Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 11/05/2008 11:20 am

Obama Can Thank Women For Big Part of His Win

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Shutterstock

Women played a large role in helping Barack Obama beat John McCain in the 2008 race for the White House.

Perhaps one specific woman named Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, and her 18 million primary supporters really gave him a boost.

Mary Gockowski, a 52-year-old Ohio pre-school worker, voted for Obama, surprising herself and joining the ranks of women who switched their party allegiance from 2004, MSNBC.com reports.

In Ohio, Obama received the support of 54% of women, compared with 53% in 2004, when President Bush beat Sen. John Kerry in that state.
In Pennsylvania, another crucial state, 60% of women opted for Obama, compared with 54% who went for Kerry in 2004. In New Hampshire, exit polls suggested that 63% of women supported Obama, compared with 54% who supported Kerry.

Women voters outnumbered men nationally by about 53 to 47%, according to exit polls. Overall, females supported Obama by 55%, compared with 43% for McCain. At least 70% of single women with and without children supported Obama. Obama and McCain were nearly even among male voters, who split 49-49%. Obama also won handily among blacks and Hispanics.

"I do like Barack Obama, but Sarah Palin was the nail in the coffin," Gockowski, who voted twice for President Bush, told MSNBC.com. "I objected to (McCain’s) judgment and to the idea that, ‘Here, we’ll give another female to the women of American because they might be dumb enough to vote for a female because of her sex.’"

Exit polls confirmed the findings of Rocky Mountain News polls over the past few months that Obama’s rise in the Colorado polls coincided with a surge in support from women. In Colorado, Obama and McCain split the male vote equally, while Obama led with women 56% to 42%.

Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Denver, a onetime Clinton supporter who switched her support to Obama, was asked by the Rocky Mountain News what a key factor was in Obama’s victory among women.

"I have two words for you: Sarah Palin," DeGette said. "Democratic women realized John McCain was capable of a cheap trick by putting an unqualified person on the ballot, just because she’s a woman."

DeGette said it became obvious that Palin’s only similarity with Clinton was her gender. "When women voters realized that, they came home," DeGette said.

Jennifer Sunderlin, a 26-year-old who typically votes Republican, said she didn’t stick with her usual party this election year.

"Don’t tell my dad, but I voted for Barack Obama," Sunderlin, of Albany, NY, told AP. She said she was turned off by Palin.

She wasn’t alone. Four in ten voters overall said Palin was an important factor in deciding who to vote for, and this group leaned slightly toward Obama. But nine in ten Republicans calling Palin’s selection important were voting for McCain.

Others weren’t convinced Obama was the right choice.

“I support (McCain) because I’m afraid if Obama gets elected we’re going to go to a more socialistic government,” said Monique Craig, a white 40-year-old administrative assistant from Boca Raton, FL, to MSNBC.com. “I don’t feel like he’s strong enough to run the country with any kind of terrorist attack.”

Craig thought a different woman as a vice-presidential pick might have improved McCain’s chances.

“My daughters and I loved Sarah Palin, but I would have been happier with (Secretary of State) Condoleezza Rice,” she said.

A Rasmussen poll going into yesterday’s election said 71% of Republicans said McCain made the right choice in picking the Alaska governor as his running mate, while 18% said she was a bad choice. Meanwhile, 65% of GOP voters say the party picked the right nominee for president.

11 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Alessan O
If McCain had not picked Sarah Palin, and picked another extreme right wing neo-con, he still would have not gotten my vote. If McCain himself was a liberal Republican I might have voted Republican for the first time ever, hoping he could change the face of the right wing nuts.
By Alessan O on 11/05/2008 11:35 am
Brooklyn Gal
The Palin-effect backfired. And those who supported Hillary showed respect for her by voting for the candidate she supported. Because not to do so would make it impossible for her to reach her dream of a good, reliable health-care plan for all Americans. Unfortunately, the economic crisis will put issues like this on the back burner. But, if it new regulation restores this economy now and for future generations, it will be worth it.
By Brooklyn Gal on 11/05/2008 11:44 am
Tear E
I was voting for Obama long before Palin was the pick of the litter. So she didn’t effect my vote, except to cement my decision. I figured out early that Obama and what he stood for fit my list to a T. I won’t list what was important to me, but a lot of Americans must have felt the same as me, he won last night.
By Tear E on 11/05/2008 12:46 pm
Wine Warrior
I was an Obama fan from the time of his speech at Kerry’s 2004 convention…..and everything I’ve learned/seen about him since has just cemented my support and admiration. American women did a terrific job that is in their best interest and that of America and the world. He is the right man for the times.
By Wine Warrior on 11/05/2008 1:59 pm
Christine Berry - Merced
I am a woman that is hell bent on show me before I rally around the newly elected President! I give him four years to prove me wrong. This country has changed so much that it is almost ununrecongnizable. We need to embrace all classes of people, not just the affluent they seem to make the decisions based on their own needs and pocket books. Lets get this country working again and stop giving to others outside our own Country, help us truly become a Godly country again….
By Christine Berry - Merced on 11/05/2008 2:35 pm
Maurine H
I was with Barack Obama from the first debates during the primaries. I wish I could explain why I felt so strongly that he would be the best candidate for President…perhaps it was the combination of idealism and pragmatism that I saw in him. But it was definite and I haven’t wavered for a moment. Once I got involved in the campaign and saw Obama’s effect on the young people in this country I was committed to working on his behalf. I know he is the right person at the right time, a time fraught with challenges and complexities. He will lead the government but women will need to play important roles in putting this country back on track. I look forward to seeing what direction Michelle Obama will take in her position as First Lady. I know that it will be one that is empowering for women.
By Maurine H on 11/05/2008 5:15 pm
gulliver fourmyle
well, you ladies have always been obviously bright—-but what took ya so long???????
By gulliver fourmyle on 11/06/2008 1:32 am
Ms. Dee
humans of the male migration—-in the way???often.
By Ms. Dee on 11/07/2008 1:20 am
gulliver fourmyle
yeah—-pretty primitive ‘set-point’ (place)—-but one must wonder why Life would bother ‘mutating’ some embryos from female (as all begin) to male? as testosterone sets this change in motion, it is obviously the Key—-and it’s one ‘mean’ hormone. i just returned from checking on my 84-year-old mom—-diabetic, overweight, total ‘couch potato’—-i was never a mom’s boy, and she’s one sneaky ‘borderline’, as was pop, ya just never know when you’ll get ‘nuked’—-so while i could be saving plenty by living w/her? i’ve learned the risk—- this visit, she was watching an ‘Animal-Planet’ deal where a normally peaceful elephant suddenly goes on a killer rampage—-then the commentary of an ‘elephant’ expert explained once/year these critters enter what’s termed ‘the musk’—-and their brain has a sudden flood of testosterone—-during said ‘musk’ they become extremely dangerous—-for centuries the people of India have chained the ‘musking’ ‘guys’ between 2 Large trees, until their ‘period’ was over. this one was ‘eccentric’, entering ‘musk’ out of its normal time. but why would Life endow some embryos w/more testosterone, switching the fetus to male? i think i know. while a lit major, all my friends/peers were Always going for physics, math, biology—-other ‘writers’ were not only boors, but so envious as to be insufferable—-they could not sell poop-for-fertilizer—-few may—-i could. i tracked the problem of ‘why-men’? while history does have its ‘matriarchies’, the greater testosterone of males, leading to everything from war, battered-women, ‘violent’ contact sports, crime etc.,etc. what seems ‘too-much’ testosterone, s w/’musking male elphants, Must have a critical use for Life—-i found it—-simply-put? while female’s have a strong supply of ‘nurturing-hormones’, these do not lead to ‘technocracy-drive’—-yes, some do—-we are speaking of ‘averages’ here—-why Life’s Need of such? please ask—-ok?
By gulliver fourmyle on 11/07/2008 6:14 pm
Ms. Dee
make that “hard-hitting” humans
By Ms. Dee on 11/07/2008 1:22 am
Ms. Dee
As Mugsy Peabody once sang: “We’re merely soldiers in petticoats. Dauntless crusaders for women’s votes. Our daughters daughters will adore us, And they’ll sing in grateful chorus Well done! Well done! Well done, sister Suffragettes!”
By Ms. Dee on 11/07/2008 1:24 am