Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the username or e-mail address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 12/01/2008 9:15 am

Obama Names National Security Team Today; Clinton Says Decision to Leave Senate Was 'Difficult'

By The staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

The guessing game, the anticipation, the rumors over “will she or won’t she,” are all over today.

President-elect Barack Obama held a press conference in Chicago Monday to announce members of his national security team. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, was officially named national security adviser. Subject to Senate confirmation, she will be the third woman to hold that post, after Condoleezza Rice and Madeleine Albright, the latter of which served under President Clinton.  

Obama also announced that President Bush’s defense secretary, Robert Gates, will stay in his post for at least a year. Washington lawyer and Clinton-era Justice Department official Eric Holder has been nominated attorney general, Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano was named homeland security secretary, campaign foreign-policy adviser Susan Rice was tapped as U.N. ambassador and retired Marine Gen. James L. Jones was named national security adviser.

“If confirmed, I will give this assignment, administration and our country my all,” Clinton said at the podium after Obama gave his nominees a chance to address the press - and the country.

“Leaving the Senate is very difficult for me,” Clinton added, but she said she’s been thinking about American troops in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, as well as the foreign service workers serving in many countries abroad. Last week’s attacks in Mumbai, India, also helped hit home the fact that America needs a strong diplomatic hand in the world – one that utilizes more diplomatic tools, and relies less on the use of force. We need “more partners and fewer adversaries,” Clinton said.

“I am proud to join you [Obama] on what will be a difficult and exciting new adventure in this century.”  

Added Napolitano: "Like Hillary, it is difficult to leave one job for another but one must go where one can best serve."

She vowed that as homeland security secretary, she will work to ensure that the domestic response to all hazards and threats will be “fast, sound, level-headed and effective.”

“Americans deserve no less.”

So when, exactly, did Obama decide that his former primary foe would be a good secretary of state? Soon after her primary concession, Obama said. And any political battles between the two waged over policy in the past will be left behind, he vowed.

“We share a view that America needs to be safe and secure” by combining military power with diplomacy, and sharing the burden of tackling the world’s evils with foreign partners, Obama said. “I believe there’s no more effective advocate than Hillary Clinton for that well rounded view for how we advance American interests.”

“It was not a light-bulb moment” where all of a sudden he knew Clinton would be a good secretary of state, he added. “I have always believed she is tough and smart and disciplned and she shares my core values and the values of the American people."

Democratic party officials said Bill Clinton has made several concessions as to how he runs his own affairs to help get his wife chosen as secretary of state, including disclosing the names of his foundation contributors and halting meetings of the Clinton Global Initiative overseas. We’re sure that the former president’s post-White House career will provide fodder for any Republicans hoping to derail Hillary’s nomination during the Senate confirmation process.

"I suspect, however, that I’m not alone in suggesting that there will be questions raised, and probably legitimate questions," Sen. Richard Lugar, R-IN, the top Republican of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told ABC’s "This Week" on Sunday.

Hillary Clinton herself has reportedly passed up a plum Senate post to take the diplomatic job offered by Obama - chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, which essentially controls the government’s spending. The New York Daily News says that seat was supposed to be a reward for her hard-fought presidential primary race, and to make up for the fact that Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-MA, refused to let her join his health-care task force. The lion of the Senate also was irritated during the campaign by Bill Clinton for his anti-Obama remarks.

On Obama’s incoming national security team, The New York Times says Gates, Clinton and Jones have all embraced “a rebalancing of America’s national security portfolio” after a huge investment in new combat capabilities during the Bush years.

“This is not an experiment, but a pragmatic solution to a long-acknowledged problem,” said Denis McDonough, a senior Obama foreign-policy adviser.

Who is Jim Jones?

The Washington Post says Defense Secretary Gates and Hillary Clinton may have some kinks to iron out in their working relationship – not least of which, they aren’t both Democrats – particularly when it comes to working on a plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq. But Politico reports that the two may share views on how deferential the president ought to be to his military leaders when it comes to moving the troops.

Jones, who will serve as national security adviser, is the man to referee such relationships, as to not let the president be bogged down by any nonsense between the State and Defense department policies.

What do we know about Jones and his world view?

He turned down an offer by Bush to head Central Command, the job David Petraeus recently took. In 2006, Rice reportedly asked Jones to serve as her deputy at the State Department, but he declined.

He co-chaired the Afghanistan Study Group. Earlier this year, he issued a scathing report that called the Bush administration’s strategy in Afghanistan failed; Obama wants to withdraw some troops from Iraq and boost troop levels in Afghanistan.

"The ‘light footprint’ in Afghanistan needs to be replaced with the ‘right footprint’ by the U.S. and its allies," Jones and the group co-chair wrote in the report." It is time to revitalize and redouble our efforts toward stabilizing Afghanistan and rethink our economic and military strategies to ensure that our level of commitment is commensurate with the threat posed by possible failure in Afghanistan."

He has said of Afghanistan: "Symbolically, it’s more the epicenter of terrorism than Iraq.”

“He is a person whose world view was presumably shaped, by a great extent, to the fact that he was an extremely successful NATO commander in Europe,” former national-security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, said on MSNBC Monday morning.  "He speaks remarkably good French, which is impressive. I’m sure that will make the French swoon.”

20 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

BelindaJoy
From my research about James Jones, I really like this guy. He seems like the type of person that holds firm to his beliefs and ideas, which during the Bush administration was a rarity. To decline a positions offered by George W. and Condoleeza Rice speaks volumes about his ability to look beyond politics and stick to what he feels is best for himself and his career. It also speaks volumes that he has accepted an offer from PE Obama. Could it be he sees in him something he did not in the Bush administration?
By BelindaJoy on 12/01/2008 9:56 am
JoanBrown
I’m so proud of Obama. All his choices have been well thought out and right on the money. I have to confess I don’t know about EVERY person he’s chosen so far, but I watch CNN, and from what I can gather Obama is doing a great job. Hurry January 20th, so the new adminstration can get to work. Can’t wait!
By JoanBrown on 12/01/2008 12:35 pm
DeBrcaobj
Everytime I watch one of these Obama press conferences it is so great to feel the hope and optimism that actual LEADERSHIP brings. It has been so long that I nearly forgot what it feels like!
By DeBrcaobj on 12/01/2008 12:47 pm
DianaT
DeB, I can’t tell you the relief I felt this a.m. when I saw the Obama Gang in front of the cameras. At last, I think we have a REal Oval Office for the first time in 8+ years. Most people seem to be quite pleased with his choices, so far, and I am looking forward to hearing the conversations on Charlie Rose tonight. It has been sooo long. And, all Bush can do is whine and he Still Doesn’t Get It!: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/01/bush-i-was-unprepared-for_n_147… And, I wonder how long it will take before we can say that this dark era in our history is behind us. Every thing I read just makes me more angry: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hTDPY8hFtJLxsv8i1Q7Ovo… I read today that it was known that there was trouble brewing with the sub-primes a long time ago, but they bowed to the lobbyists and softened the rules. What other kinds of havoc will be discovered when the new crew walks into the oval office? Did you hear NPR this a.m. in regards to out-sourcing in this administration? Today is the first of two parts, and I am going to listen to it again. We need to be aware of the abject sloppiness of the Bush administration. I guess they just don’t give a damn?? http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97322339
By DianaT on 12/01/2008 5:37 pm
DeBrcaobj
This administration has done damage to every aspect of this country and then there are people who say “at least we weren’t attacked again” well, actually we WERE attacked again, just not on our own soil, (and there is no indication Bush averted any real, plans to attack) and also, why attack when our own President is doing more damage to the country than anyone else from the outside could? They just admitted today that we have been in a recession since December 2007. Yet, what were we being told all year by this bunch?
By DeBrcaobj on 12/01/2008 5:57 pm
DianaT
Only time will tell how much damage has been brought upon our nation. Did you hear the NPR piece I sent to you?
By DianaT on 12/01/2008 7:15 pm
DeBrcaobj
Yes I did. That NPR piece is talking about the real purpose of the Bush/Cheney administration… to transfer the public wealth into the private sector. It has happened for the entire 8 years, a piece at a time, they even tried to do it with Social Security, and most Americans aren’t even aware of it. As proof that many are unaware, the GOP actually tried to win this election by using that “spread the wealth” phrase against Obama! They have STOLEN the wealth and given it to private companies!
By DeBrcaobj on 12/01/2008 9:16 pm
DeBrcaobj
That Huffington Post piece on Bush sure is a whine fest. I personally don’t give a damn what that man thinks anymore, just leave already!
By DeBrcaobj on 12/01/2008 6:00 pm
MsDee1
ahem… In the second paragraph of this post, we’re told Hillary has been named national security adviser. And in the last line of the third paragraph, we’re told that post went to James L. Jones. This is a mistake, right? I watched the press conference. Senator Hillary Clinton is waiting to be confirmed as Secretary of State….like Rice and Albright. Right? But I’m most thrilled with the face of Susan Rice becoming the face of America at the United Naions. She has many other talents to deploy in this capacity, but I’m just delighted to think America will be represented by this indisputably “global citizen” countenance.
By MsDee1 on 12/01/2008 5:43 pm
DianaT
Dee, I was so impressed with both Susan Rice and James Jones this a.m. Frankly, I do not know a whole lot about them, but what credentials! And, I thought her short speech was outstanding. Yes, that was a type-o..Hillary Clinton will most certainly be Sec’y of State…
By DianaT on 12/01/2008 7:13 pm
MsDee1
No. I typo would be if national security advisor were mispelled or something. I think this qualifies as a mistake…or a brain-blip at the very least. But it’s okay. I love this site. Thanks for your congrats about my grandbaby on the other thread. I’m so excited about this one…and every baby born now that the future looks hopeful again. I’ve been almost afraid to feel the least bit of optimism since 9/11. But I think maybe it’s okay now. I’ll risk a little disappointment to feel hopeful again.
By MsDee1 on 12/01/2008 7:36 pm
Bonnie Oliver
It is my opinion that I do not think Republican Senators will attempt to derail the appointment of Senator Clinton as Secretary of State. They will, however, probably take the opportunity to finally expose the shenanigans and deals made by the former President with regard to funds he has collected for his Library and other assorted interests. We will finally know the names of donors and the amounts of their contributions. Should prove fascinating for those who are not revolted by the data. Also, I think the appointment of Secretary Gates to remain at the post of Secretary of Defense is the most interesting of the Obama selections for his national security staff. There is no doubt that Mr. Gates must have gained assurances from the President-Elect that Obama did not intend to act upon his earlier comments with regard to early pull-out of Iraq and that, in fact, Obama has decided to maintain the steady course already in place as proposed by General Petraeus and followed by President Bush. It will be interesting to see how Obama will be able to withstand the criticism from his own supporters who hate the Iraqi and Afghan wars and actively campaigned for Obama on the basis that he would change the policy of the United States with regard to those two campaigns. It would appear that Obama who initially encouraged the support of the anti-war supporters has finally accepted the fact the current policy is the best policy and he will not endanger the successes already achieved by our armed forces by issuing rhetorical statements to appease an inflamed “left”. Dennis Kucninch and Cindy Sheehan and their followers will have to accept the fact that Obama is not representative of their policy. As far as his national security staff are concerned, the President-Elect is thinking of America, as a whole, and not as a member of the Democratic Party. I am impressed.
By Bonnie Oliver on 12/01/2008 6:48 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Postscript - It is also going to be interesting to see how the Democrats are going to nix the proposed cancellations of weapon systems as proposed by the Department of Defense during the Bush Administration but not agreed to by the Democratic held Congress. Now that a Dem will be in the White House, how on earth are the dems going to vote “no” when Secretary Gates proposes to cut weapons systems he deems no longer viable or of value to the defense of our Nation. The Dems refused to cut those programs because it meant the loss of jobs in their Districts. Now what are they going to do? Oh my… has the tiger been caught by his own tail?
By Bonnie Oliver on 12/01/2008 7:11 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Postscript - It is also going to be interesting to see how the Democrats are going to nix the proposed cancellations of weapon systems as proposed by the Department of Defense during the Bush Administration but not agreed to by the Democratic held Congress. Now that a Dem will be in the White House, how on earth are the dems going to vote “no” when Secretary Gates proposes to cut weapons systems he deems no longer viable or of value to the defense of our Nation. The Dems refused to cut those programs because it meant the loss of jobs in their Districts. Now what are they going to do? Oh my… has the tiger been caught by his own tail?
By Bonnie Oliver on 12/01/2008 7:11 pm
LouHoover
What on earth makes you think that PE Obama has changed his mind on Iraq? Gates stated that he was doing his duty to the troops to stay in his post. Should I remind you that Obama is the PE and he stated again today that he would make the policy…. the buck will stop with him. Are you just having a Republican fantasy moment?
By LouHoover on 12/01/2008 11:00 pm