Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 09/12/2008 7:47 am

Palin Talks Energy, Terrorism and 'Being Ready' for Job as Vice President

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Sarah Palin gave her first major television interview Thursday night, as she tried to explain to the world that she’s ready to become the nation’s next vice president – despite all those who say she’s just too unqualified.

In an interview with ABC News’s Charles Gibson, the Alaska governor talked about national security issues, global warming and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Israel, and how America needs to get away from politics as usual. The interviews took place in Alaska Thursday immediately before and after a deployment ceremony for her son Track, 19, a private in the U.S. Army who will leave for Iraq later this month.

Palin said she knew immediately that she was prepared to run as vice president when John McCain offered her the job. They have shared values that make them a great team, she said.

"I answered [McCain] ‘yes,’ because I have the confidence in that readiness and knowing that you can’t blink, you have to be wired in a way of being so committed to the mission, the mission that we’re on, reform of this country and victory in the war, you can’t blink," she said. "When he offered me the position as his running mate, the first thing I said to him was, ‘Do you really think that I could help the ticket? Do you really think that I could help this country? Absolutely, I want to do this with you.’"

Palin’s biggest problem may be her lack of foreign policy experience. The McCain campaign has been made fun of for responding to that criticism by saying Alaska is close to Russia, and that in the winter, an icy bridge actually forms between the two land masses. 

Conceding that she had never met a foreign leader and had only traveled to Canada and Mexico before visiting U.S. troops in Kuwait and Germany last year, Palin took a jab at Barack Obama’s running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, D-DE, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and a 35-year veteran of the Senate.

"We’ve got to remember what the desire is in the nation at this time," Palin said. "It is for no more politics as usual and somebody’s big, fat resume maybe that shows decades and decades in that Washington establishment where, yes, they’ve had opportunities to meet heads of state."

On energy, Palin said she and John McCain have to "agree to disagree" on some issues involving climate change and ANWR drilling. McCain and his running mate Palin agree on offshore drilling but differ on exploration in ANWR, a federally protected wildlife reserve.

"I’m going to keep working on that one with him," she said.

She tried to stress her energy credentials as the main resume-booster she brings to the table, saying "energy is the foundation of national security."

Palin stuck close to the McCain campaign’s established positions on former Soviet nations joining NATO, and the threats posed from Islamic terrorists and a nuclear Iran.

She did seem a bit confused about what exactly the Bush doctrine of preemption was, however – the concept that the United States has a right to strike another country preemptively before being attacked. 

Palin was repeatedly asked whether she believed in the right to "anticipatory self-defense" and crossing other nations’ borders to take action against threats.

"I believe that America has to exercise all options in order to stop the terrorists who are hell-bent on destroying America and our allies," she said. "We have got to have all options out there on the table."

New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a Republican, said Palin did a fantastic job given the tough questions.

"This was not a softball interview and I thought she handled herself really well," he told MSNBC.

The Washington Post notes that Palin — in earlier remarks to an Iraq-bound brigade of soldiers that included her son — linked that war with the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, saying those troops would "defend the innocent from the enemies who planned and carried out and rejoiced in the death of thousands of Americans." Since the war began, that connection has been rejected by the Bush administration, although militants allied with Al Qaeda are in Iraq now.

"America can never go back to that false sense of security that came before September 11, 2001," she said at the deployment ceremony.

121 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Donna Taylor
As I watched Sarah Palin last night, I was not reassured! I know it was her first interview, I think Charlie Gibson did a good job,by the way, I really just feel like McCain camp is using this woman. From comments & buttons at their convention—Hottest governor—they are not concerned about sexism, it is a way to keep the conversation off the topics that we are concerned with and they have no answer for. As far as her answers about going after Russia, I think she is even more like Bush than he is. I still want to hear more conversation from her, but my impression of last night was not a good one!!
By Donna Taylor on 09/12/2008 9:43 am
Sherrie Crews
I didn’t watch it but did hear clips on my local station this morning when I was listening for the weather while getting ready for work. She sounded at times like a well coached but mediocre high school drama student, at times like a zealot, and at times a hint of desperation or fear seemed to come through in her voice. She’s so far out of her league that I’d feel sorry for her if the possible consequences of what she’s a party to weren’t so serious. What scares me is that there seem to be so many American women who like the “Bush” league and want to keep us all down there.
By Sherrie Crews on 09/12/2008 9:59 am
Barb H
What it all seems to come down to is that if you are dead set against her, you aren’t going to see/admit the truth that she did a fabulous job and is just as prepared to be vice-president as Obama is to be president. I think you need to stop pretending that her “inexperience” is why the left wing wackos are bashing her, and admit you’re scared to death of her because of her appeal to many, many Americans-especially main stream women.
By Barb H on 09/12/2008 10:31 am
Donna Taylor
Barb H- I think you have made a wrong assumption about “main stream women” &” left wing wackos”!! I consider my self a main stream woman, who voted for George Bush twice. I am not a left wing wacko, but an independent woman who wants to make a a good decsion at this time in countries history. I would venture to say there are a lot of women out there exactly like me who see Sarah Palin like I do. I just don’t believe she is prepared enough right now to be vice president. Maybe she will show more in other interviews, but the republicans seem to want to keep her from any venue other than spouting out insults or talking points.
By Donna Taylor on 09/12/2008 11:35 am
Barb H
I don’t understand your assertion that “the republicans want to keep her from any venue”. How would you characterize her interview with Charlie Gibson?
By Barb H on 09/12/2008 12:40 pm
Mary NSB-Florida
The concern of many women is that a few others are so willing to follow already… just because she is a woman. One prepared speech (with many-many-many repeats although nothing added) and one interview (not all of which has been aired yet). I’m sure we’ve given more thought to accepting a dinner date than many of us have given to the qualifications of this candidate for the second highest office in this country. Manipulation is more than a slight possibility… and “liking” her isn’t enough.
By Mary NSB-Florida on 09/12/2008 3:03 pm
Bobbys Gurl
Barb, I’ve been reading different blogs, and the phrase “main stream women” keeps popping up. Who are these “many Americans-especially main stream women.” She doesn’t appeal to me. Does that may me a “left wing wacko?” She may not be appealing “to many, many Americans-especially main stream women,” as you may think. However, only time will tell. Sarah Palin is no more experienced to be VPOTUS as Obama is to be POTUS. That is just a bit of propaganda that is being bandied about to feed the base. Our country is circling the proverbial toilet bowl, and we won’t to keep the people in office who flushed the toilet. I think the right needs to stop pretending that it is all about Obama’s inexperience, and man-up or woman-up to what it is really about. We’re adults. We can take it, because we are use to taking it.
By Bobbys Gurl on 09/13/2008 12:33 am
Barb H
My definition of a mainstream woman is someone, like me, who won’t walk in lock step with NOW; doesn’t think that George Bush and the Republican party are evil women haters; and understands that there are as many different types of women as there are numbers of women. You’re right about one thing. Obama’s inexperience is not the only reason I won’t vote for him. In addition to that, he has a sketchy, little known background (except for the information we’ve gotten directly from him or his people), and the few things that have been verified show us an extreme left wing agenda, like the position he took in the state senate against the IL version of the “Infant Born Alive” Act. Another little known fact that I happen to know because I am from IL, is that in order to win his first election, he used the tactic of challenging and getting all his opponents thrown off the ballot, thereby running unopposed. He is a typical shady Chicago pol, and I wouldn’t wish that on the rest of the country.
By Barb H on 09/13/2008 11:15 am
Bobbys Gurl
Barb H, In my 58 years on the planet, I’ve never been accused of walking “in lock step” with anyone; so, I can assure you I am not walking “in lock step with NOW.” Why? I’m not a member. Never have been, and never will be. You may not be walking “in lockstep with NOW,” but you are walking “in lock step” with the right by spewing their lies. Obama is not for late-term abortions. You are basing your judgement of him on right-wing propaganda. Yet, you come here accusing the women here of walking “in lock step with NOW.” I don’t believe in abortion, it’s just a personal issue for me. With that being said, I must tell you, I don’t have the right to tell another woman she must abide by my beliefs. What some other woman does, is between her and her God. You and the right don’t have the right to be intermediaries in that decision. You spread lies and use contentious language because your argument against Obama is not substantiated. You sound like a low-information voter. You don’t know the truth, and it suits you just fine if you never know the truth. You are in your comfort zone. This is a choice you have made, and there is nothing wrong with it I’m not the most educated person on the planet, but I learn something new everyday. My mind is open to new experiences. I joined this blog a couple of days ago, because I came across some very logical and unbiased comments here. However, I came back yesterday and read your comments. Who calls anyone a left-wing wacko. Your notions are preconcieved and without merit. I’m not interested in changing your mind because it is already locked up. During the last 20 months, I’ve gone from blog to blog trying to get a feel for what is out there in the blogosphere. I’ve been trying to educate myself, because I was not involved as I am now about politics. The most common thing I found on a lot of the blogs were trolls from the right. They never have an argument for their side, but they do have a lot of hate and vitriol for the left. It’s never about truth or the issues, it’s always about personal attacks on the candidate. I don’t watch traditional news anymore (ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, or CNN). They are billed as liberal news, but they are all a step away from being FOX News. From what I’ve read of your post, you are just a breath away from Fox News. Just because you are from Illinois does not make you an expert on Obama. You are basing your arguments on hearsay and innuendoes. You don’t know the truth, and you’re not trying to find out the truth. You are satisfied in passing along lies. What you shouldn’t wish on this country is 4 mores of George Bush, but you don’t really care about that. You are willing to vote against your own interest, because the woman on the ticket is “a mainstream woman” just like you.
By Bobbys Gurl on 09/13/2008 2:20 pm
Barb H
Bobbys, All I can say is please check the facts regarding the IL version of the “Infant Born Alive Act” and Obama’s first IL house race in the archives of the Chicago Sun Times and Tribune, (or in numerous other sources). What I said is not hearsay-it’s fact. By the way, you may not be a dues paying member of NOW, but your irrational and illogical attacks on me (calling me a “low information voter”, whatever that means) is typical of their m.o.. Maybe you should think about joining-you would fit right in.
By Barb H on 09/13/2008 6:27 pm
sanders c
Dan Quayle with lipstick. What worries me is that some of my friends (whose opinions I respect and usually agree with) loved the interview. I’m terrified.
By sanders c on 09/12/2008 12:22 pm
Patty E
I took the time to actually think, about the following statement, by Palin: “We’ve got to remember what the desire is in the nation at this time,” Palin said. “It is for no more politics as usual and somebody’s big, fat resume maybe that shows decades and decades in that Washington establishment where, yes, they’ve had opportunities to meet heads of state.” On the surface, I can see where the country as a whole, as fed up as they are with Washington, and its inability to ‘unstuck themselves’ from their habits of pander, might think that a total revision of EVERYthing is in order. I for one, wish Congress would spend more time on working together with common sense, and accomplish something to move our country forward with wisdom. It seems sometimes, that they have more energy to fight against each other along party lines about petty things, ignoring a bigger picture. And with the reports that Democrates might get a majority this time around, has prompted many Republicans to tender their retirement papers….for most of us, a good sign that things will change. One of my family members actually thinks there should be a term limit for Congress, so that they do not forget why they are there! But Palins’ remark regarding the ‘decades and decades in the Washington Establishment’, in my thinking, is dangerous. Has anyone ever been in a siuation where they just did not know what to do? How about being given an assignment to perform brain surgery, but your background and interest is as an artist? I think about the many I have learned from, and then I took the time to reflect on those situations I was thrown into the water,where I had to swim on my own, without knowing which direction the shore was, or why I had to choose that direction, let alone know how to swim in those waters. What saved me, always, was that I was able to pull out of my memory, an experience that was relevant—even though different—from my decades of following my passion. We all know that had we NOT had certain experiences, we would not be where we are today. We also know the ‘plan’ USUALLY comes before the ‘action’, yet remember when snap decisions are just as crucial, especially when we reflect on the consequences when the decison was a bad one….For most, a bad choice made by oneself, will most often affect several others in a negative way. And decisons by congress and GWB are no different. A President, a VP, as they are at the top of the pyramid, have opportunity to enhance OR destroy, all of America! Not to be taken lightly! When a person spends time and money to get experience and education, following their passion, that person will have motivation to adjust, with wisdom based on their knowledge and experience, to know how they must re-position themselves inorder to continue their passion. To assume that just because they have been in congress for a long time, and now need to be replaced—JUST BECAUSE they have been there too long, to me, is the same as throwing out the baby with the bath water. My bottom line is this: Palins’ statement fortells, to me, danger for America, should she and McCain win the election. Babies learn to walk one step at a time. And sometimes they fall down, and sometimes they hurt themselves. But unlike a VP that does not have the decades, a baby when falling down, does not usually destroy the furniture that is in its way. Palins’ ‘overthrow- wish’ of the ‘establishmenr’ leaves me to wonder who is going to teach her what she needs to know to do the job? Or will this be the ‘learn by mistake’ era? Scary—she did not go to college with a vision of going into politics, she has not lived her life to change America, she has not even had an interst or curiosity about the rest of the world, thru travel, to see and learn how things can be done differently…So what does she base her idea that Washington needs to be thrown out?
By Patty E on 09/12/2008 12:25 pm
Lady Gator
Just some musings for the day. Yesterday was 9/11. What did you do to remember? Some on this site spent the day spewing spite and venom. Do you not remember what happened seven years ago? Maybe you don’t want to remember — maybe you think this will NEVER happen again. I pray not. However, who in their wildest dreams thought something that terrible could happen in the first place? In my neighborhood we all flew our flags at half mast — In our town we had a “remembering 9/11” ceremony. The navy provided us with a fly-over with the plane - flying out of formation to remember the “fallen heros” of that day. Are we schmaltzy people? No, I think not we just never will forget! In New York — both candidates were there at ground zero to pay their respects. It was so wonderful to see these two men putting their respective campaigns aside and standing tall for this country. It was truly an example of what can be done when people put their opinions aside and work together. Last evening was the forum at Columbia University — it was quite interesting to see how close both of these candidates came on the issues. It was also outstanding to see how much they respect each other. There was no winner in this forum — both were strong in their views - and, both should be congratulated on their views. Both are certainly capable to lead this country. Some of you have chosen one — Others have chosen another — Is that so bad? Let’s speak to the issues that both bring to the table. This is going to be a very close election — no slam dunk for either of them. As to Sarah Palin’s interview. She did well. Granted there were a few questions thrown her way that she had to think about. This was no slam dunk interview — this was not her last interview - this is not the last you will hear from Sarah Palin. I believe she is handling all the “witch hunt” slamming and will come out on top. All of the bad mouthing might come back to “haunt” those who are doing the most “slamming” — dirty politics usually does! Is she ready to be the President of the US - who knows. There is so much said about “On the job training”. I truly believe that each man who has become President had their “On the job training”. Nothing can prepare you for the first security session when you hear about all the threats, and perhaps horrors, that this country faces. Nothing can prepare them for the thoughts that must haunt them — the sleepless nights, and, the knowledge that they have the fate of every living breathing American in their hands. They don’t learn this before they sit in that office — they have to learn it. I consider that “On the job training”. As to Sarah Palin’s religion. She has been critized for mentioning God in some of her speeches. What’s wrong with that? Roosevelt, during WW2 asked all Americans to pray with him for the safety of our troops on D-Day. John F. Kennedy used the word God many times during his Preisdency. As did Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Jimmy Carter and George H. Bush. No one critized them for doing so. They started their Presidency — hand on the bible —and concluded their Oath of Office with “So Help Me God”. Now, all of a sudden, in the last years, their is a cry, by some, that believeing in God is forbidden. I would bet that all of the men mentioned above felt the need, at some point during their Presidency, to pray, and believe that a higher power was one of the mort important things they could do to keep this country safe. I will never think that is wrong. I will admire them for their ability to recognize that they need something to guide them other than advisors. I do believe that we, on this site, (the founders included) have lost a sense of direction — lost a sense of compassion for each others views - lost our sensibilities to the ideas of others. But, most of all, we’ve lost our heart. As Beth would say Peace and Grace to All
By Lady Gator on 09/12/2008 1:41 pm
C Hardy
Lady Gator…once again…AMEN! Thank You for that…I actually read every word and couldn’t stop…You read my mind…Thank you again!
By C Hardy on 09/12/2008 2:43 pm
Tick Pyne
Congratulations. This may be today’s most patronizing post. Now, if we criticize Sarah Palin, we have forgotten the meaning and import of 9/11? We have no heart? How dare you. Who picked 9/11 for her Eliza Doolittle debut moment, anyway? Are we supposed to have a moratorium on intelligence and critical judgement? Give us all one big, collective break. And as for: “Is she ready to be the President of the US - who knows,” seems awfully cavalier to me.
By Tick Pyne on 09/12/2008 2:52 pm