Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 03/02/2009 10:20 am

Is Phyllis Schlafly the Most Dangerous Woman in America?

By Andrew Belonsky
© Getty

“Feminists have a death grip on the top level of the Democratic party,” insisted Phyllis Schlafly during an interview last month. “The feminists are a disaster … It’s so unfortunate what they do to young women.” Funny, some say the same thing about Schlafly.

Yes, Schlafly’s nothing if not a contradiction. Educated at Washington University and Radcliffe, the 85-year-old conservative leader boasts quite a list of accomplishments: She’s penned 20 books, influenced powerful politicians — including Ronald Reagan — and commands a powerful lobbying group, the Eagle Forum. In fact, she would have addressed the Conservative Political Action Committee this weekend had she not broken her hip after a lecture last Wednesday. Oddly enough, the thrust of Schlafly’s success rests on her hard line against other women.

“She did lasting damage to the women’s rights movement,” remarked Mary Jean Collins, a longtime feminist activist who once headed the National Organization for Women’s Chicago branch. The iconic Betty Friedan, meanwhile, took a harsher tone during a 1970 debate, when she reportedly called Schlafly “a traitor to [the female] sex” and said she wanted to burn her at the stake. On the other hand, commentator Ann Coulter has described Schlafly as “brilliant,” “beautiful” and “principled.” Elaine Donnelly, a longtime ally of Schlafly’s and leader of the Center for Military Readiness, lavished extraordinary praise on Schlafly: “If you look at her as a conservative women, she has shown women what’s possible. She’s certainly a role model for women, regardless of party.” There’s indeed little middle ground when it comes to Schlafly. Some call her a hero, while others maintain she’s the most dangerous woman in American history. Why, though, can’t she be both?"

Born in 1924, Phyllis McAlpin Stewart came from modest beginnings in St. Louis, MO, where her family struggled through the Great Depression. Though women had only three years earlier gained the right to vote, and though discrimination still existed in the workplace, Schlafly maintains she never once felt oppressed. “I always felt I could do whatever I wanted.” And you can be sure young Ms. Stewart made short work of her goals. 

Determined to go to school, Phyllis paid her way by testing ammunition at the St. Louis Ordnance Plant, a fitting job for a woman who would become such a spitfire. She managed to finish Washington University in three years — “I don’t believe in going to college for four years” — and then headed to Radcliffe, where she earned a Masters of Arts in government in 1945, at the age of 20. From there Phyllis headed to Washington, DC, and worked for the American Enterprise Association before moving back to St. Louis, aiding a congressman’s campaign and acting as a research director at two local banks.

By her telling, Schlafly was “saved from the life as a working girl” when she met and in 1949 married a wealthy, Illinois-based attorney named Fred Schlafly. Asked whether she thinks a woman needs a man to be happy, Schlafly asserted:

I think it’s much more fun to have a home, have a spouse, have children. Absolutely. And most of the women I debated in the 1970s don’t have what I have, which is grandchildren. But they made their choice. The trouble is they’re not happy with their choices, and I’m very happy with mine.

Fred and Phyllis were certainly happy in the years after their marriage and together threw themselves into the anti-communist conservative movement. Though both passionate about politics, it was Mrs. Schlafly who made the most waves.

334 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Gramma J

I remember Phyllis well, lying hypocrite that she is.  I always believed that the main reason she wanted women out of the workplace and back in the home was because it made her much less "special" when so many women were getting college degrees and going on to have careers.  It was so evident that she was so jealous and resentful of them!  She didn’t care in the least what they wanted, she didn’t care in the least that they should get to decide what their priorities were or how they wanted to live their lives, she just wanted everyone to conform to a little plastic mold that SHE certainly didn’t try to fit into!  She was a worthless then and hasn’t changed.  On the upside for her, having always been out of her ever-lovin’ mind, no one will know when dementia takes over, if it hasn’t already.

By Gramma J on 03/03/2009 10:30 am
Paula Kalamaras
This old bat and her minions like Anne Coulter and Sarah Palin won’t be happy until we are all under Taliban-like control.  They want to be sure that they are the only women who have rights. 
By Paula Kalamaras on 03/03/2009 10:34 am
Kelly In Texas

I’d pay to watch anyone try to put a burka on Anne…that won’t be happening soon!

And Sarah…well the Taliban had better run a zig-zag pattern if they don’t want to be front and center in her cross-hairs… that woman would go down fighting for you. Even after that post.

By Kelly In Texas on 03/03/2009 2:07 pm
Gail Daigh

I am shocked by the vitriol toward each other in this thread, but I do have my own thoughts.  To start off with, I thought it was way past time for Schlafly to have died—she is SO out of step with the mainstream, and always has been, that it is unbelievable.  I am from St. Louis and remember her nonsense only too well. 

 

To Mimi:  I am appalled that a former schoolteacher’s grammar and spelling are so utterly atrocious.  Any children who missed being in your rooms were extremely lucky!  You are clueless abd ugly inside, and I feel sorry for you.  Maybe some therapy would be helpful for you to rid yourself of the hatred and bitterness inside. 

 

Anyone who blames the Demos for the ills of our nation are delusional.  Things weren’t half bad when Clinton left office, but when Bush was appointed by the Supreme Court in 2000 and the 2004 election was stolen in Ohio, the country went to hell in a hand basket!  Anyone who can’t see what happened must be wearing blinders!  Since the days of Reagan, the Republican party has sought what has now befallen us, widening the differences between the wealthy and poor and placing extreme wealth into the hands of executives.  We in my party have seen the destruction unfold since 2000 and thank God the citizenry has finally awakened and voted the Republicans out of office.  I can only  hope that we can keep them out of office for a long, long time!  Bush and his cronies wreaked destruction on all that we hold dear and ruined our stellar reputation around the world, and I am thrilled that they are gone!

 

 

By Gail Daigh on 03/03/2009 1:53 pm
Dona Howlett

Gail,

Very well said.

As to Mimi, I don’t believe she was a teacher at all.  I think she just made that up to try to make herself look better.  She shows her ignorance and no amount of lying will change that.

By Dona Howlett on 03/04/2009 4:29 am
mitzi morris

 I remember her as prefering women answer the door to greet their hubbies in a Playboy Bunny outfit with an apron tied around it.

Interesting that Coulter supports her ideas re: women, etc., as Coulter is a wild child who has never married, has a huge Adams Apple, and doesn’t know a thing about being married and in the kitchen.  Remember the Nazi credo on this junk?

 

 

 

By mitzi morris on 03/03/2009 2:29 pm
Maurine H
Ha ha ha! This is the funniest post I’ve read this week!
By Maurine H on 03/03/2009 3:06 pm
zombie maven
Those of you who think things are worse today for families, what about the damage that was being done when everyone kept mum about spousal and child abuse?  Should we all just go back to being "happy little housewives" surviving on valium and martinis?  Sorry, but the "Beaver" and Donna Read" families were nothing but a bit of hopeful wishing and make believe.  I’m not saying those families weren’t out there, but more often than not, it was a lot of dysfunction. 
By zombie maven on 03/03/2009 5:31 pm
Lavender Blossom
This woman has no relevance to my life. The women in my family from my family have all worked and raised families. Her hypocrisy and the pipe dreams she sells are pretty toxic.
By Lavender Blossom on 03/03/2009 5:56 pm
Patrice Baldwin
God! The huge image of Schlafly staring out at me from my computer screen is enough to ruin my whole week! That woman has been dangerous for about thirty years.
By Patrice Baldwin on 03/03/2009 6:43 pm
C jay

“Feminists have a death grip on the top level of the Democratic party … ”

Astute observation. Thank God she feels this way! 

Hold on, sisters.

By C jay on 03/03/2009 8:14 pm
Republican 4Life
Isn’t it wonderful that Kelly’s husband is magnanimous enough to let her use the computer from time to time?!  God does indeed reward virtuously subservient women!
By Republican 4Life on 03/04/2009 10:32 pm
Alessan O

Schlafly’s ideas about a women’s choice whether or not to have a child

is dangerous.  At the moment she’s old and on her way out, she’s

not dangerous but her young followers are, they are trying to take

away a women’s right to make her own choices about their bodies.

By Alessan O on 03/05/2009 1:53 am
T krueger
Good article on the feminist conservative roots of 30 yrs ago. Another great article appears here , related to the other side of teh feminist coin - Betty Friedan http://www.nysun.com/arts/reconsiderations-betty-friedans-the-feminine/86003/    who’s liberal approach only showed her [Ms. Friedan] disdain for those who choose a different life than preched by her. Not every woman wants the high-powered professional life, of 60+ hrs a week, parsing themselves. A stay-at-home Mom is no less important and in today’s moral chaos, is a tough job. While many of you , in these postings rally ’round the I am Woman hear me Roar - of the 70’s,  I ‘ll never understand or forgive the outright attacks on conservative women.  
By T krueger on 03/05/2009 7:44 am
Kelly In Texas

They feel like they have to "roar" because their men didn’t do it for them.

Had more men supported, protected and adored their wives as they should have, more women would have felt secure in their role as mother and wife.

By Kelly In Texas on 03/05/2009 11:46 am