Politics | 02/26/2009 12:45 pm
Obama Announces Budget, Republicans Unimpressed

With the deficit above $1 trillion and the recession ongoing, President Barack Obama today unveiled an ambitious and revolutionary budget.
Asking Congress for $3.75 trillion, the president proposed increasing taxes for the wealthiest Americans, raising revenue through carbon credit incentives for businesses and curtailing government pay-offs to crop farmers whose income exceeds $500,000.
Those and other measures, he says, will help reduce the ever-growing deficit by at least half over four years, and lay the foundation for new health care programs and other administrative plans.
Mr. Obama also took some shots today at the previous administration’s "dishonest accounting" practices that have underprojected the deficit and obscured budgetary directions. This budget, said the president, will be "an honest accounting of where we are and where we intend to go."
Republicans aren’t so sure about that, and Republican Rep. Mike Pence blasted the budget as insufficient: "The American people deserve a budget that puts fiscal discipline and jobs first. The budget offered by the Obama administration fails on both counts." House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, meanwhile, also lashed out:
[The budget] is not just misguided but dangerous to raise taxes on small businesses and families that can’t afford to pay them. In fact, a majority of those penalized by the proposed tax increase in this budget are small businesses.
President Obama, however, believes some Americans must make sacrifices for the greater good, like extending health-care benefits: "With this budget, we are making a historic commit to comprehensive health-care reform."























201 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Hi Zera Lee — not only do they not understand copy/right laws, they do not understand the need to cite sources. Obviously, links should be provided — then the reader can see not only the source but see the article for themselves. Since the need to cite sources is one of the first things taught in college class — I am surprised at this….perhaps they have a reason for not citing?
And you’re right — personally, I can’t hear their points through all the name calling and vitriole. Reading their posts just reinforces for me how grateful I am that Obama is president and dems have a majority.
Surprise, surprise. Them vs. Us is alive and continuing in Washington instead of "for the people". Same old politics by the same old people. Same old negative rants on this site by the same FEW people. Yada, yada, yada. Belinda, I’m with you.. bitch and moan, bitch and moan. I’m going to go hug my hubby and have a good laugh!
I agree with you two.
I’m just happy that Obama is coming up with ideas to fix what he had dumped on his lap.
God forbid the republicians help a president who is a democratic. Republician’s are so closed minded!
Are you kidding?? what will this fix? I suppose those that do not pay tax in the first place have no problems with this.
What incentive do people have to work hard and make money if those who don’t ge twhatever they want anyway.
What do you consider a FAIR percentage of their wealth?…..98%.
Socialism…that is the goal! Quit all the sugar coating..that is the goal and has been all along!
Joan: …to fix what he had dumped on his lap.
Obama has campaigned for two years to secure the job of POTUS. Nothing was dumped in his lap that he didn’t willingly go after.
We are waiting patiently for his ideas to take hold. So far, we’ve got pork and an overwhelming debt… and sacrifice (tax increases) on the way.
Margorie—I’m with you on this "dumped in his lap" business. Everyone seems to forget that the majority of Dems in Congress also said "yea" to every single one of "Bush’s" spending bills—remember appropriations bills originate in the House—they write the bill— Bush only signs them. To say this was all "Bush’s" spending is disingenuous, the Dems would have gladly spent more if Bush hadn’t vetoed some of the spending. Isn’t it "convenient" now to dump it on Bush—albeit, he should not have approved or signed all that spending.
As far as the Bush deficit—it was 1 tril—with most of it coming in 2008 with TARP—didn’t Obama vote "yea" to TARP?—one of the few times he didn’t vote "present". Now Obama has trippled the deficit in just 2 WEEKS with the "stimulus"—900bil, housing, 400 bil, 600 bil for health care reform, and a 500 bill omnibus appropriations bill. So which is it? Now he talks about "fiscal restraint" after he has bankrupted the country.