Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 02/26/2009 10:30 am

Margo Howard Calls Rush Limbaugh a Fat Fool

By Margo Howard
© Getty Images
Well, that didn’t take long. Obama’s been in office little more than a month and I am once more in banshee mode, alternately known as high dudgeon, about the Republicans (exempting a very few, like Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins). Republican leaders are calling it “irresponsible” to increase some taxes, along with the federal debt. Well, there is no choice! Why can’t these party hacks connect the dots and own up to the fact that these measures are necessary because George Bush, with Cheney pulling the strings, got us into this mess … mostly to help their big business buddies? Obama inherited this financial chaos. I assure you he did not choose to begin his term by rescuing financial institutions and printing money.

The putative golden boy of the Republicans, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, in a lame response to Obama’s address, beat the drum for tax cuts. Helloooooo.  We had tax cuts, remember? And … the Republicans’ own George W. Bush, during eight years, ran up quite an eye-popping deficit himself.

I find it Kafkaesque that many Republicans embrace the wish voiced by that fat fool Rush Limbaugh that Obama fail. It is hard to imagine an American even saying that. Do these people not live here, too? Who in their right mind would wish failure on a leader just because their guy lost? This is partisanship on steroids, with a big dose of obstructionism thrown in.

But I have a wish, too, Rush: that when the Republican legislators battling Obama come up for reelection, they are booted out, in big numbers, with their constituents letting them know that singing the same old song is no longer acceptable. Not to mention that they were way off-key in the first place.

360 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

HA BIBI
Olbermann’s Plastic Ivy by  Ann Coulter
03/04/2009 Print This Forward Feedback Facebook LinkedIn Digg This! Subscribe Sponsored By: —>

Fortunately, we have Keith Olbermann to point out that Rush Limbaugh did not accurately quote the preamble to the Constitution in his CPAC speech last weekend. I’m not sure what scam Olbermann imagined Rush was trying to put over on the American people by saying conservatives believed in the "preamble to the Constitution" and then quoting words from the Declaration of Independence — but Olbermann put an end to that cruel deception!
   
These small-time opportunities to show off by correcting someone else’s teeny-tiny mistakes are the lifeblood of Olbermann’s MSNBC show, "Countdown." Olbermann is no more capable of not correcting Rep. Charlie Rangel when he said "inferred," but meant "implied," than an obsessive compulsive could pass a sink without washing his hands.
   
There is utterly no purpose to these lame "gotchas," except that Olbermann is so desperately insecure that he is willing to waste valuable airtime in order to convince other status-conscious idiots that he is, like, scary-smart.
   
Olbermann relentlessly attacked low-level Bush administration employee Monica Goodling for not going to a name-dropping college, saying — approximately 1 million times — that she got her law degree "by sending 100 box tops to Religious Lunatic University."
   
I would venture to say that the students at Goodling’s law school at Regent University are far more impressive than those at the Cornell agriculture school — the land-grant, non-Ivy League school Keith attended.
   
I wouldn’t mention it, except that Olbermann savages anyone who didn’t go to an impressive college. As it happens, he didn’t go to an impressive college, either.
   
If you’ve ever watched any three nights of his show, you know that Olbermann went to Cornell. But he always forgets to mention that he went to the school that offers classes in milking and bovine management.
   
Indeed, Keith is constantly lying about his nonexistent "Ivy League" education, boasting to Playboy magazine, for example: "My Ivy League education taught me how to cut corners, skim books and take an idea and write 15 pages on it, and also how to work all day at the Cornell radio station and never actually go to class."
   
Except Keith didn’t go to the Ivy League Cornell; he went to the Old MacDonald Cornell.
   
The real Cornell, the School of Arts and Sciences (average SAT: 1,325; acceptance rate: 1 in 6 applicants), is the only Ivy League school at Cornell and the only one that grants a Bachelor of Arts degree.
   
Keith went to an affiliated state college at Cornell, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (average SAT: about that of pulling guards at the University of South Carolina; acceptance rate: 1 of every 1.01 applicants).
   
Olbermann’s incessant lying about having an "Ivy League education" when he went to the non-Ivy League ag school at Cornell would be like a graduate of the Yale locksmithing school boasting about being a "Yale man."
   
Among the graduates of the Ivy League Cornell are Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Thomas Pynchon, Paul Wolfowitz, E.B. White, Sanford I. Weill, Floyd Abrams, Kurt Vonnegut, Douglas Ginsburg, Janet Reno, Henry Heimlich and Harold Bloom.
   
Graduates of the ag school include David LeNeveu of the Anaheim Ducks, Mitch Carefoot of the Phoenix RoadRunners, Darren Eliot, former professional hockey player, and Joe Nieuwendyk, multiple Stanley Cup winner.
   
One begins to understand why Harvard students threw a chicken on the ice during Cornell’s famous rout of Harvard at a 1973 hockey game.
   
If you actually want to pursue a career related to agriculture, there is no better school than the Cornell ag school. I have nothing but admiration for the farmers and aspiring veterinarians at the ag school. They didn’t go there just to have "Cornell" on their resumes.
   
In addition to the farmers, there are some smart kids who go to the ag school — as there are at all state universities. But most people who majored in "communications" at an ag school don’t act like Marshall Scholars or go around mocking graduates of Regent University Law School.
   
The sort of insecurity that would force you to always say "trebled" instead of "tripled" could only come from a communications major with massive status anxiety, like Keith. Without even looking it up, I am confident that Harvard, Yale and Princeton do not offer degrees in "communications." I know there is no "communications" major at the Ivy League Cornell.
   
"Communications" is a major, along with "recreation science," most commonly associated with linemen at USC. But at least the linemen can throw a football, which Keith cannot because his mother decided he was not physically robust enough to play outdoors as a child.
   
It may seem cruel to reveal the true college of someone who already wakes up in the middle of the night in a cold sweat worried that he’s a fraud. But I believe that by pointing out that Olbermann actually is a fraud, I am liberating him.
   
You may not realize it now, Keith, but you will look back on this day and say, "That was the best thing that ever happened to me!"
   
Finally, you can stop pretending that you went to the hard-to-get-into Cornell.
   
Now you won’t have to quickly change the subject whenever people idly remark that they didn’t know it was possible to major in "communications" at an Ivy League school.
   
No longer will you have to aggressively bring up Cornell when it has nothing to do with the conversation.
   
Relax, Keith. Now you can let people like you for you.
By HA BIBI on 03/04/2009 7:56 pm
Kelly In Texas
Oh yeah…freakin hysterically funny stuff!
By Kelly In Texas on 03/04/2009 7:58 pm
HA BIBI

Hi Joe,

Totally agree!

By HA BIBI on 03/04/2009 11:31 pm
HA BIBI

Joe,

 Obama is afraid of Rushes message, he knows how many people are loyal listeners of Rush. That detracts from Obama’s base of believers and his reason for attempting to silence Rush is because Obama knows that for the most part, many Americans fell for his lies and he is hoping he can push his Socialist agenda before the people wake up and realize they have been duped. Although it will be to late. And all Rush is doing is fervently getting that information out there so as to avert that disaster. That’s the bottom line with all this. Don’t worry, this Nation will never completely allow for Socialism to reign. Those avid listeners of Rush are far to wise to allow for that to happen. And I most definately believe Obama is a one term President. All those with common sense know that Obama’s policies are failing, most knew that before he was put in office. 

By HA BIBI on 03/05/2009 3:24 pm
Alessan O
People who listen to Limpbrain are ignorant.
By Alessan O on 03/05/2009 2:47 am
Lady Gator
Alessan O —Apparently James Carvel (the Karl Rove of the Democratic Party) and Rham Emanuel both fit your category described by you.  They are behind this "smoke screen" to make Rush Limbaugh the scape goat.  Jump on rush, get the media to chime in - and Margo Howard — it will take the bad publicity away from the President’s "Stumpus" Bill!
By Lady Gator on 03/05/2009 10:59 am
Lori F.

Margo Howard is no exactly a raving beauty herself!

She’s Ann Landers only child, she is now acting like one when she calls

names in a mean sprited way! 

What did Limbaugh do to her?

Oh! he was talking about the idiot who is running to White House!

By Lori F. on 03/04/2009 8:57 pm
Alessan O
You people look up to to a dumb radio crazy person, so I guess Rahm thought you’d be happy he was called the leader of the anti-human beings.  It’s a joke on the republicans.  lYou let this crazy man speak at one of your important meetings, you repect him, so why not admit you want him as your next PRESIDENT, what a sad state of affairs that would be for all.
By Alessan O on 03/05/2009 2:53 am
Lady Gator
Alessan O.  I don’t want Rush as the Presidential nominee for the Republican party.  I’m holding out for Mitt!
By Lady Gator on 03/05/2009 11:03 am
Alessan O
Republicans like Limpbrain are anti-human beings.
By Alessan O on 03/05/2009 2:55 am
Lady Gator
Duchess of Delete — I thought name calling was a no-no on here.  Hello out there!
By Lady Gator on 03/05/2009 11:05 am
Kelly In Texas
That’s it A-less-than….you parrot Rahms sad rhetoric like a good little brain dead minion. Tis better to be a "limpbrain" than a "deadbrain". Tsk, tsk…
By Kelly In Texas on 03/05/2009 12:03 pm
Dee Toma
Rush challanged Obama to a debate today, Rush isn’t intelligent enough to debate with anyone. Loud, rude and crude small minded man. As a child  his mother should have given him one or two cracks on the a$$ with a wooden spoon. Rush is not only a spoiled selfish little boy with a bad temper, he is a big bully. And he wonders why women don’t like him.
By Dee Toma on 03/04/2009 11:31 pm
Lori F.

Well Dee, if the is true then Obama should by all means debate him. Obama is the greatest debater on the Planet, he would crush Limbaugh, embarrass him and Limbaugh will be nothing in America.

But the little coward Obama will not!

He will hide with the liberal press covering his ass!

He will get his little punk minions  to do his drit for him!

Face it liberals you have a coward in the White House!

By Lori F. on 03/04/2009 11:36 pm
Kelly In Texas

Yup Lori…that just about sums it up!

By Kelly In Texas on 03/05/2009 12:06 pm