Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 01/09/2009 12:40 pm

Obama Taps Counterterror Heavyweights for CIA, Intelligence Posts

By The staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Barack Obama’s not taking any chances when it comes to our nation’s safety. The president-elect this week rounded out his intelligence team to help catch Osama bin Laden and protect the country from further terror attacks.

"As we learned on 9/11, we are not protected by the distance of an ocean or the ability to deter an enemy," Obama said today in making his announcement. "There is no margin for error … Good intelligence is not a luxury – it is a necessity."

He also took a direct swipe at the Bush administration, saying, "we have learned that to make pragmatic policy choices, we must insist on assessments grounded solely in the facts, and not seek information to suit any ideological agenda."

The president-elect today officially named former Clinton chief of staff, Leon Panetta, as CIA chief, despite opposition that surfaced after word leaked of this pick. While Panetta’s great, smart and a fantastic manager, some, including Sen. Dianne Feinstein, questioned his actual intelligence credentials - it now appears that those mountainous obstacles may be more like molehills.

Obama also picked retired Adm. Dennis Blair as national intelligence director. A former head of the U.S. Pacific Command who got kudos for battling terrorism in southeast Asia after 9/11, Blair helped our foreign partners cripple Jemaah Islamiyah in Indonesia and Abu Sayyaf in the Philippines. He’ll be responsible for giving the daily intelligence briefings to Obama.

Obama’s picks are clear signs that he’s trying to break with the Bush administration’s War on Terror policies. He passed along a "no torture allowed" message to his new team. And he means it. "Under my administration, the United States does not torture. We will abide by the Geneva Conventions. We will uphold our highest ideals," Obama said during the press conference. "It’s important to do that not just because that’s who we are, but ultimately, that will make us safe."

But Blair’s already found at least a few vocal critics. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-OR, told the AP that he plans to question Blair about his role a decade ago in U.S. efforts to rein in the Indonesian military as it cracked down on civilians in East Timor. Some human-rights groups have also said Blair’s the wrong choice.

Obama has also picked John O. Brennan as his top counterterrorism adviser. Brennan was said to be Obama’s top pick for CIA director, until Brennan withdrew his name after the blogosphere cried foul over his perceived approval of some controversial Bush administration interrogation techniques. In this position, Brennan – a CIA veteran – will likely advise Obama on issues such as the government’s use of security contractors, the Middle East and Iran.

The current director of national intelligence, Mike McConnell, will serve on Obama’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. The National Counterterrorism Center will continue to be led by Michael Leiter.

The team’s not all men, of course, as Obama invited some fabulous females to help secure our nation.

Michèle Flournoy, a former principal deputy assistant defense secretary under President Clinton, has been tapped as Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. In 2007, Flournoy cofounded and was named president of the Center for a New American Security, and served as a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, where she worked on defense policy and international security issues. She has also served as research professor at the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense University. When she worked for Clinton, she oversaw three policy offices and was awarded the Secretary of Defense Medal for Outstanding Public Service in 1996, the Department of Defense Medal for Distinguished Public Service in 1998 and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff’s Joint Distinguished Civilian Service Award in 2000.

59 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Brooklyn Gal
I will support any team that not only gets Osama bin Laden but is victorious over the Taliban and Pakistani terrorists too. This is a far cry from what the Bush administration did. He may have “protected” our shores, but allowed these groups to rearm and grow. Imagine had he not been so consumed with Iraq? The world might have been a safer place today.
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/09/2009 12:52 pm
DeBúrca obj
He didn’t protect our shores, in fact he cut the funding for our police and never implemented a good system of inspection of incoming containers. Not to mention sending our National Guard out of the country and over to Iraq. There has been no proof of any interception of any real terrorist plots in this country either. So this Bush PR re-writing of history going on lately, with his supporters saying he kept us safe, (and I know that is not what you are saying here) isn’t true. And you’re right, he has been the best recruiter of terrorists around the world… Bin Laden should have put Bush on the payroll!
By DeBúrca obj on 01/09/2009 5:32 pm
Brooklyn Gal
Did you not see the quotation marks around the word “protecting” which usually means when using fingers, that I was being sarcastic? Probably not since you answered as if I were some kind of Bush apologist.
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/09/2009 5:54 pm
Frannie Em
Brooklyn Many of the top ranked terrorists have been caught, are in prison or killed in battle. OBL is still out there with a couple other high ranking sheiks that never come out of hiding, but that is why Al Queda is losing favor. As they have lost their leaders, the new lower level guys are indiscriminate murdering thugs. They kill, rob, rape, kidnap and extort from the locals whenever they want to without any repercussions from above. They join for the money and drugs and are slowly being exposed. The warlords are encouraging more cooperation with the west to get rid of Al Queda. As we all know, Pakistan is the problem, their ranks have not been as decimated, but if they send more troops into Afghanistan, that problem may be dealt with. If NATO continues to lead the efforts in Afghanistan, then we will lose. More Americans are dying there now than before, because NATO, not under the command of the Americans, does not deal with conflict well. Our soldiers have done this overwhelming job. They have slept in the rain, snow, mud and stand storms, crawled in booby trapped caves, eaten MRE’s three times a day for weeks, stop wearing underwear because there is no place to wash it (can’t waste water on that) and if worn too long, it gives them a hell of a crotch problem. Sometimes they don’t take their boots off for 3-4 days and then their feet have terrible athletes foot and smell like rot. (I was in barracks when some guys came back - ugh you cannot imagine the smell of those boots). Can’t wash themselves or their clothes for weeks. No restaurants to go out to, very little entertainment, only what comes from home. They live between two inner enemies, the pressure of the fear of injury and death, and absolute boredom, and they come home and know that the rest of our society cannot relate to it at all, so who to talk to? In Afghanistan, they have to climb straight up rock cliffs to get to outposts with 50-60 lbs packs on, and carry their weapons as well. And they search those guys out night and day, and they get shot at, IED’d, RPG’d and missiles lobbed at them on a regular basis. One time in a village a school for girls was set up and AQ tried to blow it up so our guys had to be security on it. A man sent his son over to one of the GI’s with what looked like a cup of tea, which they share quite a bit with the Gi’s. The boy gave the soldier the tea and the boy had a small needle in his hand tainted with something, and poked the GI who got very sick and had to be medivac’d out. That was not a rare incident. Sorry, you know how I get about our guys. They have worked their asses off to destroy the ranks of Al Queda, and have succeeded on more than one level. I am not saying it was always done right, but they have worked their hardest to get it right and stay alive, and, although not widely reported, they have put a big dent in AQ.
By Frannie Em on 01/09/2009 8:23 pm
Brooklyn Gal
Frannie, I was not talking about our armed forces who unfortunately were sent to fight the wrong war. Yes, some have been captured, but they are like roaches. I have said for months on this site that Afghanistan should have been our major target and now Obama wants to right that wrong. We are losing that war, and I blame Bush. I also blame him for not keeping his promise to the Pakistani government that he would assist in rooting out terrorism. He never followed through and look at what’s happened. I am not that naive to believe that there are no terrorists in our country. I could see the smoke billowing from the Towers from my classroom window. So yes, I am glad that Al Queda did not make headway in Iraq, but that wasn’t the case for years after the war started. Bush and Co. were not supporting the soldiers with the proper equipment and the much needed reinforcements. The surge only happened because Bush was up against the wall. That’s not protecting, that’s correcting his very stupid decision to listen to Rummy and Cheney. And I will say it again, I blame BUSH for the increase of violence in the Middle East. He didn’t want to be proactive like his father was. That’s documented. If anyone has protected us, it people like your son and not his Commander-in-Chief. So please when I discuss Bush, do not take it to mean I do not appreciate the work of our armed forces. They are the only ones who deserve the support of the American people. Bush does not get mine.
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/09/2009 8:42 pm
Frannie Em
Brooklyn I know that you meant Bush, just taking the time to point out and remind everyone what has been accomplished in terms of Al Queda. It is a tough thing to write about because of what accomplished means.
By Frannie Em on 01/11/2009 2:51 am
Frannie Em
Merrell Thanks, I appreciate it.
By Frannie Em on 01/11/2009 2:52 am
DeBúrca obj
I knew you were being sarcastic, I was just backing you up… did you notice the parenthesis around (and I know that is not what you are saying here)? Parenthesis usually means a taking aside and qualifying your statement.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/10/2009 10:58 am
Brooklyn Gal
I stand corrected. I am been hit by Jim so many times I am starting to get everyone mixed up. If you read on, you will see Frannie taking my comment in a different context too. How I wish we can go back to the days of The Sandbox where all comments are just for fun and serious comments are left at the door.
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/10/2009 11:08 am
DeBúrca obj
Jim Henley? He is an obnoxious 15 year old boy, I am sure of it!
By DeBúrca obj on 01/10/2009 11:21 am
Jim Henley
This comment has been deleted as it violated the Ten Commandments of Posting on our website.
By Jim Henley on 01/10/2009 8:20 pm
DeBúrca obj
You are a very ignorant, misinformed, Rush Koolaide drinking 15 year old. That is a fact. And if calling you on it makes me an obnoxious old bag… then that’s what I am little boy.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/10/2009 8:36 pm
Frannie Em
Brooklyn I knew what you meant, just standing up for my guy. i know you care about me. Back atcha
By Frannie Em on 01/11/2009 2:54 am
Jim Henley
This comment has been deleted as it violated the Ten Commandments of Posting on our website.
By Jim Henley on 01/10/2009 1:02 pm
Brooklyn Gal
Poor boy. Why do you spend so much time on a women’s site?
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/11/2009 9:48 am