Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Money | 09/24/2008 9:00 am

Republicans, Democrats Spitting Mad Over $700 Billion Bailout

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© iStock

The $700-billion-bank-bailout package is turning out to be a pretty hard sell on Capitol Hill. And it’s not just Democrats playing hard to get.

Vice President Dick Cheney, White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten and other Bush money men went from meeting to meeting Tuesday, selling the plan to worried lawmakers. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Jr. and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke publicly told Congress to authorize the plan quickly and without many alterations.

Many on Main Street are asking why they have to foot the bill for financial institutions’ bad decisions, but some experts argue that the consequences of not doing anything will be much worse.

Politico.com reports that the meeting with Cheney was "a bloodbath" and "an unmitigated disaster."

One lawmaker present said that Cheney, Bolten and economic policy adviser Keith Hennessey "were in worse shape when they left than when they came in."

Both Democrats and many Republicans voiced doubts and balked at the entreaties from Bush officials.

"Just because God created the world in seven days doesn’t mean we have to pass this bill in seven days," Rep. Joe Barton, R-TX, said after a two-hour meeting with Cheney.

"I don’t know – it could pass because you know, the Fed and the Treasury secretary and the administration, they’re going to scare a lot of people," Sen. Richard Shelby, the ranking Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, told CNN on Wednesday morning. "But you know, the best disciplinarian of all of us is the marketplace. I believe if we didn’t do anything, the market would correct it all."

Democrats said they would not approve the legislation without significant Republican support.

"It’s their problem. It’s their bill. And they’re going to have to figure out if they can support it," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA.

It’s questionable the package will be approved by Friday – Congress’s self-imposed deadline. That’s the day lawmakers adjourn for the elections.

MCNBC.com reports that among rank-and-file congressional Democrats, there is deep anger that the end result is likely to be a bailout designed by the Bush administration but made possible only by sufficient votes from them. The party faces the risk that they will be blamed if they fail to pass a rescue bill and Main Street America feels the impact of an economic disaster.

But they still want assurances this package won’t just be a one-time shot in the arm simply to alleviate the crisis at hand.

"There is literally not one line in this bill, not one line, that will keep this from happening again," Sen. Evan Bayh, D-IN, told MSNBC Wednesday morning. "Once this bill is passed, getting the long-term reform done will be much more difficult."

Some key GOP senators now agree with Democratic demands that the bailout package set limits on executive salaries at financial institutions that participate in the program. Democrats have argued that CEOs whose companies accept taxpayer money to get them out of trouble should not be allowed to pocket millions of dollars in bonuses or big severance packages known as "golden parachutes."

"This is sort of an economic Pearl Harbor we’re going through," billionaire investor Warren E. Buffett told CNBC Wednesday. "But in the end, Republicans and Democrats, they’ve got the interests of the country at heart and I think they will do the right thing but I hope they do it soon."

In other financial news today:

-The 78-year-old Berkshire Hathaway CEO Buffett is pumping at least $5 billion into Goldman Sachs, as the Wall Street firm tries to raise cash from investors. Buffett is the second-richest American, and the move may boost market confidence.

"From our standpoint, we have a lot of cash and we now are seeing things that give us a chance to use this cash sensibly and this was a $5 billion opportunity to deploy cash sensibly,” Buffett told CNBC Wednesday morning.

-The Federal Reserve, along with foreign central banks, plowed $30 billion into money markets overseas Wednesday to help relieve the global credit crunch, AP reports. The Fed’s action sets up temporary "swap" arrangements to supply dollars to the central banks of Australia, Denmark, Norway and Sweden in exchange for their currencies.

-AIG has signed a "definitive" agreement for up to $85 billion in borrowings from the Fed, the main part of a rescue by the central bank that will see it take a 79.9 percent stake in the giant insurer, Reuters reports. AIG said the facility was "the company’s best alternative" in the current market environment.

91 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

C Hardy
Patty you know what else I find funny about Countrywide…Bank of America bailed them out, RIGHT, well they did, but why is it that every top executive from Countrywide is getting all the top executive over lap positions? Thats right, BofA is giving all the top executive positions that over lapped due to the buy out to all Countrywide executives? They ran countrywide into the ground YET BofA is giving them control…Pretty sad huh?
By C Hardy on 09/24/2008 2:31 pm
Patty E
YUP! I first heard that yesterday, and just could not believe it! for a minute there, I thought I was having some sort of dream! Well, I thank you for the clarification. It wasn;t a dream….it was a NIGHTMARE!
By Patty E on 09/24/2008 2:42 pm
C Hardy
Patty…I work for BofA so we have been hearing this since we bought out Countrywide…It is scary for us who worked for BofA first b/c who is there to back us up?
By C Hardy on 09/24/2008 3:17 pm
Patty E
I may have mentioned this on some other board, but when Countrywide started issuing the new-fangled mortgages, I held several bank and investment banks stocks in my portfolio. When I read on a message board, that ‘we have two years before things fall apart” on the C board, I sold all those stocks. My point is this: The banks KNEW there were going to be foreclosures and problems, and they even knew how long it would be, before the problems hit mainstream. That seems fishy, doesn;t it? I watched the hearings those several months ago, with Countrywide, et al, and I believe Paulson too….and I am TRULY disappointed that ALL involved got merely a slap on the hand, back then. It is my opinion, that had ‘correction’ been made back then, we would not be in the shape we are in today—it could have been averted.
By Patty E on 09/24/2008 3:32 pm
Step away from the BLOG!
It was definitely planned and rigged just as with Silverado. Lucky you to have gotten out.
By Step away from the BLOG! on 09/24/2008 5:22 pm
C Hardy
Working in the Mortgage Industry it amazed me what type of loans and approvals were going on during “that” time…I mean people would call in and just tell the loan officers I make $90K and the income wasn’t being verified…I mean when my Fiance’ and I first started looking at buying a house we were told that with our combined income which is only around $85K that we qualify for a home up to $450K…yes $450K…our mortgage payment on $450K was higher then both of our take home checks, YET the bank would have given us a loan for that amount…Its NUTS. I agree more needs to be done to the Mortgage Company CEO’s who got our economy into this mess and for the Appraiser’s who went along with it & would appraise homes at $300K when just a year before that it appraised at $200K…Its amazing how many people, even the “little” people got rich quick during these last couple of years. I can at least say that BofA kept their standards higher than most but… As a citizen with a voice I would LOVE to see more done to those who created this mess but I hate to say it…I dont think it will ever happen.
By C Hardy on 09/25/2008 6:37 am
Rainbow Power
As I grew up, the old saying “when the Republicans are in office, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer”. Now I am older and the same dang thing is true. Now they don’t care who knows it.
By Rainbow Power on 09/24/2008 9:32 am
Belinda Joy
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Jr. and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke should have been the first people in our entire nation to see that this financial crisis was brewing and that what we are going through was a possibility. And yet they freely admit they didn’t in this kind of……”aw shucks. We didn’t know” manner. And now the only way to get out of this financial debacle is to give them carte blanche to 700 BILLION dollars in US currency? Let me remind everyone of something. Bill Clinton is no longer a favorite of mine for many reasons. However when he left office and turned over the reigns to Bush, we had a surplus in the hundreds of millions. Under the republican leadership and George W. Bush the next president will inherit a debt far beyond anything in our nation’s history. In 8 years, less than a decade, we are grossly in debt, hated throughout the world, our allies have dwindled and thousands of our citizens have died in an occupation that was perpetrated on flawed intelligence. I implore each of you, do not allow the Republican party to attempt to distract you with frivorlous issues like Sarah Palin vs. the big bad media, race, “supposed sexism” and other insignificant matters. You are not dogs being distracted with a big shiny metal object. No, this is the time for each of us to concentrate on the issues at hand that carry huge consequences. When you stand in the voting booth on November 4th, take a few minutes to think about all of that and ask yourself “Do I really want to put the same driver in the seat that drove us to the cliff knowing it is only a matter of time before we all tumble over it?”
By Belinda Joy on 09/24/2008 9:50 am
Patty E
A VERY good point, Belinda! How could they NOT know? It is their job to know! That is why they get paid the big bucks for the title given them!! Did Rove start working for McCain, to put him in office? or to KEEP him from office? Was Palin picked to create diversion, so that this debacle would remain under the covers? Was this NOT KNOWING part of the bigger plan you suggest? Perhaps…It would be easy for me to believe it was meant to be kept secret until after the election….
By Patty E on 09/24/2008 10:25 am
Step away from the BLOG!
THEY KNEW FOR PETE’S SAKE!!! GIMMENEE CHRISTMAS THEY GAMED THE FRICKINSYSTEM JUST AS IN SILVERADO, JUST AS IN IRAN-CONTRA, JUST AS IN THE BCCI SCANDAL, JUST AS IN SPENDING $72M TO INVESTIGATE A BJ, AND $3M TO INVESTIGATE 911. THEY KNEW FOR CRYING OUT LOUD. THAT’S THE GAME PLAN. AND $700B NO QUESTIONS ASKED IS TOO. THEY ARE CROOKS!! READ MY LIPS!! SHEESH ALREADY!!! WHEN PEOPLE SHOW AND TELL YOU WHAT THEY AREBELIEVE THEM!!
By Step away from the BLOG! on 09/24/2008 12:46 pm
Mary NSB-Florida
The “me” attitude usually catches up eventually… just not to this level. I have another concern however, with the timing. According to reports, this situation has been under review, in spite of assurances, for a few months. Was the plan to hold off announcing until after the election if possible ? There is already an FBI review underway for the firms that are already approved for bailouts and/or backruptcy. Regardless of what is done, regarding the immediate crisis, there needs to be a review of possible election issues.
By Mary NSB-Florida on 09/24/2008 10:14 am
WE D
McCain, McCain, McCain oh please. In 2006 he warned about Freddie and Fannie. Why do people forget Obama’s advisors were with Fannie Mae, one walked away with 90 million after taking the company down. Read these if you dare. http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/mccains-attempt-to-fix-fannie-mae-… http://iusbvision.wordpress.com/2008/09/23/alan-greedspan-and-the-federa… http://hennessysview.com/2008/09/08/obama-the-property-of-freddiefannie-… http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/16/wsj-investigate-countrywide-politi…
By WE D on 09/24/2008 10:40 am
Tom L
You might want to add this link.It is a excellant video on the reason for this meltdown. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5tZc8oH—o
By Tom L on 09/27/2008 6:39 pm
Belinda Joy
Hmmm WE D, I’ll see your Obama’s advisors and raise you with McCains! http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/24/on-davis-s-tie…
By Belinda Joy on 09/24/2008 11:34 am
D S
I think the politicians ‘tried’ to catch the Fannie/Freddie problems in the 109th Congress (Republican majority) via “FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE REFORM ACT OF 2005”. Did it not pass majority?
By D S on 09/24/2008 11:53 am