Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 11/26/2008 8:40 am

Gates to Stay on as Defense Secretary; Brennan Withdraws Name for Intel Post

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Robert Gates/Defenselink.mil

Despite Barack Obama’s theme of “change,” throughout his presidential campaign, he’s keeping on Defense Secretary Robert Gates – at least through the first year of his term in the White House.

Various news reports are saying the arrangement is pretty much a “done deal,” even though President-elect Obama isn’t expected to announce his national security team until early next week.

Reuters, however, reports that sources said they don’t think either Gates or retired Marine Gen. James Jones — who is said to be named national security adviser – have reached a final pact with Obama. Gates apparently wants to keep certain members of his staff. While there’s consensus that Gates is no neoconservative war hawk, many around him are – and that may be cause for some concern from Democrats.

But no change in defense chief? That may not be a bad thing right now. With two badly mismanaged wars going on in Iraq and Afghanistan, the work Gates has done since taking over for Donald Rumsfeld has been a marked improvement from his predecessor.

The New York Times says some Democrats who have advised Obama are less than thrilled at the pick, given Obama’s past commitment to end the war. But Gates also wants to draw down troops in Iraq as soon as it’s safe.

“From our point of view, it looks pretty damn good because of continuity and stability,” one Obama adviser said. “And I don’t think there are any ideological problems.”

Meanwhile, Obama’s top adviser on intelligence, John Brennan, withdrew his name out of the running for any future intelligence job. He was thought to be a top contender for CIA chief.

Brennan is unhappy over the blogosphere associating him with controversial Bush administration interrogation techniques (i.e., waterboarding), detention and rendition policies, the latter of which is the practice of sending terror suspects to countries that practice torture, or something like it.

"It is with profound regret that I respectfully ask that my name be withdrawn from consideration for a position within the intelligence community. The challenges ahead of our nation are too daunting, and the role of the CIA too critical, for there to be any distraction from the vital work that lays ahead," Brennan wrote in a letter to Obama.

"It has been immaterial to the critics that I have been a strong opponent of many of the policies of the Bush administration such as the pre-emptive war in Iraq and coercive interrogation tactics, to include waterboarding.”

"This is a decision and an action that he made," a source on the Obama transition team told ABC News. The criticism from liberal groups and blogs was growing "and he felt it was becoming insurmountable."

5 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

DeBúrca obj
One last time… CHANGE means more than just getting rid of everyone and putting unknowns in spots! One important part of “change” means doing the smart thing, not the politically expedient thing. Keeping Gates is the smart thing and doing so IS change.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/26/2008 9:09 am
f p
Exactly De—a very smart move; in fact all Obama’s appointments excepting Hillary have been smart IMO.
By f p on 11/26/2008 10:26 am
newzie snoozie
WHAT WE PEOPLE HAVE TO DO IS ACCEPT JOHN BRENNANS OPINION ON WHETHER TO GO FOR IT OR TO SAY NO. HE IS APPARENTLY MORE INTELLIGENT THEN WE OFF OF THE STREET PEOPLE ARE. BUT SEEMS TO ME WASN’T HE A DAG-GONE GOOD PERSON? FOR SOME REASON THERE IS SOMTHIGN THAT KEEPS THINKING WE JUST LOST A GOOD GUYANY WORDS ON HIS GOODNESS HE HAS DOEN ALREADY.?
By newzie snoozie on 11/26/2008 9:12 am
Mary NSB-Florida
It’s not the “faces”… it’s the “policies”
By Mary NSB-Florida on 11/26/2008 11:35 am
Belinda Joy
It is interesting to read that Gates has concerns because he wants to keep many of those that work alongside him. PE Obama would be completely justified in vetting anyone Gates would seek to retain. People are so hung up on the fact that Barack is choosing former Clinton staff or Bush staff for his administration, arguing that this is not change. He has said all along (I know I heard it repeatedly during his campaign) that he wanted “the most qualified” surrounding him and that he would pull from past and current administrations. Everyone associated with the Bush administration isn’t lacking in intelligent and thoughtful insight. Many are skilled at what they do but may have been under utilized. Kudos to PE Obama for casting a wide net to pull in ALL of the qualified minds to help lead our country regardless of where they come from. Gates is a great choice because he has proven himself to be level headed and is not too far to the right or left. His priorities in regard to handling the wars are where they should be. Why shake things up in this area needlessly?
By Belinda Joy on 11/26/2008 3:52 pm