Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 12/08/2008 9:30 am

Romney PAC Paving Way for 2012 Run?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Sarah Palin hasn’t said whether she’ll run for the White House come 2012, but, if she does, she may face some competition from Mitt Romney.

Romney, who failed to clinch the GOP nomination this year, founded the Free and Strong America political action committee soon after dropping out of the race last spring. According to Romney, the PAC would be used to help bolster his party peers in battles across the country. His spending habits, however, indicate that Romney may be padding his own coffers to keep his career afloat ahead of the next election.

Of the $2.1 million raised for Free and Strong America, only $244,000 has been spent on other Republican candidates, many of them unopposed or in shoe-in races. And, not surprisingly, many of them supported Romney’s own presidential bid. The Boston Globe provides some of the financial nitty-gritty:

Qualifying for a donation from the committee did not necessarily depend on a candidate’s need for financial assistance. U.S. Representative Rodney Alexander of Louisiana got $4,600 and his GOP colleague Lamar S. Smith of Texas received a $2,300 donation, although both had no opponents. They each had endorsed Romney in his presidential bid.

Mississippi’s U.S. Sen. Thad Cochran, who threw his support for Romney, was easily favored to win reelection, but he still got a $2,300 donation from the committee. Cochran won with 62 percent of the vote. Another Republican senator, Lamar Alexander, a popular Tennessee Republican who was under no threat of losing his seat, got a $2,300 check from Romney as he cruised to victory with 65 percent of the vote.

Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom said this work shows that the PAC’s “level of financial support was extraordinary.” He also defended Romney’s motivations, saying, “The main purpose of Mitt Romney’s PAC is to enable him to travel around the country on virtually a full-time basis to campaign and raise funds for candidates and to promote policies that will strengthen America.” Too bad most of the money has been spent on aides and advisers who have worked closely with Romney over the years, even back to when he was governor of Massachusetts.

One of the Free and Strong America committee’s largest expenditures was to a firm owned by Spencer J. Zwick, a close Romney aide, which was paid $221,794 from April to November. Fehrnstrom said Zwick takes no salary but uses the money paid to his firm to pay ongoing commissions to several Romney fund-raisers who served on Romney’s presidential campaign staff.

Another $250,000 went to pay salaries and consulting fees, including $115,000 for Romney’s senior political staff — Beth Myers, Peter Flaherty and Fehrnstrom — all of whom had also served in top posts in the governor’s office and in his presidential campaign.

Romney hasn’t broken any laws, nor has he done anything necessarily unheard of, but that doesn’t mean it’s right, says Paul S. Ryan, associate legal counsel to the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center: "This is not uncommon and not illegal, but it is unfortunate and deceptive to tell donors their funds are going to help candidates when in fact a big chunk is used to further the career of the political person who created the PAC.” The only thing donors can do, insists Ryan, is keep an eye on patronized group’s finances: “The legal reality is contributor beware. It would be wise for donors to look at the track records."

Unless, of course, if you’re looking to help Romney, in which case may you should throw Free and Strong a few bucks.

5 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Diana T
Well and good for Mitt, but right now, it is ridiculous to even be thinking of a year from now, let alone 4. We have many bridges to cross before we can even consider what our needs will be then. In four years, this will be a very different USA we live in, for better or worse. We should be far more concerned about how to work together and try to find solutions for our current crisis. It concerns me that certain of these politicians are far more concerned about THEIR futures than they are ours and our nation as a whole.
By Diana T on 12/08/2008 10:52 am
f p
Well said, Di—Mitt’s jumping the gun.
By f p on 12/08/2008 5:15 pm
Zera Lee
Early in the Republican primaries, Romney effectively vowed NOT to defend the Constitution from attack by theocracy. The time will never be right for someone like that to hold high public office. Not in this country. Going back to the PACs and buying allegiances is the kind of old-school politics America has learned to dislike and reject. I am a bit curious how a man who made his fortune and his economic reputation by killing jobs and shrinking businesses would propose to create jobs during a major recession.
By Zera Lee on 12/08/2008 9:22 pm
Marjorie C.
Romney seems to have everything going for him, good looks, intelligence, experience, money, untainted background… yet people just don’t seem to take to him. While he was governor of Massachusetts, it was the same thing. I wish him well, but he needs to figure out what he’s doing that causes people to step away from him. Something besides his religion, which for some might be a factor, but not in Massachusetts.
By Marjorie C. on 12/08/2008 11:55 am
Diana T
I think you hit upon a very interesting point, Marjorie. I wonder if it is because we all sense that we are not seeing the authentic person. That somehow, he is TOO perfect, or that he just isn’t really the person that he presents to us?
By Diana T on 12/08/2008 9:43 pm