Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 07/17/2008 10:10 am

Planned Parenthood Targets McCain's 'Viagra Moment'

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Planned Parenthood hasn’t missed a step in calling John McCain out on his so-called "Viagra moment."

Planned Parenthood Action Fund, the political and advocacy arm of the abortion rights group, has launched a 30-second advertisement of the Arizona senator’s long, awkward and, what they say, telling pause after a reporter last week asked him whether he thinks it’s fair that some health insurance companies cover the drug Viagra for men, but not birth control pills.

"I don’t know enough about it to give you an informed answer," McCain said after several moments of pounding silence. "I don’t usually duck an issue, but I’ll try to get back to you."

Reporter’s pounced on his answer, or lack thereof, because it came after one of his advisers and surrogate, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, pointed out to journalists in Washington that some women are frustrated that certain insurance companies pay for Viagra but not birth control.

"Let me give you a real, live example, which I’ve been hearing a lot about from women. There are many health insurance plans that will cover Viagra but won’t cover birth control medication. Those women would like a choice," she said.

But Fiorina’s birth control comments would lead one to believe that McCain, too, shared in that frustration.

Granted, McCain knows that anything he says on a controversial issue will be viewed as very reflective of his policy stance if elected to the White House, so he’s treading carefully. The Republican presidential hopeful tried to explain the apparent discrepancy between Fiorina’s contentions and his own position. He has voted in opposition to coverage for contraception during his time in the Senate, but the issue included using taxpayer money to promote emergency contraceptives.

A McCain campaign spokesman later said Fiorina was describing McCain’s "vision for choice and competition in health insurance." He said McCain will open insurance markets "for greater variety and competition, allowing women to choose policies that fit their needs. An example is the choice for women to dump a policy that only covers Viagra for a policy that covers their real needs."

Planned Parenthood’s ad is targeting women voters in battleground states, including Colorado, Iowa, Minnesota, New Mexico, Ohio, Wisconsin and the Washington, D.C. area.

"John McCain is out of touch when it comes to women’s health care," said Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, which officially endorsed Sen. Barack Obama last week.

Amber Wilkerson, a spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee, said: "These types of misleading partisan attacks won’t help women who are desperately in need of quality health care.

"John McCain’s plan will provide all Americans with choice and competition in health insurance, putting patients in charge of their own care instead of Washington bureaucrats."

Richards’ group is also sponsoring a "kNOw McCain" campaign that portrays McCain as having an "dangerously out-of-touch record on women’s health issues." Planned Parenthood has given McCain a zero rating – the lowest given in the U.S. Senate.

48 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

mary lou s
if you would feature this story instead of hiding it away…
By mary lou s on 07/17/2008 6:26 pm
DeBúrca obj
Agree 100% mary lou s! Why is this story being hidden within this website. Obama is picked apart day after day in the media for every word he says, doesn’t say and for every word someone ELSE says! Yet, McCain is making blunder after blunder, false statements, day after day and it doesn’t get reported. He mixes up Sunnis with Shiites, calls the Czech Republic “Czechoslovakia”, and dodges a question about women’s contraceptives when it is a fact that he has voted more than once against requiring Insurance companies which cover Viagra to cover women’s contraceptives! Yet hardly anyone hears any of this.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/18/2008 3:35 pm
Diana T
Hello, DeB, This is the first time I noticed this story. Anyway, this piece in today’s NYTimes by Frank Rich almost paraphrases your post here. What a coincidence. Why WAS this piece not more visible? Don’t get me started on Viagra…I do not have many good things to say about it. I look forward to our postings next week.
By Diana T on 08/17/2008 8:39 pm
DeBúrca obj
This is why a lot of people were writing about the over abundance of stories about Edwards and Madonna. Then we get “reprimanded” for saying it’s too much and that we don’t care. But why were those stories front and center for days and then something like this is imbedded in the website where most people don’t even find it? It’s fair to ask anyway.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/17/2008 9:04 pm
Diana T
You’re darned right it is, DeB. I didn’t see this until a few minutes ago. Womens issuues and family planning is one of the major reasons I am voting for Obama. And, by the way, I think it was very courageous of him to stick to his guns last night in front of an unsympathetic audience. By the way, McCain started being against Roe v Wade when he had to start courting Jerry Falwell whilst preparing for his presedential run a few years ago. Back on this subject, I have emailed the people at wow more than once to please bring us some health issues(heart attacks, osteoporosis, etc) and some subjects with heft instead of the fluff like Madona, Edwards ad nauseum, and some of the other lightweight things they have been running.
By Diana T on 08/17/2008 9:12 pm
Diana T
Geez! I must have been having a senior moment; did I put this link out to you this evening? I sent it to some of my friends and can’t remember. Frank Rich’s wonderful article in the NYTimes today. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/17/opinion/17rich.html?ex=1219636800&en=3…
By Diana T on 08/17/2008 9:14 pm
DeBúrca obj
Great article Diana. I am frustrated with the way the media is overdoing it with Obama. They won’t let up on him and meanwhile McCain is not getting the scrutiny he should. I’m sick of pundits saying he should be farther ahead, though he has been consistently ahead. I really think Obama is scaring the Power Elite and that the media is being used to try to beat him… not in the obvious way like ignoring him but by over exposing him, scrutinizing every syllable that comes out of his mouth (there was even an article in here criticizing the way he “hesitates” when he talks!) and by laying low as far as McCain goes and giving him a pass. Yet in here you hear people say “I don’t like McCain but I don’t know enough about Obama”! I don’t think anyone has ever known AS MUCH about any candidate ever.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/18/2008 4:44 am
Diana T
Media is owned by corporations, DeB. There are many ways to beat somebody down and still look like you’re doing your job. I agree with you. People say they know nothing about Obama because that is what they are being told they think. But, the more I am learning about McCain, (and as you know I am researching reams of material), the more I see that is chilling. As James Gemmell said somewhere in the night, he is a loose cannon. Plus, this guy has serious anger management problems that are going to get all of us in a world of hurt if he does end up in the Oval Office.
By Diana T on 08/18/2008 10:34 am
DeBúrca obj
People are being told to think that Obama SHOULD have a larger lead now, which really is ridiculous at this point. Cokie Roberts is insinuating something is wrong with Obama going to that “exotic” place which is actually a US state called Hawaii for a holiday with his grandmother… I’m really getting sick of the pundits, when they’re not being idiotic, they’re being partisan hacks. I mean just think of the way the media managed to convince people Bush was a “regular guy” and now they’re repeating that garbage about McCain! The guy grew up the son of an admiral, wears $520 loafers and owns 9 houses… and yet the media keeps telling us how elite Obama is! And it’s not just the campaigns doing it, the media is definitely the larger part of this. The media should be out there jumping on the misinformation the campaigns are attempting to spread. Instead, if McCain’s campaign says “Obama is an elitist” the media asks “why do people think Obama is elitist?”… we have no free press anymore.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/18/2008 11:24 am
Diana T
It’s called propaganda, DeB. Advert agencies pay huge salaries for their Ph.d psychologists because of the way psychology figures into convincng people about what to think, what to purchase, which car is the best, which soap detergent will make your dishes shine. Same thing. Incidentally, we rank #53(!) in the free press realm, having fallen 9 points since last year, and when the Free Press Rankings were first posted in 2002, we ranked #7. http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=639
By Diana T on 08/18/2008 12:17 pm
DeBúrca obj
Wow, I’m going to have to revise my rankings list. The last number I had was 44th. That’s pathetic.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/18/2008 2:29 pm
DeBúrca obj
Wow, we rank 53rd, along with Botswana, Croatia and Tonga… they must be our allies. Want to really get depressed? Look at some of the countries that rank better than us! And Ireland ranks with 1 along with Finland, Iceland and the Netherlands, I’ll have to tell my husband.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/18/2008 2:34 pm
Diana T
And, also, Ireland is one of the tech leaders. One of the fastest growing economies in the EU. Someone just took me to task for being “emotionally” involved; I don’t see much emotion with these figures. They are what they are. As I am getting most of my information from think tanks and international sites such as this, as well as some very well respected authors, well, each to his own.
By Diana T on 08/18/2008 2:45 pm
DeBúrca obj
Well, Diana, it has been my experience that those who take me to task for being “emotionally” involved or any other vague put down, usually suffer from a lack of facts to back up their own views so all that is left to them is a person attack or put down.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/18/2008 3:09 pm
Diana T
Oh well, whatever, as my kids are used to hearing me say. Right now, I am studying the implication of Musharraf’s resignation in Pakistan. This is a Big Hotspot. Far more important than tempers flaring on a hot day. And, intensely more interesting for me. As you can tell, I have always had a fascination of world history and international affairs. And, as Friedman says, The World is Flat. And, getting smaller every day.
By Diana T on 08/18/2008 3:21 pm