Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 05/29/2008 2:57 pm

Monica Crowley to Scott McClellan: 'Not Cool' to Kiss 'n' Tell With Bush Still in Office

Editor’s Note: Monica Crowley, Ph.D., is a panelist on The McLaughlin Group, the host of the nationally syndicated radio program, "The Monica Crowley Show," and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

It used to be, back in the day, that those who served their country in high positions — positions of authority and importance — would honor their offices and the office they ultimately served: the presidency. Even when they may have acted dishonorably in office, they kept the dirty linens to themselves. That’s what was expected of them, and that’s what they did.

They didn’t write kiss ‘n’ tells. They didn’t spill the beans. They didn’t tell tales out of school.

They kept their counsel, and went to their graves with the stories that gentlemen simply did not tell.

Good-bye to all that.

The unspoken rule of political memoirs once was: you can write what you’d like, and you can express disagreements and even once-confidential conversations (provided enough time had elapsed so as not to imperil national security secrets or anyone’s reputation), but you must only do it once the presidency in which you had served had ended. There was to be no memoir writing while the president for whom you had worked was still in office.

George Stephanopoulos was the first high-ranking White House official to publish a tell-all while his president was still in office. All Too Human was a scathing look inside the highly dysfunctional Clinton White House, published nine months before Bill and Hillary backed up the moving van and made off with the White House furniture.

Was it salacious? Yup. Was it delightful? You bet. Was it proper? Not really.

Now a new memoir is hitting the bookshelves, written by former Bush press secretary Scott McClellan. In it, he blasts the president for relying on "propaganda" to sell the Iraq war, which he now deems "unnecessary." He attacks the vice president and Secretary Condi Rice for incompetence and arrogance, and goes after the president for being stubbornly attached to certain positions.

Some of these criticisms may have merit. The events we are in the midst of now will one day be history, and the history of the administration will be looked at from many angles and with many sets of eyes.

But for someone who was once the president’s confidante, someone he knew and trusted, someone who gave him the opportunity of a lifetime, to write a tell-all while that history is still being made is not cool. There will be plenty of memoirs coming out of the Bush administration. Most will be cover-your-tushy affairs, as memoirs often are. Some will paint a glossy picture. Some will be critical. But their timing is crucial.

McClellan could have published this book in eight months, when Bush was on his way out the door. But then, he wouldn’t have sold as many books. Publishing now may make him a bit wealthier, but it’s simply not cool to do to your former boss and your president. Not cool at all.

273 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

beth willis
Right now, “Rose” are bacically preaching to the choir…not so in the months to come. “Keep your friends close; keep your enemies closer.” To insult is to stop the chance of any dialogue. I’m predicting, though I feel sure unpopularly, that a big issue in the campaign will be comparing Michelle Obama to Cindy McCain. That may not be right, but obviously not all Americans think alike. Read Julia Reed’s article about Cindy McCain in the new Vogue. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 05/31/2008 6:33 pm
Everyone--into the Rose Garden
BETH—I am not interested in any ‘dialogue’ or anything eles with any Bush supporter. I have nothing but total contempt for him, his criminal administration, and the supporters of his criminal enterprise, and his enablers like Nancy Pelosi who has failed in her Constitutional responsibilities. I don’t keep enemies close and could care less what the choir is comprised of, or not comprised of. My opinions don’t shift based on what other people think of them. Nor am I interested in what red-state bigots think of Michelle Obama, which is what I believe you were referring to my ‘comparison’ bet the wives. Cindy McCain grew up in wealthy circumstances , was a rodeo queen and a cheerleader, got involved with McCain when he was married, married him after his divorce from his first wife, then she was a bookkeeper on the Keating Five scandal-couldn’t find receipts—great bookkeeper—and became addicted to pain pills, stole prescriptions from an international aid charity and forged signatures to fill them. Rich as she is there wasn’t another way? There’s just so much in that one paragraph that is anathema. Michelle Obama did NOT grow up in cushy circumstance, went tp Princeton and Harvard Law School and to work as an attorney…and is her own person. All of which I admire. My only interest now is who Senator Obama selects as a running mate. The compromise was reached on the Mich and Fl delegates so now he needs 20 more than before…but as said on MSNBC today, “The DNC is not controlled by the Clintons any more…this is Barack Obama’s party now. He’s already been winning the outside game, he now won the inside game.. Guys, it’s over.” IF by some miracle Clinton got the nomination—I won’t work for the Demo ticket, or vote. And if by some chance the nation is dumb enough to vote McSame in…I’ll be living in Europe with my attention elsewhere. In the meantime it’ll be one long slugfest between now and then. If you want to wear your white gloves and serve tea for it…goody for you…include me out of your mindset please…
By Everyone--into the Rose Garden on 06/01/2008 1:58 am
beth willis
Suzanne, I’ve considered you a well-informed, passionate supporter of Democratic change in the coming election. But to refuse to vote for the Democratic candidate, especially considering what it will determine about the Supreme Court in years to come,( if perhaps it is not Obama) seems foolish. To enourage me to vote for the Republican candidate because you don’t like my thought process seems shortshighted. Not to consider any possibility from any community so as to be prepared without entering into a slugfest is a disservice to my candidate, should Obama receive the nomintaion. I would caution you not to confuse kindness with weakness. Although assuming facts not in evidence is your strong suit as concerns some of the posters on this website, I can assure you I”v no intention of changing my political party due to the rantings of a stanger whose name remains unknown. Perhaps I’ll see you in Denver. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 06/01/2008 10:44 am
Everyone--into the Rose Garden
What????? I’m not encouraging you to do anything, lady. I could care less what you do. Denver. Yeah, that’ll be the day.
By Everyone--into the Rose Garden on 06/01/2008 1:42 pm
Deni G
IF by some miracle Clinton got the nomination—I won’t work for the Demo ticket, or vote. ” In that case you become of the “enablers”. You do the work of the Extreme Right and would be complicit in the wars, death and destruction of our Constitution that would follow a McSame presidency. It is not about our country or the people dying or all the other high-minded rhetoric you claim. You become exactly what you decry.
By Deni G on 06/03/2008 11:43 am
Liza D 08 .... beta
Blah, blah, blah … Arianna! We heard you the first time, and then the time before that.
By Liza D 08 .... beta on 05/31/2008 9:33 pm
eleanor roche
Rose Garden— Same old rhetoric, eh Princess? Beth is right, to dismiss Bush supporters as dumb/tastsless/ignorant is yesterday’s playbook.
By eleanor roche on 05/31/2008 10:29 am
beth willis
I do have a question which has been on my mind throughout the debates..I may have my information wrong.(I was wrong one other time: I thought I was wrong, but wasn’t) Here it is: With absolute sincerity, seeking information, if the vote in the senate was in 2002, and Senator Obama did not take office until January, 2005, how could he have cast a vote against the war? Be gentle.
By beth willis on 05/30/2008 7:02 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
Barack Obama gave a speech in 2002, a speech against the war, this particular war in Iraq, not all wars. That speech, compared and contrasted to the statements of Senator Clinton in support of “regime change” and giving Bush a blank check to invade, are telling. Here is a copy of the speech: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Barack_Obama’s_Iraq_Speech Here is a youtube video with part of that speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUV69LZbCNQ
By Elizabeth Bennett on 05/30/2008 7:15 pm
Renata
When you consider the voters of the State of New York (except for our corporate media and Neocon friends) did NOT want our Senators to vote for the Iraq War — which redirected attention away from and leveraged 9/11, making us more vulnerable in future — the contrast becomes even more stark. HRC was complicit with this nonsense — and at the beginning of this Nomination process — was still touting the McCain/Bush line re Iraq — until it became evident that would NOT sell to the millions of voters in the Democratic Primaries. Only by February did she realize Iraq was a no-go. She has yet to apologize for that vote as John Edwards did, based upon current evidence it was a disgrace. John Edwards isn’t the Senator from New York and his former constituents were not attacked by those who still are free to send us monthly DVDs threatening us. That distinction belongs to HRC.
By Renata on 05/30/2008 9:34 pm
Maurine H
And here are the names of the members of the Senate who voted their consciences in 2002: * Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii) * Jeff Bingaman (D-New Mexico) * Barbara Boxer (D-California) * Robert Byrd (D-West Virginia) * Lincoln Chaffee (R-Rhode Island) * Kent Conrad (D-North Dakota) * Jon Corzine (D-New Jersey) * Mark Dayton (D-Minnesota) * Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) * Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin) * Bob Graham (D-Florida) * Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) * Jim Jeffords (I-Vermont) * Ted Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) * Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) * Carl Levin (D-Michigan) * Barbara Mikulski (D-Maryland) * Patty Murray (D-Washington) * Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island) * Paul Sarbanes (D-Maryland) * Debbie Stabenow (D-Michigan) * The late Paul Wellstone (D-Minnesota) * Ron Wyden (D-Oregon)
By Maurine H on 05/31/2008 1:04 am
Renata
Maurine - Thank you for providing this list w/in the context of this conversation. Disgracefully, BOTH NY Senators voted to take their eyes off those who attacked on 9/11. There will be many more changes, locally. We have a new Govenor to replace the previous out-of-control and distracted one we mistakenly voted for. Next — Senators, Congressmen/women, Attorney General…dog catchers who stubbornly refuse to change.
By Renata on 05/31/2008 1:13 am
mary lou s
if purity in your senators’ vote toward the war authorization is your strong value, move to michigan, hawaii or vermont. on the phone back then, carl levin told me:”i’ll do my best.” and he has.
By mary lou s on 05/31/2008 2:37 pm
Everyone--into the Rose Garden
Yes and good old Teddy Kennedy said it was the proudest vote he ever cast. Among all his fighting for increased minimum wage, education, improved health care, for veterans etc. Anyone who listened to Robert Byrd’s excellent floor speech before the vote and voted for the war, is someone I hope will be voted out of office UNLESS they have UNEQIVOCABLLY recanted the vote AND support impeachment. If they don’t then they still don’t have a moral center and are STILL failing in their CONSTITUTIONAL duty. So screw em. Hopefully Nancy Pelosi et al will go down in defeat. The great Paul Wellstone was the outspoken leader in the Senate against the war…before his plane crash.
By Everyone--into the Rose Garden on 05/31/2008 3:52 pm
Everyone--into the Rose Garden
I forgot to say thanks for the list Maurine. Actually it has been tatooed in my brain since 2003. I know who the Profiles in Courage are—and also who is not.
By Everyone--into the Rose Garden on 05/31/2008 3:56 pm