Caroline Kennedy Candidacy Watch | 01/09/2009 10:20 am

Paterson: Kennedy's Lack of Experience a 'Minus'

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

In this series, which started in July ‘08, wowOwow follows the political news swirling around Caroline Kennedy since her surprise endorsement of Barack Obama and high-profile placement on his VP selection committee. Now, Caroline is ready to launch a political career of her own. With the Caroline Kennedy Candidacy Watch, we’ll follow all the latest news.

If Caroline Kennedy were getting graded on her political experience, she would get "a minus." That, New York Gov. David Paterson thinks, could hinder her bid to take Hillary Clinton’s Senate seat.

Paterson – the man who will pick Clinton’s replacement – thinks her lack of legislative experience is working against her, according to the New York Post, but he also said she "obviously does have a tremendous relationship with [President-elect Barack Obama and] that’s certainly a plus."

Hmmm, but should being on Obama’s good side be a qualification for U.S. senator? We don’t really think so. How about picking the person most qualified and best for New York, rather than the person who may help you the most in your 2010 election?

Many have said that Paterson’s already set on Kennedy, but the governor’s still downplaying suggestions. And, to make his point, he asked six candidates to fill out a 28-page questionnaire, asking about everything from criminal records, to tax problems, to their kids’ Facebook pages.

Paterson told The Buffalo News
, "The notion that I have to take Caroline is not coming from me." "Gossip" has become a "greater force right now than my decision," he added, and said the media have become too consumed with her. 

"Why do you all pay so much attention to her? She’s just another person. So what? Her name is Kennedy. Why do you pay so much attention to her? I’m not reacting to what I think, I’m reacting to what I see," he said. "To the media it’s Caroline and the others. To me, there are 10 to 15 good candidates." Sarah Palin, we’re sure, would agree.

Regardless of where Paterson himself stands, Kennedy’s bid has reignited the so-called "mommy wars" and debate among women re-entering the workforce. Although Kennedy isn’t exactly the average every-mom, many women identify with her.

From AP:

Kennedy’s bid for the Senate has reignited the "mommy wars" between mothers with careers and those who take a break from paid employment. Like Kennedy, many women face resentment when they return to the workforce after raising kids and doing volunteer work. "She’s a Kennedy, but she’s a lot like us," was the headline of a December 28 column by Anne Glusker in The Washington Post. "If you strip away the glamour, the name and the money, then Caroline is … me. And many of my friends."

If nothing else comes out of this, hopefully the Kennedy drama will inspire women to follow their dreams. And isn’t that what democracy’s all about? 

28 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

S.J. Morgan
You could insert Sarah Palins name instead of Kennedy and I would agree!
By S.J. Morgan on 01/09/2009 11:18 am
Belinda Joy
but he also said she “obviously does have a tremendous relationship with [President-elect Barack Obama and] that’s certainly a plus.” Okay, that was a really bone-headed thing to say. I’m with you wOw staff, how does that equate to her being qualified for the job? Given that he says she lacks legislative experience, coupled with the remark about Obama, if he does pick her it will (and rightly so) be perceived as favoritism. Well, so much for her chances of getting the appointment. He stepped in it up to his thigh on this one! :-)
By Belinda Joy on 01/09/2009 11:18 am
S.J. Morgan
Belinda….in this case I agree with you! Shows what a sexist he really is…
By S.J. Morgan on 01/09/2009 11:27 am
Lucinda Herbert
His remarks do not make David Patterson a sexist for goodness sake! He is absolutely correct; there are quite a few candidates who have earned being considered. Carolyn Maloney would be my pick, but there are quite a few others worth considering including Kirsten Gillibrand. The candidates are being asked to submit all kinds of information, including the addresses of their children’s facebook and MySpace pages. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/nyregion/09senate.html?ref=nyregion
By Lucinda Herbert on 01/09/2009 5:37 pm
S.J. Morgan
hit the submite key to soon..the above was in regards to this quote ”If nothing else comes out of this, hopefully the PALIN drama will inspire women to follow their dreams. And isn’t that what democracy’s all about? “
By S.J. Morgan on 01/09/2009 11:19 am
f p
Palin was a drama but a recognizable farce. She should never been vetted or asked in the 1st place.
By f p on 01/09/2009 12:03 pm
DeBúrca obj
I think she never WAS vetted, that’s the problem.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/09/2009 12:56 pm
f p
No she was—one day vetting lolol Some vetting by the idiots in charge of the Repub party.
By f p on 01/09/2009 1:12 pm
DeBúrca obj
Oh well… does “one day” actually fall under the heading of “vetted”? lol… I suppose when the Know-nothing wing of the party takes over, one day is enough.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/09/2009 1:21 pm
f p
yep, they certainly picked a know-nothing for veep—that’s fro sure.
By f p on 01/09/2009 1:31 pm
Catherine Kaiman
fp, are you sure it was one day, I would think it was more like 15 minutes! lol
By Catherine Kaiman on 01/09/2009 2:25 pm
f p
That is what was reported—frankly why the hell did they bother to begin with—one day? losers. lolol
By f p on 01/09/2009 2:44 pm
Marjorie C.
DeBúrca: I think she never WAS vetted, that’s the problem. You mean like Richardson was so properly vetted? And who know who all else. Whether you want to accept it or not, Palin has the ability to draw a crowd… she has a following. That’s why we keep talking about her. Problem is with all this talk, nothing really changes… I still like her, and you still don’t. That’s where we were three months ago.
By Marjorie C. on 01/09/2009 6:18 pm
DeBúrca obj
And the more she talks the more people who didn’t like her don’t. She is not doing herself any favors and as far as drawing a crowd, it was a nasty crowd that yelled hateful things like “Kill him” and idiotic things like “Drill Baby Drill”. It’s a small group.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/10/2009 11:54 am
beth willis
Marjorie C., I’m not a supporter of Palin’s, but I do agree with you that she could make a contribution to her party if she would go under the national radar for a year, concentrating entirely on Alaska, being tutored in international affairs, legislative maneuvers. If Rove trained her properly, I think she could be a factor in the future. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 01/11/2009 6:33 pm