Politics | 03/02/2009 11:20 am
Is Phyllis Schlafly the Most Dangerous Woman in America?

“Feminists have a death grip on the top level of the Democratic party,” insisted Phyllis Schlafly during an interview last month. “The feminists are a disaster … It’s so unfortunate what they do to young women.” Funny, some say the same thing about Schlafly.
Yes, Schlafly’s nothing if not a contradiction. Educated at Washington University and Radcliffe, the 85-year-old conservative leader boasts quite a list of accomplishments: She’s penned 20 books, influenced powerful politicians — including Ronald Reagan — and commands a powerful lobbying group, the Eagle Forum. In fact, she would have addressed the Conservative Political Action Committee this weekend had she not broken her hip after a lecture last Wednesday. Oddly enough, the thrust of Schlafly’s success rests on her hard line against other women.
“She did lasting damage to the women’s rights movement,” remarked Mary Jean Collins, a longtime feminist activist who once headed the National Organization for Women’s Chicago branch. The iconic Betty Friedan, meanwhile, took a harsher tone during a 1970 debate, when she reportedly called Schlafly “a traitor to [the female] sex” and said she wanted to burn her at the stake. On the other hand, commentator Ann Coulter has described Schlafly as “brilliant,” “beautiful” and “principled.” Elaine Donnelly, a longtime ally of Schlafly’s and leader of the Center for Military Readiness, lavished extraordinary praise on Schlafly: “If you look at her as a conservative women, she has shown women what’s possible. She’s certainly a role model for women, regardless of party.” There’s indeed little middle ground when it comes to Schlafly. Some call her a hero, while others maintain she’s the most dangerous woman in American history. Why, though, can’t she be both?"
Born in 1924, Phyllis McAlpin Stewart came from modest beginnings in St. Louis, MO, where her family struggled through the Great Depression. Though women had only three years earlier gained the right to vote, and though discrimination still existed in the workplace, Schlafly maintains she never once felt oppressed. “I always felt I could do whatever I wanted.” And you can be sure young Ms. Stewart made short work of her goals.
Determined to go to school, Phyllis paid her way by testing ammunition at the St. Louis Ordnance Plant, a fitting job for a woman who would become such a spitfire. She managed to finish Washington University in three years — “I don’t believe in going to college for four years” — and then headed to Radcliffe, where she earned a Masters of Arts in government in 1945, at the age of 20. From there Phyllis headed to Washington, DC, and worked for the American Enterprise Association before moving back to St. Louis, aiding a congressman’s campaign and acting as a research director at two local banks.
By her telling, Schlafly was “saved from the life as a working girl” when she met and in 1949 married a wealthy, Illinois-based attorney named Fred Schlafly. Asked whether she thinks a woman needs a man to be happy, Schlafly asserted:
I think it’s much more fun to have a home, have a spouse, have children. Absolutely. And most of the women I debated in the 1970s don’t have what I have, which is grandchildren. But they made their choice. The trouble is they’re not happy with their choices, and I’m very happy with mine.
Fred and Phyllis were certainly happy in the years after their marriage and together threw themselves into the anti-communist conservative movement. Though both passionate about politics, it was Mrs. Schlafly who made the most waves.























334 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Schafly has been railing about this for 30 years. Nothing new. As a member of the Feminist Generation, I remember hearing both sides of this "argument" and it is obvious, by this website by women for women, who won…look who is at the top of this Masthead; women in all categories that have Made It.
March is Womens’ History MOnth. I think it would be a wonderful idea is the Masthead Ladies would consider running an article each day of the month about the women that have enriched our nation, lifted its National Morale during the tough times, and have left their mark forever.
Barbara Jordan, Billy Jean King, Agnes de Mille, Martha Graham, Helen Hayes, Helen Keller, Bess Truman and Eleanor Roosevelt—these are but a few women in our history that have made such a difference for America.
Diana, we’re around the same age, and I too remember Phyllis in her "day" … and I may be having a senior moment here, but wasn’t it Schlafly who said women should wrap themselves in saran wrap and meet their husbands at the door when they arrive home from work ? Or was it someone else like her
And yes, just look at the women at the masthead, can you imagine any of these women NOT working a 60 hour week ?
EKA, I think you’re right! I had forgotten about that. I remember when she would appear on TV back in the Reagan administration, my husband would have apoplexy. He couldn’t stand her, and felt as though she wanted to set womens rights to pre-voting days.
I preferred Bella Abzug with her hats because she was just less boring.
I was wrong …. (see below) but she WAS pushing the "little woman in the kitchen supporting her man" . The total opposite of the women at w0w, hard working, mutually supportive of the men who see them as equals. I would not go back to the Schlafly days for anything.
Bella Abzug absolutely !
"TOTAL WOMAN" yes, what a horrid nightmare!!!
"Ms. Phyllis" never overcame her abuse, hence surged forward to save herself, with sociopathic tendencies (at best!), and frankly, sadly, will never change. She can’t. Same with Perro - her Dallas side-kick.
What quite irked me (for literally decades) is when a greater % of women marching against "abortion centers" toting placards, "Not in Our Neighborhood" many of them had had hysterectomies ( and several hadn’t a clue their husbands had vasectomies!). Immersion in mental illness is not helping our culture.
Beau, If they really wanted to talk about a woman that made a real difference, they should discuss Golda Meir, a Russian Jew, raised in Wisconsin who went on to become Israel’s 4th Prime Minister.
De,
I’ve stated here on wOw that I used to be a ‘proud’ member of the EAGLE FORUM, and I was very active in the Phoenix chapter of Phyllis Schlafly’s organization during the early 70’s because I supported many of the issues she stood for respective to family issues, and how the ERA might have a negative impact affecting the stability of what was hailed as the ‘traditional’ family model - as exemplified on 60’s televison shows like Ozzie & Harriet, The Donna Reed Show, and Father Knows Best. I was an ardent supporter for many years … until the late 70’s and early 80’s. Yet, I have to acknowledge that much of Schlafly’s ‘prediections’ have proven to be true … but not because of the ERA.
I agree with you that some of the rhethoric was ’relevant back during the Feminist debate years’. But those days are long over, and Schlafly’s ideolgy … I agree, is no longer relvant, particularily as it relates to women’s issues and today’s new family structure, which has little resembelance to the ‘traditional’ family model of the 60’s.
Yet, I’m not entirely sure - if advancements [achieved through the ERA] have had either a positive or negative affect on today’s ‘new’ family.
Because of the damaging changes to the American family her message is all the more relevant.
Look up Tommy Nelson and "The song of Solomon" tapes. He explains it so well, it will touch your soul, if not change your life.
It is about and for every woman, every relationship. It is powerful, moving and real.
She’s not the most dangerous woman alive. UNLESS,
she’s willing to be a "living bomb" like those overseas
who believe so heartedly for what they want, they blow
themselves and hundreds of innocent people up? Words
are powerful but bombs are more so when they take
innocent peoples’ lives.