Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

SHEconomics | 11/28/2008 5:00 am

Private Equity Firms' Arrogance Causes Public Problem, by Liz Peek

By Liz Peek
On February 13, 2007, defining the peak of the private-equity bubble, Blackstone’s CEO Steve Schwartzman decided to celebrate himself … by hosting a multimillion-dollar birthday party, complete with entertainment by Rod Stewart and Patti LaBelle. The event, which followed by just a few days Blackstone’s $39 billion takeover of Equity Office Properties – the largest leveraged buyout ever — was so extraordinary as to attract the attention of the media. Soon thereafter Blackstone decided to sell itself to the public, in the process releasing a fair amount of financial information that perhaps was better left private. Among other things, several members of Congress began to agitate for a change in the absurdly favorable tax treatment of private-equity firms, whose management fees are taxed at capital gains rates, defying logic.

Though an initial attempt to end the favoritism was defeated, most players that I spoke to at the time agreed that some modification was inevitable. They were none too pleased with the glare produced by Schwartzman’s birthday candles.

In the past 18 months, as the credit crunch gathered steam and investors’ appetite for new stock issues waned, private-equity firms slumped. The wizards behind the curtain turned out to have fewer tools at their disposal than investors expected. Unlike hedge funds that usually allow investors to get their money out every quarter, private-equity firms typically lock up your funds for several years. Often, investors pay in only a chunk of their total commitment up front, and then get “capital calls” for the balance as it is needed. Today, many investors are seeing returns plummet, but are nonetheless having to pony up more cash. They are not too happy.

Because of outstanding results earlier this decade, private-equity companies attracted too many investors and too many imitators in the past several years, driving returns down. There is now a shakeup underway, and ultimately the firms that really do add value will be those that survive. Will Cerberus be one of them? Stay tuned.

20 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Chrome Toe
wow… i better not tell my husband about Cerebrus or he may have a stroke! he’s already practically stroking out over the bail out of the big three. this might put him over an edge..
By Chrome Toe on 11/28/2008 8:30 am
Liz Peek
Hey Kelly- lots of people are in the same camp- Detroit needs to do some serious restructuing, and many people are afraid that won’t happen if they the government gets involved. On the other hand, let’s not wound your husband - there are so many other battles to fight! Take care - Liz
By Liz Peek on 11/30/2008 6:32 pm
Chrome Toe
I skipped mentioning it lol… But I do have a question about the bailout that I keep hoping someone will answer. Hint..:) I don’t understand why we keep talking as though not bailing them out means they fail and go away. isn’t a bankruptcy a restructuring? haven’t big companies been restructuring under that for years?
By Chrome Toe on 12/01/2008 6:27 am
Tinka Parker
This is a stunning look inside the free-for-all that has brought our country to its knees. Thanks Liz, I had no idea, and I’m getting smarter with every word you write.
By Tinka Parker on 11/28/2008 10:03 am
Liz Peek
Hi Tinka - my computer is acting up, so if I repeat myself, please forgive. I appreciate your enthusiasm - I truly do want to be helpful. This week I’ll tackle ETFs and index funds - but please let me know what puzzles you! Happy Thanksgiving! - Liz
By Liz Peek on 11/30/2008 6:30 pm
Rita@ Goldivas
Although I still disagree that the financial crisis would not have happened if women were more involved in financial matters, it is a good thing that Liz is providing these lessons. Taking responsibility for financial matters (and consequences od bad decisions) is part of being a grownup and more women should do it.
By Rita@ Goldivas on 11/28/2008 11:11 am
Liz Peek
Rita - you are totally right! The point is….everyone needs to be involved! Best - Liz
By Liz Peek on 11/30/2008 6:34 pm
Rita@ Goldivas
I meant “consequences of bad decisions”
By Rita@ Goldivas on 11/28/2008 11:12 am
Liz Peek
Dear Merrell- you are so welcome! Let me know what financial issues concern or baffle you! - Liz
By Liz Peek on 11/30/2008 6:35 pm
rocky rocky
I’ve not seen evidence of any kind that would suggest this crisis might have had a different outcome if more women had been “paying attention.” When an article starts out like that — with a broad generalization and no supporting facts — I kind of lose interest early. Anyway, it was our government that should have been paying attention … As for this little tidbit from Liz Peek’s article: “… private-equity companies like Cerberus …” I must ask: Why would anyone do business with a company named after the multi-headed dog that (according to the ancient Greeks) guards the gates of Hades to prevent anyone from escaping? Isn’t that warning enough?
By rocky rocky on 11/28/2008 9:33 pm
Liz Peek
Hi Rocky - please go back to the opening segment of Sheconomics, wherin I try to explain why it is so vitally important that women concern themselves with finance. Of course, I am trying to be a bit provacative - since I want to disturb the prevailing female complacency about such matters - but I really think women bring a different approach to the table - one that is more conservative and less all-out competitive. This overarching posture would have tamed the wall street warriors, a bit. One of my best firends was a risk manager with one of the biggest banks, and finally quit because she was so tired of turning down loans and then having senior management approve them anyway. All those deals went sour, of course. Would that she had prevailed! Only one data point - but I know many more such. Take care - Liz
By Liz Peek on 11/30/2008 6:43 pm
rocky rocky
Hello, Liz. Thank you for your response. I concur that in a capitalist society women — as well as men — should do the best they can to concern themselves with financial matters, and after reading your note, now appreciate your effort to be provocative. I also believe your anecdotal evidence — that the women you know are more conservative and less competitive than the cutthroats who work on wall street and beyond. However, I don’t believe that responsible behavior is a domain inhabited by women any more than men. Rather than male vs female as cause or cure for this $$ crisis, my inclination is to consider unbridled power — license to do whatever whenever to whomever with no accountability or consequence — and how that kind of power affects the psyches and behavior of human beings. Especially, now, when their lethal escapades are being rewarded with the beneficence (think bailouts) of their victims …
By rocky rocky on 12/01/2008 1:13 am
mary lou s
rocky, the chrysler workers knew they were dealing with the hound of hell as they negotiated their contract. i do think congress should clarify the uses of the money it spends in cerberus’ direction. eliot spitzer, personal peccadillos intact, did what no one else in government would do at the time: he prosecuted financial wrongdoers. the securities exchange commission would not regulate. spitzer prosecuted where he could. anybody who says the government regulated clearly does not know who is still nominally president of the united states of america.
By mary lou s on 11/29/2008 2:46 pm
rocky rocky
Hi Mary Lou. I must admit that I’m bewildered by our current government’s (you fill in the branch) unwillingness to pursue those $$ criminals. I hate to think the reasons are corruption and indifference. How can a nation recover from such a poisonous cloud?
By rocky rocky on 12/01/2008 1:29 am
Okpulot Taha
Mary Lou sees Eliot Spitzer much as I do, “…he prosecuted financial wrongdoers.” Eliot Spitzer was a hero to small investors and American families. Here is a fascinating article about Spitzer published at The Huffington Post earlier this year, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-g-brant/eliot-spitzer-george-bus_b_… Of great interest to me is The New York Times bit player part in the downfall of Spitzer. This is not a surprise knowing The New York Times routinely plays dirty politics and is well known for dispensing deceitful news reports. The New York Times is amongst the worst of Yellow Journalism publications. Readers will also discover how George Bush used the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to enable and facilitate predatory lending. *** This is one of my numerous articles published at the Securities and Exchange Commission website back in 2005 year, an article which applauds Spitzer and pits Spitzer against the SEC, http://www.sec.gov/rules/petitions/4-500/kschilitubi061705.pdf Mary Lou and I are both women and the two of us see what our government and mainstream media would like to conceal. This lends much credibility to Liz Peek and her attitude about a need for more involvement by women into our market system, specifically our stock markets. Okpulot Taha Choctaw Nation
By Okpulot Taha on 11/30/2008 11:21 am