Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 10/25/2008 8:48 am

Poor Cindy McCain Is Just Another Lonely, Neglected Wife

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Click here to read her column on Yahoo!

There was a front-page story in last Saturday’s New York Times about Cindy McCain that had the senator’s campaign spitting bullets – and, of course, attacking the Times and "the liberal media." Their ire, I feel certain, was not that there was anything untrue in the piece, but that "America" had perhaps not had all this information laid out for them before. The story basically detailed the McCain’s de facto separate lives, revealed Cindy’s weird desire to emulate, if not be Princess Diana, and shone a spotlight on things John McCain would just as soon have consigned to the Distant Past bin: his and Cindy’s deep connection to the Keating Five, John’s dumping his loyal, well-liked, health-impaired starter wife, and Mrs. McCain’s possibly felonious theft of pain meds from a charity.

But none of that is what got my attention, perhaps because I already knew much of it. What did register with me, as a woman, was this quote: "As his poll numbers have slid recently, her devotion has seemed only to grow."

Bingo. I understood why that sentence made bells go off: I recognized the dynamic. Not only had I lived it, but so had a few women I knew well. (It is quite possible that some of you will read this with a knowing smile.) My hard-earned insight was this: when a man — whether husband or lover – is chilly and plays hard to get, emotionally, it elicits from the female partner a mad desire to please.  The woman will do anything to make him happy, grateful, and with luck, bring him closer. Sometimes these are men who run around; sometimes they are just narcissists who are emotionally unavailable.

I suspect what incensed the McCain campaign was that the Times story, for those who knew what they were reading, spelled it out that John McCain was not such a great husband and that Cindy, her heiress status not withstanding, was just another lonely, neglected wife. Politically, this message ain’t great … family values and all that. But for me, for the first time, I no longer had negative feelings about Cindy McCain. I simply felt sorry for her. I would bet anything that the possibility of her husband gaining the presidency would give Cindy the hope that they might, at last, be together, share something, and have more of a marriage. Unfortunately for her, I don’t think that will happen.

81 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Chrome Toe
this entire campaign i’ve been in awe of the fact that John MCCAIN is touting family values.. is claiming to be the candidate for “joe the plumber, joe six pack and sally hockey mom… is claiming to be the candidate who cares about women’s issues.. it’s hilarious. it would be even more hilarious if people weren’t buying it. I’ve never had negative feelings about Cindy McCain. I’ve always figured that underneath the politicking she’s probably the better person of the two.
By Chrome Toe on 10/25/2008 9:40 am
Oh! My Favorite
Yes, Margo…I was able to read this with a “knowing smile” (as is every woman of a certain [see dating] age. At least once in her life a woman has bent over backwards to acommodate an emotionally distant man in the hopes of bridging the romantic gap between them. I stopped having sympathy for those women, however (myself included). HOW deeply in love can a woman be to continually allow herself to be mistreated, ad infinitum? And a woman with her own money (because we all know there are many unfortunate women who’ve trapped themselves into bad situations due to their lack of money)?! Money that her man is living well off of? Puleeze! Leave Woman: do it to make YOU happy, grateful and, with any luck, bring YOURSELF closer (TO yourself).
By Oh! My Favorite on 10/25/2008 10:05 am
Jazzy JJ
We could all read between the lines, she lives here he lives there, what ever is takes to keep up the apperance that all was well within the family! Mr.McCains face it tells the tale, he is about gratification for himself and what is important to him, unfortunately for her she has her own fairy tale that she has designed for herself. Guess it work for her!
By Jazzy JJ on 10/25/2008 11:10 am
Ms. Dee
That Cindy McCain is a lonely, neglected, eager-to-please wife has been obvious from the way he’s treated her in public since the beginning of the campaign. She stands there, dutifully at his side, he rarely acknowledges her, or escorts her on and off a stage, or lends her a hand when they’re coming off a bus or a plane. He slobbers at the sound of Sarah Palin’s name, and told the whole world he considered his biggest moral failure in life was the way he ended his first marriage. How would you feel if your husband turned you into the woman who inspired this greatest “moral failure”? She’s a beautiful doormat, but he’s wiping his feet on her. I don’t need The New York Times to open my eyes on this one. In fact, I have to wonder what’s taken them so long. It’s so obvious.
By Ms. Dee on 10/25/2008 11:27 am
Frannie Em
Margo, Is that as deep as your insight goes. You are really grasping at straws aren’t you. LOL I can’t believe it. It is like you walk around with one of those water divining rods (old stick with two branching ends) and think you have hit on something when you read some nonsense by a guy who probably has no idea what he is talking about. Who cares? It is that important? Why isn’t anyone concerned where all the money is coming from and going to? Amazingly trite.
By Frannie Em on 10/26/2008 11:12 pm
Star Lawrence
Cindy does not look to me like she is sniveling around or needs or desires your croc tears. She has a full life, with her kids, causes, pets, and driving hobby—in fact, she is more well-rounded than hubs. Leaving for DC and a ceremonial lifestyle will be a sacrifice for her! For love of country…
By Star Lawrence on 10/27/2008 10:37 am
Andromeda Jakes
You forgot her 100 million $s. I don’t feel sorry for her nor do I envy her. She’s just not my choice for First Lady in 2008. I wish her all the best as well as her family.
By Andromeda Jakes on 10/29/2008 3:32 pm
Belinda Joy
Margo, great insight. I feel sorry for her, but for reasons that go far beyond what I think will be discussed and debated on this post. Cindy is that woman that we all know (and some may be themselves) who never “got it.” The type that never “got” that there are millions of men in America who they could conceivably be with. Single, intelligent, savvy, driven, sexy men that could cater to their sexual, emotional and intellectual needs. But instead of turning their attention to these men who are free to give them what they need and want, they look for men who are already taken. She knew when she met John McCain he was not free to be with her, but she didn’t care. She felt she could give him something his wife could not. We all know women like this. To fill a void in her marriage and possibly her life, she began to pour herself into philanthropic endeavors. She adopted a child in need and engaged in countless activities that would be perceived by the masses as beneficial. But none of this worked, because she developed a drug problem. There was a void in her life that needed to be filled that her family, friends, social activities and the like could not fill. All the while she stood by John’s side as he made his bids for the presidency. This time around he made it, he is the Republican nominee and she is now on a national stage for all the world to see. And what I see is a woman who does not look happy. The visual difference between the Obamas’ and the McCains’ transcends the race and age issues. The level of affection between the two couples is glaring….striking. Where Barack and Michelle embrace, smile freeing and exude a genuine level of love and respect for one another; John and Cindy seem distant and aloof. There is no warmth; there is no sense of their even acknowledging the other on a basic level. I have little sympathy for women who make life mistakes and “choose” not to learn from them. As much as I respect Hillary Clinton, I fault her for staying with Bill after all of his sexual dalliances were uncovered. She chose to stay because of career opportunities and that alone. No one can argue with me that a woman as intelligent as Hillary Clinton is, would knowingly stay with a man that has repeated betrayed her trust on the grounds of “I know you love me Bill and I know I can’t satisfy your sexual needs but I love you and even though you’re not 100% committed to me and our marriage, I will stay with you forever.” I don’t buy it. The same can be said about Cindy McCain. She is in a marriage that on some level is not giving her what she needs, she is not happy it is clear. When she speaks she reminds me of Elisabeth Hasselback, spewing all the words she was taught to say to rally the base, with this faint hint of “did I do good?” look on her face seeking approval. There is nothing more pathetic than a person that goes to their grave knowing they had not lived a genuine life. In the quiet of her home and in those moments of quiet introspection, she knows she is not living the life she envisioned, and that is sad.
By Belinda Joy on 10/25/2008 11:32 am
Patty E
I remember when I was a child, watching all those old movies, where the Big Shot always had a wife, and a mistress. The the ‘Trophy Wife’ became the race, that powerful men chose to run…in the stereotypical world, I would imagine that John McCain was merely following the trends of his time. And Cindy, the perfect victim, was also wrapped up in the trend where women were attracted to handsome, powerful, older men, who would ‘take care of her’ like daddy did… I can understand the phenomenon, although, I would never condone that sort of existence for myself. When I read about Cindy mcCain spending her time in Arizona whole mcCain spent his in Washington, two things came to mind: 1. She is a sensitive person, uncomfortable around the rigors and the hardball games played in Washington, and 2. If John mcCain were not a politician in Washington, there might have been a divorce, long ago.
By Patty E on 10/25/2008 12:10 pm
rocky rocky
I suppose everything is fodder for speculation when it comes to public figures. (sigh) But I believe that no one on the “outside” can know what affections may or may not be shared in a marriage. And perhaps that’s how it should be.
By rocky rocky on 10/25/2008 12:11 pm
Theresa Mulhern
I am ashamed of whoever posted this. I am sure Cindy does not want your sympathy, and you should leave the wives out of the campaign. At least she isn’t on TV like Obama’s wife, who subjected viewers to hours of stories and character referrences about what a great mom and wife she is, as if that will have any influence whatsoever on whether or not I vote for her husband. I didn’t see any of these people talking about how great he was. Cindy McCain has a right to choose to support her husband, and she may not see it as seeking his affection or being neglected. Cut the crap people, and let’s vote on tax plans and medical reform, not on whether or not a candidates wife is lonely or a popular person. And Michelle, get off my TV!
By Theresa Mulhern on 10/25/2008 12:19 pm
Marjorie C.
Theresa: And Michelle, get off my TV! LOL. LOL. I agree.
By Marjorie C. on 10/25/2008 12:49 pm
Belinda Joy
This post is an excellent example of why people such as yourself get slammed so often. Although I don’t like to tell people what they should and should not do, I need to tell you, you SHOULD become better informed before you voice an opinion. Especially if you are going to reference a particular point. Cindy McCain was a guest host on ABC’s The View in which she spent a great amount of time talking about herself and her life. She was on that show again with her husband at her side, again talking about her life and who she is. She has been featured on many, many shows. I can’t speak for all the other intelligent, thoughtful men and women on this site, but for myself I find it insulting that you have implied my vote would hinge on a candidate’s wife or that candidate’s social popularity. Like you, I care about taxes, health insurance and a whole plethora of issues that affect me on a day to day basis. Support your political party Theresa, but you need to do so in a manner that does not diminish your character or sense of fairness.
By Belinda Joy on 10/25/2008 3:29 pm
DeBúrca obj
I think John and Cindy McCain are probably perfect for each other and that’s why they’re together. And I may have missed something, but as far as candidates wives go, the only one I have heard making snarky comments about the other wife and even the other candidate has been Cindy McCain. The Obamas have kept this campaign as much about issues as possible considering they have had to endure incessant personal attacks from the McCain Campaign, which has made everything personal and tried it’s best to steer clear of the issues.
By DeBúrca obj on 10/25/2008 5:54 pm
Fred O.
I don’t know how to put a label on you,you’re so far “LEFT” its not believable,the items they have made personal are the connections with Obama’s past,like Ayers/Wright and many others which the American people have a right to know about before they slip up and vote for Mr. “SOCIALISTS
By Fred O. on 10/30/2008 1:05 pm