Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Lesley Stahl | 03/13/2008 10:13 pm

Meg Whitman: 'Glam, She's Not?' (Part VI)

Meg Whitman

As eBay’s Meg Whitman becomes co-chair of Sen. John McCain’s national campaign, she talks to our Lesley Stahl about retiring from the business world and about her future. The following is part VI of a VII-part, exclusive interview that took place on Tuesday, March 11. To read the entire interview, click the links at the end of the article.

LESLEY: So, Meg, let’s talk clothes, OK?

MEG: OK.

LESLEY: Alright. This is not an insult. I think you’ve even said it about yourself: "Glam, I’m not!" Right? Tell me if this is true: you seem to wear, basically, khaki pants and a polo shirt every day. None of this "dress for success," those suits that you see – frankly, that I wear. Whoops. Did you make a conscious decision about how you wanted to look?

MEG: So, in my early days – I have a hilarious picture, Lesley, that I should probably send you, that I can’t really let you publish.

LESLEY: Oh, darn. We want the picture!

MEG: It’s of me at Bain & Company in the 1980s and I was wearing the 1980s outfit of a suit, a white shirt and remember those little bowties we used to wear?

LESLEY: Oh, absolutely. Of course.

MEG: I mean, it was the sort of emerging executive women outfit. And so I thought a lot about it in my early days at Bain. And, you know, we were consultants, right? So we had to have a little bit more. But my personal style is not a particularly … you know, I just haven’t … it’s not an interest. I’m not very good at it.

LESLEY: Not good at clothes. Not good at shopping.

MEG: I’m not good at clothes. I’m not good at fashion. And you know what? I think it really sort of stems from growing up. My mother wasn’t very good at it, either.

LESLEY: It’s genetic.

MEG: It’s genetic. And so I just wear what I’m comfortable in and it … one of the joys of coming to Silicon Valley was that everyone is very casual here. So wearing khakis and a button-down shirt every day is kind of what everyone wears. And, blue jeans and…. So, I have actually thrived in an environment where it is a very casually dressed environment, and, obviously, will wear a suit when it’s required. But I am most comfortable, you’re right, in a pair of khakis and a button-down shirt.

LESLEY: Well, it sends out an image of, I don’t know, nice. It does.

Meg Whitman on What’s Next After eBay (Part I)
Meg Whitman: ‘Oh, Gosh. People Put Up Anything You Can Imagine’ (Part II)
Meg Whitman on ‘Security 101’: ‘Consumers Deserve to Know’ (Part III)
Meg Whitman: ‘I Think It’s Better, but We’ve Got a Long Way to Go’ (Part IV)
Meg Whitman: ‘We Took Turns Sabotaging Each Others’ Careers’ (Part V)
Meg Whitman on Running a Household and Thoughts on the Economy (Part VII)

Read more about: Business, eBay, Meg Whitman, Q & A

4 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Bella Mia
The hi tech uniform is khakis and a company-logo polo or t-shirt that was handed out at work. Employees can build a whole wardrobe that way.
By Bella Mia on 03/18/2008 11:26 am
CAROLINE MuLVEY
I was taught to dress for success. To wear skirts,dresses or a nice pants out-fit. Now I find out that Khakis and a polo shirt is all you need to make a great first impression and become success full. You mean they look at your qualifications beyond your looks. If that is true GREAT I like it.
By CAROLINE MuLVEY on 04/05/2008 6:58 am
Mugsy Peabody
In the early ’70s in SF, it was still skirts and dresses for women and in some places gloves. I was sought after by one company but turned the job down because I couldn’t wear slacks. They called their home office in Chicago, and they agreed I could wear matching suits with pants things. So I was one of the first. Then we started in with the department stores, because they charged women for alterations, but not men. They actually told us, “But women can sew.” Well, boys, women can also sue. Unfortunately, what happened was, they started charging men as well. Equality. Sigh. Feel free to thank us, Meg. We were a bunch o’ toughies!
By Mugsy Peabody on 04/05/2008 11:22 pm
Kelly K
To all the powerful, poetic, brilliant, brassy, witty and wonderful women of wowOwow~ thank you! Lesley’s comment about women needing conversation as much as we need food, shelter, air, in fact, moved me to write and thank each of you. I have always been blessed by the company and conversation of women - what I refer to as the global sisterhood, and now I feel as though you all have opened yet another door, offered a seat at another kitchen table so that myself and other sisters always have the nourishment in connecting we need. Having recently moved to a new community, I was invited into a neighbor’s house for a glass of wine with some women. While we talked around the proverbial kitchen table, a question was posed to me about my support for Senator Clinton, as I have a campaign sign in my yard. While it was quite clear quite quickly that my politics were in the minority around the table, I was eager to reach out to these women, to make new connections. At some point, someone asked me why I considered myself a feminist. While at first I felt quite defensive about sharing such a personal and important part of who I am with strangers, as I spoke, and as I listened to the other women around that table, I realized that whether we agreed on politics, or parenting or the definition (and purpose) of feminism was simply not as important as the conversation in and of itself. I hope that I am invited back for more. Thank you for inviting us to the conversation here~ Kelly K., Cleveland Ohio
By Kelly K on 04/09/2008 12:15 am