Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 07/30/2008 12:05 pm

Nancy Pelosi Wages Political Battles, Big and Small

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Photo Courtesy of http://www.house.gov/pelosi/

Eighteen months after taking power as the leader of the House Democrats, Rep. Nancy Pelosi must now summon all her strength and navigational skills for the political waters that lie ahead.

With chances that Democrats could be the ruling party on Capitol Hill AND in the Oval Office after the November elections, the spotlight is on Pelosi, the country’s first female speaker of the House operating in a very male-dominated power structure. She hit the national television circuit Monday with her new book, Know Your Power: A Message to America’s Daughters; next month, she’ll chair the convention in Denver that will nominate Barack Obama as her party’s presidential nominee.

In recent months, the California lawmaker has driven legislative items such as Medicare, housing and the new GI Bill with more force than the White House. Obama didn’t embrace the recent terrorism surveillance bill until Pelosi did so publicly.

Whereas up until now, Pelosi was viewed mostly as a counterweight to President Bush — always ready and willing to go to battle with him on just about each and every issue — voters might now take a closer look at her performance and fairness. After all, issues such as the troubled housing and financial markets and rising food and energy costs still face the nation — and Democrats have promised, if elected, to get us out of this mess.

"I respect the office that I hold," Pelosi told Politico.com in an interview. "And when you win the election, you win the majority, and what is the power of the speaker? To set the agenda, the power of recognition, and I am not giving the gavel away to anyone."

Pelosi’s gutsiness in politics can at times appear hard-edged, even arrogant. Her book could provide some insight into how she’s gotten to where she is, and what she needed to do to get there.

"The goal," she says, "is to give an answer to people who all over the country say to me, ‘How did you go from the kitchen to the Congress, being a housewife to the House speaker?’ And it was just a short little story of that."

She adds: "It’s also I’m passionate about the fact that we need many more women in public policy positions, leadership roles and public office … And whether it’s that or the academic world or corporate world, they really have to have confidence in the experience that they have, because I know that people will try to trivialize a lot of what women do."

29 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Marjorie C.
My opinion: Californians need to vote her out.
By Marjorie C. on 07/30/2008 12:51 pm
Maurine H
Marjorie - I am one Californian who will vote for Pelosi every time.
By Maurine H on 07/30/2008 10:13 pm
Bonnie Oliver
One of our regular participants - Winery Lifestyle a/k/a Suzanne, lives in Ms. Pelosi’s district. Suzanne has written here that Ms. Pelosi is very unpopular for a number of reasons. First being her failure to support Senator Obama when the district was 70%+ for his candidacy against Senator Clinton and secondly because of Ms. Pelosi’s failure to lead the 2006 Congress into a confrontation with the president about the war - a la Cindy Sheehan. The expectations that were raised when the Dems took control of Congress were soon dashed. Nancy Pelosi will be a woman of history. However, if she has lost the support of her own District, then a challenge might not only lose her the leadership but her Congressional Seat also. Yet, I do not know if she is to be challenged within her own party. Of course, I observe this only as a resident of a nearby County. My own opinion is that Ms. Pelosi is considered a rather weak Speaker of the House.
By Bonnie Oliver on 07/30/2008 2:04 pm
Marjorie C.
Bonnie, my opinion is that Pelosi wanted to appear neutral, but as time went on it was obvious that she was for Obama — which is fine. As much as I like to see women in the positions of power, she’s a disappointment. She doesn’t seem to have the courage to take a stand, maybe she tries to play it too safe. McCain likes her, though. (SF Chronicle) “…praising her as an effective leader and an ‘inspiration to millions of Americans.’ “‘I respect Speaker Pelosi. I think she’s one of the great American success stories,’ McCain said.” Politicians are forever politicians.
By Marjorie C. on 07/30/2008 3:48 pm
DeBúrca obj
This woman is one tough cookie. I’m not happy with her stance on Impeachment, but you can’t have everything, and I’m hoping she changes on that. Though I’m an Obama supporter it doesn’t bother me, too much, that she originally supported Clinton that was her right. Since Obama won the primary she has strongly supported him, which is the right thing for her to do as the top Democrat in office. She has not been strong enough on the war either, none of the Democrats have. However, I can also see the other side of that issue. As Obama has stated and I agree with, this president is not above keeping the troops hostage in Iraq without supplies. If the funds were taken from the war, Bush would just keep the troops over there without financial support, let them suffer the consequences of it and then just blame the Democrats for their situation.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/30/2008 3:32 pm
DeBúrca obj
… and I’ll take Nancy Pelosi over Denny Hastert any day!
By DeBúrca obj on 07/30/2008 3:33 pm
C Hardy
Ok I dont agree that Bush would leave our Troops in Iraq with no supplies…Yes this has been a crazy War but that is pushing the limits a little too much…Bush may be a little nuts, well a lot nuts, but he would never leave our Troops without supplies. I cant commnet on Pelosi b/c I have not really listened to her…
By C Hardy on 07/30/2008 6:55 pm
DeBúrca obj
He sent them their without the proper armor didn’t he?
By DeBúrca obj on 07/30/2008 11:36 pm
DeBúrca obj
typo… He sent the THERE not “their”… I hate when I do that.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/31/2008 3:30 am
C Hardy
Well I can tell you what I know from getting it first hand from my Fiance’ who spent 8 months in Iraq…Yes a lot of the troops didnt have the proper armor on their vehicles but how is that Bush’s fault. I know he is Commander in Cheif BUT he only knows what he is told. He can’t go out and inspect every Unit that is being deployed…Oh and I’ll just say this also about sending Troops without armor for their vehicles…My Fiance’ also served in Bosnia under Clinton, they didnt have armor either then! So its not just Bush….
By C Hardy on 07/31/2008 7:09 am
DeBúrca obj
He had been told that for months and months. It was in the news long before they got what they needed. Also you said it, he’s the Commander in Chief, the buck stops with him. All you have to do is google troops without armor and you will see.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/31/2008 9:17 am
DeBúrca obj
Also, I know PARENTS were purchasing armor for their sons and daughters and sending it to them because they weren’t being issued the right gear. That’s pretty disgusting, also, if the parents knew it Bush knew it, it makes my point even clearer. Bush knew and so did Rumsfeld.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/31/2008 9:24 am
C Hardy
I am not saying he didnt know but I can tell you at first he may not have known…Trust me this whole Iraq business in shady and I agree with that but its not always Bush’s fault. What about the Troops not having armor when they fought in Bosnia under Clinton? I guess that was somebody else’s fault b/c it couldnt be Clinton’s fault and don’t say they didnt need it in Bosnia…THEY NEED IT ALL THE TIME! Rumsfeld was an idiot!
By C Hardy on 07/31/2008 1:08 pm
DeBúrca obj
Tell me, where did you read that during the Clinton administration the troops were not fully equipped with the necessary armor? I’ve googled it a couple times and can’t find anything.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/31/2008 11:06 pm
C Hardy
Well I didnt find it on the internet b/c it was of course never published but I was told that by friends and family who fought in Bosnia and I would assume they know since it was them without it.
By C Hardy on 08/01/2008 8:29 am