Post | 11/21/2008 9:00 am
Obama Set to Pick Clinton as Secretary of State, But Will She Accept?

Two Democratic officials confirmed last night President-elect Barack Obama is set to name Sen. Hillary Clinton as his Secretary of State. The formal announcement will come after Thanksgiving, according to the ever-anonymous sources, and shows how far the political powerhouses have come since they fought hard for the presidential nomination. The move also proves Obama is building what he’s called the "Team of Rivals."
Many feared Bill Clinton’s post-White House career would complicate matters, but Obama aides say they were pleased by Clinton’s "unprecedented disclosures about his finances," reports Politico. But the Clinton disclosures were just the tip of the iceberg in this complicated process.
Clinton and Obama have obviously been in close contact, but "Hillaryland," the senator’s closest allies, also played a large role in "campaigning" for Clinton, say insiders. Regardless, the ultimate decision remained up to Mr. Obama, who apparently believes Clinton would bring what one aide described as "instant stature and credibility" to the nation’s international relations.
Some assumed Clinton would jump at the opportunity to become the nation’s top diplomat; aides say she’s also been mulling ways to improve her senatorial standing and has been waffling over which direction to take. The New York Times reports that Mrs. Clinton started talks with New York Democrats prior to the Obama invitation:
The discussions about an enhanced position for Mrs. Clinton are factoring into her deliberations over joining the cabinet, the officials said. Mrs. Clinton, the junior senator from New York, is wrestling with whether to abandon her independence to become the nation’s top diplomat or remain in a chamber where lack of seniority limits her influence.
Mrs. Clinton asked to join the Senate Democratic leadership after the November 4 election, and party leaders began trying to figure out a way to accommodate her without dislodging any of the current leaders, Democratic officials said. The conversations, they added, preceded Mr. Obama’s approach to her about becoming secretary of state and are on the table if she turns the job down.
…
One friend said Mrs. Clinton decided late Wednesday to say no, reasoning that she would have more freedom in the Senate. By midday Thursday, the friend said, she was “back in the indecisive column again.”
Things are now apparently "on track" for the post-Thanksgiving announcement. That would be good news, but that just means another week of unconfirmed murmurs. Yippee!


Print
Email
Talk to Us
Share













31 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
What’s the difference between suspense and drama?
Ok at the risk of having the wrath of god down on my ass I’m going to say this: I’ve personally had it with the Bill/Hillary public psychodrama. I’ve seen enough. Yes she’s highly capable but can Bill stay in the background? Frankly he needs to butt out. But will he? I doubt it. And there is the factor that many overlook: her inability to control her contentious staff during her campaign which contributed in a major way to her loss of the nomination. That is telling for me about her organizational abilities. How will she run her staff at state? Will she bring those same people with her to state? How will they interact with the Obama team? These are questions that have troubled me since her campaign. I honestly wonder if her waffling this week is based on these factors. The senate wants her to remain and is willing to place her in a position of authority beyond her tenure there. That says a great deal about the respect they have for her. As Sec’y of State one doesn’t work for oneself, one works for the President. In the Senate one can work for oneself and this is the role I feel suits her best.
Will the Senate offer her the leadership role?? Is Reid willing to step aside. I hope this is the route she takes because like you, I do not trust her staff. I think their are still bitter feelings there.
Yes it’s already be posted in the press—Reid is willing and it would be a dynamite move for her. I still get back to one factor—she’s used to working for herself—she’s a self-made woman and esteems that individuality of hers as she should—as Sec’y of State she would work for the Pres. I seriously wonder if she’s capable of subsuming her very large ego to that one single fact. And I’m not forgetting Bill’s ultra large ego wither—that’s another factor. She’s used to working for herself and being subordinate would, I think, have to rankle, and subordinate to Obama she would be.
Frank,
Couldn’t agree with you more. And, she would remain my senator too. I am not a Richardson or Kerry fan, so it will be interesting to see who will get the post if she turns it down.
I’m with Diana on this: I wan to see Chuck Hagel on Obama’s team—Holbrooke would be fine—but I have reservations about Kerry’s out-sized ego.
I agree with you, Frank. I just don’t think it’s the time for her. I’d much rather see Bill Richardson, Richard Holbrooke or Chuck Hagel. There is no way he can get Hillary without Bill. And, her staff leaks too much. I don’t know if you remember Bill Clinton’s West Wing, but it was run like a college fraternity, and, to be honest I am weary with all of that. Besides, I want her very much to head up the Senate and deal with Mitch McConnell; Harry Reid can’t.
Yes Reid needs to be replaced and Hils would be ideal.
Frank
Interesting summation. Good point about the staff. There will always be the question of Bill, but on the other hand, should she have to hold her career back because of Bill? If Reid will step down I would be eternally grateful….. As a mother of a soldier, I want to say it,….. but I won’t. I just think he is kind of a…. I won’t say it. Anyway, I do think she could do great things in the senate, she has such a great practical and working knowledge. I know Kennedy is coming back, but I wonder for how long. Going through that stuff make you tired.
WEll it’s a moot point now Frannie—she accepted the offer.
Well, that is that and more power to her. I have not listened to the news lately. Just glad that Obama named his treasury secretary. We shall see how it all plays out.
Cassiopeia A!—-ya know i was a 10-20” newt mfg, amateur from 2—-as for Hillary? kinda surprised—-i’d be sick of That Oval Room—-on the other hand Obama could use her experience—-she does know how to handle the numerous Bushmasters (the deadly snake) no doubt left by the departing snake—-i was initially peeved with Obama, as i felt his chances were rather slim, vs. hers—-i mean a 1st woman prez would be a great leap, as it were, but even a part-black had me worried—-that’s a Giant leap—-that this country made it? amazing—-my entire family are your standard ‘honkey’—-i’m the Black Sheep’—-even 2 black ‘sons-in-law’, grandkid!
they all have Never voted Reep, but swore ‘no-way’ would they vote for a Muslim ‘plant’—-they really bought all that BS—-it took month’s ‘nuking’ them—-some seemed to ‘get-it’—-but they’re super-liars, so who knows? but we made that leap—-and Obama really needs someone to show him where the floor gets slippery—-she knows—-as for ‘Bill’? quite sure he tries influencing Her—-‘balls-in-orbit’.
overall? nice set-up for Prez, down-the-line—-we need a third party, not as the Reeps, as they were based on ‘fiscal interest’—-not ‘The People’s’ Interest’—-that has to go—-
time will tell—-
If it is offered, I hope she doesn’t accept. I bet President-elect Obama already regrets presenting it as an offer to her. Look at all the drama of the last week and all the leaks which I expect the Clintons are responsible for. I feel protective of our new Presidient and I don’t want this wrteched woman and her husband in his, or our face. He did a very nice thing considering her and I hope is about done considering her. I am so sick of the Cliintons I could scream.
I hope he doesn’t offer, but if he does, I hope she doesn’t accept. The more I think about it, the less I like the idea of Hillary Clinton in this particular position. The Clintons, both of them, are too personally ambitious to be team players. They like/need the lime light too much to be in a position of doing what the boss says, and Obama needs to be the boss of his administration. Also, I think there are probably people better suited for the position of Secretary of State.
DeB,
I tend to agree with Frank and Diana regarding why I’d rather Hillary Clinton not serve as Obama’s Secretary of State. However, I’m not so sure about who is best for that position. Frank and Diana mentioned Hagel. I prefer Richardson over Hagel.
You wrote, “I think there are probably people better suited for the position of Secretary of State.”
I’m curious. Who do you think is the better choice?