Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 02/06/2009 9:05 am

Nadya Suleman, Octuplet Mother Explains to NBC: 'I Just Longed for Certain Connections'

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Octuplet Mother Nadya Suleman

After days of seclusion, Nadya Suleman, who last week gave birth to octuplets, finally explains herself.

"That was always a dream of mine, to have a large family, a huge family, and I just longed for certain connections and attachments with another person that I really lacked, I believe, growing up," Nadya Suleman said to NBC’s Ann Curry during her first television interview.

In an interview scheduled to air on NBC’s "Today" show on Monday and on "Dateline" at 10 PM on Tuesday, the California mother, who had six children prior to last week’s birth, defends her decision to be a single mother of such a large family. Suleman, who is unemployed and living with her divorced parents in a three-bedroom home insisted, contrary to criticism, that she is a responsible parent.

"I’m providing myself to my children. I’m loving them unconditionally, accepting them unconditionally," she told Curry. "Everything I do. I’ll stop my life for them and be present with them. And hold them. And be with them. And how many parents do that? I’m sure there are many that do, but many don’t. And that’s unfortunate. That is selfish."

Just shortly after her release from the hospital on Thursday, Suleman met with Curry to talk about her upbringing, her failed marriage, health and her unemployment situation.

For seven years beginning in her teens, Nadya Suleman tried to conceive. She suffered three miscarriages. She tried artificial insemination and fertility drugs, to no avail. By 2000, a back injury and her inability to bear children had sent her into a deep depression, in which she told a psychiatrist that she had suicidal thoughts.

"And then the first IVF procedure from that facility — it was successful. And then I just kept going in."

The more cynical observer could simply chalk up Suleman’s octuplet adventure to nothing but a media ploy: She reportedly hoped to become a television personality talking about child care and parenting.

Suleman’s eight newborns babies, born January 26, will remain in the hospital for several weeks. Her six other children are aged 2 to 7. All 14 children were reportedly products of the same sperm, belonging to Suleman’s friend.

Click here for more of the interview.

133 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

f p
Whoa, all kidding aside and all respect for her love for her kids but this woman is basically very immature and unrealistic in her expectations. Just how is she supporting them by living with her parents? Does she expect the public tit to keep her until they are grown and available to care, work and feed themselves? And her hope to become a tv personality? Well she got that one close to right.
By f p on 02/06/2009 9:20 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/06/nadya-suleman-speaks-octu_n_164… Here’s the video. She’s very cute with lips like Angelina Jolie––baby lips? This young mother will have to depend on the kindness of strangers and other close family caretakers in order to deal with all this. Her profession of love for her children is not enough and I find her situation not only irresponsible, but scary. She plans to go back to school? With fourteen children you are going back to school? Stay tuned–the media will milk this dry, as I think was the plan in the beginning.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 02/06/2009 10:35 am
f p
You are correct Phyllis—irresponsible doesn’t really get it—and the media will milk this dry.
By f p on 02/06/2009 10:49 am
Nellie Cortea
There is no way this home is enough space. If this is not abuse of Adults and Children by family, explain to me what is? NCorte
By Nellie Cortea on 02/07/2009 10:43 am
Diana T
I’ve heard many a high school un-wed mother say the same thing about “connecting”. I wonder what her mental age is. But, I’m sure the reality/voyeuristic TV people will happily make her a millionaire. To heck with the babies—let’s exploit the dickens out of them. Remember, Frank, the story of the Dion Quints back when you and I were kids? It didnt’ turn out so well for them, did it.
By Diana T on 02/06/2009 11:45 am
Mandisa Jones
There is no doubt that this woman has emotional issues which now have our attention, and she will need a professional resolution, but the 14 children are already here, so what do we do? As fairly intelligent adults in a democratic and capitalist country, we must take into consideration that previous large fertilized families have received financial or product support, even TV shows and commercial endorsements… not to mention the reality of African American, Hispanic, and rural white families who have always somehow managed to raise productive citizens with little income. And I assume we are aware of the facts brought out in the various news media that she is unemployed because she suffered an injury on the job, she received a fairly large compensation which she spent on plastic surgery and on a home which she and her mother just lost. For the sake of the innocent children, I would pray that she does confirm those typical endorsements and deals in the best interest of her children with legal advice, and secure a home and future college tuition for them. As dysfunctional as it may seem, I am not sure children resent a mother for telling them she wanted them and loves them unconditionally, despite any lack of material luxuries. Just as long as they don’t become a burden to the state in terms of health, education or crime rate, this is her business. I would really like to know where the pro-lifers stand on this one…
By Mandisa Jones on 02/07/2009 11:32 am
Belinda Joy
This woman has serious mental and emotional problems. I’m looking forward to seeing the interviews.
By Belinda Joy on 02/06/2009 9:21 am
Lila Kuh
I cringe at the idea of seeing the interviews, for the same reasons. She had all these children to fill her own emotional need, and all she has to offer them is “herself.” Now THAT is selfish and unrealistic - at 33, she is still a child herself. Her parents continue to provide for Nadya AND are now essentially raising her children too. Armchair psychology time: she has created the siblings that she always desired; she is not a mother to them in any way ther than biologically. From my childhood book, “The Tall Book of Make Believe” I think we have a window into Ms. Suleman’s mind: MRS BROWN As soon as I’m in bed at night And snugly settled down, The little girl I am by day Goes very suddenly away, And then I’m Mrs. Brown. I have a family of six, And all of them have names, The girls are Joyce and Nancy Maud. The boys are Marmaduke and Claude And Percival and James. We have a house with twenty rooms A mile away from town ; I think it’s good for girls and boys To be allowed to make a noise- And so does Mr Brown. We do the most exciting things, Enough to make you creep ; And on and on and on we go I sometimes wonder if I know When I have gone to sleep.
By Lila Kuh on 02/06/2009 9:52 am
DeBúrca obj
An excellent article in the Chicago Tribune today: “Once high on a pedestal, motherhood is taking a beating” by Georgie Anne Geyer http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-oped0206geyerfeb06,0,6722555.stor…
By DeBúrca obj on 02/06/2009 9:46 am
Lila Kuh
Great article and so true. As to the three adults and six children already living in the three-bedroom house: in the county where I live, the code dictates how many people are allowed to occupy bedrooms based on bedroom size. The reasons are for health, fire safety, and load on the local infrastructure. Beyond that, state law governs rules on age and gender for bedroom-sharing. Once the octuplets go home, the living arrangement would be illegal here. I don’t know what California’s rules are, but the Sulemans - who already declared bankruptcy last year - now need to expand their home or move to a larger one to be fair to all those kids. More expense… and who will pay?
By Lila Kuh on 02/06/2009 10:07 am
deber B
It has to be about Sarah Palin and her daughter!
By deber B on 02/06/2009 2:02 pm
kermie b
Huh?
By kermie b on 02/06/2009 2:23 pm
Bonni Hutchison
Someone with your avi posts on TPM. Is it you? Hi! I post there under outleft.
By Bonni Hutchison on 02/07/2009 11:10 am
Bonni Hutchison
This was suposed to be a reply to DeBurca but didn’t post that way. Sorry.
By Bonni Hutchison on 02/07/2009 11:13 am
caj p
Wanting babies and looking after them when they are actually here is a different story especially in her case as she 6 already and living with her parents!!! I don’t think she has a grasp on reality here and is just revelling in the limelight she finds herself in….this is so irresponsible.
By caj p on 02/06/2009 9:54 am