Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 09/02/2008 10:40 am

Moms: Can Palin Pull Off Motherhood and Vice Presidency?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Sarah Palin holding infant Trig/AP

When John McCain announced Sarah Palin as his running mate, many hailed his choice as brilliant – a young, working hockey mom who wasn’t afraid to take on the Establishment.

But The New York Times reports that some mothers across the country are doubting whether the Alaska governor — who has five children, including an infant with Down syndrome and a pregnant teenage daughter — has enough time to take care of her family and be the country’s vice president.

Plus, some say they are worried that any campaign stumbles might hold consequences for other working mothers.

"There’s nervousness among working moms of both parties that how she does in this race will reflect on the overall ability of working moms," Cindi Leive, the editor of Glamour magazine and a mother of two, told the Times.

Social conservatives, usually staunch advocates for stay-at-home motherhood, are mostly defending her, while some others, including some working mothers, worry that she is taking on too much.

"How is this really going to work?" said Karen Shopoff Rooff, an independent voter, personal trainer and mother of two in Austin, TX. "I don’t care whether she’s the mother or the father; it’s a lot to handle."

But Lori Viars, a mother of two and evangelical Christian from Lebanon, OH, cheered the candidacy as well as the decision of both Palin women to keep their babies. "The whole family is pro-life, and they put that into practice even when it’s not easy," Viars said.

Within minutes of Friday’s announcement that Palin was joining the Republican ticket, administrators of one website, D.C. Urban Moms, said they had received hundreds of postings about Palin and her family stresses, more than on any other political issue this year. Many women, citing their own difficulties with less-demanding jobs, said it would be impossible for Palin to succeed both at motherhood and in the White House.

"You can juggle a BlackBerry and a breast pump in a lot of jobs, but not in the vice presidency," said Christina Henry de Tessan, a mother of two in Portland, OR, who supports Sen. Barack Obama.

64 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

ame wadler
Can she pull it off is the totally wrong question. That question of working woman vs. neglected family has been asked and resoundedly answered many times over. Has anyone asked Barak Obama that quesiton — after all, he has small children as well. The real question is can she pull off those things the country needs…not can she juggle work and family.
By ame wadler on 09/02/2008 11:15 am
Susan B
You are exactly right! What does being a working woman have to do with it? The question is, should she have been hired for THIS job.
By Susan B on 09/02/2008 11:47 pm
Dana Jae
The question here, people, is about sound judgment and character of both John McCain and Sarah Palin. We should leave the family alone as Obama has demanded of his campaign team, but we, the constituency, can’t leave the mother alone because she is playing in the highest stakes game for the #2 (and quite possibly #1) seat of power in this nation. Neither McCain nor Palin are fit to govern this country. They both show an incredible LACK of sound judgment and neither have an admirable character. No matter what the real circumstances (be it cover-up or as the Repubs are presenting this), Sarah Palin does not even put her family first, so how can we assume she’ll put country first? Most teenage pregnancies occur due to motherly neglect. I’m sure Sarah Pallin didn’t mean to neglect her eldest daughter, but she was too busy running Alaska and having a baby of her own at exactly the time she claims her daughter got pregnant (5 months ago, someone gave birth to Trig, right?) It’s completely irresponsible of a new Governor to find herself pregnant her first year in office. I’m sure you can run the state of Alaska in the situation she’s in, but this campaign and office require her 24/7. Now, the new young mom faces one of the toughest times in her young life while her mother campaigns day & Night and then would theoretically take office one month after her daughter’s new baby is born in a place that is 4,245 miles from Alaska. And how about the special needs new baby? Mom is on the campaign trail full-time PLUS for the next ten weeks while this poor child who needs a LOT of love and attention is being held and cared for by her sister (who is getting practice, I suppose.) All of this is under the guise that Sarah Palin is pro-life and pro-family values. This is good character with sound judgment? This person should be our next V.P.? I’m all for working Moms, but working at a reasonable job, not running the U.S. (And yes, she’s just THAT close to the Presidency as we know with Mr. McCain being a senior citizen with health issues.) McCain’s list of character flaws would cause me to keep writing here until Nov. 4 (and I still wouldn’t be done). He showed terrible judgment in choosing Palin which is clearly 100% for political gain and has 0% to do with putting country first and “straight talk”. This is a man you would trust to get us out of a war with Iraq? This is a man you would trust to choose (potentially) three new supreme court justices and many, many more important decisions? We don’t need a maverick like this, people.
By Dana Jae on 09/02/2008 11:28 am
Chrome Toe
Most teenage pregnancies occur due to motherly neglect.” Dana - extensive research has shown that teen pregnancies occur because two teens.. one female and one male.. have sex.
By Chrome Toe on 09/02/2008 12:26 pm
Kathrine Gluvna
This is not a question we asked Obama.
By Kathrine Gluvna on 09/02/2008 11:45 am
Susan B
Yes, and I’m frankly surprised, and dismayed, that the question was asked on this site.
By Susan B on 09/02/2008 11:48 pm
K O
In all fairness, I think we must separate whether the candidate represents one’s positions on the issues from this argument of whether a woman can have a family and a responsible job. I hope the women’s rights movement has addressed the latter issue, and hope the two are argued separately.
By K O on 09/02/2008 11:46 am
The Granny
I am afraid that her role is being re-defined from “soccer mom” to “super mom” in light of the recent revelation of her daughter’s situation. This role will distract from her experience and qualifications for the position of vice president. My concern is that her family situation will become a banner for “a woman can have it all” and negate the issue of the vice presidency.
By The Granny on 09/02/2008 11:55 am
Maurine H
I don’t think the “working mom” issue is in dispute as much as the “priority” issue is. Sarah Palin has a family that obviously needs some guidance and focus. With a special-needs infant and a pregnant daughter, and three other children, Sarah Palin has chosen to run for the second-highest office in the country. Obviously, her ambition outweighs her commitment to her children. So, let’s be honest about it. She touts her family values, conservative, anti-choice, abstinence-only education, creationism views, but in microcosm, her own family is an example of the negative side of some of those positions. All of that aside, my biggest question is: if John McCain were to die in office, would Sarah Palin, governor of Alaska for less than two years, be able to take over the management of this country - a country at war, a country whose economy is faltering, a country that needs a strong leadership with real integrity? Sarah Palin, who, in the 1990s was not even a Republican but a member of the Alaska Independence Party, which has at times sought a vote on whether the state should secede from the Union, is certainly unprepared and unable to provide the kind of leadership that my country needs.
By Maurine H on 09/02/2008 11:57 am
Chrome Toe
Okay.. this is a question that pisses me off. I am not voting for McCain so this isn’t a partisan statemetn. But why the hell isn’t anyone talking about Biden being a bad dad for continueing to do his job as a politician after the death of his wife and child… making him a single parent with a traumatized kid?? Nooo… we’re making him out to be a hero who served the public through crisis. but we’re asking if Palin is a crummy mom for basically doing the same thing?? Although I have yet to hear whether or not her husband is involved or how he handles the home stuff. This entire focus of debate about palin is absolutely flat out sexist. And not because my vote is for a PARENT of either sex to spend hours and hours away from home working on an ambitious career. But my vote is to not make the fact that she’s a mom importatn when we don’t do it with men. obama’s got little kids… McCain has several kids. He didn’t even know his wife was addicted to pain killers he was gone from home so much. But no ones discussing this about the men in this campaign. Argggg… seriously pushed my buttons.
By Chrome Toe on 09/02/2008 12:05 pm
Chips AHoey
exactly!
By Chips AHoey on 09/02/2008 2:20 pm
Maurine H
Kelly - Biden had no choice. He had a family to support. Palin has a working husband and she has a new baby. She doesn’t have to work. She chooses to work. That’s the difference.
By Maurine H on 09/02/2008 3:49 pm
Chrome Toe
Maurine - the point isn’t who has the most moral authority to do this or not do it. I can’t comment on the Biden thing as I have no idea what his circumstances were. He may or may not have “had” to work and he may or may not have “had” to work at such a demanding job which requires long long periods of time away from home in order to simply support his family. For all we know he had other means of support or other choices he could have made that would have kept him from being gone so much… SO.. with that said. Maybe i’m not clear when I write. But the point is that we should not be having this discussion about ANY female candidate if we are not going to be having this discussion about the male candidates.
By Chrome Toe on 09/02/2008 4:31 pm
Maurine H
Hi Kelly - I can comment on “the Biden thing”. Joe Biden did not come from wealth and worked his way up the ladder by his own efforts. He did have to work after the tragic deaths of his wife and daughter and he had two badly injured sons to care for. He did an admirable job, choosing not to further uproot his boys, but commuting to Washington every single day so that they could remain in familiar surroundings. Sarah Palin has shown herself to be cut of a different fabric, and I am within my rights to question her priorities with respect to a family that has some deep problems and challenges. However, as I said before, that’s not my major concern with Gov. Palin. Her qualifications, lack of any national experience, admitted ignorance about the Iraq war and the job of the Vice President are convincing arguments that she is far from qualified or ready to hold such an important office. I repeat the question I have asked all along. If circumstances made it necessary, would you want Sarah Palin to take over the Presidency of the United States? Personally, I shudder at the thought.
By Maurine H on 09/02/2008 10:48 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
Friday night, Arsenio Hall was on Leno, and quipped that Sarah Silverman had more foreign policy experience than Sarah Palin. I bet if you think about it, you could come up with a dozen Republicans with pro-life credentials who have more qualifications for the Presidency [and therefore vice presidency] than Palin. Many people do not remember that in Reagan’s second term, GHWB maneuvered a great many things, including Iran-Contra [for which he later pardoned all who were indicted] and cooked up his own little empire. Who the Veep is really does matter. We are still suffering the fallout of some of the decisions GHWB made as veep. Reagan did not really want to pick Bush; he wasn’t crazy about him, but none of his other picks worked out. I have a friend who majored in international relations and then went to law school. We were having brunch six months after her son was born, and she confessed that in order to pay proper attention to her son, she had had to forget whole chunks of information she had previously known cold about treaties and foreign politics. I do think that when children are infants and toddlers and when one is the principal caretaker, it is not easy to keep on top of other things because they demand so much of one’s attention—and they tend to leave one sleep deprived. Nancy Pelosi chose to enter politics after her children were older. But I agree that Palin’s children are the least disqualifying thing about her. She is a total lightweight. If you asked her to explain the mideast situation, I bet she could not even tell you which countries border Iraq.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 09/03/2008 11:21 am