Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 01/15/2009 10:15 am

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Rosie O’Donnell may have started a fresh feud. The entertainer, who’s known for publicly blasting other celebrities, took to the radio waves yesterday and lashed out at Ann Coulter. Chatting on Sirius/XM’s "Whatever with Alexis and Jennifer," O’Donnell offered her own analysis of the right-wing writer, who O’Donnell views as akin to inhuman.

She’s angry if you ask me. She’s full of rage. When you see someone like that, you have to go back to what happened in their childhood … You don’t know what went on in their household. Sometimes people with very controversial views, there is some part of their humanity that you can relate to. Even though they think differently than you do, you can still reach them as a human being, but she’s not one of them for me.

Asked whether she thinks Coulter’s ink-grabbing actions are simply for show, O’Donnell insisted, "I don’t think it is a show. The passion from which she spews it … It’s deep-seeded. It’s bizarre." For better or for worse, we’re sure Coulter will have something to say about that.

367 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

DeBúrca obj
A word to the wise: Let’s not allow the crazies like Duck to suck us into a quagmire here and push up the number of posts of yet ANOTHER Coulter thread. (And I admit I am one of the worst at keeping from getting sucked in, but not this time!) I’ve given my opinion on this thread. Bye bye.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/15/2009 2:22 pm
Donald Duck
YOU LIBERALS JUST KEEP PROVING MY POINT. THE TRUTH HURTS, & YOU JUST CAN’T HELP YOURSELVES, BUT TO ATTACK THE MESSENGER. ANN COULTER IS THE MESSENGER, AND WHEN ANY CONSERVATIVE AGREES WITH HER, YOU HAVE NOTHING TO SAY. YOURSAVIOROBAMA WILL NOT SAVE YOU FROM ANYTHING, AS HE IS NOT GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By Donald Duck on 01/15/2009 2:35 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
AND GOD CAME FORTH FROM OUT OF THE HIGH CLOUDS , LOOKED DOWN AT THE DUCK AND SAID, “WOW, WHENCE DID THAT CREATURE COME FROM? ” AND A WEE WOW WOMAN APPEARED FROM EARTH AND SPAKE THUSLY: “I SAY, HE WALKS LIKE A DUCK, HE SPEAKS LIKE A DUCK, AND HE’S AS DUMB AS A DUCK SOOOOO, I GUESS HE MUST BE A DUCK.” AND THE LORD , VERY TIRED AFTER A HARD DAY AT THE OFFICE, SAID: BE OF GOOD CHEER, MY CHILD, DUCKS GET LAME, LIKE BUSH, THEY JUST FADE AWAY.” At that the wee Wow woman smiled, got back in her car and drove away singing, What a Fool Believes, not sounding exactly like the Doobie Brothers, but pretty close.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 01/15/2009 5:09 pm
Zera Lee
There are alternatives to choose from… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVb2xZn2gqY
By Zera Lee on 01/17/2009 2:18 am
Donald Duck
You prove my point again that liberals, have nothing constructive to say. They can only bash & call people names. Ann Coulter is completly right when she states that liberals have nothing to say, except to call people names & bash the messenger.
By Donald Duck on 01/16/2009 2:24 am
Catherine Kaiman
Phyllis, this wins comment of the week, lol, priceless!
By Catherine Kaiman on 01/16/2009 11:31 pm
Susan B
Jim.
By Susan B on 01/16/2009 9:03 pm
Catherine Kaiman
Ha, glad to know I’m not the only one…
By Catherine Kaiman on 01/16/2009 9:24 pm
Susan B
Either the same poster, or they were separated at birth.
By Susan B on 01/16/2009 10:57 pm
Catherine Kaiman
I’m betting on the same person.
By Catherine Kaiman on 01/16/2009 11:33 pm
Dee T
DeB, good for you! One thing about us “liberals” if that’s what some one to call us, is we keep an open mind, think from all perspectives, and make educated comments or opinions. These threads are meant to voice opinions, educate one another openly, not to rant, froth at the mouth, and spout narrow minded, judgmental diatribes. I’m lifting a glass of wine to you.. Salute’
By Dee T on 01/15/2009 3:28 pm
Sally K
Bless your heart. I had just hit the reply button to reply to that moron, when I glanced down and saw your post. I keep promising myself that I will not respond to obvious idiots, but every now and then I can’t stop myself. In this case, however, you stopped me, and I thank you for that. I’m going home from work and taking a nap.
By Sally K on 01/15/2009 4:07 pm
Donald Duck
reply to that moron, This is not name calling & is inteligent conversation????????????????/
By Donald Duck on 01/15/2009 4:30 pm
Donald Duck
I’m going home from work and taking a nap. And surf the internet is what you do at work???????????????????//
By Donald Duck on 01/15/2009 4:32 pm
Sally K
1. Yes, I called you a moron. I stand by that statement. Relatively mild, I’d say, compared to some of the things you have called others who did not agree with you .” LIBERALS including UGLY SOCIALIST BIG MOUTH PIGS LIKE ROSIE THE BIG MOUTH SLOB ” Ring any bells? 2. What I do at work is between my supervisor and me. I’m betting that were our work records put side by side, you’d look like the underachieving squirrel I believe you to be. There , called you another name. Whine about that 3. I enjoy this site, because so many intelligent people write their opinions and thoughts. I, especially enjoy reading those opinions of people who are well-read, knowledgeable and do not happen to agree with me. You would not be included in the list, sir or madam, as the case may be. Therefore, no matter what else you write to me, I will not be responding. 4. For further reference, intelligent has two l’s , not one.
By Sally K on 01/15/2009 11:38 pm