Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 10/28/2008 7:29 am

Sarah Palin for President in 2012?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Getty Images

There’s more than just a few rumors out there that conservatives and Sarah Palin fans are planning for a Sarah Palin Presidential run in 2012.  The thinking among these "Saranistas" is, if McCain loses this year’s election, Palin not only could emerge as the party’s 2012 nominee, but she could be the GOP’s next Ronald Reagan.

In fact, one Republican even called Palin "the new Ronald Reagan."

There’s also a grassroots effort cropping up on the Web to put Palin in the White House in 2012.

A Google search of "Sarah Palin for president" turns up pages of results. Many sites like Palintology.com and palinforpresidentblog.com are championing her candidacy, and there are even some YouTube "ads" out there promoting her 2012 candidacy.

Among the chattering class, the positioning of Sarah as the Republican Party’s standard bearer for the future has already started:

"Win or lose, there is a ready-made conservative candidate waiting in the wings. Sarah Palin is not the new Iain Duncan Smith, she is the new Ronald Reagan," Jim Nuzzo, a White House aide to the first President Bush, told the U.K.’s Sunday Telegraph

David Frum, a former Bush speechwriter, has said Palin isn’t ready to be president now or then, but he still acknowledged that she likely could be the nominee four years from now. Palin "emerges from this election as the probable frontrunner for the 2012 nomination," he told the Telegraph. "Her supporters vastly outnumber her critics. But it will be extremely difficult for her to win the presidency."

Frum also told New York magazine in an article for this week’s issue that, "The people who criticize her do so because we have some hope that we could be in contention in 2012, and there’s some risk that she could be the party’s nominee, and she’d probably lose – and even if by some miracle she won, she’d be a terrible president."

Not everyone is so pessimistic about her chances, however.

One key Republican promoting a Palin run in 2012 tells USA Today: "As of today, Palin is the top contender. She clearly has the potential to be a winning top-of-the-ticket candidate: solid character, solid values, fire in the belly, etc. But four years is a long time. Neither [Mitt] Romney, [Mike] Huckabee, or others have the complete package. If Palin spends a bit more time traveling overseas and domestically, broadening her horizons, and wins re-election in Alaska in 2010, she will be the nominee in 2012."

Greg Mueller, who was a senior aide in the presidential campaigns of Pat Buchanan and Steve Forbes, told Politico that if John McCain loses the general election to Barack Obama next week, Palin "has absolutely earned a right to run in 2012." He said Palin has given conservatives "hope" and "something to believe in."

But even if McCain only serves one term – Palin could also try for her own bid. By then, she would have had four years of experience as a vice president and would be much more knowledgeable of not just Washington, but the world. If McCain loses, Palin could win re-election in Alaska, raise her national profile by, perhaps, take a leadership position in the Republican Governors Association or the National Governors Association, and better prepare herself in the next four years.

Palin is now trying to break free of her campaign handlers’ constraints that have restricted what she talks about, when, and to whom, since McCain announced his vice presidential pick. Even one McCain insider said the Alaska governor is "playing for her own future and sees herself as the next leader of the party.”

Palin has repeatedly stated that she would be more aggressive in making the case against Obama that the McCain campaign has – which has made many conservatives who say McCain has been too soft on Obama even more wild about her future role in the party - while she’s also distanced herself from campaign tactics such as robocalls.

One National Review post written after Palin’s much-anticipated debate against Sen. Joe Biden, said: "She’s a natural saleswoman. She certainly saved her prospects for national office in 2012, if she so chooses. She certainly, my guess is, reenergized the GOP base and independents, centrists, and undecided, if they’re honest with themselves, will conclude that they witnessed an impressive woman tonight."



234 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

DeBúrca obj
Amazing you can even say that with FOX spreading its manure 24/7. The reason Obama is ahead is that enough Americans have learned the lesson of buying into the smear and fear to maybe, just maybe get rid of Rove and those who practice his politics once and for all. And here is what George Will, mr. conservative, has to say about your candidate: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/29/AR200810
By DeBúrca obj on 10/31/2008 9:27 pm
Andromeda Jakes
Star, You must be so unhappy with the way the election is going just now. Let’s have a pity party.
By Andromeda Jakes on 11/02/2008 2:21 pm
Becky R
Good one Mary! I agree that it would be an easy win for the Democrats if Palin were the Republican candidate. She might be good for Alaska so she should stay there. I don’t want her as my President, now or ever!
By Becky R on 10/29/2008 3:53 pm
Fred O.
Ronald Reagan’s son made the statement that he would never have thought that his Father would be reincarnated in a “Skirt”. I think this is a pretty good endorsement.I really do not agree with David Frum’s assessment of Palin.I do agree that the contenders that were mentioned do not have the total package.As far as i am concerned Palin has more experience than Obama,which i believe has no packaging,and will have to rely on “on the job training”if elected.I do believe that McCain has been to soft on Obama and Palin presents the case more aggressively and should.I like Her style and values,and if she did run for President i would vote Her.
By Fred O. on 10/28/2008 9:22 am
Marjorie C.
Fred O. …if she (Palin) did run for President i would vote Her. Me too.
By Marjorie C. on 10/28/2008 10:20 am
gulliver fourmyle
would you and Fred please get a brain-scan? Palin is a pure lune—-do ya think ‘The Anchorage Times’ endorsed Obama for ‘nuttin’? they know this ego-maniac woman—-master-manipulator, unsane, and proud of it—-she’s a joke—-what’s worse? only the AK Times isn’t laughing—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 10/28/2008 4:09 pm
Fred O.
Sit home,take a deep breath,and see if you can come up with something of value to add to the conversation !
By Fred O. on 10/28/2008 5:23 pm
gulliver fourmyle
so, i, as a former irs ‘very wealthy’ Wasillan should do you’re home-work?—-i know the place, i know the ‘new’ vs. the ‘traditional’—-is it not enough she’s destroying the wild-life, ‘The Major Tourism $$$ source’? pushing for ‘Big-Oil’, as guv, reduced the once far superior school-system to a ludicrous joke—-and she’s pushing for a bridge from Anchorage—-yeah, save ya 20+ miles—-ya want a freaking bridge over Cook Inlet? have ya ever heard of Earthquakes? very common in AK—-even the worst on record—-in ‘64, after the shaking of 30+ feet, back, forth, up-down, an entire subdivision slid into the sea—-and Anchorage’s main street was 34’ feet lower—-even far-away Valdez was wasted—-by quake/tsunami—- this scheme alone should do, for any sane person, to question such idiocy. an engineering nightmare—-now, do your own surfing—-again, as ‘My Cousin Vinnie’ said—-‘I’m through with this one.’
By gulliver fourmyle on 10/28/2008 7:01 pm
gulliver fourmyle
search ‘cook inlet faults’—-i’ve tried sending this ONE page—-ya really want this witch ‘pork-master’ as prez?
By gulliver fourmyle on 10/28/2008 8:04 pm
gulliver fourmyle
all you Palin ‘perhaps-zipperheads’—-read that page—-‘cook inlet faults’—-who would push for a bridge across one ‘certain-to-be’ disaster? and such you would vote for??????—-seems everyone knows cook inlet is one massive Tectonic Fault—-may Palin spell ‘tectonic’? AK ain’t ‘one big-IdaHo-baked-potato’—-she is—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 10/28/2008 8:14 pm
Sarah N.
Wow nothing changes. Months later I return to this site and Marjorie on this and other threads is still shriveled and bitter about Hillary losing. I suppose that the definition of ‘feminist’ to some may be ‘women above any other’…..at least that seems to be Marjorie’s approach. As long as its in a skirt, its automatically better than a man. Especially a black man. I’d prefer to think of women as truly the equals of men - and therefore judged against the same criteria. Because lets face it. While Sarah Palin cries about “double standards” (even though she called Hillary a whiner during the primaries - but dont tell Marjorie that)….shes receiving the benefit of such. She’s not held to the same standard a man is when it comes to wardrobe or appearances….or actual substantive knowledge either. Marjorie I’m so glad people like you aren’t in charge of this country. Bitter, willfully ignorant, fear mongering, hateful people will get what’s coming to them. In this life or the next.
By Sarah N. on 10/31/2008 8:28 am
Star Lawrence
I suppose that the definition of ‘feminist’ to some may be ‘women above any other’…..at least that seems to be Marjorie’s approach. As long as its in a skirt, its automatically better than a man. I used to think that, yes. Your adding the black man thing was lame and twisted and another reason, thanks to this site, that I no longer believe sisterhood even exists anymore, much less rules. And as for our being bitter about Hillary—she has proved her expediency now—I would never vote for her for anything.
By Star Lawrence on 10/31/2008 9:49 am
Linda Mason
Hi Star — Here’s a switch—I’m defending HRC to you! I don’t know what you find “expedient” — that she is stumping for the Democratic candidate? That is the process! If that sounds “high minded,” I assure you it is purely pragmatic for HRC, maybe even necessary for her political future! Why should HRC campaign for Obama? There are 2 good reasons. 1st — Obama is a great candidate (and likely to win). And your belief notwithstanding, he did not commit an unforgivable sin against women by winning the nomination, and at some level HRC knows it. You and other HRC supporters have convinced yourselves that Obama’s alleged “sexism” forfeits her support. Well, obviously, the alleged Victim (HRC) disagrees, so there was nothing to those charges to begin with. 2nd, HRC has not sold out, she is being true to herself, which is a politician. 2008 is just one election cycle — should HRC throw away everything she has worked for by being the quintessential “sore loser” and not supporting Obama, just to placate “supporters” like you? If she sat this election out, that may earn her the approval of you and others, but a politician cannot win election with “warm, fuzzy feelings.” To do that, HRC needs political capital and you have to let her build hers up again! GObama!
By Linda Mason on 11/02/2008 8:38 pm
DeBúrca obj
Ron Reagan despises his father’s politics and didn’t mean it as a compliment. And the one thing Reagan was really good at was uniting people… Palin is the antitheses of that Reaganesque quality.
By DeBúrca obj on 10/28/2008 10:58 am
Fred O.
You’re statement is incorrect,in the interview i watched it truly was meant as a complement,and he praised Palin for her views.As i watch some of these comments,it looks like most Women are intimidated by another strong woman.As you can see Palin has the ability to Unite People,she has united the Conservative base which McCain would have never accomplished,she has been a big asset to him and the rep. party.
By Fred O. on 10/28/2008 1:15 pm