Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Caroline Kennedy Candidacy Watch | 01/09/2009 9:20 am

Paterson: Kennedy's Lack of Experience a 'Minus'

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

In this series, which started in July ‘08, wowOwow follows the political news swirling around Caroline Kennedy since her surprise endorsement of Barack Obama and high-profile placement on his VP selection committee. Now, Caroline is ready to launch a political career of her own. With the Caroline Kennedy Candidacy Watch, we’ll follow all the latest news.

If Caroline Kennedy were getting graded on her political experience, she would get "a minus." That, New York Gov. David Paterson thinks, could hinder her bid to take Hillary Clinton’s Senate seat.

Paterson – the man who will pick Clinton’s replacement – thinks her lack of legislative experience is working against her, according to the New York Post, but he also said she "obviously does have a tremendous relationship with [President-elect Barack Obama and] that’s certainly a plus."

Hmmm, but should being on Obama’s good side be a qualification for U.S. senator? We don’t really think so. How about picking the person most qualified and best for New York, rather than the person who may help you the most in your 2010 election?

Many have said that Paterson’s already set on Kennedy, but the governor’s still downplaying suggestions. And, to make his point, he asked six candidates to fill out a 28-page questionnaire, asking about everything from criminal records, to tax problems, to their kids’ Facebook pages.

Paterson told The Buffalo News
, "The notion that I have to take Caroline is not coming from me." "Gossip" has become a "greater force right now than my decision," he added, and said the media have become too consumed with her. 

"Why do you all pay so much attention to her? She’s just another person. So what? Her name is Kennedy. Why do you pay so much attention to her? I’m not reacting to what I think, I’m reacting to what I see," he said. "To the media it’s Caroline and the others. To me, there are 10 to 15 good candidates." Sarah Palin, we’re sure, would agree.

Regardless of where Paterson himself stands, Kennedy’s bid has reignited the so-called "mommy wars" and debate among women re-entering the workforce. Although Kennedy isn’t exactly the average every-mom, many women identify with her.

From AP:

Kennedy’s bid for the Senate has reignited the "mommy wars" between mothers with careers and those who take a break from paid employment. Like Kennedy, many women face resentment when they return to the workforce after raising kids and doing volunteer work. "She’s a Kennedy, but she’s a lot like us," was the headline of a December 28 column by Anne Glusker in The Washington Post. "If you strip away the glamour, the name and the money, then Caroline is … me. And many of my friends."

If nothing else comes out of this, hopefully the Kennedy drama will inspire women to follow their dreams. And isn’t that what democracy’s all about? 

28 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Garden Goddess
I believe the same criteria applied to Sarah Palin are a requirement in this case as well. One cannot merely skip to the front of the line. Name recognition is not a substitute for ability, experience and genuine desire for service. Neither woman has the qualifications for the position for which she has deemed herself worthy. Both need to do their homework, which includes effective public service other than in the arts for Caroline. There is no place for hubris. These positions are very serious positions and politics as usual has become almost anathema (or should). There is so much hard work ahead of everyone in this country that we simply must have the best candidates for every position for the best possible team. Social connections are irrelevant.
By Garden Goddess on 01/09/2009 10:27 am
Tee Zee
Well said, G.G.!
By Tee Zee on 01/09/2009 11:15 am
S.J. Morgan
Well one can say that Palin did not call up McCain and ask for the position as Caroline did! And Caroline cannot assume her pedigree assures her a position. BOTH could be future candidates with some more education and experience . What Caroline lacks is practical experience.. What Sarah lacks is formal education in world issues ouside her expertice! Both have shown an ability to learn! BOTH can inspire woman to follow their dreams! As a woman I feel we should encourage rather than belittle.
By S.J. Morgan on 01/09/2009 11:33 am
DeBúrca obj
No actually it has been well reported that Palin DID go after the VP position before McCain chose her. That doesn’t excuse McCain for making such a horrible choice, but I have to say, the fact that the voters didn’t fall for it is very redeeming. Also, having an “ability to learn” has a much different meaning for a Senate position and for a position of being a heartbeat from the presidency. Yes women FOLLOW YOUR DREAMS! But don’t expect to be VP unless you are qualified for the job.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/09/2009 11:59 am
DeBúrca obj
TYPO: Also, having an “ability to learn” has a much different meaning for a Senate position THAN for a position of being a heartbeat from the presidency.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/09/2009 12:00 pm
S.J. Morgan
well reported that Palin DID go after the VP position before McCain chose her”…by whom? Link?…and not a blog site?
By S.J. Morgan on 01/09/2009 1:36 pm
DeBúrca obj
Here is just one, you can google to find much more: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/10/27/081027fa_fact_mayer?curren…
By DeBúrca obj on 01/09/2009 2:03 pm
S.J. Morgan
Thanks for sharing I had not seen that. Yet I strill do not see that as a problem as it appears others in the party were interested in her percuit as well. Barack as well has been said has been training for this positon and in past interviews before the last two years he has compaigned he indicated a reluctance to say he was ready. What changed his mind? People encouraging him and offering funding! To my knowlege it may have been a dream of Sarah’s but she was not anywhere near what Obama has in his persuit. Thos relationships in WA that the article mentions could be beneficial to her as a state Governor as well.
By S.J. Morgan on 01/09/2009 11:57 pm
DeBúrca obj
Sarah Palin’s abilities and qualifications are not anywhere near what Obama has either.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/10/2009 11:12 am
Marjorie C.
DeBúrca: …but I have to say, the fact that the voters didn’t fall for it is very redeeming. Try to remember that 47% of America’s voters did fall for her and McCain. That’s a big chunk of people. Of course, that big chunk of people could have simply been voting against Obama — in that case it lessens her impact. We may never see Sarah Palin again as a national candidate for anything, or we may see a very changed and learned Sarah Palin, and that Sarah Palin will be a force to contend with. Americans have short memories… they will forget and forgive her missteps of 2008.
By Marjorie C. on 01/09/2009 5:28 pm
DeBúrca obj
47% were voting for the McCain/Palin ticket, not Palin herself.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/10/2009 10:55 am
Brooklyn Gal
Well, once Hillary is confirmed, I hope Paterson gets off the pot and makes a decision. This is taking up too much media time and getting nasty too.
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/09/2009 1:08 pm
Diana T
Paterson’s lack of decision making is as much a problem as Kennedy’s lack of experience. Governor, just take a deep breath, make your choice and move on! You can’t please all of the people all of the time; get over it.
By Diana T on 01/09/2009 1:32 pm