Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 10/28/2008 7:29 am

Sarah Palin for President in 2012?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Getty Images

There’s more than just a few rumors out there that conservatives and Sarah Palin fans are planning for a Sarah Palin Presidential run in 2012.  The thinking among these "Saranistas" is, if McCain loses this year’s election, Palin not only could emerge as the party’s 2012 nominee, but she could be the GOP’s next Ronald Reagan.

In fact, one Republican even called Palin "the new Ronald Reagan."

There’s also a grassroots effort cropping up on the Web to put Palin in the White House in 2012.

A Google search of "Sarah Palin for president" turns up pages of results. Many sites like Palintology.com and palinforpresidentblog.com are championing her candidacy, and there are even some YouTube "ads" out there promoting her 2012 candidacy.

Among the chattering class, the positioning of Sarah as the Republican Party’s standard bearer for the future has already started:

"Win or lose, there is a ready-made conservative candidate waiting in the wings. Sarah Palin is not the new Iain Duncan Smith, she is the new Ronald Reagan," Jim Nuzzo, a White House aide to the first President Bush, told the U.K.’s Sunday Telegraph

David Frum, a former Bush speechwriter, has said Palin isn’t ready to be president now or then, but he still acknowledged that she likely could be the nominee four years from now. Palin "emerges from this election as the probable frontrunner for the 2012 nomination," he told the Telegraph. "Her supporters vastly outnumber her critics. But it will be extremely difficult for her to win the presidency."

Frum also told New York magazine in an article for this week’s issue that, "The people who criticize her do so because we have some hope that we could be in contention in 2012, and there’s some risk that she could be the party’s nominee, and she’d probably lose – and even if by some miracle she won, she’d be a terrible president."

Not everyone is so pessimistic about her chances, however.

One key Republican promoting a Palin run in 2012 tells USA Today: "As of today, Palin is the top contender. She clearly has the potential to be a winning top-of-the-ticket candidate: solid character, solid values, fire in the belly, etc. But four years is a long time. Neither [Mitt] Romney, [Mike] Huckabee, or others have the complete package. If Palin spends a bit more time traveling overseas and domestically, broadening her horizons, and wins re-election in Alaska in 2010, she will be the nominee in 2012."

Greg Mueller, who was a senior aide in the presidential campaigns of Pat Buchanan and Steve Forbes, told Politico that if John McCain loses the general election to Barack Obama next week, Palin "has absolutely earned a right to run in 2012." He said Palin has given conservatives "hope" and "something to believe in."

But even if McCain only serves one term – Palin could also try for her own bid. By then, she would have had four years of experience as a vice president and would be much more knowledgeable of not just Washington, but the world. If McCain loses, Palin could win re-election in Alaska, raise her national profile by, perhaps, take a leadership position in the Republican Governors Association or the National Governors Association, and better prepare herself in the next four years.

Palin is now trying to break free of her campaign handlers’ constraints that have restricted what she talks about, when, and to whom, since McCain announced his vice presidential pick. Even one McCain insider said the Alaska governor is "playing for her own future and sees herself as the next leader of the party.”

Palin has repeatedly stated that she would be more aggressive in making the case against Obama that the McCain campaign has – which has made many conservatives who say McCain has been too soft on Obama even more wild about her future role in the party - while she’s also distanced herself from campaign tactics such as robocalls.

One National Review post written after Palin’s much-anticipated debate against Sen. Joe Biden, said: "She’s a natural saleswoman. She certainly saved her prospects for national office in 2012, if she so chooses. She certainly, my guess is, reenergized the GOP base and independents, centrists, and undecided, if they’re honest with themselves, will conclude that they witnessed an impressive woman tonight."



234 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

DeBúrca obj
If I were intimidated by a strong woman, I’d be scared of Hillary Clinton and love Palin. And Ron Reagan Jr. works for Air America radio, has long disagreed with his father’s political ideology, and is not a Palin supporter. In fact, when I do a google search on your premise, what I get is Michael Reagan, who is an ultra conservative, stating she is his father incarnate… not RON Reagan. So you may be confused about who you saw in the interview. Here is one article on this subject: ELECTION 2008 Ron Reagan: I doubt my father would back Palin But when brother Michael looks at Alaska governor he sees his dad ‘reborn’ SEATTLE – When Michael Reagan watched Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin thrill the Republican Party faithful Wednesday night, he saw his father “reborn.” But Ronald Prescott Reagan told WND yesterday he knew Ronald Reagan, too, and Sarah Palin, he insisted, is no Ronald Reagan. The two brothers – talk radio hosts who live at opposite ends of the political spectrum – reflect the sharp divide across the nation over John McCain’s running mate. Echoing the polarized reactions to President Reagan during his two terms in the 1980s, it’s hard to remain indifferent to the hockey mom from Wasilla, whose meteoric political rise has taken her from the PTA to the governorship to a national ticket at the age of 44. Either you love her, it seems, or she epitomizes what’s wrong with America. WND met the youngest son of President Reagan, a self-described political “progressive,” awaiting a flight to Seattle following the GOP convention in St. Paul, Minn. Ron Reagan, 50, told WND he cannot speak for his father, who died in 2004, but doubts the 40th president would approve of Palin if he were alive and well today. “Sarah Palin,” he said, “has nothing in common with my father, a two-term governor of the largest state in the union, a man who had been in public life for decades, someone who had written, thought and spoke for decades about foreign policy issues, domestic policy issues, and on and on and on.” But many introduced to Palin this week say she excites them like Ronald Reagan did. “I think they ought to start using their brain, instead of viscera,” Ron Jr. said in reaction. Ron Reagan Isn’t the excitement, however, simply over a charismatic candidate for national office who espouses conservative values and ideas without apology and already has successfully put them into practice? “That may excite them,” Ron Jr. said. “But many of those values are hypocritical and dishonest, and, frankly, scary.” Creationism is one of the scary beliefs Palin advocates, he said. “It doesn’t bother some people, I know, but, frankly, somebody like that has no idea what kind of planet we live on – literally has no idea what the planet is all about,” Ron Jr. said. “It’s such a profoundly anti-intellectual, anti-science stance,” he asserted. “I don’t see how you can hold high office and believe something like that.” Some critics have charged Palin opposes the teaching of evolution in public schools and would mandate teaching creationism. But she has kept a pledge from her 2006 campaign for governor to not press for creation-based alternatives or seek creation advocates for the school board. Asked what his mother, Nancy Reagan, thinks about Palin, Ron Jr. said he cannot speak on her behalf. But he related that when he briefly discussed Palin with her this past week on the phone, “she was a bit mystified by the choice.” She previously announced her endorsement of McCain. Michael Reagan, in his commentary piece, praises Palin as “a red-blooded American with that rare, God-given ability to rally her dispirited fellow Republicans and take up the daunting task of leading them – and all her fellow Americans – on a pilgrimage to that shining city on the hill my father envisioned as our nation’s real destination.” The elder brother, whose adoptive mother was the late actress Jane Wyman, says he’s been trying to convince his fellow conservatives they have been wasting their time looking for a new Ronald Reagan to emerge. But no more. “I insisted that we’d never see his like again because he was one of a kind. I was wrong. Wednesday night I watched the Republican National Convention on television and there, before my very eyes, I saw my Dad reborn; only this time he’s a she. And what a she!” Two Americas Ron Jr., who debuts a show Monday on the left-leaning Air America talk radio network, was asked his overall impression of the GOP convention. “It’s a little depressing to me, because I think, you know, John Edwards was right in the sense about the two Americas,” he said. “But, you know, it’s not just liberal and conservative, rich and poor, it’s rational, and as Rachel Maddow, my colleague on Air America, put it, post-rational.” McCain’s selection of Palin was “post-rational,” he said, “one of the most irresponsible choices I have ever seen a presidential candidate make.” “It’s clearly a tactical, political decision,” he said. “It has absolutely nothing to do with governance. The woman is clearly unqualified to be where she is right now.” Ron Jr. said it was “right around puberty” when he began to realize he didn’t agree with his father on many issues. “There were some issues we did (agree on), of course,” he said. “I thought standing up to the Soviet Union was a good idea. A totalitarian government, and who likes that? Tell them the truth. You know, want to call them an evil empire? Go ahead, stick it to ‘em, get up in their grill a little bit. You don’t want to take it to a military level, but speak the truth, speak the truth at heart.” On the other hand, he said, there was “vehement” disagreement over the environment and some social issues. “We’d discuss it all the time over dinner,” he said. “We’d have some good old arguments about it – always civil, but, nevertheless, spirited.”
By DeBúrca obj on 10/28/2008 1:57 pm
DeBúrca obj
Actually, when I reread your post, you never mentioned WHICH son, I just thought you meant Ron Reagan because that’s the only Reagan in your post. Anyway, we are talking about 2 different sons. Michael is an ultra conservative and I’m not surprised he’d say anything to connect Palin with his father because he is working to get McCain elected. But read my article anyway, you will see a different opinion about Sarah Palin from the other son.
By DeBúrca obj on 10/28/2008 2:02 pm
Maizie James
DeBúrca obj , Thank you. You always succeed to inform.
By Maizie James on 10/28/2008 2:26 pm
Linda Mason
Fred — you are confusing an Egomaniac with a big mouth with a Strong Woman. Not the same! GObama!
By Linda Mason on 11/02/2008 8:45 pm
Frannie Em
DeBurca Ron Reagan has always had issues about his father, this is not something new. Living in So Cal, there were always questions about how it worked. Ron R. is a fine man. He didn’t speak out against his father when President Reagan held office, that was very respectful of his father and the office. Now he has a voice to say what really bothers him, good for him. If he wasn’t the son of a President, the same goes for Michael, how much would he be listened to? How would they have gotten those jobs?
By Frannie Em on 10/28/2008 2:30 pm
DeBúrca obj
I was just answering a post that said Reagan’s son compared Palin to his dad… I just gave the OTHER son’s side of it.
By DeBúrca obj on 10/28/2008 4:25 pm
Frannie Em
Deb Okee dokee. I get it.
By Frannie Em on 10/28/2008 11:14 pm
C Hardy
DeBurca…this is CO but now C Hardy, as I got married!!! I was at the mall the other day & was looking through some of those big movie posters and saw this girl on a french movie poster that looks just like your avatar? I stopped thought of you and wasnt sure if that is where your picture came from…
By C Hardy on 10/28/2008 2:49 pm
Frannie Em
CHardy Yes, that is where DeBurca got her picture from. Rent the movie, it is fun and magical.
By Frannie Em on 10/28/2008 2:55 pm
John G
I agree, Frannie. It’s one of the more interesting movies available, actually.
By John G on 10/28/2008 4:03 pm
gulliver fourmyle
Congrats—-it’s good to be married—-from what you’ve said of your now ‘hubby’, he’s a Mr. Testosterone—-as a father of 9, a bit of advice (don’t we all hate it)—-but if kiddies are on the way, remember a new mother’s hormones simply forget all, but that true ‘bundle-o-joy’—-new moms even forget the father—-‘Mother Nature’s Way’—-so try and not neglect his needs, as a man—-there are ways—-and things will run smoothly—-and i wish you both the best—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 10/28/2008 3:49 pm
Frannie Em
Gulliver Are you really giving a woman advice about being a wife and mother on a woman’s site?
By Frannie Em on 10/28/2008 11:16 pm
gulliver fourmyle
from a husband’s POV? why not? and i’ll even toss in, ‘please breast-feed’. men and women will always be somewhat enigmatic to one another—-Dr. Spock didn’t mind being the ‘authority’ on mothering—-and back in the 60’s his advice was awful—-take his method of Not ‘spoiling’ your new child—-‘leave them in their crib, alone, 1st nite, they’ll cry for an hour, next nite 1/2 hour—-next nite a few minutes.’ healthy newborns cry because they’re wet, poopy, hungry, alone—-we learned—-i’ve ‘delivered 4 of 9, by far the easiest on the mom—-been mr. mom—- i don’t think our 1st ever got over Dr. Spock’s influence—-from then on, we always had a king-bed, and the kiddie slept with us—-the dread, ‘mother rolls on, smother’s baby’ is one scam—-gotta sell those cribs—-‘jails’ a better word—-yeah if mom’s drunk she might smother her own child—-but how many did cribs strangle—-mothers are very astute at their child’s state—-and just as men may learn from women, they may learn from men—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 10/30/2008 2:58 pm
DeBúrca obj
Yep, that is her, Amélie. It’s my daughter’s favorite movie. Congratulations on your marriage…. feminism or not… isn’t it fun to take on a new name? I did the same thing recently (4 yrs ago), went back and forth btwn, not changing, a hyphen, or changing, and chose to just go with the new name!
By DeBúrca obj on 10/28/2008 4:29 pm
C Hardy
Yes I am going w/ the full name change…our daughter has his last name so now we will all have the same last name! What is the name of the movie, maybe I can rent it and check it out!
By C Hardy on 10/28/2008 9:26 pm