Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 02/25/2009 9:15 am

Palin to Pay Alaska for Kid-Accompanied Trips

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has agreed to pay her state back for business trips on which she took her kids. But she still says she did nothing wrong. You betcha!

Palin will write a check for about $6,800 to cover the cost of nine trips in 2007 and 2008, including airfare and one meal when daughter Bristol accompanied her to New York City for a women’s leadership conference. The deal’s meant to pacify a state ethics investigation.

Also this week, Palin turned in her Chevy Suburban after finding out she would owe income taxes on it if she used it for personal use. Last week, she also found out that she owed back taxes on thousands of dollars paid in state meal allowances used while she was staying at home in Wasilla, not in the governor’s official residence near Anchorage.

Palin’s attorney says the governor is happily complying with ethics standards that don’t even exist. There’s actually no law saying kids can’t travel with their state-official parents. Now the state is going to create new regulations for future trips paid for with Alaska taxpayer money.

Palin’s staff went even further, saying this week that Palin is living more frugally than her two immediate predecessors, Govs. Frank Murkowski and Tony Knowles. Even so, isn’t it sort of a "no-duh" question of whether taxpayer money should fund a trip to see "Beauty and the Beast?"

 

167 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Terrie Coles

Marjorie,

As much as I like Mrs. Obama, not really, not now.  When she takes on her projects as First Lady and there is something more to discuss other than whether you like her dress or not, then Yes, I will chime in.  For me, Governor Palin was news, and I emphasize was news during the election. She is not contributing anything worthwhile that addresses the State of our Nation right now.  I come to the WOW site for the current issues from a woman’s perspective. 

By Terrie Coles on 02/25/2009 12:11 pm
Marjorie C.

Terrie:  I come to the WOW site for the current issues from a woman’s perspective. 

Okay, we’ve got that, and welcome to the site. 

About Governor Palin, being that she is the governor of Alaska, she still is news. but I will agree with you that she is not contributing anything of a national scope right now.   

However, being women we often talk about fluff.  This article might be considered fluff since who really cares if Sarah Palin takes her family on state business every now and again or if she works from home.  She is attending to business.  Alaska is in good financial shape — probably one of the few states that is not posting horrific deficits. 

By Marjorie C. on 02/25/2009 12:39 pm
Terrie Coles

OK.  I could disagree with you about Governor Palin’s accomplishments; however, I don’t want to continue the debate about her.

Thank you for the welcome and I look forward to discussing other topics including the fluff:-)

By Terrie Coles on 02/25/2009 2:27 pm
Walter Wallis
Here in my home town of Palo Alto, the LibLudds are throwing a similar tizzy about the return of Dr. Rice to Stanford. My admiration for Dr. Rice was for accomplishment, not gender, race or party. Of course it didn’t hurt that Rice, like Palin, is a stone fox. LibLudds just can’t stand it when someone of their flock ges off the reservation.
By Walter Wallis on 02/25/2009 1:40 pm
Belinda Joy
Kudos to you wOw staff! “isn’t it sort of a “no-duh” question of whether taxpayer money should fund a trip to see “Beauty and the Beast?” And there in lies the crux of the matter. Whether Democrat or Republican, how anyone can argue with that is beyond me. There are many articles on Sarah Palin that those who support her and people like me who despise her can debate on. But in this instance where it was clear - using my favorite expression “even Stevie Wonder could see it” she misused government monies, this is not a case where her actions require defense. She did something unethical. She knows it and the state’s board that oversees ethics knows it, which is why she is paying the money back. This will be ammunition for her competitors to use against her and rightly so, given the fact she knew she was misusing funds. Republicans and Democrats alike need to clean up their acts. Whether it’s this issue for Palin, tax issues for politicians, inappropriate comments that must be rescinded the following day…..they all need to stop and take a hard look at their actions.
By Belinda Joy on 02/25/2009 10:18 am
C Hardy

Belinda…there are no laws in her state that says what she did was illegial or unethical. 

So if there were no laws and currently still isnt on the books for Alaska, how did she break the law?  She is paying it back which is more then what I can say for others…

Also are all the Politicians being looked at or is it just her? 

I am not a great lover of Palin but I think what she is doing is great.  Pay it back even though legally she did nothing wrong. 

By C Hardy on 02/25/2009 11:11 am
caj p
Nothing according to Sarah Palin is unethical that she does, this is the second time she has been called out on something "unethical" and each time she is not guilty of anything in her mind!!  You have to wonder what does ethical mean to her!!
By caj p on 02/25/2009 1:53 pm
C Hardy

What does it mean to you?  Aren’t most to all Politicians unethical?  I mean really…they throw earmarks in a stimulas bill that has nothing to do with jump starting our economy…they also take trips and bill their states, YET, I dont see them stepping up and paying it back. 

Again I ask you…why is it so bad for Palin yet ok for so many others?

By C Hardy on 02/25/2009 1:56 pm
Libra Lady

CH….good job girl…you hold your own very well…but the libs won’t give you a direct answer…we all know that…but doing great!!!

By Libra Lady on 02/25/2009 2:23 pm
caj p
You say they throw earmarks in the stimulus bill that has nothing to do with jump starting the economy….and you know this how?  Just because all those Reps who said no to it think they can see into the future and know for sure and what they say is right!!!   I’s not just bad for Palin alone I said in an earlier post that any of them who are in the same situation and should know better should be called out about it.
By caj p on 02/25/2009 2:25 pm
C Hardy
Last night on the news, and it wasnt a republican speaking, they said there were earmarks for bird control in Kentucky, pig smell in another state…i can keep going.  to me that is not something that will jump start our economy.  that is what that politician wanted and got.
By C Hardy on 02/25/2009 3:54 pm
caj p
I’ve no doubt that there are many things in there that some of the politicians wanted on both sides…that is called trying to appease each side on certain things, some I’m sure Obama would not have wanted in it but to try and get this bill to pass compromise has to be made for some things.  Obama is not keen on tax cuts all over the place but that is a Rep essential so he compromised on that.  Not everything in their will stimulate the economy nobody has said it would but the majority of it will do just that and that should be the main focus, all this quibbling about questionable items which may not stimulate the economy, but in fact nobody knows if it will.
By caj p on 02/25/2009 5:23 pm
C Hardy
Didnt Obama say during his campain no earmarks…yet this package was full of them.  I am sure Obama himself didnt know all the earmarks included. 
By C Hardy on 02/25/2009 6:33 pm
caj p
The package is full of them according to the Reps,  if they had got all they wanted tax cuts and more tax cuts they wouldn’t be any moaning about any of it.  The Reps have to remember that they are not the ones in power anymore and that is their problem but they will just have to deal with it.
By caj p on 02/25/2009 9:48 pm
C Hardy

I guess it boils down to not getting what you want and acting like a baby in return…Some of these Politicians act worse than my soon to be 3 year old daughter.   

By C Hardy on 02/26/2009 6:58 am