Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 05/29/2008 2:57 pm

Monica Crowley to Scott McClellan: 'Not Cool' to Kiss 'n' Tell With Bush Still in Office

Editor’s Note: Monica Crowley, Ph.D., is a panelist on The McLaughlin Group, the host of the nationally syndicated radio program, "The Monica Crowley Show," and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

It used to be, back in the day, that those who served their country in high positions — positions of authority and importance — would honor their offices and the office they ultimately served: the presidency. Even when they may have acted dishonorably in office, they kept the dirty linens to themselves. That’s what was expected of them, and that’s what they did.

They didn’t write kiss ‘n’ tells. They didn’t spill the beans. They didn’t tell tales out of school.

They kept their counsel, and went to their graves with the stories that gentlemen simply did not tell.

Good-bye to all that.

The unspoken rule of political memoirs once was: you can write what you’d like, and you can express disagreements and even once-confidential conversations (provided enough time had elapsed so as not to imperil national security secrets or anyone’s reputation), but you must only do it once the presidency in which you had served had ended. There was to be no memoir writing while the president for whom you had worked was still in office.

George Stephanopoulos was the first high-ranking White House official to publish a tell-all while his president was still in office. All Too Human was a scathing look inside the highly dysfunctional Clinton White House, published nine months before Bill and Hillary backed up the moving van and made off with the White House furniture.

Was it salacious? Yup. Was it delightful? You bet. Was it proper? Not really.

Now a new memoir is hitting the bookshelves, written by former Bush press secretary Scott McClellan. In it, he blasts the president for relying on "propaganda" to sell the Iraq war, which he now deems "unnecessary." He attacks the vice president and Secretary Condi Rice for incompetence and arrogance, and goes after the president for being stubbornly attached to certain positions.

Some of these criticisms may have merit. The events we are in the midst of now will one day be history, and the history of the administration will be looked at from many angles and with many sets of eyes.

But for someone who was once the president’s confidante, someone he knew and trusted, someone who gave him the opportunity of a lifetime, to write a tell-all while that history is still being made is not cool. There will be plenty of memoirs coming out of the Bush administration. Most will be cover-your-tushy affairs, as memoirs often are. Some will paint a glossy picture. Some will be critical. But their timing is crucial.

McClellan could have published this book in eight months, when Bush was on his way out the door. But then, he wouldn’t have sold as many books. Publishing now may make him a bit wealthier, but it’s simply not cool to do to your former boss and your president. Not cool at all.

273 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Everyone--into the Rose Garden
One of those oh so polite Clinton supporters at the DNC Rules Committee meeting. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KACQuZVAE3s Great lady vote for McCain…you were going to vote for war-mongering Hillary so why not vote for war-mongering MCain—who cares.
By Everyone--into the Rose Garden on 06/01/2008 3:49 am
Jenny Oops
I’m betwixed amd between in my reaction to Scott McClellean’s ‘tell all’. On the one hand, I think — “finally, thank God”. On the other hand: gotta wonder about his reasons. I’m very uncomfortable with the whole thing no matter which stand we take. Someone in the media suggested we charge Bush and Buddies and handmaiden Buddietts with war crimes. Hate to say it, but this idea appeals to me a lot more than I think it should. I think such a charge makes sense, even if it comes from another country/countries. My wish for the man who holds our presidency just now is that the face of every single soldier killed or seriously wounded in Iraq because of his nonsensical, immature thinking pass through his dreams every night for the rest of his life. We should probably toss in all the Iraqis killed or injured and the Iraqi children orphaned as well. Poor man would get no rest at all, and I find it hard to care. Hope most of you saw Colonel McMasters (think I got the rank right) and the other gentleman, whose name I can’t remember, on Friday night’s program. Finally, some people are looking at the world and we humans as we really are. We are all treading on territory where none have tread before. Our world has gotten smaller as it grows larger. We, all of us, need to shift gears soon and as fast as possible if we’re the least bit interested in survival. We need new ways — all of us inhabiting Mother Earth — of being human. I was so impressed with Charlie’s guests Friday night, I plan to watch the show again at Noon on Monday when it replays here in our area. Thanx, Charlie, for bringing us the new voices and new thinking so sorely needed. Praise Allah!
By Jenny Oops on 06/01/2008 5:27 am
Chrome Toe
wow… i actually took the time to read most of these posts. Where do you people get all this information?? Are you all a bunch of journalists, professors of publib admin, or political science? And I’m not being sarcastic. I’ve garnered more information off of this discussion than I have just about any form of media. I’d have to check facts of course as some of it sounds like some people are off their meds. But then again… even the “I might be off my meds” posts are from folks who appear to be doing a lot of research. I’m impressed.
By Chrome Toe on 06/01/2008 8:49 am
Buh- Bye
Speaking of political minds. Who has the answer to this? Now that the DNC has effectively crowned Barack Obama as the nominee by snatching Hillary’s Florida and Michigan delegates away from her (visions of the Supreme Court crowning of Bush)… does Clinton still have the option of running for the White House as an independent? I’m pretty sure if she did she’d pull out a Lieberman-type victory. I know I’d sure as hell vote for her.
By Buh- Bye on 06/02/2008 2:29 pm
Everyone--into the Rose Garden
Surprising. Rupert Murdock on why Obama will win: http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid452319854/bctid1579802959
By Everyone--into the Rose Garden on 06/01/2008 12:27 pm
Buh- Bye
In that clip Murdock starts off by saying Fox News is fair and BALANCED reportage. Then goes on to endorse Obama. It totally lifts the veil on Obama’s “Change” chant. This should be seen as a shot across the bow to any self-respecting Democrat.
By Buh- Bye on 06/02/2008 2:38 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Kelly x2 , I’ve been reading a very important new book called “The Age of American Unreason,” by Susan Jacoby. (Bill Moyers interview with Jacoby: http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/02152008/watch2.html) It is something I would like to see everyone on this web read because at root we are yearning for the same sort of intelligent and informed discourse she is writing about.
By Mugsy Peabody on 06/01/2008 12:35 pm
Everyone--into the Rose Garden
On “The Age of Unreason” [stating the obvious] Publisher’s Weekly wrote, “Inspired by Richard Hofstadter’s 1963 cultural analysis Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, Jacoby,…dismayed by the average U.S. citizen’s political and social apathy and the overall crisis of memory and knowledge…. argues that the nation’s current cult of unreason has deadly and destructive consequences and traces the seeds back to post-WWII society…singles out mass media and the resurgence of fundamentalist religion” OK, nothing revolutionary there. In her interview with Bill Moyers [on link provided] she states that we get lost in personal minutiae instead of the BIG picture; then wonders off in a convoluted personal minutiae tour of FDR’s era, and her wish for his return. Some factoids from FDR’s1935: U.S. population then: 127 million. Now: 300 million. Unemployment: 20.1%. Key events: Nazis repudiate Treaty of Versailles and enacts Nuremberg Laws against Jews for “racial pollution, and starts a “Aryan super race” breeding program. Mussolini invades Ethiopia. Persia becomes Iran. Huey Long assassinated in Louisiana. Best Picture Oscar: It Happened One Night. George Gershwin writes Porgy & Bess. The neutron discovered. Du Pont creates the first 100% synthetic fabric-nylon. Aircraft-detecting radar is pioneered in England. My problem with her book and talk on Bill Moyers: 1. She didn’t present a clear premise in a historical frame and offer key solutions. PW’s criticism was academic/convoluted writing. 2. She failed to state that historically the pendulum swings from dark to enlightened times [until some gomer like GWB finally pushes the red button] And that dark eras share the same societal blueprint. Enlightened eras share the same societal blueprint. That’s basic and should have been point #1 like stating if you take-in more calories than expended you’ll be fat. The math is simple: If a nation becomes militaristic it will become dark. 3. That “The Age of Unreason” has always been institutionalized by what we in the US call the Radical Right in every culture: deeps cuts to education and infrastructure, militarism/privalized prisons/creation of mercenaries/cronyism, loss of true Free Press, religious fundamentalism, cultural promoting of Neanderthalism/ditto-heads: i.e. The European witch hunts that left entire villages with few women left and when the Church insitutionalized their torture and murder and then seized their personal estates and that of their family as ‘payment’ for their ‘trials.’ 4. Since she sees the seeds of today in Post WWII, hopefully she elucidates Operation Paperclip that brought Nazis into the US, including at the Univ of Illinois where many of today’s Neocons studied under Leo Strauss and believe in a society based on perpetual war, in an entitled self-appointed ruling elite that lies as a matter of form, uses religion to control the masses, and shifts rights from the people to corporations: ie Neo-Fascism, which is of course based in “unreason.” 5.She failed to state what sparked EVERY era shift from darkness to light: Nearly supernatural individuals arrive on the scene who articulate visions that reinvigorated the masses, and reawakened and redirected energy: King Pericles, Plato, Pico della Mirandola, Good Kind Rene, Saint Joan of Arc, Rousseau, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, FDR, JFK, Obama. While she is a smart, nice lady writing to the choir is affirmative but doesn’t help all that much. The same message with pop-culture appeal gets to the people who NEED it. i.e. Thomas Paine’s short pamphlet “Common Sense” had as much weight in shaping the U.S. as anything. Certainly her premise of a scary lack of memory and knowledge is true.
By Everyone--into the Rose Garden on 06/01/2008 4:15 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Thanks, Suzanne. Everyone else? Read it anyway. Thanks, MP
By Mugsy Peabody on 06/01/2008 6:52 pm
MaryPage Drake
Bill Clinton was a disgusting womanizer. Hardly an impeachable offense, or We The People would have impeached many a president ‘affore’ him! Bill Clinton’s lie did not hurt the nation or its citizens. It was a good lie in that it was a attempt to protect his wife and daughter and the scarlet woman involved. It was the lie of a Southern gentleman. George Bush’s lies have killed hundreds of thousands of people and have been a betrayal of the trust of our nation and its citizens. Good Grief! I’ve been around for 79 years, and these differrences were taught me early on by my West Point graduate father: Duty, Honor, Country. George Bush does not know the meaning of these things.
By MaryPage Drake on 06/01/2008 1:20 pm
MaryPage Drake
About Lying Still hug myself with delight remembering a column the late Jody Powell wrote years ago about an experience while he was President Carter’s press secretary. When Carter became president, everyone wanted to go and interview his beloved mother, a great character in Georgia. The White House was very nervous about this, as No One, least of all her son, could control what it might pop into her head to say. Finally, a member of the media was given an appointment to interview Miss Lillian in her home. I have been all over the internet this afternoon trying to find a copy of Powell’s column about this for you, to no avail; so here goes from my memory: Miss Lillian was welcoming and charming. The interview was progressing well. Then the reporter mentioned Carter going around the nation saying he never told a lie. Quite aggressively, this reporter asked Carter’s mother if this could possibly be true. Miss Lillian stated it was true. The reporter asked again, in a strongly disbelieving manner. Miss Lillian allowed that possibly he had, in his lifetime, perhaps told a little white lie. Aha! The reporter rounded on her fiercely and demanded to know what possible difference there could be between a lie and a little white lie. Miss Lillian, ever gracious, offered an example: “You remember when you came to the door and I told you how lovely you looked and how glad I was to see you?”
By MaryPage Drake on 06/01/2008 1:51 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
Thanks MaryPage, that is a great example! I also took a class in ethics once where the instructor asked how honest we would be if we were living downstairs from Anne Frank and were asked by Nazi officials if there was someone living in the attic. This was Michael Josephson, who now has an institute on ethics. He really made me start to think what was a lie, and what was a bad lie. Lillian Carter’s take on it is hilarious.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 06/01/2008 1:57 pm
Maurine H
Elizabeth - ethics- what a great topic for a discussion on wOw. And of course there are lies we tell to protect people we love, the innocent, those who can’t protect themselves - ask any mother, sister, son or daughter. Your instructor, Michael Josephson, asked the bottom line question - would you lie to protect someone else even if meant placing yourself in grave danger?
By Maurine H on 06/02/2008 12:27 am
Everyone--into the Rose Garden
MaryPage- Wow…you’re 79! Neat! My Dad is too and also very activist on Internet, unfortunately he’s been in ICU for quite a long time. But, loved you story re Miss Lillian. I got to meet President Carter and he was so warm, friendly, amazingly fresh skin and twinkling blue eyes, nice smile. He loves to chat. Rosalynn was standing behind him and said under her breathe, “Move it along, Jimmy.” I thought that was hysterical. She seemed to wear the pants in the family.
By Everyone--into the Rose Garden on 06/01/2008 4:25 pm
beverly linens
Pres. Carter talks about this in his new book, A Remarkable Mother. It is a delightful book about a remarkable woman. It is an easy afternoon read and I recomend it. It’s fun to read a nice book about a nice woman for a change. She was a true character.
By beverly linens on 06/11/2008 3:55 am