Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Liz Smith | 04/01/2008 1:04 pm

Is Adultery Bred Into the Male Animal?

Liz Smith

Once again I have to cite my favorite magazine The Week for reminding us of a question that seems eternal. Is it true evolution has bred the male of the species to philander?

This was asked of David Barish in the L.A. Times and he answered: “Among our fellow mammals, males are invariably aggressive sexual adventurers driven by their genes to couple with as many partners as possible.”

Mr. Barish went on to remind of the movie scene in Nora Ephron’s “Heartburn” where the father tells the weeping Meryl Streep “You want monogamy? Marry a swan.”

Also in the Times, Jennie Dusheck answered back that DNA analysis of offsprings’ parentage reveals that infidelity is common among female animals as well as male. She added, “Scientists have been pushing this threadbare argument that men just can’t help themselves for years … The larger question is why we’re even looking to the animal kingdom for lessons in morality. Unlike animals, which have no consciences, human beings can choose whether to act upon an impulse or to suppress it.”

Then, also in the Times, Meghan Daum writes, “Despite abundant evidence to the contrary, most of us desperately want to think that long-term sexual monogamy will work … That’s why people find these public sex scandals so fascinating — and so terrifying. When a straight-arrow family man such as Spitzer gets caught hiring hookers, or an anti-gay crusader like Sen. Larry Craig is arrested for soliciting sex in a men’s room, it suggests that human beings – including your spouse — are, sexually speaking, secretly capable of anything.”

I, Liz, know some happily married people where it appears neither of them cheat. But I know hundreds of other unhappily married people. And even happy ones who cheat.

I would like to hear from our women friends on this subject …

 

NOTE:  Don’t forget to read my nationally syndicated column today! 

Read more about: Adultery, Love, Marriage, Silda Spitzer

51 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Pamela Munro
Nothing is worse than an unhappy marriage (which encourages cheating) and nothing is better than a happy marriage (which does not). I am now happily monogamous with my first true marriage after several false starts. But my husband is a good and honorable man who shares my sense of spirituality, which I think is even more important than mere “morality.” It’s time that the males took responsibility for their lack of control. Why does the corralling of males always fall into the hands of the females? It’s just passing the buck. And as bad as it is in the West, in more Asiatic cultures, it is even WORSE.
By Pamela Munro on 04/01/2008 4:12 pm
Bella Mia
I’n finishing my degree in therapy and work with a sex and marriage therapist. In order for people to cheat, they have to justify it, and our culture has provided more convenient justifications for men. Nature weighs less heavily on men, than women, with it’s consequences for promiscuity - or at least it used to before DNA paternity tests, and mandatory child support. But there is a correlation to self-indulgence and adultery. Research has found that those people who were more indulged as children by their parents, were more self-indulgent as adults, feeling more entitled to benefit themselves at the expense of other people. (www.selfindulgence.info.) That’s why the Spitzer debacle was no surprise. He was on a self-indulgent train he couldn’t get off, or should I say, too painful to get off. Women may indulge with chocolate, but men, with their high testosterone levels, and social incentives fling themselves into the same sand trap over and over. Now more than ever, women are given permission to justify their affairs. It’s a move in a toxic direction. The assumption should be that people will certainly stumble and fail at hard things. A long term relationship is a work of art, challenging, with the forces of chaos and complexity and law of entropy tearing at it everyday. It would be interesting, if I were Silda’s therapist, to ask her if there had ever been an agreement between her and her husband about WHEN the temptation arose, not IF but WHEN, what would be the protocol in the relationship. Did they have a plan? Did they discuss that it would be a probable temptation, since most people in a long term relationship would be tempted. A man of Spitzers power would definitely have the temptation presented to him. My husband and I are relatively attractive and so we agreed we would be transparent about any situations or thoughts that involved another person. Many have come along, all of which, to date have been instigated by third parties, like the receptionist at the dentist office - twice!! What is fascinating is to discuss the interaction, and then ask “Why not?” The pluses are few and the consequences many. I think fidelity requires constant vigilance and awareness of human nature. I would ask her: How could anyone assume that this wouldn’t happen to them, and not plan for the inevitable temptation? The same goes for money and business - people will naturally be tempted to take short-cuts and make unethical decisions based on expediency. Plan ahead for human foibles.
By Bella Mia on 04/01/2008 4:14 pm
Andy C
I absolutely agree! The male has been given a ‘pass’ on fidelity. We have a friend who, with such an incredulous look on his face, told my husband that he (my husband) is the only married guy he knows that doesn’t cheat! He wasn’t sure if that made me the greatest thing since Eve or made my husband some sort of weird anamoly. I’m in the middle of reading “The Senator’s Wife” by Sue Miller where she so poignantly describes the feelings of the betrayed wife…….such pain, such sorrow, such loss. And, of course, such limited choices are then left to a wife so betrayed. How sad that we must plan ahead for “human foibles”…..are to be as Harry in “When Harry Met Sally” and he’s on his rant about labeling ashtrays and vases?
By Andy C on 04/03/2008 9:55 am
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Complex topic. Morality is time, culture, individual beliefs and socialization. For me if there is no trust there is no real love. My first husband I trusted totally. He’s been dead a long time. My second was a CEO-entitled type 26 years older. As myopic a Pollyanna as I was then, it didn’t take too long to figure out I was the set piece, and that he had a lifelong ‘hobby’ that wasn’t going to change. With in-your-face-proof, I moved into the guest room until my son’s school term was over and we could leave without disrupting his studies. I told my husband that I had a sense of humor, he should continue with his hobby—that everyone needs one. And he was never getting his hands again on me. Despite the pre-nup I left without a cent to avoid unpleasantness. I hadn’t wanted to get remarried, he insisted and my son wanted it. For now, I greatly prefer being single, but believe when I relocate to the South of France and have Act Three well underway that’s when I’ll meet the one right for me. And at the Farmer’s Market in Aix-en-Provence. You know that Aix was literally built around Apollo…..!
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/01/2008 5:19 pm
Frank Peterson
Highly complex. I find it difficult as a man to be calm in the face of some of the hatred of men I read in some of these posts. But I do remain rational. I have to. I’ve been married twice, my first wife died when she and I were very young; my second, didn’t work out the way it should have and for that we are both equally to blame. Though I do think now after 3 years that it was a marriage that should never have happened. The mistakes people make. And the people some people marry. Regarding men’s sexual appetites and affairs, cheating, whatever it’s called, I curiously find that all of my male friends are monogamous. At least I see no sign of them wandering. They seem genuinely happy as do their wives. Do men have an inbuilt cheating factor, a genetic malformation? I have not idea. Do all men exercise this this putative factor: I’m not sure—I know I haven’t and didn’t and had no need to do so. But then perhaps mine is the aberrant factor in a male’s makeup. The south of France—when you go, lucky lady, check out the Luberon valley, truly as lovely place on earth as I have ever seen. I can smell the terroir and taste the wine even now after so many years. Beau in Seattle with some two buck chuck in the fridge.
By Frank Peterson on 04/01/2008 5:42 pm
Anistasia Beaverhousen
Don’t worry frank, men’s hatred toward women is ALL over porn and other media. You got it easy unless you’re black. As far as female infidelity, it makes complete sense. All of it does. Men are born to get women pregnant, as many as possible. That’s why most men visually scan looking for what’s on all their magazine covers- thin, young women. Thin, can’t be pregnant, young, more likely to get pregnant if you have sex with her. This is for the most Neanderthal of men who are not mature, but any man will naturally be attracted to it. It’s normal. Now, as far as women, it would make no sense for a women to have more than two children with one man. If he is genetically inferior, diabetes lets say, then she did all this work and her children will all die. If she breaks it up, fall in love for two to four years, the common amount among poverty females and celebrity females who have resources/money, have two kids or one with the next guy you fall in love with, then two with the next guy you fall in love with, on and on. See, mix up the genetics and you have a higher rate of surviving children who breed at fourteen and fifteen. That was the common age. This was common behavior. It’s on both sexes as nature wants to do one thing, even if the human has no food, as evidenced by women in Africa-BREED!!! Then BREED!!! So, now we have a bunch of civilization stuff with some religion (made up for men to control) in the last ten thousand years, and you have the tide swung for men and now the women swinging back. But the smartest animals know two healthy, loved, groomed, educated children will fare the best after you are dead. Watch out though, you may simply be out numbered by idiocracy and the meek shall indeed inherit the earth right before it implodes from trashing the environment. There I go predicting the end after explaining the beginning.
By Anistasia Beaverhousen on 04/01/2008 7:13 pm
Mugsy Peabody
So now you get it how women have felt for centuries, excluded from everything except what men told them was okay. Why not just sit quietly and maybe you could learn something from women who have lived a lifetime dealing with this sexist bullshit.
By Mugsy Peabody on 04/01/2008 8:18 pm
brad berger
No
By brad berger on 04/01/2008 5:40 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Yeah, Brad, we get that from you.
By Mugsy Peabody on 04/01/2008 8:19 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Mugsy, I’m going to have to swallow the tea (BTW UP! Barry’s very strong gold label import) every time I spot your avatar and BEFORE reading. Otherwise my greatly beloved Apple laptop is in danger of becoming toast. Too funny.
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/01/2008 8:25 pm
brad berger
Mugsy since I have two young daughters rather than BSing how come women haven’t activated their consciences to relight the torch for the ERA amendment and finally get it passed. It seems to me that with the election coming up Congress would be scared not to get the amendment out of committee and pass the amendment again and quickly. Also the individual states would have to move quickly and ratify the amendment since those men will be running scared since women could easily challenge them. I believe that women now have the numbers and power and powerful women to get the amendment passed. Anyway all is well with the world the Yankees won their first game.
By brad berger on 04/01/2008 8:41 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Ah, finally, something we can agree on! The Yankees!
By Mugsy Peabody on 04/01/2008 8:44 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Okay, okay, I’ve got a story for you. In the 70s, my father called me and said, “Your mother has lost her mind.” “Why? What’s going on?” “She’s handcuffed herself to the gates of the statehouse in Springfield because they’re talking about not passing the ERA.” “Well, Daddy,” I said, “I just have one question for you. Why aren’t you there with her?”
By Mugsy Peabody on 04/01/2008 8:46 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Baseball Fans- Bush getting righteously booed at National throwing out the first pitch. Sorry to report fans were waterboarded right after the game, but did receive free Bush Bobble Heads. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qCDX02DfIM&feature=related
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/01/2008 9:14 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Baseball clip…oops selected wrong one…the poster added bad language etc…. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eProtMK3l4Q
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/01/2008 10:15 pm