposals that require too much government regulation. While he said he had not studied then-Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s plan, he said it was "eerily reminiscent" of the failed plan she offered as First Lady in the 1990s. "I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig," he said of her proposal.

They also point out that former Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee even said to give Obama a break on the lipstick comment.

"It’s an old expression, and I’m going to have to cut Obama some slack on that one," Huckabee told FOX News. "I do not think he was referring to Sarah Palin; he didn’t reference her. If you take the two soundbites together, it may sound like it. But I’ve been a guy at the podium many times, and you say something that’s maybe a part of an old joke and then somebody ties it in. So, I’m going to have to cut him slack."

137 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Lori Smaltz
By Lori Smaltz on 09/11/2008 3:08 pm
Bonita Caracciolo
Lori, sorry (long day at work). I like the positive approach to immigration reform. Thanks for your efforts in providing that info. As the child of immigrants, this is a very sensitive subject to me. Indeed, many of the immigrants being referred to are illegal. We, as Americans, must be willing to shoulder some of the responsibility! We’re talking something like TWELVE MILLION (presumably) illegal aliens in this country, many from Mexico and Central America. So, here’s my question, where were our leaders TWELVE MILLION illegal aliens ago?? I’ll tell you where, turning a blind eye for the sake of filling menial positions that Americans were no longer willing to do. From top to bottom, you can bet many, many perfectly fine American citizens employed these folks. But many still abused them, didn’t pay a living wage, didn’t pay taxes on them and got real cheap, desperate labor! It’s still going on. Let me tell you a little story: when I bring up the issue of immigration reform and I remind people that I am the product of an immigrant Italian family that came to this country in the 1900s—for the very same reasons these folks did—the response is, “well, your father did it the ‘right way’ “, i.e., came on a boat with papers and all that, had to be de-liced and whatever other things to be allowed off that boat. The only difference between those people and slaves is that my ancestors were allowed to stand up unshackled. The conditions were god-awful. If Italy had been attached to the border of the United States, I can pretty much promise you that they would’ve crossed any river, climbed any mountain, topped any fence…for a chance at life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. There’s got to be a more humane way to deal with this than to simply go hell-bent rounding up hundreds of good people and ripping them from their communities, their homes, their schools and their neighbors to send them back where they risked their lives to GET OUT OF! That’s my “rant” on the subject for now. I think that immigration is not being addressed in a balanced way by the presidential campaigns is because 1) they don’t know what to do about it and have no plan and 2) it’s way too sensitive for some to even address. Also, and this is just paranoid me talking, I suspect some of these illegals will “magically” be voting. But that’s just me! What do you think we should do? Any ideas?
By Bonita Caracciolo on 09/11/2008 7:39 pm
Lori Smaltz
Bonita, I believe the figure for illegal immigrants is more like 14 MILLION and I understand that 2 MILLION of this 14 MILLION are illegal immigrants that have committed crimes. Since last year, citizenship fees rose from $400 to $675. This rise will most likely cause a decrease in applicants. I find the following [Obama] article to be an accurate conclusion: Immigrants are scapegoats for high unemployment rates Q: How do you address high unemployment & declining wages in the African-American community related to the flood of immigrant labor? A: Before the latest round of immigrants showed up, you had huge unemployment rates among African-American youth. So to suggest somehow that the problem that we’re seeing in inner-city unemployment, for example, is attributable to immigrants is a case of scapegoating that I do not believe in, I do not subscribe to. There is no doubt that we have to get control of our borders. We can’t have hundreds of thousands of people coming over to the US without us having any idea who they are. We have to crack down on those employers that are taking advantage of the situation, hiring folks who cannot complain about worker conditions, who aren’t getting the minimum wage sometimes, or aren’t getting overtime. There are a whole host of reasons why we have not been generating the kinds of jobs that we are generating. We should not use immigration as a tactic to divide. Source: 2008 Democratic debate in Los Angeles before Super Tuesday Jan 31, 2008 Sorry, I didn’t mean to run with this but felt it was an important thing to read. ~Lori
By Lori Smaltz on 09/11/2008 8:54 pm
Donna Leach
Bonita, The issue of immigration as a single issue has not been on the forefront of the candidate’s platforms. However, it is in almost every issue that is so vital to running this country, The Economy, the War(s), Health care, Women’s Rights, Housing ( via the Foreclosures) and our everyday needs. So if we continue to dwell on the distractions that are bated by the mass media ( Like the “Lipstick on a Pig” issue). We also don”t allow ourselves at this vital time, to keep focused on the REAL ISSUES.
By Donna Leach on 09/11/2008 11:24 am
Bonita Caracciolo
Donna, I agree and that’s why I am going to try to block this stuff out (it’s very tempting for me ‘cause I like a good argument) but I’d rather talk about the issues and try to be civilized which I promised Question Almost Everything I would do. :) Furthermore, Lori appears to be a young woman who is here to get some sensible conversation going from here “elders”. I don’t like the idea that any young people are being influenced by this stupid pig/lipstick embarrasment.
By Bonita Caracciolo on 09/11/2008 7:44 pm
Eliza Dodd
Go to Obama /Biden web site and look at the SMEAR page …and read what the Rep.’s have done to Obama ..And you can read all the Big Lies Palin has told along with McNut ! This Palin is the Worlds greates Liar ..Ya know the kind who looks you in the eyes and tries to make you BELIEVE it ? I cant stand those kinds of women …She makes me want to Puke ..She knows like all the other know they are Just Using Her ….She is not a WOMAN …she is a MOLE !
By Eliza Dodd on 09/11/2008 1:29 pm
Mrs. Cheryl Hampton
My word, My word, no one has put it better than that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!KUDOS TO YOU
By Mrs. Cheryl Hampton on 09/15/2008 7:42 pm
starry Nite
Karl Rove and the republican machine are fantastic - they are brillant . Too bad they don’t use this brillance to help our country instead continuing on with the destruction of a great country. I travel outside the country and I am always reminded how great our country is. I am amazed that we are so willing to give this away because women identify with an “average Hockey Mom” who in reality is not like the average working mother at all. Just an illusion. They are missing an opportunity to get real help. If she has all these great helpful plans why hasn’t she shared them ?
By starry Nite on 09/11/2008 1:54 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
Rovian evil genius aside, it does seem that the McCain camp’s claim that they have a trademark on the word “lipstick” should send shivers through the halls of Revlon, Clinique, and its corporate brethren. Will they have to license it from the Senator if they want to market their wares?
By Elizabeth Bennett on 09/12/2008 8:09 pm
rocky rocky
Watching this Sunday’s morning shows and reading some of this thread (just to postpone getting back to work, which I must do after posting this). Result = tangled webs come to mind. Or maybe chaos theory come to life. It seems the republican electorate must do three things simultaneously: (a) perpetuate their candidate’s lies, half-truths, and distortions because that’s how their leaders say they can win; (b) make a guess about what their candidate really means to do if elected; and (c) rationalize their loyalty — consciously or not — by insisting that the Dem candidate is lying, too. The real problem is that the Dem supporters keep acting as if the Reps BELIEVED all that drek. They don’t. After saying IT’S NOT TRUE really boldly, the strategists say, immediately go on to what the Reps DO NOT want to talk about: their record on the issues! I believe them: the Obama vs Palin argument cannot get the Dems anywhere. Get the discussion back every time to Obama vs McCain; that’s the argument the Dems cannot lose.
By rocky rocky on 09/14/2008 10:51 am
Melanie Waldrop
I think that Obama owes an apology to pork and—ahem—porkers everywhere if he’s calling Palin a pig!
By Melanie Waldrop on 09/14/2008 1:25 pm
rocky rocky
Maybe there’s just too much lead in America’s water.
By rocky rocky on 09/14/2008 3:38 pm
Melanie Waldrop
My above comment was merely meant as a little comedy relief. I whole hartedly agree with you regarding the GOP’s reticence to discuss the records of the current republican administration, the issues regarding their own policies, or any other matters of any real substance. Accountability has NEVER been the GOP’s strong suite (for example, our horrible economic condition secondary to the high cost of gas isn’t due to poor leadership/mismanagement within this republican administration/sanctioned profiteering on the part of the oil industry—an interest in which both G.W. Bush and Palin’s husband are involved…”NO! These difficulties are caused by liberals in congress who don’t want to drill in Alaska!” they declare). It has long been the republicans’ habit to wave the flag and mention hot button topics like prayer in school, Roe v.Wade, or any other emotionally charged issue (or rather non-issue) that will get fundamentalist ministers across the nation to whip their congregations into a frenzy and propel them toward the polls in November. This is nothing but a charade,..huckstering and grandstanding by the use of so much smoke and mirrors!
By Melanie Waldrop on 09/14/2008 7:31 pm
rocky rocky
Hi Melanie — My one-liner was not meant as a response to your comedy relief, although I can see why you would think so. If it had been, I’d have hit your “reply” button. No, I was just expressing frustration and sent it out into the wOw universe. Good to read the post above however. You made some interesting points. Best, R
By rocky rocky on 09/15/2008 8:11 am
John G
While I agree with your statements regarding Sarah and McCain, I also know that fundamentalist ministers of Obama fans will be whipping up their congregations also… it works for both. Unfortunately, since I would much prefer that magical deities are totally absent from the government for the next four years.
By John G on 09/16/2008 3:54 pm