Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 11/14/2008 12:00 pm

With Sarah Palin's Star Rising, What's Next for Mitt Romney?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Mitt Romney/Sarah Palin © AP
Sarah Palin could be throwing a wrench in Mitt Romney’s plans.

Romney, the former Governor of Massachusetts, grabbed the national spotlight last year when he entered the Republican party’s presidential primary. Things looked good for a while, but Romney’s dreams were shattered after party loyalists scoffed at his dubious conservative conversion and past associations with liberal lawmakers like Sen. Ted Kennedy.

Despite losing out in the primaries, Romney hoped to redeem himself by supporting the party’s candidate, John McCain, for whom Romney helped raise $20 million. And, according to friends close to Romney, the politician hoped his post-loss actions would endear him to party insiders and loyalists, thus setting the stage for a potential run in 2012. In fact, on February 7, the day Romney suspended his bid, a campaign aide told Politico that the 61-year-old would "consider" running in the next national election. That was before, however, he had to consider Palin, who has become a star since McCain picked her as his running mate. Now friends and aides are suggesting Romney’s rethinking his future. Republican operative and former Romney advisor Charley Manning remarked, “I’d be surprised if Mitt ever ran again for president."

Former Republican National Committee chairman Rich Bond went a bit further by pointing out that Palin’s quite popular with the party’s base. "While [Palin] may not be popular with the winning majority that Barack Obama put together, she’s enormously popular with the losing minority that John McCain put together — and that pretty closely mirrors Republican primary voters." But Bond said he wouldn’t count Romney out too soon: "If I were him, I would be looking at my greatest asset — his national fund-raising base — as well as his grass-roots base, his enhanced name identification and the fact that he countered Obama’s ‘spread-the-wealth’ tax policy better than John McCain ever was able to. He’s got a lot going for him, so why rule him out prematurely?"

Romney’s team isn’t even entertaining the topic — his spokesman insisted Romney’s focused on the upcoming holidays and bringing America together for the next administration: "Gov. Romney believes that now is the time for all Americans to stand above partisan politics and help our president-elect address the pressing needs of the nation." That may actually be the best thing for Palin, too. One bemused strategist for a potential rival had this to say about rumors that Palin is angling for 2012: "Fine with us. Let her be the sacrificial lamb for 2012." Other leaders are focusing on 2016.

37 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

DeBúrca obj
Boy oh boy… the GOP has such great plans for America, Romney or Palin, what a choice.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/14/2008 12:43 pm
Lady Gator
If Mitt Romney throws his name up for the Republican ticket — Sarah Palin wouldn’t have a chance. Mitt Romney was quite popular with women and many conservatives during the primaries. And, personally I think he would have won had it not been for the cross-over Democrats who voted for McCain. By, the way, I heard today that Obama is considering Hillary as Secretary of State — IMO that is an excellent choice. What say you?
By Lady Gator on 11/14/2008 1:08 pm
Frannie Em
Lady Gator I also think that would and excellent choice. I have full confidence she could do it. Do you know if anyone else was on the “short” list? I don’t know if he has leaked any Treasury Secretary names, but maybe something to give Wall Street some confidence. I haven’t looked at the Dow or Nasdaq today, so don’t know if we are up or down.
By Frannie Em on 11/14/2008 1:18 pm
Marjorie C.
Romney was governor of Massachusetts for four years. In those four years he faced an overwhelmingly Democratic legislature. Despite that disadvantage, he was able to get a universal health care program off the ground. I think he should give it a shot in 2012. As much as I admire Sarah Palin, I would feel more comfortable with Romney. Hillary would make a fine Secretary of State, but she’d probably be more useful in the Senate.
By Marjorie C. on 11/14/2008 1:27 pm
Marina B.
Someone who admires Palin AND Hillary. Proof positive that it is possible for a human to hold two diametrically contradictory positions at once.
By Marina B. on 11/14/2008 4:03 pm
Marjorie C.
Marina: Someone who admires Palin AND Hillary. There are aspects of Hillary’s personality that I admire, certainly her expertise. There is a spunkiness and determination to Sarah that I can’t help being drawn to. Remember, I’m an Independent voter. Suddenly Hillary is a hero in Democrats eyes, however nine months ago, she was being dragged through the mud by these same Democrats. Is this a short memory problem or hypocrisy?
By Marjorie C. on 11/15/2008 6:10 am
Marina B.
A lot of less than admirable people have “spunkiness” and “determination”, Tonya Harding for one. Pretty much any dictator I can think of for many others. Of course, most dictators get to be dictators because a lot of people apparently can’t help being drawn to those qualities, so you’re far from being alone in the quality of your judgment about what’s important in a leader. Seems to me that, in admiring both Hillary and Palin, you’re not being Independent as much as illogical. I wasn’t here nine months ago, but if what was going on here was similar to what I saw on other sites, there was crticism of Hillary by Democrats, which is not the same as being “dragged through the mud.” That has always been reserved to certain segments of the far right, which has accused her of everything from being a multiple murderer to being a dominatrix.
By Marina B. on 11/15/2008 11:50 am
Marjorie C.
Marina: Of course, most dictators get to be dictators because a lot of people apparently can’t help being drawn to those qualities, so you’re far from being alone in the quality of your judgment about what’s important in a leader. Exactly. I couldn’t have said it better myself. We must remain ever vigilant lest we march blindly behind a leader whose qualities we find admirable. Take a good look in the mirror, and count the facts and character flaws you’re willing to overlook.
By Marjorie C. on 11/16/2008 6:46 am
Marina B.
Oh, I look in the mirror all the time, and I’m not supporting anyone because of “spunkiness and determination.” I’m supporting someone who is intelligent, has a wide ranging and open world view, is knowledgeable about both history and current world events, has a demonstrated compassion that extends to everyone, not just people like him, is both pragmatic and optimistic about our collective ability to tap into what is best in us, is intellectually curious, is a loving father and husband who doesn’t use his children as mere campaign props, builds his base of support on hope and bringing divergent populations together, instead of on fear and distrust of “otherness, etc. All that being said, I will continue to be vigilant, as I have throughout my life. It’s why I became disenchanted with Bill Clinton, and. to a much lesser extent, with Hillary. As always, Marjorie, you’ve been good for a chuckle. You’re much like a color blind person advising others as to what colors to paint their walls.
By Marina B. on 11/16/2008 1:10 pm
Marjorie C.
Marina: …supporting someone who is intelligent, has a wide ranging and open world view,… blah, blah, blah Your point of view is not shared by all.
By Marjorie C. on 11/16/2008 1:16 pm
Marina B.
I don’t expect it to be, and I respect the view of people who have reasoned, logical differences, rather than unreasoning hatred based on spite. In case you haven’t noticed, you’re not included in the former category. LOL.
By Marina B. on 11/16/2008 1:33 pm
Andromeda Jakes
Marjorie C Could you please describe for me the details of the “mud’ by these same Democrats” you refer to. As I recall, it was an Amercan campaign for the democratic party nomination for the Presidency of the USA. Not against HRC. If the former First Lady didnt want to compete for the Office she should not have run. As I recall ,the HRC campaign had its own “mud” stuff going on at the time. However, the times are different now and we as individuals, group associations, a Country, Americans, Party affiliation, special interests, etc. are trying (many of the “people”) to move on to the future. I am currently not an independent voter, but have been in the past. In my opinion registering independent …… Oh I’m to tired to explain. I read an article on the RCN website today that indicated threats to the President Elect are way up compared to other President Elects. All threats should be taken very seriously. I have been concerned about this since the beginning of President Elect Obama’s interest in running for Commander in Chief of the USA. I am still very and more very concerned about his safety, as well as his family’s well being, here and country’s abroad.
By Andromeda Jakes on 11/15/2008 3:37 pm
Marjorie C.
Andromeda, If you are willing to overlook the accusations of racism, the sexism, the misogyny, then it’s useless to point them out. Continue on your happy path towards the future.
By Marjorie C. on 11/16/2008 6:56 am
Frannie Em
Marjorie It is always an interesting aspect to me how much things change after the elections are over and people have to go back and work with each other. Obama could have several reasons for picking her for Sec of State (if he actually has). She can’t try to make a run for the presidency if Obama doesn’t do so well (remember Kennedy on the convention floor in ‘80, wanting to replace Carter?) She is out of the senate and so she won’t have competing social programs with him. If we all recall, they did have some differences about health care. She doesn’t have enough seniority to take over Kennedy’s position in the senate. That fact may want her to take the job of Sec State, but in the senate she can continue to make her own mark on the nation through legislation. She wouldn’t be the first female Sec of State, she would be the third, so no “first to be it” notoriety. Madeleine Albright had that and then Condoleeza Rice had first African American woman to be secretary of state. In that position she would be doing the will of the president, and with Joe Biden supposedly such a hot shot of foreign affairs, she would have to be dealing with his gaffes all the time. If she has been offered it, I would love to be a fly on the wall in the Clinton household to listen in to the discussions on that.
By Frannie Em on 11/17/2008 1:01 am
Frannie Em
Merrell Is your comment in response to my post? If so, I don’t understand.
By Frannie Em on 11/17/2008 2:03 pm